Customer Disservice Spotlight On: FedEx

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

Posted July 25, 2008 | 05:53 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Four years ago, in the summer of 2004, I decided to start writing a book. I knew it would take a while, and sure enough, it did. I was thrilled when I finally could hold a real copy in my hands a few weeks ago. The respective Battles of Spellcheck, Representation, and Publishing were finally at an end. Who knew that there would be one more epic conflict in the War on Disinformation: The Battle of Shipping.

It took me only a few minutes to pick my poison. For a box full of books, UPS wanted to charge me about $18 to ship from Pennsylvania to Ohio, while FedEx Ground was willing to charge only about $13. I gave the manufacturer my company's FedEx account number, and on May 30, 2008, more than half a ton of freshly printed books began making its way across the country in trucks painted white, purple, and green.

Of course, as soon as they arrived, there was something wrong. Every single book jacket looked as though it had been dug out of a trash can and smeared with oil. The jackets had to be re-printed, requiring additional time and shipping. Fortunately, thanks to UPS Saturday Delivery and the printer's willingness to pick up the extra costs, the new jackets arrived on schedule and in good condition, leaving me with my FedEx bills to ponder.

At first, they looked fine. My Amazon.com partnership discount with FedEx gave me anywhere from 5% to 20% off the price of each package, and my American Express bill neatly displayed a corresponding line at the end of each FedEx line item stating "YOUR FEDEX CUSTOM DISCOUNT IS..."--except when it didn't. Sometimes, the discount simply wasn't there at all. I called FedEx to find out why.

It started off with the age-old routine that customer service representatives never tire of: the runaround. The people in Revenue Services told me that I needed to speak with the people responsible for my particular discount, in Associations. Duran in Associations told me that as much as he wanted to help me, he was not authorized to access my account. Miraculously, he had no ability to see what packages I had shipped, where I had shipped them, or how much they cost. His only job was to talk about discounts. To answer my questions, he would need to talk to someone in Revenue Services. The problem was that no one in Associations had a direct phone line, and they all shared one e-mail address. So I e-mailed Duran all of the tracking numbers I had questions about, approximately 70 in all.

It was weeks before I heard anything back from Duran, and when I did hear back from him, all that I heard was that he was "looking into things." Eventually, he decided that the problem was that I hadn't used the "correct" tracking numbers.

FedEx Ground is actually the remains of a forgotten company called RPS, which was acquired by FedEx in 1997. RPS used a different kind of tracking number scheme than FedEx, such that each customer had its own numeric prefix. More than a decade after the acquisition, FedEx still hadn't bothered integrating RPS tracking numbers into its own system, and so when the book manufacturer shipped the boxes, it had made a "mistake" by using its own tracking numbers instead of mine.

"I told them to bill my FedEx account number," I protested to Duran. "It shouldn't matter. My discounts are tied to my FedEx account number, not the individual tracking numbers."

"They can't do that," Duran said. "They have to pay themselves."

"They can do that and they did," I insisted. "I'm looking at the bill on my credit card! And besides, some of these packages are ones I shipped, with my tracking numbers!" Duran said he'd get back to me.

In the meantime, I called Customer Service. Several different representatives told me that they would look into my problem. Most never called back. One told me that my FedEx account representative was the only one who could help me, so he transferred me to a voice mailbox.

The next day, as FedEx announced that it was one of many companies that had lost a staggering amount of money in the last fiscal quarter, I received a package via FedEx from -- FedEx! It was my Amazon.com discount program welcome kit -- too heavy, at 15 sheets of 8.5" x 11" paper, to provide to customers over the internet at a time when oil prices were at an all-time high -- spelling out all of the discount percentages I was supposed to receive on various services, including FedEx Ground. Some of them made perfect sense to me, with tables reading "5%," "10%," "15%," "20%," and so on. Others made less sense. For multi-weight ground shipments, the percentages read "551," "552," "553, "554," and "555," with no explanation. I guessed they weren't referring to a 555% discount, but who was I to judge?

When my supposed FedEx account representative called back, she suggested that there was no such thing as a discount program for FedEx Ground. When I told her that I was looking at the documents right in front of me, she determined instead that my packages didn't weigh enough.

"They weighed 30 pounds each," I said. "That qualifies for a 20% discount." She proceeded to read me the same tables I was looking at, twice. Eventually, I'd had enough.

"I want to talk to the President's office," I said. And so I was transferred.

Eventually, I was put in touch with Beverly in the "Corporate Office," who echoed a familiar refrain: there was no such thing as a discount for FedEx Ground because it was already a "cheap service." She was the kind of person who made it difficult to get a word in edgewise, and so I had considerable difficulty explaining to her that I had already been given discounts on some, but not all, FedEx Ground packages, seemingly at random. Either way, I had written proof in my hand that I was supposed to receive discounts on all of my shipments. She asked me to send her the documents, and so I scanned in each page of the packet that should have been provided in a digital format in the first place, and finally sent them by e-mail to a general account for executive escalations.

I then received an e-mail from John, who was my "new" FedEx account manager, and who would be helping me with my issues. Unfortunately, he never did. When I called him one week later after hearing nothing but silence, he told me that he thought the issues had been resolved.

"How could they be resolved?" I asked. "Nothing has happened!"

"Well, I got an e-mail," John said. "From Beverly."

"When did you receive it?" I asked.

"June 8th," he told me.

"You sent me an e-mail on June 9th introducing yourself!" I exclaimed, infuriated. "That was the e-mail she sent asking you to SOLVE the problem, not telling you it had been FIXED!"

Trying to get in touch with Beverly proved difficult, as she had left for vacation. When I tried to ask her boss to transfer me to the CIO of the company, or someone who knew about database software, she refused.

Later, when Beverly returned, John actually took my side on a conference call, seeming unsure as to why it took so long to fix a simple billing error, and asking for someone else to help. Beverly reassured us both.

"I'm talking to people in billing who can help us with this," she said.

And so she was. Beverly called back later to tell me that the people in billing had looked over my account, and determined everything to be in order. I almost hit the roof -- and yet, it was consistent. I had disputed every single tracking number in my account through the FedEx web site, and more than a week later, every single request had been denied. I couldn't explain any of the details or case history, because the memo field in FedEx's system only allowed for twenty-one characters per dispute: enough to spell APPLESAUCE twice with one letter left over. Even Morse code was too verbose.

"You're getting your discounts, Mr. Greenspan," Beverly told me again and again.

According to the FedEx Billing site, I wasn't. In fact, according to the FedEx Billing site, I was being charged Residential Delivery surcharges for deliveries to massive commercial book warehouses. Sometimes, I was being charged two Residential Delivery surcharges per package, as if I were shipping to a building endowed with double the essence of a typical house.

After taking ten minutes to argue with me about whether or not Amazon.com's Kentucky Distribution Center was a residence in a residential area, Beverly said she'd look into it. I turned out to be right (it wasn't), and she issued refunds for the surcharges, but the issue of my discounts remained unresolved.

For several weeks we went back and forth, exchanging tracking numbers, with me arguing that had-I-received-a-discount-it-would-have-said-so-somewhere-just-like-all-of-the-other-packages-that-I-shipped-that-received-discounts, and Beverly arguing that you-received-a-discount-it's-just-not-showing-it-because-they-didn't-code-it-right-when-you-dropped-the-package-off. Making the point that I'd used FedEx's web site to pre-pay and ship the packages each time, thereby eliminating the possibility of clerical error at any of FedEx's counters, was futile. I finally admitted that it was barely worth my time to fight the battle any more, hung up, and tried to think about something else.

Instead, I pulled up my most recent American Express statement and found one package out of many listed with no stated discount. I had shipped it, as usual, through the FedEx web site. I went back to http://www.fedex.com, got a rate quote for the same type of package, and discovered that I had, in fact, been billed $13.16--only a few cents off from the standard, non-discounted price of $13.28. When I signed in with my account number, I got a lower price quote of $10.95 with a "Matrix Discount" clearly applied, which was definitely not what I had been billed. I called Beverly again.

"You're getting your discounts, Mr. Greenspan," she repeated for the tenth time that day. "Without the discount, we would have charged you $16.07. You only got billed $13.16. We did find some mistakes in your fuel surcharges, though, so you'll be getting a credit of about seven or eight dollars."

Unsure of whether I should be happy or upset about the fuel errors, I still disagreed about the discounts. "On your web site it says that the base rate is $10.63. There's a $1.50 Delivery Area Surcharge, and a $1.15 Fuel Surcharge. That comes to $13.28 total. Then there's the Matrix Discount that brings the price down to $10.95. Now, on my bill, the fuel surcharge was only $1.03, but everything else was the same, except I got no 'Matrix Discount.' They used twelve cents less gas than they expected, but I didn't get my discount!"

We argued about this for ten more minutes, with my insisting that the problem was in their clearly antiquated and absurd Oracle-based billing software, and Beverly insisting that there was no problem at all. Beverly finally offered to conference in the toll-free FedEx telephone number to get an unbiased rate quote over the phone. The woman on the line agreed with Beverly.

"Your rate would be $16.07," she said.

"How come your web site quotes $13.28 then?" I asked.

"I don't know," she said.

"Fine, whatever," I said, admitting the pointlessness of the endeavor. "If you're just going to quote me a higher price over the phone, take 20% off, and then claim I'm getting my discount because I got billed approximately the same thing, there's nothing I can do to stop you." I hung up with Beverly.

Curious, I called the Associations department once again. "I'd like a price quote, please," I told them. I gave Tammi, the representative, all of my package details, and then asked her how much it would cost to ship.

"Ten dollars and ninety five cents," she said.

"Interesting," I replied. "I just got charged $13.16 for that package. You're sure it's $10.95?" I asked just to double-check.

"$10.95 is what my system says," she confirmed. I conferenced in Beverly, who had Tammi repeat everything. We determined with Tammi that with no account number, on the phone, the package cost $16.07 to ship. With my account number, on the phone, it cost $10.95 to ship. With no account number, on the internet, it cost $13.28 to ship. With my account number, on the internet, it cost $10.95 to ship. Since I had actually been billed $13.16, we now had four different prices for the same package, and there were seventy packages of various sizes and weights totaling thousands of dollars in fees in question.

I couldn't handle any more for the moment, and politely hung up again after Beverly started to remind me how good my prices were. Then, she called back about a half-hour later.

"I talked to some people in billing," she said. "When we were getting that rate quote for the $16.07, you were telling us the zip code to ship from, but for some reason it was putting in your billing zip code in California! I don't know why it was doing that. So we were giving you a different quote. It looks like you're not getting all your discounts!"

This is a day in the life of the United States economy. We depend utterly and completely on database systems to do an unfathomable number of tasks for us. The process of getting a boring package from point A to point B requires computers that handle timing logistics, airplane systems, billing, telephones, etc. A failure at any point along the line can cause the entire system to fail -- or not. In my case, my packages got where they needed to go, just with a 50% chance that I would be billed 25% more for them than the shipping company had contractually agreed to charge. Not many people would notice. The root cause is probably a missing punctuation mark in one line of code among millions.

FedEx is a large company, and we've all grown accustomed to dealing with large companies. When there are so many people involved in a system that it is no longer possible for one individual to actually understand the entire system, it's understandable that some errors might creep in. So what can you do?

As it turns out, there's a lot you can do. You can design better database systems. You can hire educated people to provide support who can think for themselves, instead of parroting party lines. You can grant those employees more authority because you trust them, because education is a good proxy for knowing the difference between right and wrong. You can listen to your customers instead of shouting over them. You can throw out automated phone systems that cost more money than they save because of the time they waste. You can enforce quality assurance policies that route computer-related problems to people who actually know something about computers. You can perform random billing audits to catch mistakes before customers do.

Any one of these would have made my interaction with FedEx less horrifying. Yet even when the company is losing millions of dollars per quarter, the chance of a company that large listening to such common-sense suggestions, from a customer no less, is close to zero. Why is the American economy doing badly? This is why. This is not a story in a vacuum. This is how commerce in the United States of America works today.

As it turns out, I could have written this story about the book manufacturer, or the book distributor that received the infamous $13.16 box. Upon signing for 12 books in Illinois, they recorded them as being in Georgia, where they somehow remain still. For the most basic of products, requiring no refrigeration, special handling, or unique treatment, there has not been a single company along the supply chain that has performed its job properly.

So, if you're as anxious as I am for a time when the American economy is once again the envy of the world, take a look around you. Whether you're a CEO or a call center automaton, there's a lot of work to do.

This article originally appeared on aarongreenspan.com.

Aaron Greenspan is the author of Authoritas: One Student's Harvard Admissions and the Founding of the Facebook Era.

 
 

Comments
19
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- Eric8869 See Profile I'm a Fan of Eric8869

Unfortunately contacting the Better Busines Bureau doesn't really do very much. I contacted them after being ripped off by a video conferencing provider called ICUII. The head of the company pretty much told me off when I complained about a billing issue.

First the BBB transfers you from one office to another. Then you fill out the information.

They wait for a reply from the business. This company ICUII had several complaints against them already. They didn't respond. (To any of them)

If the company doesn't respond - they just make a note that they got a complaint on them. That's it. No real recourse for the business.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 AM on 07/30/2008
- filabac See Profile I'm a Fan of filabac

I sent a package to my parents using UPS. They never got the package. I filed an insurance claim with UPS. I got back a from letter assuring me the package was delievered because "UPS does not lose things". They said as proof, attached was a copy of the signature page from the delivery. Attached was a hand written note that they had lost the signature page in question. To my surprise, when I wrote them back saying "You got to be kidding" they quickly sent me a check.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 PM on 07/29/2008
- NHGranite See Profile I'm a Fan of NHGranite

This sounds exactly like my experience with my De ll Computer! 6 months in, the hard drive crashed; they said they sent one, it never arrived. After repeated calls, they emailed me that they RAN OUT of hard drives! What happened to the overnight service I paid extra for? "Too bad, that was for things I couldn't do myself, like replace a hard drive." They finally found one, but once opened, the refurb unit was for another computer. Weeks more, they sent a third - another wrong one! CRIPES! Three months with no laptop!

After I wrote to BBB and added my complaint to thousands of others' De ll tried to tell them I wouldn't accept the bad hard drives. I wrote to Michael Dell and got an upgraded laptop. In the meantime NY State sued them with a class action; but that was Spitzer, and look at what happened to him! They drove him nuts and he could only relax with call girls.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 07/28/2008
- RobinSeattle See Profile I'm a Fan of RobinSeattle

Here's a story for you:

Many years ago, nationally syndicated talk show host Tom Leykis had the misfortune of buying a Gateway computer. The thing soon died (as Gateways are wont to do) and so Leykis contacted Gateway about getting a new one and got nothing but an endless series of frustrating runarounds and evasions.

Finally, Leykis, who didn't want to do this, told them that if they didn't rectify this soon he would talk about it on his radio show. Gateway told him to get stuffed. And after Leykis did talk about it on his show, did Gateway call and apologize or try to offer some lame explanation for the shafting they gave him? No.

Lesson: I will never ever buy a Gateway. And nobody else should, either. If they won't even heed complaints form popular media figures who could damage them significantly then regular people have no chance. This company has no right to exist.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 AM on 07/29/2008
- falco See Profile I'm a Fan of falco

Yeah, good for you for persuing it, they count on the fact that people don't want to waste their time. They design their systems this way ON PURPOSE. The corporations have successfully built up a wall between you and anyone who can do anything about the issue. Remind you of anything? Like our congressmen and senators? Wall built between us so that we are at their mercy. Sounds to me like a phony "democracy" or a phony sense of "freedom". The answer is to quit using each and every store that pretends to be the friend of the consumer but is not. Of course, we would eventually not have anyplace to do business because, just as our government and politicians have, we are considered the "enemy", the cattle at the bottom of the chain to be ripped off and used so the elite can have the better life - at our expense and off our backs. More people will wake up when the FDIC goes bankrupt and the average American Joe gets no help, their money vaporizes, and the banksters have been alread paid and are sitting on the beach in Dubai laughing about the demise of America.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 07/28/2008
- WIpatriot See Profile I'm a Fan of WIpatriot

Aaron, this is so funny on several levels. This is exactly how large American companies are currently operating today. If you want to "pile on," you could discuss how the invoice gets changed after they are billed and paid because they are making "corrections" to them. Tehn see if you are paying the correct amount, correctly...LOL.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:54 AM on 07/28/2008
- uhappytoo See Profile I'm a Fan of uhappytoo

It costs a great deal more to train customer service workers in the way a company does business, than to write scripts for people who know only how to read. The former knows the business well enough to identify off-track problems and move to get them fixed. The latter are those we all speak to these days, but can't even skip a paragraph in the script without himself or herself getting off track.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 AM on 07/28/2008
- Aaron Greenspan - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Aaron Greenspan

Hi,

You're right about this--it does cost more to hire educated workers, but I think if you were to do a full analysis, you'd probably find that the value of the amount of time saved thanks to those "higher-cost" individuals (due to drastically quicker resolutions) far exceeds the cost of getting them on board. That's in large part why a lot of companies that previously outsourced support to India are now bringing support operations back to the United States.

Aaron

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 AM on 07/28/2008
- uhappytoo See Profile I'm a Fan of uhappytoo

Actually that was my point. I just didn't make it explicitly. I agree with you wholeheartedly. But not only was time lost, customer frustration led to the loss of business as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 AM on 07/28/2008
- Eric8869 See Profile I'm a Fan of Eric8869

So frustrating what we customers have to go through on a daily basis. Sometimes you are just on the phone with several options (none of which match your situation) and can't get through to a live person.

I once had RCN apply my cable bill payment to someone else's account. They wouldn't believe me that I had paid even though I could see the payment in my bank's account. Eventually I had to fax them the documentation to prove it before they discovered their error. Until then they didn't even try to investigate it.

This took several phone calls to resolve.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 PM on 07/27/2008
- JerseyBob See Profile I'm a Fan of JerseyBob

RIGHT ON!
FE's business model is bupkas. Staff seems technically incompetent. Its infrastructure has serious flaws. FE should have given you your discount as you knew it to be.
I learned FE drivers are non-union contract persons who are paid to move packages ASAP. ASAP does not mean actual delivery. I understand a package can get lost. I'm reasonable. But bureaucratic, technically incompetent FE response is the pits.
A summer hat was ordered and not delivered to me. A Door Tag advised it was delivered to the apt. leasing office. It wasn't! Called FE- they said they'd call after their driver checked it out. Next day apt. people said driver came back looking for package-not sure he left it there.

Over more than one day I spent several hours with FE. I heard:
1. I should file a claim with FE
2. I should file a claim with the shipper. (The shipper seems to be good about all this.)
3. I should file a claim with FE and the shipper
4. Do nothing-FE is on top of this.

FE online software failed. I needed to go to Staples and fax it the next day with a copy of the (partial) claim I might have sent. It is a week now. I had asked FE who their "customers" were -the shipper or the receiver. FE said both. I think they have that right.
Luck with your book!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 07/27/2008
- cinemaven See Profile I'm a Fan of cinemaven

It takes so much work and determination to get through the process with companies like that so generally, people will give up after just a few tries. Kudos for actually going the distance. Hopefully, in the process you taught a few people how to do their jobs!

I generally complain if something isn't right (I also call companies about an equal number of times to let customer relations know when something is wonderful) and recently, I got a huge surprise. I had bought a package of uncooked shredded potato from the grocery store and after the first day in the fridge and about a month short of the best before date, the sealed bag started to inflate in a pretty frightening way. I'm used to food looking scary after I cook it but not usually before so I called the company (Reisers). The woman who answered was wonderful and she told me to throw them out immediately and she'd send off some coupons. Since the package was $1.69, I was expecting a coupon for a free package. I got an envelope 2 days later with $50 in free product coupons and a letter of apology that wasn't even a form letter!! It just blew me away that there are still companies getting it right since I'm more used to your scenario.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 PM on 07/26/2008
- AZBunny See Profile I'm a Fan of AZBunny

I think the biggest problems is that companies do NOT want to keep employees for very long so they can pay them less AND no retirement. So you end up withe relatively new people who don't understand, nor care how the company works.

ADD to that the fact that most companies outsource thier service calls to generic call centers that pay very little and train even less and you have the mess that is customer service today.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 PM on 07/26/2008
- AZAcct See Profile I'm a Fan of AZAcct

Well talk about documenting a chain of CS inquiries! ;)

In any event--I have had similar problems with UPS and DHL...I don't think it's specific to the company FedEx...I just thing Customer Service and Billing departments figure there are enough people who don't want to spend as much time as you to get things taken care of...and that's extra money in their pockets. :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:40 PM on 07/26/2008
- dexxjones See Profile I'm a Fan of dexxjones

your post is right on target. i remember a while back, being in an aeropastale clothing store, i wanted to snatch something to wear for the evening. but even though it was the middle of summer, all i could buy were sweaters. i was one of like fifteen people who browsed and then fled without buying anything.

why? because a 25 yearold isnt buying sweaters in august.

why did they HAVE sweaters in august? some corporate chart told them it was time to shift merchandise for the new "season" and so of course i read a while later that federated (the parent company of this and the structure store across the mall which also had sweaters that day) was in trouble financially. it didnt take a rocket scientist to figure out why.

today's failing companies are yesterday's netscape/real media/ etc (dont tell me about microsoft's IE being criminal- it scrolled! while netscape would wait and then keep scrolling!)

in fact look at microsoft today! vista anybody? they will learn or they will starve.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:13 PM on 07/25/2008
- allonfla See Profile I'm a Fan of allonfla

ALL Retail stores do that. It is not just Federated and it is not because they are having money problems. I worked in Retail for 13 years and every store I have worked for started their "seasons" early. Yes, it is about money but it is not because the stores were in financial trouble. Personally I see it as a plus because the time I'm ready to buy, the buying office is already scheduled to mark down those items.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 AM on 07/27/2008
- dexxjones See Profile I'm a Fan of dexxjones

i didnt say that the early "season" was a result of financial trouble. i said it was the CAUSE. bad business. pure and simple. many many people walked in and out of the store that day. a conversation with the clerk (more like a rant) revealed that there had been many walkouts and precious few purchases. the mall was packed by the way. nobody was buying f*king sweaters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 07/27/2008
- RobinSeattle See Profile I'm a Fan of RobinSeattle

Friends of mine who have used FedEx to deliver music equipment have had myriad problems with them. I have always used UPS and so far so good, but UPS hasn't been perfect, either. UPS' penchant for leaving often expensive packages marked "recipeint must sign" (or something to that effect) on the door step when the person who ordered the goods wasn't home is particularly vexing. In one case I know of, the UPS driver left a package with a person who said he was a neighbor. The recipient never saw that merchandise and had to file a claim for the missing goods while being effectively stonewalled by UPS.

I honestly don't know what is wrong with some of these companies. It isn'/ hard to get stuff right. It also isn't hard to say, "we screwed up, let's make it right." But in a Bush Administration created environment where the government is trying to limit regular people's recourses to address problems with companies, these firms have become more and more arrogant. They all do it, so there is no competition in that regard.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 PM on 07/25/2008
- dexxjones See Profile I'm a Fan of dexxjones

ups also has a habit of saying "we knocked" when you see them just drive by. this happened a few times to me. turns out, that the driver- a big, burly guy- was afraid of my two ankle-biting puffball dogs. the drivers seem to do what they want.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 AM on 07/26/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Stock Quote

Enter a ticker symbol below:

Data provided by AOL



 
 
Related Tags
 

 Site  Web