- BIG NEWS:
- Green Living
- |
- Green Energy
- |
- Energy
- |
- Animals
- |
For ever so long, the energy and environmental community has been working to communicate the dishonesty, truthiness, deceptiveness of John McCain's claims when it comes to renewable energy and global warming. Sadly, the McBlurring McSame McCain has worked all too well in creating confusion that John McCain is "green", that he is somehow a real leader when it comes to key technologies and approaches for achieving an energy smart future.
The League of Conservation Voters (LCV) has just released a great video that shines a new light to unblur the situation.
The case against John McCain is quite stark in terms of claims and the realities when it comes to support for renewable energy. Post the last debate, the Obama campaign's fact sheet was actually too generous to John McCain when it comes to renewable energy.
The spin machines work long and hard and fast nowadays. Email boxes around the country are filled with "fact sheets" and other material from campaigns during presidential debates and in the hours afterwards. Among other things, the Obama campaign produced "John McCain's 26 Lies Tonight". Lie #16:
RENEWABLE ENERGY: McCainclaimed to support renewable energies, but his record shows otherwise. He has voted 23 times against investing in renewable energies and opposed a bipartisan effort to remove tax breaks for oil companies in order to invest in renewable energy.
Now, it is good that the Obama campaign is calling out McCain for his disingenuous statements, "lies", when it comes to supporting renewable energy. For too long, McCain's "Green Straight Talk Express" has actually been the "Dirty Energy Twisted Action Delay Machine".
One way to test John McCain in this arena: compare his voting record with those of Barbara Boxer and James Inhofe.
So much for John McGreen ...
NOTE: Consider taking one of those last chances, Act Blue for the Earth in an Energy Smart way, help get some truly Energy Smart people into Congress.
VATICAN CITY — President Barack Obama sat down with...
I'm pleased to announce the launch today of two new HuffPost...
After a three-night stay in Moscow, the Obamas touched down in Rome on Wednesday so Papa President...
How would you like to live in the White House? Take the HuffPost Poll of World Leaders' Residences...
UPDATE: Paris Jackson also spoke. Watch her moving...
I was sorry to watch, live on CNN, Edward R. Murrow and Emmy Award-winning broadcaster and...
The following post...
It was with interest that I read Dr. Soram Khalsa's post on The Huffington Post...
Yesterday evening, Greg Sargent reported on The Plum Line that one of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's key reasons...
OH NOES! What happened on Fox and Friends today, people?
Hermione herself, Emma Watson, charmed David Letterman and...
As our own Jason Linkins pointed out, Letterman is one of the few comedians...
I'm liveblogging the latest Iran election fallout. Email me with any news or thoughts, or follow me...
MADISON, Wis. (AP) -- Oscar G. Mayer, retired chairman of the Wisconsin-based meat processing company that bears his name,...
It's summer, the time for weddings! A few of my friends are getting married this summer and fall, so lately...
SYDNEY — Residents of a rural Australian town hoping to protect the earth and their wallets...
I get many letters like this from readers...
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
I'm not certain this kind of analysis proves much.
For example, what about the IRAQ WAR FUNDING BILLS that PRO IRAQ WAR senators voted against? Did that make them Anti Iraq War? No, they were end the war bills put forward by the left. But you can take those votes and call them "against funding the war". It's very easy to take some votes in congress, take them out of context, and make them say or smear anyway you want to.
Sort of like statistics, statistics don't lie, but liars use statistics.
The truth is McCain has voted for the environment far more than he has voted "against" it. And by the way, the same games can be played with Obama's votes. And I'm sure you would rush to "explain" his votes and be sure that Obama's votes were put right back into context.
These hateful games do not help the environment. But to most people playing the games.....it's not the environment that is number one on their agenda....it's getting "their" guy elected or seeing that "their party" is in control and the environment is just another weapon in the cultural war they wage.
You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in or