More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
Adam Winkler

GET UPDATES FROM Adam Winkler
 

Another Big Win for Marriage Equality

Posted: 02/23/2012 1:22 pm

On Wednesday, a week after a federal court rejected California's Proposition 8, which bans same-sex marriage, another federal court issued a landmark ruling in favor of marriage equality. This time the law declared unconstitutional was the federal Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, which prohibits any federal agency from recognizing marriages between couples of the same-sex. Unlike the Proposition 8 case, in which the opinion was written by arch-liberal judge Stephen Reinhardt, Wednesday's DOMA ruling was issued by a conservative judge appointed by George W. Bush, Jeffrey White.

Surprisingly, where the liberal Reinhardt's opinion was narrow, the conservative White's opinion in the DOMA case was broad and far reaching.

Some supporters of marriage equality criticized Reinhardt's Proposition 8 opinion last week for being too timid. In contrast to the earlier decision of Judge Vaughn Walker in the Proposition 8 case, which held that marriage was a fundamental right for all Americans regardless of sexual orientation, Reinhardt's opinion refused to make such an audacious declaration. Instead, Reinhardt explained that Proposition 8 was unconstitutional because of the unique circumstances of California, which first allowed gay people to marry and then took that right away. Even if accepted by the Supreme Court, Reinhardt's approach would not require the recognition of same-sex marriage nationwide.

White's opinion in Wednesday's ruling was assertive and bold, calling into question every law that discriminates against LGBT people. White held that such laws are subject to "heightened scrutiny" by the courts, which means that the laws will be struck down unless the government can show very good reasons, backed by strong evidence, for the disparate treatment.

The justifications for DOMA, however -- which included encouraging responsible procreation and child-rearing, nurturing traditional marriage, and preserving scarce government resources -- had little to no evidence to support them. He cited, for example, numerous studies proving that children are not harmed by being raised in a gay household and he found no credible evidence that allowing gays to marry hurts opposite-sex couples.

In requiring courts to apply heightened scrutiny to laws discriminating against gays and lesbians, White's opinion showed the profound influence of the Obama administration's announcement last year that it will not defend DOMA. (The current case was being defended by lawyers hired by Congress.) The administration stated that, in its view, heightened scrutiny was appropriate in cases of anti-gay discrimination -- a daring position at the time given the Supreme Court had never held that, despite several opportunities to do so. White cited the Obama administration's announcement as support for his own ruling.

When the Obama administration first announced that it wouldn't defend DOMA, I criticized that decision here. Although I still have concerns -- it could provide a precedent for, say, a future Santorum administration to refuse to defend Obama's healthcare reform law -- the game-changing impact of the Obama announcement can't be denied. Achieving equal citizenship for LGBT people, the great civil rights issue of our day, is well worth such risks. Turns out that Obama was right about DOMA and it was me who was wrong.

Whether White's ruling in the DOMA case will be upheld on appeal, no one knows. But his is the second federal court decision to declare DOMA unconstitutional, suggesting that the tide is turning quickly against anti-gay discrimination -- even among many conservatives. And for that, at least some of the credit goes to the brave decision of the Obama administration not to defend this statutory testament to anti-gay prejudice.

 

Follow Adam Winkler on Twitter: www.twitter.com/adamwinkler

On Wednesday, a week after a federal court rejected California's Proposition 8, which bans same-sex marriage, another federal court issued a landmark ruling in favor of marriage equality. This time th...
On Wednesday, a week after a federal court rejected California's Proposition 8, which bans same-sex marriage, another federal court issued a landmark ruling in favor of marriage equality. This time th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 47
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
jerryatthebeach
Till Death Do You Barrier Island...
04:52 PM on 02/26/2012
I think the Republicans are finally waking up and realizing that if they don't go with the flow of the 21st century. The party becomes obsolete...
02:51 PM on 02/24/2012
Hey suffy, where you at? I told you the Higher Courts would put a beat down on Prop 8. This proves that not only can the Constitution be upheld but can be done so with a conservative Judge's ruling. Whaaaaaat?
photo
racmd
Just riding the wave of life
01:18 PM on 02/24/2012
I posted after Obama refused to try the DOMA any further that it was a slick move on his part. I now have the proof. Not only was the refusal to continue to defend the act a slick move....but by repealling the DADT President Obama carefully placed the government in a situation whereby it would have to begin to provide same sex partners with health insurance, housing, family coverage and all of this without a whisper from the House of Representative or the Senate.
Justice White did what he had to do...and the gay-lesbian community needs to let every judge, politician and presidential candidate know that we do have not only implied power by numbers...but we have actual power by dollars ....and the time has come when we will have our civil liberties guaranteed by law!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
03:06 PM on 02/24/2012
DOMA will be dead in SCOTUS soon enough to. Conservatives can bark, but they eventually will reach a point where they can either be anti-DOMA or pro-estate-tax. Their heads will explode. When push comes to shove, they will always follow the money, regardless of their social positions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BooBoo Bob
Fighter, activist, bon-vivant and lover.
08:29 AM on 02/24/2012
I'm so proud of Judge White. He has ruled in fairness. The fact that he is a conservative really does show that the tide is turning. I'm looking forward to the day when gay people can just live. The fight is tiring and the road is long and some of us need to catch our breath. :0-)
pavementends42
Micro-bio is a study, not a blurb.
09:47 AM on 02/24/2012
The tides are turning and it's impossible to justify such laws with just bigoted consensus, anymore. Troubling how slowly things change but, "democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms," according to Churchill.
12:36 PM on 02/24/2012
Most of the previous rulings against marriage discrimination have been issued by conservative-appointed judges. I think that's important to note. It drives the rightwingnuts crazy and they don't discuss it but conservative legal principles strongly support equal legal rights for all. That's why the religionists and rightwingnuts have mounted their "activist judges must be stopped" campaign: they can't say that it's liberal judges, but it's not only liberal judges striking down discriminatory marriage laws
07:48 AM on 02/24/2012
Conservatives have ignored the very elementary point that gay marriage IS the conservative option for gay men and lesbians.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:48 PM on 02/23/2012
What I also find encouraging is that no haters have ( as of yet ) found the courage or literacy to berate this appointee of Dubya.
I'm also glad to see that the system MAY work, sometimes.

Proud father of a gay daughter
photo
DessieRandom
ಠ_ಠ
08:27 PM on 02/23/2012
Amazing! And about time! :)
07:08 PM on 02/23/2012
I don't know how it took this long. DOMA is a plain violation of the Constitution, having no basis in any enumerated power. Our Congresscritters need to understand that from their point of view, "marriage" is whatever the state that performed the marriage tells them it is. If they don't like it, they chose the wrong profession.
07:06 PM on 02/23/2012
This is the case I would love to see before the SCOTUS. The broad nature of the judge's decision may be the silver bullet to kill DOMA.
01:18 PM on 02/24/2012
Indeed, and perhaps the rest of the bigoted laws.
photo
MsMoonpieJD
I have badges but HuffPo won't show them.
06:02 PM on 02/23/2012
I find it interesting that while Rick Santorum, Newt and Mitt are arguing about who is the biggest conservative and sounding all medieval, the state legislatures and the courts are calmly taking progressive measures to ensure marriage equality.

This shows you how out of touch the party of rich white old men has become.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tainteddr34ms
We don't have to accept hate to be tolerant.
05:18 PM on 02/23/2012
So republicans? Care to explain how this is liberal bias and not following the constitution? From a Bush appointee? But then the fact the Walker was a Reagan appointee didn't stop any of you so...come on, how is this one liberal bias?
01:14 PM on 02/27/2012
I've already seen the reaction on the right-wing blogosphere. Did you know that this judge is in CALIFORNIA? And remember how Vaughn Walker was too blinded by gayness to have rendered a fair decision in court? Well now they've broadened the argument considerably, by the transitive property, any judge who rules in favour of gay rights in any way must be gay. It's the only explanation left to someone who cannot consider the possibility that they might be wrong.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:24 PM on 02/23/2012
A similar decision made by Jean Chretien, the Canadian PM of the day, is what ended the battle for equal marriage in Canada. The superior bench in three provinces separately found the definition of marriage unconstitutional, and the federal government announced that it would not be appealing those decisions to the federal supreme court. Seeing this, the remaining provinces fell into line and began issuing marriage licenses to same sex couples.
04:13 PM on 02/23/2012
Wonderful! People are finally starting to open their eyes and minds. :) beautiful!
04:06 PM on 02/23/2012
The President knows what he's doing and it baffles the right (Wrong) wing nuts. They say he leads from behind, but surely they don't realize that he has out foxed them on almost every issue. The President knew that what would he ask for would be rejected so he did his work from "behind" and it worked out correctly. The gay community should be very happy with what President Obama forced to happen without him coming out and asking for the right legislation that supports the gay community.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fancy from delancey
Disgusted but still amused
04:05 PM on 02/23/2012
DOMA was a shameful moment in this country's legislative history, and one of the worst stains on Bill Clinton's legacy.
photo
MsMoonpieJD
I have badges but HuffPo won't show them.
06:03 PM on 02/23/2012
This is the beginning of the end of state DOMAs, too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gibby1855
06:15 PM on 02/23/2012
What about the stain on Monica's dress