iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Aiko Stevenson

GET UPDATES FROM Aiko Stevenson
 

TEDxAntarctica: Solar Powered TEDx Event Takes Place in the Antarctic March 6

Posted: 03/ 4/2012 8:58 pm

The first solar powered TEDx event from Antarctica will be broadcast live from Paradise Bay on March 6. It's message: if alternative energy can work in the coldest, harshest, most unforgiving place on earth, it can be used anywhere.

The event is being spearheaded by Darren McGann from KPMG who has been inspired to tackle climate change since taking his first step onto the continent last year. He is one of 73 participants taking part in polar explorer turned environmentalist Robert Swan's 2012 International Antarctic Expedition.

Robert Swan OBE made the longest unassisted walk to the South Pole in 1984. Three years later, he went onto the North Pole and by age of 33, he became the first person in history to walk to both poles.

What started out "as an adventure to go boldly where no man has gone before" has evolved into a lifelong commitment for a continent whose future now hangs in the balance owing to climate change.

Air temperatures across the Antarctic have risen by more than 2 degrees celsius in the last 30 years. "It's the largest regional warming on Earth at this level," says Dr. John Turner of the British Antarctic Survey. And it's the western side of the continent that is heating up the most.

This dramatic pace of change could have devastating consequences for the rest of the world as the region holds enough water in its ice caps to raise sea levels by over 55 meters. That would leave major cities like New York, Hong Kong and London all underwater. Swan likens the Antarctic to a "canary in the coal mine."

The latest series of twisters to strike and tear across the U.S. partly stem from this year's milder winter and warmer start to spring. Regardless of what the climate change deniers may say, its effects are becoming increasingly loud and clear.

Last November, the United Nations issued a report predicting a rise in "wild weather" over the next century. The report considered the views of over 100 experts and took two years to complete. It states that "it is virtually certain that increases in the frequency and magnitude of warm daily temperature extremes will occur in the 21st century on a global scale."

The report came one week after the International Energy Agency (IEA) warned that the world is on the brink of irreversible climate change. According to its research, global warming will hit the point of no return in five years time.

In a world of 7 billion inhabitants, this may only accelerate as more and more people require their energy needs to be met. According to median demographic estimates, by 2050 the world's population will hit the 9 billion mark.

A need for a global climate deal couldn't be more pressing. But, failure to strike a deal at the 2009 Copenhagen summit points to a world reluctant to ween itself off of carbon emitting energy sources. Moreover, the global financial crisis has turned the world's gaze away from the challenge of climate change.

But in this day and age, the economy and the environment couldn't possibly be more closely interlinked. According to the World Economic Forum (WEF), in ten years time 1.2 billion young people will be looking for work, but there will only be 300 million jobs up for grabs. Innovating the green sector may be one of our best bets to solving both our environmental and economic woes.

In the words of Britain's former foreign secretary David Miliband: "We cannot let the age of austerity be the age of inaction. Reducing our dependence on foreign energy, investing in low-carbon infrastructure, and innovating and exporting green technologies are critical levers for reviving the UK's economy." Clearly, this applies not only to Britain, but to the rest of the world too.

In our great challenge against climate change, idealism must meet realism. As Richard Yemm, founder of Pelamis Wave Power in Scotland points out: "It's not just about environmental stewardship, it's about making a buck along the way too." Green energy represents an "economic opportunity" which will pave the way for our next industrial revolution.

So, returning back now to the solar powered TEDx event in Antarctica, let's hope that this broadcast from the most inhospitable place on earth will help move the issue of renewable energy forward. In Swan's own words: "I try to inspire young people on the issue by doing stuff .. not by talking, sending an email or passing along a YouTube clip... but by action."

Some say that the "future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams." May all the team at the TEDx event in Antarctica believe in the beauty of their dreams. And may our world believe in the future of renewable energy, and in the beauty of our planet that gives us home.

March 6: TEDxAntarcticPeninsula took place at Paradise Bay, Antarctica. For all updates on this event, please follow the Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/pages/TEDxAntarcticPeninsula/260740667332237?sk=wall

 

Follow Aiko Stevenson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@AikoStevenson

 
 
  • Comments
  • 21
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:05 PM on 03/05/2012
And ALL of the energy used to just get the participants there was also generated by solar energy?

Hardly. As much as I understand and support the cause, the bad habit of externalising real cost HAS TO STOP. Even among those who are on the right side of the fence.
06:15 AM on 03/06/2012
Lighten up. The 70 invited guests will probably be the most effective in retransmitting the ideas presented at Neko Harbour. I suspect that transportation has been offset in one form or another. This is the kind of thing you want to happen even if, it costs a little extra.
11:29 AM on 03/06/2012
"I suspect that transportation has been offset in one form or another. "

Unless you can find EVIDENCE for this statement, it is basically meaningless. In any case, offsets do nothing to eliminate the problem that people, even those who mean well, externalise cost without thinking twice. The problem here is in the human mind, not the fuel tanks of the planes that got these people there. Thanks for making my point for me.
photo
oneeasyrider
E=mc2: From light you exist
11:39 PM on 03/08/2012
SJ, your statement is a perfect opportunity to mention the phrase "penny wise dollar foolish."

In larger scope of GW, carbon footprint of these scientific educators is insignificant in the larger picture. You're normally reasonable and pragmatic...know you know what I'm talking about.

Don't try to win...just admit you made a mistake. ;-)
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
11:19 PM on 03/04/2012
It's hard to see any way of avoiding the drastic meltdown, if not the 55 meters sea level rise, which I just can't get my mind around. Scientists have under-estimated how rapidly the warming is progressing, or how, once set in motion, one failed system compromises another in a domino effect.

Today, listening to the McLaughlin show, my heart sank at the confident assertions by ALL that we must have the Keystone XL pipeline. Even liberal Eleanor Cliff assures us that it will be built once the route is altered for better safety. It mattered not one shred (not even to her) that she declared (truthfully) that the oil was destined for other parts, and not for the USA. They just kept up the same mantra: "We need the oil." They were also keen on fracking to the max.

So, solar event notwithstanding, the picture for the Antarctic, and indeed for the planet, is nor glowing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
03:13 PM on 03/05/2012
We hear about man's carbon footprint causing global warming but nothing of killing ecosystems that are the natural sequestration of those climate warming, heat trapping gases. While terrestrial ecosystems, that which will be destroyed for this planet devouring pipeline, occupy only 30 percent of the Earth's surface, these ecosystems create and support the vast majority of all life on the Earth. This pipeline will kill multi-thousands of acres of boreal, wetland, riverine, riparian and grassland [prairie; plains] ecosystems.

What sits on the Earth impacts the climate. When they plowed the Great Plains ecosystem for agriculture, that climate heated up. Our forested ecosystems [plants and trees covering ecosystems and their life giving soil] release oxygen, sequester the heat trapping gases while exhaling cooling water vapor that cools the leaves, the soil and the surrounding area, moderating the immediate and regional climates.

This pipeline will destroy oxygen releasing, the atmosphere, the climate, the sequestration of the heat trapping gases that will be re-released when the soil is disturbed and the plant biodiversity chopped down, adding massive amounts of the heat trapping gases to the atmosphere.

Ecosystems provide mankind with all his life giving and supporting functions, cycles and services and every and all reasons man breathes. And, climate regulation and moderation are listed as a natural ecosystem, free service. Killing the Earth to mitigate climate changes, still kills every and all reasons man exists. "In wildness is the salvation..."
photo
oneeasyrider
E=mc2: From light you exist
11:58 PM on 03/08/2012
Excellent post.
photo
oneeasyrider
E=mc2: From light you exist
11:58 PM on 03/08/2012
55 meter sea level rise is news to me and shocking...especially, because I know human nature just like you...we don't learn collectively until our backs are up against the wall. You and I are going to escape rapid changes coming but grandchildren surely will see onset of GW full effects.

It's too bad, too because it doesn't have to be that way. Solar investment (govt. loans managed by power companies or PACE loans) to immediately install roof-top solar panels on every roof in America is a simple solution but politicians are sadly dense and incompetent.

Humans will have to adapt quickly during the next hundred years. If projected methane (10x's more harmful than CO2 emissions) release from the ocean depths becomes reality, then it's going to be scary environmental change for billions of people.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Aiko Stevenson
07:33 AM on 04/03/2012
And that is why we need to act now before it's too late. We can not afford to wait for a really big climate change inspired event to wake us up to change for by then, it may already be too late. The world, our home, is already telling us that it needs out help NOW.