More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Afton Branche

Afton Branche

Posted: June 25, 2010 02:34 PM

CEOs Join Cities in the Fight for Immigration Reform

What's Your Reaction:

From police chiefs to mayors, city leaders have been increasingly outspoken about the pressing need for federal immigration reform. And with good reason: though regulating immigration is an exclusively federal task, local leaders are the ones who must deal with both the political pressures and practical challenges that stem from our unworkable immigration system. Just last week, an estimated 200 mayors gathered at the U.S. Conference of Mayors took a unified stance on the issue and passed resolutions opposing Arizona's law and calling for immigration reform.

And yesterday, in perhaps the most high profile effort to date, a group of mayors joined forces with prominent business leaders to announce the "Partnership for a New American Economy," a coalition formed to make the economic case for immigration reform. New York's own Mayor Bloomberg announced co-chairs from a diverse collection of cities: Mayor Castro of San Antonio, Mayor Nutter from Philadelphia, Mayor Phil Gordon from Phoenix and Mayor Villaraigosa from Los Angeles. From the business end, co-chairs include CEOs Rupert Murdoch, Robert Iger from Disney Co. and Jim McNerney of Boeing.

Of the effort, Phoenix Mayor Gordon says: "Delays at the federal level have created tension in our streets and economic hardship for our already budget-challenges cities and communities. Immigration reform that secures our borders and encourages legal migration is absolutely essential to our country's economic recovery."

Granted, the economic case for immigration reform isn't a new argument. Academics, activists and others have long held that reworking our immigration system will both bolster the economic contributions immigrants make to cities and yield sizable benefits for the country as a whole. But it's significant that in the ever-polarized immigration debate, a powerful group of elected officials and business titans are willing to take a rational look at the facts and advocate for immigration reform.

It's not surprising that the coalition argues for policies to "attract the world's best and brightest" and "remain competitive in the 21st century"; these phrases are something of a mantra for business leaders and moderate politicians looking to support immigration reform. The coalition also backs the standard increased border security and employer verification principles. What's a bit more unexpected is that the Partnership also favors establishing a path to legal status for currently undocumented immigrants. In our current immigration debate, any mention of an earned legalization program seems to elicit the knee-jerk "no amnesty" response. It's refreshing to hear a group of leaders--including the owner of Fox News, no less--publicly promoting comprehensive immigration reform that includes such a measure. Indeed, San Antonio Mayor Castro says: "We need to hit the reset button to bring the immigration debate out of the realm of political theater and into the arena of public policy."

In the coming months, the Partnership aims to work with Congress and President Obama to enact federal legislation that will solve the immigration crises plaguing our cities and states. But this announcement comes at a time when even Democratic support for immigration reform is flagging. Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL), a tireless supporter of immigration reform and co-sponsor of the only comprehensive bill in Congress, said that there aren't enough Democratic votes for the measure to pass the House. Perhaps a vote of confidence from leaders of our nation's largest cities and corporations is just what our federal legislators need to continue fighting for comprehensive immigration reform.

 

Follow Afton Branche on Twitter: www.twitter.com/AftonBrancheDMI

 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:50 PM on 06/30/2010
“What's really disturbing here is how some of you posters go out of your way to impugn the reputation of one of our highest and most respected leaders.

Sen. Boehner doesn't drink whiskey.

He prefers moonshine.
02:07 PM on 06/27/2010
Of course the CEO's support it, who doubted that? They want to keep wages low and that's the best way to do it. Unfortunately, both parties are right in line with their wishes. All of you who back illegal immigration are backing the same bad corporatist policies you moan against. Give me a party that secures our borders and establishes tariffs
12:05 AM on 06/27/2010
There is already a bipartisan plan for immigration reform which I support. It was done by the Jordan Commission and appointed by Clinton. It called for fencing along the border, verifiable IDs and employee verification being MANDATORY for all workers using the SS data base and no match letters. It was done by a black woman who had the respect of ALL Americans. She pointed out that our immigration policy should be done on the basis of what is in the national interest of the USA. She also said that the immgration policy is that those who should come here are allowed in, those who are NOT allowed in must be DEPORTED, and those who should not come in are KEPT OUT!

The Amnesty word was never uttered by her or her commission. She also pointed out that illegals drive down the wages of the most vulnerable segments of our country. SUPPORT Barbara Jordan's last legacy and fight amnesty!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ugly american
Just say "No!" But to What?
11:03 AM on 06/27/2010
The group that wants amnesty so bad does not have the interests of America at heart but Mexico. But since Mexico seems so desperate for it, it makes one wonder what that foriegn country is up to. The last time a nation tried to overwhelm us with their citizens was the 1930's. Then 1941 came along and we found out why.
02:08 PM on 06/27/2010
If you live in CA you know what they want...Reconquista...that's why they are flooding american and helping their people cross the border
11:06 PM on 06/26/2010
If they want the "best and brightest," what is the argument for allowing immigration ("legal" and illegal) to continue to be dominated by Mexico? Mexico has produced neither the best nor the brightest immigrants, and Mexicans have done precious little to distinguish themselves in the field of business or of invention in this country. 2nd generation educational attainment is terrible.

Or is it "racist" to point out facts and to ask the question "what can immigrants do for us?"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grlbhvingbadly
10:33 AM on 06/30/2010
It's times like these that I am happy the richest man on earth is Mexican.
10:19 PM on 06/26/2010
If there were plenty of jobs for American citizens, there wouldn't be a problem. Politicians are missing the picture here. The feds have let immigration laws go unenforced for too long. Now we are way beyond a matter of just giving people amnesty. They need to be deported and we need to do like other countries and make immigrants show that they have skills or already have jobs before they get here. We need jobs for Americans, and enforcement of current immigration laws. We DON"T need the feds trying to find ways to skirt the laws just so that they can get more Dem votes.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realitytrumpsbull
two 'alves of coconut!
09:59 PM on 06/26/2010
I'm for reform, as long as it's 'enforcement FIRST', and doesn't amount to a get-out-of-jail-free card for the people that have been flaunting the law all this time. And, given that two of the people mentioned are from states that've essentially gone bankrupt, Illinois, and California, I'm not too confident about economic recoveries, either. I think the reason that all the mayors are getting involved is because they see that if they don't pull a political 'hail mary', here, some of them might be receiving summons on the issue, for running 'sanctuary cities'. 20+ states are now considering following Arizona on immigration enforcement. There does come a point when the B.S. has worn too thin, and the People are put in a condition of deliberate economic/social duress as a result of what some city managers and business types and others have decided will be the future policy, sans a public vote on the matter. And, at that point, it's time to ask that the actual laws be enforced, and those found in breach, mayors included, get right with the law, or get out of dodge. Recall elections do work!
10:25 AM on 06/26/2010
Do any of you think tank folks ever consider the fact that the majority of the 12 million illegals who would become citizens will try to sponsor at least one family member, probably more, over the next decade. That doesn't sound like a good idea to me. Just how many people do you think our economy and environment can support? I mean seriously...
photo
jeffrey678
You don't happen to make it. You make it happen.
09:16 AM on 06/26/2010
If we had LOW UNEMPLOYMENT and more job creation this would not be an issue. The people who want MORE immigrants seem to be out of touch with reality when they call for more immigration at a time when we have more immigrants at any time in our history. link from the bls.gov , http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2009/mar/wk5/art02.htm. read it for yourself. Then compare the out of work Americans. http://moneymorning.com/2009/10/20/unemployment-recovery/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Caroli
Give peace a chance
08:54 AM on 06/26/2010
Along with reform and a path to citizenship for those already here, we need to step up the efforts to stop the flow of illegals coming into this country, and the way to do that is crack down on companies hiring them with a lot more scrutiny and progressive fines, otherwise reform's an open invitation for more illegals.
photo
jeffrey678
You don't happen to make it. You make it happen.
09:21 AM on 06/26/2010
Federal Immigration and Labor laws are NEVER enforced. What are the penalties for NON-enforcement ? NOTHING !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dtairtime
It is what it is
11:26 PM on 06/25/2010
Really?

You think CEO's care about the pressure on cities? Wake up. They care about their profits. They care about continuing their profits while keeping unemployment at 10%+. That way wages stay low and they come out ahead.

Mayors are either pandering. The only ones who are coming out against this are the ones with heavy latino communities.

It's too late to sell "comprehensive reform" as anything other then amnesty. Even with the media denying it and refusing to ever report it the word has gotten out.

Every group who comes out against AZ seems to have an agenda. The mayors are pandering, the CEO's are greedy, the immigration attorneys are greedy, the Hispanic community wants all their illegal friends/family to stay, (some-SEIU) unions want more membership and the priests want people who haven't heard they are pedophiles.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Emma2011
03:56 PM on 06/25/2010
What is lacking is leadership from Obama. He has put immigration reform on the backburner to protect Democratic lawmakers from having to vote on immigration reform. Immigration reform will be dead in the next Congress and so will Obama's re-election bid in 2012. The Latinos cannot re-elect a president who squandered sizeable majorities in the House and Senate and broke his promise on immigration reform at the expense of millions of suffering immigrants across the nation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrayRiv
Pro-Immigrant; Pro-gressive; PrO-bama...
03:24 PM on 06/25/2010
Good for the Mayors and the CEOs. Anything that gets the attention of even a single Republican on the Hill and keeps them from blocking immigration reform, the better. I don't think Rep. Gutierrez is fairly treated in this article. He said at a press conference that Dems alone do not have the votes and Republicans are needed (this makes it sound like Dem support is flagging, which is neither the case nor what Gutierrez said). He has made the point that the Dems will bring 200 votes to the table if the GOPers can muster 20 and a similar math exists on the Senate side. He would not keep pushing if he thought the votes (and not just the Dem votes) couldn't get us to 218 in the House and 60 in the Senate.