The Curious Myth of Hillary Clinton's Senate Effectiveness

Posted February 20, 2008 | 02:05 PM (EST)



stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Frankly, I'm tired of listening to Senator Clinton portray herself as being in the solutions business -- as boasting a nice, fat resume of accomplishments -- while mocking Barack Obama for being a rhetorical empty suit.

Is she truly a beacon of experience? Because I couldn't think of a single piece of legislation that has her name stuck proudly on the front of it, no equivalent of McCain-Feingold, for example, I headed straight for her campaign website to see what glorious aspects of her vaunted experience I was missing.

Actually, I was missing nothing. There is not one single example of any legislation with her name appended to it. In fact, the page devoted to her Senate biography is a mush-mash, a laundry list of good intentions. When she talks about "sponsoring" and "introducing" and "fighting for" legislation that obviously hasn't passed, that's a smokescreen for failure. By introducing all that legislation that never makes it out of committee, she's guilty of what she accuses Senator Obama of: confusing "hoping" with doing.

Consider these examples:

• "...{she} worked with her colleagues to secure the funds New York needed to recover and rebuild."

• "...she fought to provide compensation to the families of the victims."

• "She is an original sponsor of legislation that expanded health benefit to members of the National Guard and Reserves."

• "Some of Hillary' proudest achievements have been her work to ensure the safety of prescription drugs for children, with legislation now included in the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act." (What in God's name does that mumbo-jumbo mean?)

Yes, it's true that for many years, she was in the minority. But if she is the effective legislator she claims to be, she'd be able find co-sponsors across the aisle who share her commitment to specific issues, in the same way that John McCain found his doppelganger, Russ Feingold.

But an inability to get legislation passed is just the beginning of Senator Clinton's shallow record. For many of the bills she introduced, she couldn't even get a cosponsor in her own party!

Below are some perfectly fine, liberal, progressive bills that she introduced, but was unable to attract a cosponsor of any party, according to the Library of Congress.

Note that while her website proclaims that "She is an original sponsor of legislation that expanded health benefit to member of the National Guard and Reserves", she wasn't able to rustle up a single cosponsor for legislation that would have extended military retirement credit for National Guard Members called up after 9/11.

So Senator Clinton is right when she claims to be the experienced candidate, although it's not the experience she would like us to believe. It's a track record of legislative failure and futility.

89. S.4065 : A bill to direct the Attorney General to conduct a study on the feasibility of collecting crime data relating to the occurrence of school-related crime in elementary schools and secondary schools.
Sponsor: Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY] (introduced 11/16/2006) Cosponsors (None)

88. S.4029 : A bill to increase the number of well-educated nurses, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY] (introduced 9/29/2006) Cosponsors (None)

90. S.4103 : A bill to prevent nuclear terrorism, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY] (introduced 12/7/2006) Cosponsors (None)

77. S.3909 : A bill to amend the foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to provide assistance for developing countries to promote quality basic education and to establish the achievement of universal basic education in all developing countries as an objective of United States foreign assistance policy, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY] (introduced 9/18/2006) Cosponsors (None)

59. S.2993 : A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose a temporary oil profit fee and to use the proceeds of the fee collected to provide a Strategic Energy Fund and expand certain energy tax incentives, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY] (introduced 5/23/2006) Cosponsors (None)

26. S.1144 : A bill to provide military retirement credit for certain service by National Guard members performed while in a State duty status immediately after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
Sponsor: Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY] (introduced 5/26/2005) Cosponsors (None)

50. S.2260 : A bill to amend titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act to make improvements to payments to Medicare Advantage plans and to reinstate protections in the Medicaid program for working families, their children, and the disabled against excessive out-of-pocket costs, inadequate benefits, and health care coverage loss.
Sponsor: Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY] (introduced 2/8/2006) Cosponsors (None)


 
 

Comments
114
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

It pains me to see the Obama supporters use tactics that mirror the Republicans in both tone and content. With regard to the Clintons, it's exactly what one would expect to read on redstate.org or powerline. It's not Mr. Obama per se but his supporter who are making it increasingly impossible for me to vote for him.
I suspect there are more people like me out there who find this whole "destroy Hillary" mentality disturbing. Once you break it, how do you plan to put it back together again? I am sure we will hear and read lots of very nice things about the Clintons here on HuffPo once Hillary concedes. It won't fool anyone. Arriana and her team have destroyed the village in order to save it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:56 PM on 02/21/2008

We are hearing the same thing from the Obama camp about intoduced this bill or that bill...I agree; both side are full of usefull idiots.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 02/21/2008

This Obama supporter is jumping in to say that often, those most instrumental and effective in making something happen are not the ones to get their names on things.

I applaud you for looking into the facts behind the spin, but those of us who've never served in the US Senate aren't in a position to know what this information means.

It's quite possible that the way things get "done" involves offering up first drafts of bills that eventually become something passable under someone else's rubric.

Should HRC magically get the nomination, I'll work hard for her; we must beat the Republicans and take our country back from the brink.
While Obama is the leader this country needs, I believe Democrats in the Senate who say that HRC has been very resourceful and effective.

We just need a whole new thing now.
OBAMA 2008.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 02/21/2008

thank you so much Adam . . . we know bills that passed that she backed the invasion of Iraq; kyl/lieberman and ones she didn't vote for too: the Levin amendment; a bill to ban landmines and cluster bombs . . . and she skipped the vote on granting telecoms immunity . . . too busy campaigning . . . hypocrisy is writ large in hillary's dossier . ..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:02 AM on 02/21/2008

Let's take a look at another bill that was co-sponsored across the aisle: the Lugar-Obama proliferation and threat reduction initiative, signed into law 1/11/07. From http://obama.senate.gov/press/070111-lugar-obama_non/ : "Authored by U.S. Sens. Dick Lugar (R-IN) and Barack Obama (D-IL). An immensely important national security piece of legislation that the two senators not only got through committee, but passed and signed by Bush. When the Republicans had done absolutely nothing about the loose nukes and other weapons lying around the world, Lugar and Obama, as a freshman senator, made it happen.

So, there's national security understanding and experience; effectiveness working across the aisle to get something good, instead of working across the aisle to give us such lofty things as bans on flag burning.

Then there's what Hillary voted for: Kyl/Lieberman, the Iraq vote, voting against a ban on cluster bombs, not showing up to vote against the telecom immunity amendment. Hillary can whine that Obama isn't vetted enough. I wish there were more articles like this, actually vetting her performance in the Senate. Thanks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 02/21/2008

So true, Adam. Thank you! You've nailed the hypocrisy. --
And for idiots still going on about "present" votes in the Illinois State Legislature, you DON'T UNDERSTAND how Illinois works, and how a "present" vote is the correct procedural thing to do at times. -- Read http://virginiadem.wordpress.com/2008/02/16/standard-operating-procedure-in-the-illinois-legislature/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 AM on 02/21/2008

Much like she accuses Obama, her "35 years of experience" claim never comes with any substantive facts to back it up.

Her campaign has been all about inevitability from "day one", including thinking that she wouldn't have to back her words, as though they would be taken at face value.

Gradually over the past few months, Americans have wised-up,but Hill keeps pumping out the same junk.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 AM on 02/21/2008

Let us not forget Clinton's vote on Iraq. That bill successfully passed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 PM on 02/20/2008

She co-sponsored a flag-burning bill. That's gotta count for something, right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 PM on 02/20/2008

Yeah it counts for me writing her off as exactly the kind of politician we don't need more of.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 AM on 02/21/2008

Thanks for the reminder! The ACLU probably thanks her for that - they probably got a few new members after that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 AM on 02/21/2008

Great Post!!

I already knew this though, she is a big zero!
All that education and she is a flop!
If she wasn't married to Bill she would be on Welfare.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 PM on 02/20/2008

More likely she would be making high-six or seven figures at a law firm.

Now where's Obama's list? Anyone have a 2" X 2" sticky note?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 02/21/2008

hillary isn't the shining example of senate greatness that she claims to be?

i'm shocked!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 02/20/2008

Speaking of effectiveness. How is Obama going to explain his voting 'Present' 129 times in the Illinois state senate when the republicans say he can't make a decision especially a command decision? I believe the 'Present' issue was mentioned in one of the democratic debates but I expect the republicans to hammer him on this. This issue will matter to ordinary citizens and I mean those who don't come to this website.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 02/20/2008

"This issue will matter to ordinary citizens and I mean those who don't come to this website" So, you aren't an ordinary citizen?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 02/21/2008

Great idea! Let's educate 75 million voters nationally on the archaic rules of voting in the Illinois Legislature. Good luck!

I am sure that Hillary will lay out a good road map for the Rethug-licans over the next couple of weeks, but Obama has done a good job of transparency of his record. Can Hillary claim the same?

Where are her tax returns? Where are the donor records to the Clinton Library? Hillary Clinton is hardly vetted, nor ready to serve on day one. She can't even run a campaign past Feb 5. She can't serve on Feb 6.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 AM on 02/21/2008

A fair look at Hillary Clinton's record in the Senate shows that she has done little, and only speaks out on issues that are safe. Not too controversial. Doesn't want to upset her corporate owners and her Republican sponsors.

She supports a law to make flag-burning illegal. She supports a law to investigate violence in video games.

She's also lied and claimed credit for other people's work. She repeatedly said that the poor children in New Hampshire got health insurance because of her law. Problem is that law was passed in 1997, long before Hillary was a Senator, and it was sponsored by Ted Kennedy and Orin Hatch. Not Hillary Clinton.

She has sat in the Senate with one goal only: to position herself for a run for President.

Even disregarding what laws she sponsored, let's look at the big picture. Telecom immunity: she couldn't be bothered to show up (or maybe she didn't want to) and her supposed VP choice Evan Bayh voted to grant immunity. Think he did that without her approval? I don't.

Torture? Not a peep. Kidnapping, murder? Didn't make it to Hillary's short list. War? She loves it, wants more. Government trouncing the constitution, illegal spying on citizens, elimination of constitutional rights to counsel, to be advised of charges, to have a trial? Hillary apparently doesn't care. Nafta, Cafta, Whatever-ta: if it sends jobs out of the U.S., she's for it.

Hillary Clinton has desperately tried to make friends with the Republicans because she thought that way she could become president. She was wrong. I guess she didn't learn that lesson about hanging out with the bad crowd. Now she's destined to be a failure with a bad reputation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 PM on 02/20/2008

after reading this blog, i feel incredibly blessed to have a link to post for all those people who swear on their lives that obama is all talk and no action:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery

here's the list for all the chris matthews' and various "journalists" and bloggers who prefer blinders as eyewear.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 PM on 02/20/2008

Unfortunately the link gives a 505 server error.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 AM on 02/21/2008

Go to http://thomas.loc.gov/ and select Barack Obama from the drop-down list.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:45 AM on 02/21/2008

I'm still a non-committed independent, but feel an article such as this should portray legislation of both candidates. There's a gap in mentioning what legislation Obama put forth, found co-sponsors for, and was eventually passed.
Frankly, I'm tired of lop-sided reporting. When using a measure of experience, success, or whatever gague to evaluate one candidate, all of them should be scrutinized by the same standard and evaluated so the picture is clearer and more even-handed.
I wish the MSM would do its job and report the facts about all the candidates, so as to give the voters an across-the-board comparison on issues, records, finances, ethics and whatever else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 PM on 02/20/2008

For one example of legislation Obama co-sponsored, passed and was signed into law google Lugar-Obama regarding nuclear proliferation. It's a pretty important initiative and Obama was able to work with a Republican to get a very important national security bill passed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 PM on 02/20/2008

Obama worked with Lugar and other senators to pass the Lugar-Obama Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Conventional Weapons Threat Reduction Act.

Obama worked with Coburn and other senators to pass the Coburn-Obama Government Transparency and Accountability Act.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 02/20/2008

Hillary says please name for me any Obama accomplishments!

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2008/02/20/sot.clinton.new.york.cnn

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:03 PM on 02/20/2008

Here's one of the 3 bills Obama introduced that actually passed the Senate:

S.Res. 268: A resolution designating July 12, 2007, as "National Summer Learning Day".

Yay Summer learning!

This cut and paste game is fun - like kindergarten but using a computer and the Library of Congress.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:20 PM on 02/20/2008

see the breakdown here, from obama and hillary:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/20/201332/807/36/458633

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 PM on 02/20/2008

Hillary Clinton's attempt to criminalize flag-burning is still my favorite of her legislative accomplishments. This more than anything shows her character.

Don't mess with my 1st amendment rights, Hillary.

In Dec. 2005: "Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is supporting new legislation to criminalize desecration of the United States flag _ though she still opposes a constitutional ban on flag attacks.
Clinton, D-N.Y., has agreed to co-sponsor a measure by Republican Sen. Bob Bennett of Utah, which has been written in hopes of surviving any constitutional challenge following a 2003 Supreme Court ruling on the subject.

Her support of Bennett's bill follows her position in Congress last summer, when a constitutional ban on flag-burning was debated. Clinton said then she didn't support a constitutional ban, but did support federal legislation making it a crime to desecrate the flag.

In her public statements, she has compared the act of flag-burning to burning a cross, which can be considered a violation of federal civil rights law."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:18 PM on 02/20/2008

Hillary Rodham Clinton sponsored a bill to ban flag burning. This was another incident where Hillary Clinton furthered the agenda of the right wing of the GOP. She also voted for the war in Iraq, for the surge in Iraq and also for voting against the ban on cluster bombing that generally kills innocent men, women and children. The 8 years of the Clinton administration which moved so to the right, paved for the fascist administration of George II. Let's blow the myth of the populist agenda of Hillary Clinton.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:11 PM on 02/20/2008

You can still burn the flag you know. The law would've made you show just how dedicated to your cause you were by risking jail. Courage, not hope!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 02/20/2008

Both her Iraq vote and the flag amendment bill had nothing to do with her true sentiments. They were, rather, 100% contrived, phony, and politically motivated pandering with the aim of attracting general election votes in her pre-planned 2008 Presidential campaign.

Clue to Hilary, Mitt Romney, and ex-straight talk expresser, John McCain: even the gullible American public can now smell rats the size of horses, after having been manipulated for seven plus years by Karl Rove, G.W. Bush, Dick Cheney, et al., and now getting their noses rubbed in the disastrous results.

The main reason Obama and Huckabee are successful is because they are genuine, articulate, and true to themselves. If Huckster wasn't batshit insane, he would have won the Republican nomination. Since Obama is sane and grounded as well as intelligent, inspirational, and, well, presidential, he will win the Democratic nomination, and eventually the presidency.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 PM on 02/20/2008

this is quite brilliant. a blogger on another post listed the HRC bills that DID pass -- they were for naming federal buildings & declaring celebratory days for worthy causes. whooptido.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:03 PM on 02/20/2008

This is what was posted:

In five years as the most influential Democrat in the Senate, Hillary has managed to get the following laws and resolutions enacted:

Establish the Kate Mullany National Historic Site

Support the goals and ideals of Better Hearing and Speech Month

Recognize the Ellis Island Medal of Honor

Name courthouse after Thurgood Marshall

Name courthouse after James L. Watson

Name post office after John A. O'Shea

Designate August 7, 2003, as National Purple Heart Recognition Day

Support the goals and ideals of National Purple Heart Recognition Day

Honor the life and legacy of Alexander Hamilton on the bicentennial of his death

Congratulate the Syracuse University Orange Men's Lacrosse Team on winning the championship.

Congratulate the Le Moyne College Dolphins Men's Lacrosse Team on winning the championship

Establish the 225th Anniversary of the American Revolution Commemorative Program

Name post office after Sergeant Riayan A. Tejeda

Honor Shirley Chisholm for her service to the nation and express condolences on her death

Honor John J. Downing, Brian Fahey, and Harry Ford, firefighters who lost their lives on duty.

Only five of Clinton's bills are "substantive":

Extend period of unemployment assistance to victims of 9/11

Pay for city projects in response to 9/11

Assist landmine victims in other countries

Assist family caregivers in accessing affordable respite care

Designate part of the National Forest System in Puerto Rico as protected in the Wilderness Preservation System

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 AM on 02/21/2008

"Ethics reform would have been a good response, "

When did this happen?

Didn't Obama vote in opposition to the Ethics Reform Bill when it passed 90 to 8 in the Senate?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/29/AR2006032902424.html

Should he receive credit for its passage?

For whatever reason that he may give for voting in opposition to its passage, it seems that he was not instrumental in getting it passed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:01 PM on 02/20/2008

Did you even read the HEADLINE of the article you linked to?

~~~~~~~~~~

Legislation Stresses More Disclosure; CRITICS HAD SOUGHT TOUGHER ETHICS RULES

~~~~~~~~~~

And guess what? They got those tougher rules passed.

The Truth About Ethics Reform

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/21/opinion/21mon2.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

We"ve long grown used to candidates" cherry-picking each other"s records to score points in a campaign. But the new Congressional ethics law, and the role Senator Barack Obama played in passing it, have been belittled in troubling ways that are worth noting.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

How Obama defied Reid and got real ethics reform passed

http://www.raisingkaine.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=12761

There is not a salient quote I can pick out but if you read this story you will see that Obama helped blocked a WEAKER version of ethics reform so he could get the STRONGER version passed.

I find it very hard to believe that this was just an honest mistake on your part. If you feel you need to lie and distort Obama's record wouldn't it make more sense to simply support him instead?

If you think Clinton is the better candidate, that's fine. Simply tell us what makes her better. But when you instead spread lies and distortions about Obama you make it appear that you think HE is the better candidate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 AM on 02/21/2008

I'm an Obama supporter, but I don't think this article is fair to Hillary Clinton. You know, these have been lonely, dark years for progressives - truly. There are lots of things John Kerry, someone else I admire, has tried to do too and has been unable to get passed. The Republicans are just bastards. It really is that simple. And, unlike Democrats, Republicans ALWAYS follow their leaders (unlike Dems, who have differences of opinion because they prefer THINKING to GOOSE-STEPPING). The fact that Hillary's had these good intentions and been unable to get bipartisan support reflects poorly, not on Hillary, but on those who ignored her efforts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:48 PM on 02/20/2008

It's Obama's supporters who make it increasingly unlikely I could ever vote for the man. Their use of Republican tactics have tainted my view of their beloved candidate. Most of these anti-hillary comments would be perfectly at home on any number of rightwing blogs. The funny thing is, they assume that all Democrats will automatically vote for the winner regardless of what they say or do. I for one would rather have a President named McCain than a cult leader named Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 PM on 02/21/2008