Stephen Colbert: Great Boss, Potentially A Republican?

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Huffington Post   |   May 2, 2008 06:45 PM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Update/Correction: Sam Reich has since removed the below item from his blog, and the contents of the below post can no longer be verified and may be inaccurate. The Huffington Post regrets the confusion.

CollegeHumor's Sam Reich blogged about his visit to the set of "The Colbert Report," where his friend Barry is a writer. Reich reported that Colbert may be a conservative, according to the writers on the show, and that he voted for a Republican president at least once in his life. Reich also reported the interesting, but not surprising, tidbit that Colbert is a "great boss" who thanks his writers personally when they deliver a good monologue:

I asked Barry if any conservatives worked at the show, and he said he doubted it, although the jury was out on Colbert. He's a devout Catholic, goes to church every Sunday and teaches Sunday school. He's also voted for at least one Republican president. Still, there's no doubt where his politics lay at present. On the left part of the set, the part that we at home don't see, there's a banner that says "McCain '08: The Luck Stops Here." Before the show starts, Colbert does laps around his desk and then addresses his audience: "Does anyone have any questions that can help redeem me in real life for who I play on television?"


He's a great boss, too. When monologues go particularly well, he calls writers to thank them personally. Once, when calling New Zealand "Diet Australia" got a lot of laughs, he gave the author a bottle of wine. Barry was responsible for "The Word" when John Edwards took it over this past Thursday, and the reaction was so good that Colbert said, "What White House correspondents dinner?"

Read Sam's entire account from his time at the "Colbert Report" here.

 
 

Comments
243
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

He's a Catholic from Charleston. You might remember that Charleston sat out the Revolutionary War as a British enclave, sat out the Civil War as a federally blockaded neutral zone, and sat out the entire Prohibition Era as an only slightly subdued cocktail party. They don't have 'conservatives' in Charleston, they just have Charlestonians. They all drink, even the Methodists, and their idea of 'conservative' has to do with doing church in Latin, keeping the l918 Prayer Book and generally not playing golf farther north than Conway. Their liberals are people like Fritz Hollings, who stay sober enough to know where the federal action is. Colbert is just more evolved than the rest of us. He's from the Holy City. What can we say?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 AM on 05/05/2008

Stephen Colbert is nothing short of brilliant. We can all second guess him all we want, i think he's too clever to be "figured out." He defies political party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 AM on 05/05/2008

So if Stephen Colbert is a devout Catholic, that makes him a Republican? This is news for John Kerry, not to mention the entire Kennedy family. Clearly you're getting your talking points from FOX News.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 AM on 05/05/2008

I think Colbert is Colbert. I think he's nopartisan. That's what makes him awesome.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:34 AM on 05/05/2008

the white house press correspondents dinner from a couple of years ago was the best piece of political satire and lampooning EVER. if anyone here hasn't seen it, just google stephen colbert's name with the correspondents dinner, and watch the whole thing. shocking. brave. brilliant. he's comedic genius, pure and simple.

he's a devout sunday school teacher yes. but he's way too decent and smart to be a republican.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:13 AM on 05/05/2008

I kon't care about his party affiliation (although I read in his biography that he is a Democrat and he did try to run in NC as a Democrat), but as much as he makes fun of the pope and Jesus, I was hoping that he had left the church. Why are Catholics not leaving in droves over the priest sex abuse scandal and its massive coverup over so many years? If you contribute money to the church, you are part of the problem!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 AM on 05/05/2008

He tried to run for President in South Carolina on both the Republican and Democratic tickets.

He didn't run as a Rep. because they wanted a $20,000 filing fee.

Although he got enough signatures to petition on to the Dem ballot the Party wouldn't let him on. Rightly so.

Doritos sponsored his candidacy. I wonder how FEC would have dealt with tht had he gotten on the ballot?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 05/05/2008

yea and your tax dollars get spent on an unjust war, yet you don't leave the country. show some tolerance, you may not respect the Catholic church, but you can't say that all Catholics are culpable for the sex abuse scandal, and it was South Carolina, not NC that Colbert almost got on the ballot in

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 AM on 05/05/2008

Besides, Catholics don't give to the church worth a toot, and for them the Catholic Church remains as Mort Sahl said 'the only THE Church'.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 AM on 05/05/2008

I heard him in an interview on "Fresh Air" (go here to listen http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15116383) . He is not a republican. His character is. They, however, are not the same person.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 AM on 05/05/2008

When Steven Colbert did an interview on 60 minutes last year where he said he was a Liberal Democrat. And if he was a a true conservative, he'd never have humiliated Bush at that dinner years back. Besides, voting for a Republican President doesn't automatically make you a Conservative.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 PM on 05/04/2008

he's not a freakin republican, being religious doesn't make you republican, voting once for a republican candidate doesn't make you republican, geez!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 PM on 05/04/2008

.
The Stephen Colbert character is simply a ROCKERY of a neocon talking head, BOR???
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 PM on 05/04/2008

I'm not sure if Colbert is a Republican - but I know who is DEFINITELY one: HILLARY CLINTON!

The warning signs have been everywhere - Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Bill Kristol, Richard Mellon Scaife, Pat Buchanan, Joe Scarborough all endorsing her in one form or another; Hillary supporters finding comfort and warmth from FOX NEWS -- many even going so far as to proclaim Fox really IS fair and balanced. Crazy, right?

Well - - it's official - The Weekly Standard calls Hillary Clinton One of it's own:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/063kvafy.asp?pg=1

They predict that if she gets the nomination, she will run to the right of John McCain. LOLOL Have fun dealing with THAT, Hillary supporters!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:16 PM on 05/04/2008

Oh Please - Yes Nationalized Healthcare is such a Republican thing. She went on fox to reach an audience she might not otherwise - plain and simple. If Obama had done it -you'd be swooning at what a 'reach across party lines' guy he is. That is a joke.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 PM on 05/04/2008

Actually Obama was on "faux" just not with Bill O'.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 AM on 05/05/2008

Actually National Health Insurance COULD be a conservative issue.

After all, the individual who first instituted National Health Insurance was that well known liberal Otto Von Bismark. Around 1880 something.

Which only goes to show: German conservatives are only about a century ahead of American liberals.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 AM on 05/05/2008

I don't think you read the article. It has nothing to do with her going on Fox (Obama went on Fox to make his case for their viewers, too - you didn't know that?). It's about the accusations that Hillary is Hillary waging her campaign against Obama as if she were a Republican. Accusations that are well-founded. SHe is selling out the base of her very own party to win this nomination.

In this article, she is called "Nixonian", compared (favorably) to Lieberman. and is described as a "feminist form of George W. Bush".

And that sits fine with you? Those three names give you the warm fuzzies?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 AM on 05/05/2008

Are you selling the Weakly Standard?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 PM on 05/04/2008

Doesn't matter which side of the political fence he is on; the man is an insane wondernaut with balls the size of Texas. Lots of love to Mr. Colbert

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 PM on 05/04/2008

Nothing about that tells me he's a Republican. JFK was a Catholic. A whole lot of Democrats that are still registered Democrat voted for Reagan or Bush Sr. at one time. Everyone makes mistakes sometimes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 PM on 05/04/2008

Oh, please. Stephen Colbert is a familiar social type. He grew up in a loving, conservative, Roman Catholic family, the kind of family that, if it ever voted Dem, stopped voting Dem after the 1970s. Many of the girls and some of the boys kept the faith--literally, by continuing to be practicing Catholics, and/or figuratively, by accepting that the Democratic party better reflects the the social justice message of the Church. The abortion issue is the only significant area of agreement between the Church and the Republican party. All of the conflicts, contradictions, and challenges of Boomer Catholicism make for interesting personality types. Some are quite angry. Most develop a unique sarcastic style. A small minority, like Stephen (and MoDo on a good day), have learned to challenge the bizzareness of it all into a great comedy routine. They're liberal, but they defy the conventional pigeon holes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 PM on 05/04/2008

Not all practicing Catholics are conservatives. A wing of the Catholic Church has a long tradition of active protest against conservative, militaristic policiies. Remember the Berrigan Brothers? The lead on this article is deceptive...happens a lot on Huffpo.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:23 AM on 05/05/2008

Is Colbert a (R)?

To answer that, I think one would have to ask a (R) ... Why not that person that booked him of the W.H. Correspondence Dinner?

Snerd

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 PM on 05/04/2008

Yes he is thats why I think he so funny he has everyone fooled on this site.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 05/04/2008

Don't watch his show, do you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 05/05/2008

In the spirit of Stephen Colbert

Check out

The Empire Strikes Barak


http://youtube.com/watch?v=a8lvc-azCXY

If you support Hillary get a sense of humor
If you support Obama You'll laugh.....It's a little long but watch it to the end

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 PM on 05/04/2008

I am a die hard supporter of Senator Obama and hope very much that I will be able to vote for him in November. By some chance Senator Clinton is the parties nominee I will gladly vote for her.
Personally I am so sick of where the Bush crowd has led our country that I would vote for a potted plant if it has a (D) behind its name. But that doesn't mean that I have never voted for a Republican.
Some of the comments in this and other threads on here are very sad indeed. They unfortunately reflect just how divisive politics in America has become. One of the many reasons I support Senator Obama is that I believe he is truly a man of integrity and intellect. Our country is in desperate need of real leadership. Perhaps he may disappoint me and turn out to be just one more politician.
I certainly hope that isn't the case.
As for Corbert I really dont care what his politics are. He is an entertainer with a TV show. The fact that his TV show sometimes conveys more truth and understanding regarding the problems we face speaks volumes about the level that so called political analysis and punditry has descended to in our country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 PM on 05/04/2008

Bum: "... Personally I am so sick of where the Bush crowd has led our country that I would vote for a potted plant if it has a (D) behind its name."

SG: But what if that person with a (D) behind their name had an (R) in it ... i.e. Hilla(R)y?

Snerd

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 PM on 05/04/2008

I agree about the many comments on HuffPo. There is a lot of intolerance out there. Lots of " My guy or the highway" talk. I will vote for either candidate, as long as it doesn't end up being a stolen nomination. Everything political has been so quirky since 2000 that I don't think the Democratic Party can take a nasty scandal deciding the nomination.

It does, however, amaze me that so many people are adamant for their guy and no other. This isn't a football rivalry. This is the future of the U.S. I know people have been saying this for a lot of years, but this time it is real. We need some leadership that is actually with the program, and McCain doesn't even know there's a program in progress. We can't have 4-8 more years of this drift. So I get really puzzled by the blood and guts comments about the nomination. There's a big picture here. We all need to keep seeing it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 PM on 05/04/2008

Alifelong Democrat, I could never vote in good conscience for Sen. Clinton. You can't have that many faces, carrying so many lies - and expect me to believe you'll do a 180 once the process is done - and we should forget all the rest? The BIG picture is if not the one that lied the least - what's the difference in the other two?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 AM on 05/05/2008

Most real Republicans aren't even considered Republicans, according to the neo-con loonies who have taken over the party. Hell, even Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon (two Republican leaders held in great esteem by many Republicans) weren't even Republicans according, once again, the looneys who have taken over the asylum that is the Republican Party. Double Hell, even the old John McCain is not considered a Republican according to these same backwards standards. Even the looneys who spew off this new neo-con Republican rhetoric that accounts for the supposed new and improve peronally-responsible, fiscally-conservative Republican Party aren't really Republicans if you examine their own personally-irresponsible and fiscally-unsound antics. In other words, real conservatives, who walk it like they talk it, are so far removed from fake conservatives who shame everyone for not living up to standards even they themselves can't abide their virtually incomparable. This is why the very limiting two party system really is one of the weakest examples of democracy ever known. It does a disservice to representing the needs of the people because it lumps people together ideologically who really are, in many ways, polar opposites. And the corporatists (who run the show no matter who's in power) want it that way. they feed off that friction and do their own bidding while everyone is too busy splitting hairs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:41 PM on 05/04/2008

Not all Republicans are bad, I learned this from Obama.

Plus Colbert is smart and funny vs. a O'Reilly or Limbaugh funny because they are so 'darn' dumb.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 PM on 05/04/2008

Wow - sad day when obama has to expand one's understanding to say 'not all republicans are bad' --------- i have news for you - all politicians - republican or democrat - are Good, Bad + Ugly and occassionally noble. :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 PM on 05/04/2008

Many of us take it for granted that all Republicans are automatically and unflinchingly conservative. Just like there are "Reagan Democrats", surely there are (let's say) "Obama Republicans." If Stephen is a Republican, perhaps he is more a centrist type - it's hard for any thinking person to not be outraged at the current administration, 'pubs included.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:51 PM on 05/04/2008

before you get all misty eyed about 'good republicans', find out what they want to do about single payer healthcare, and homelessness, and obscene profits for corps, and 27% creditcards.....shall I continue or have you regained your senses?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:52 PM on 05/04/2008

*rolls eyes* I'm not talking about Republican politicians but people whom so happen to be registered thus. Being from Indiana, I know quite a few of pissed-off 'pubs unwilling to change the R to a D or an I our of loyalty to the values they feel the party once upheld, somewhat like not emigrating to Canada in hopes that as an American you can change something for the better around here. Not everybody's a straight-ticket voter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 05/05/2008

CNN IS THE NEW FOX !!!! As a news/political junkie I've always noticed how the media has led us like sheep regarding our invasion of Iraq. Daily I'd flip through cable news shows in search of TRUTH. I felt long ago, and Huffington recently exposed, how the military 'experts' were being paid by the Pentagon (aka Bush regime) to lie and mislead the American people regarding Iraq. This means all the cable networks have been part of this manipulation. NOW I'M NOTICING A NEW TREND AT CNN !!!! CNN has quietly made changes that are a bit scary. First, they brought Keran Gentry from Fox. Their overall tone started sounding more GOPish. They took Solidad and Miles, replaced them with John Roberts and Campbell Brown (husband works at Fox). Added Tony Snow (formerly of Fox and Bush's Press spokesperson)...now the addition of Bush's former spokewoman Francis Townsend. Also, flip from CNN to FOX during Live broadcasts you'll see that they are using the same camera source, ie....WORKING TOGETHER !! These changes mean only 1 of 2 things. They expect Obama to get the nomination and want to join Fox (and much of MSNBC) in attacking him......or they've been notified by the regime that something big (bomb Iran?) is ahead....Either way the manipulative media is getting set for massive lieing.... Fooled us once (Iraq War)....but as they say....NEVER AGAIN !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Greg Jones
www.Blacks4Barack.org
(A Multi-Racial, Grassroots Org...Dedicated To Truth)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:28 PM on 05/04/2008

I wouldn't say that CNN is Fox - but it is more your establishment, cabal-type, powerful interest - driven mass media, darling ---------- The news is sensationalist and rarely delving into true in depth investigative or analytical journalism. They are a bunch of vanity models - mindless news readers with an agenda. MSNBC is orgasming all over itself for Obama. That is not what I want from my news. Regardless of my position.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 AM on 05/05/2008

their, sorry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 05/04/2008

Big deal.

I voted for a Republican at least once before in my lifetime too.

It wasn't a bad party before the Neocons, Supply Siders and Fundamentalists turned it into a cult.