iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Al Franken

GET UPDATES FROM Al Franken
 

Fighting For America's Middle Class, Netroots Nation 2011

Posted: 06/23/11 03:49 PM ET

On Saturday, June 18th, I was given the honor of speaking at Netroots Nation 2011 in Minneapolis, the 6th annual convention of progressive grassroots leaders and activists. I was the opening speaker at Saturday's Morning Keynote session, which focused on how to save the middle class and build progressive infrastructure. I had an amazing time at the conference and met a ton of passionate activists and progressives.

It was fitting that Netroots Nation was in Minnesota this year. Minnesota is the state that sent Hubert Humphrey to the U.S. Senate, where he cheerfully waged--and usually won--great battles in the name of the young and the old, the poor and the vulnerable, the oppressed and the disenfranchised.

It's the state where Walter Mondale rose to become the living embodiment of common-sense Midwestern progressive values. And it's the state where Paul Wellstone became my hero--and the hero of a generation of progressives who believed, as he did, that we all do better when we all do better.

These Minnesotans were instrumental in establishing the America we know and love today - from building the social safety net to establishing workers' rights to investing in our manufacturing sector - they helped build the middle class. And defending those progressive values is crucial to saving the middle class today.

My speech, entitled: "The Attack on America's Middle Class, and the Plan to Fight Back," laid out some ideas on what we can do to preserve these values that began as 'progressive,' but have become simply American.

The full video and text of my speech is below. Enjoy!

The Attack on America's Middle Class, and the Plan to Fight Back
Netroots Nation 2011, welcome to Minnesota!

This is the state that sent Hubert Humphrey, the middle-class son of a pharmacist, to the U.S. Senate, where he cheerfully waged--and usually won--great battles in the name of the young and the old, the poor and the vulnerable, the oppressed and the disenfranchised.

This is the state where Walter Mondale--who, at the age of 20, had helped to organize Humphrey's first Senate campaign--rose to become the living embodiment of common-sense Midwestern progressive values.

And this is the state where Paul Wellstone, a professor down at Carleton College in Northfield, became my hero--and the hero of a generation of progressives who believed, as he did, that we all do better when we all do better. We all do better when we all have health care. We all do better when we all can get a good education. We all do better when we all can earn a fair wage at a good job. We all do better when we all can find a good home and economic security and justice when we're wronged.

---

Today, 100 years after Hubert Humphrey was born, nearly half a century after Walter Mondale began his legendary career in public service, and two decades after Paul Wellstone won his first race for the Senate, we gather in Minnesota to take stock.

We all believe that we all do better when we all do better. The question is: How are we doing?

And if we're talking about the fate of ordinary families, the answer is clear: We're losing.

The American middle class is in trouble. Median family income is down. Jobs are scarce. Opportunities people thought they'd earned through hard work are disappearing before theireyes. Working families are falling further and further behind.

And that means it's hard for progressives not to feel like we're losing, too. Our movement is about putting the concerns of those working Americans at the forefront of our national agenda.

Now, you can argue that Democrats in Congress should be doing more to win legislative battles--although, as someone who is in the room every day, I can tell you that I don't doubt for a second my colleagues' commitment to moving our country in the right direction.

And you can argue that the Democratic Party should be using different tactics to win elections.

But the fact remains: We as a progressive movement are losing the argument. On issue after issue, we're playing defense.

We're ready to fight for cap-and-trade. But instead, we're forced into an argument about whether global warming even exists.

We're ready tofight for the Employee Free Choice Act. But instead, we're forced into an argument about whether workers should have any rights at all. As proud as we all are of the fight our movement has shown in Wisconsin and around the country in the face of Republican efforts to end collective bargaining, we know that these aren't the conversations we should be having in the year 2011.

And instead of having a debate about what the government should be doing to help the struggling middle class, we're having a debate about what parts of the social safety net we should sacrifice in order to preserve and extend giveaways to the wealthiest few, and to well-connected corporations.

---

We can urge Democrats in Congress to stand stronger when Republicans hold our government hostage. We can urge each other to work harder to win elections. And you won't hear any disagreement from me on either count.

But if we're going to win these fights, we have to start by reclaiming the upper hand in the argument over what our country should be about. And I want to suggest that conservatives might just have given us the playbook.

For decades, their argument against progressive policies hasn't just been about the substance of our ideas, but about the scope of our vision. They call us radicals. They say we want to do too much, too fast. They accuse us of wanting to remake the fundamental fabric of American society, as if we were proposing to rip a few dozen stars off the flag.

They understand that Americans don't like radical change. We love our country, and are rightly proud of its traditions. We revere our past.

And it's easy to offer people a return to the "good ol' days"--when the economy was growing, everyone was optimistic, and we went to bed at night secure in the knowledge that our kids would have better opportunities than we had.

What conservatives miss when they talk about those "good ol' days," of course, is that they were good for a reason.

---

Some of you might have heard me talk about my childhood here in Minnesota. My dad never graduated high school. He was a printing salesman. We lived in a two-bedroom, one-bath house in St. Louis Park, Minnesota. We weren't rich--but we felt secure.

I felt like the luckiest kid in the world. And I was. I was growing up middle-class in a time when growing up middle-class in America meant there would be jobs for my parents, good schools for me to prepare myself for a career, and, if I worked hard and played by the rules, a chance for me to do anything I wanted. Including being a comedy writer and then a Senator. In that order.

Between 1947 and 1977, we experienced three decades of incredible growth--growth that flowed to the middle class.

And as we grew, we grew together. Everyone benefited. Income for the top fifth of Americans grew by 99 percent, and the income of those in the bottom fifth rose by 116 percent. I know that's hard to believe. The wages of the bottom fifth grew more than the wages of the top fifth. Really. That happened.

Meanwhile, the middle class could afford to buy more, so there was more demand--and that meant there were more jobs.

And with the tax dollars that came from all this growth, the government built 40,000 miles of straight freeways that greatly reduced the cost of transporting goods, invested in education that prepared kids for the workforce and innovations that created entire new industries, and strengthened the social safety net so that everyone could aspire to the middle class.

Oh. And we sent a man to the moon. Actually, a number of them.

---

Which brings me to my wife, Franni. When she was seventeen months old, her dad--a decorated veteran of World War II--died in a car accident, leaving my future mother-in-law widowed at age 29 with five kids.

That family made it because of Social Security survivor benefits.

Every single one of the four girls in Franni's family went to college, thanks to Pell Grants and other scholarships. My brother-in-law, Neil, went into the Coast Guard, where he became an electrical engineer.

My mother-in-law got herself a $300 GI loan to fix her roof, and used the money instead to go to the University of Maine. She became a grade school teacher and taught poor kids, and so her loans were forgiven.

She and all five of those kids became productive members of society. They pulled themselves up by their bootstraps--but first, they had to have the boots. And the government gave Franni's family the boots.

---

These are stories about security and opportunity. These are stories about the American dream. These are stories about the country we are so proud to call our own, the one we all want to protect and preserve.

But they are also stories about a progressive America, one in which the government adopts the principle that we all do better when we all do better.

It was our vision that government should provide economic security for the middle class and provide the boots for people looking to pull themselves up into it.

It was our vision that America should be in the business of making things, and that we should invest in innovation and infrastructure so that we could have an economy where there's enough for everyone.

It was our vision that American workers should earn enough to buy what they produced.

It was our vision that everyone should have basic rights at work, no matter how powerful their employer, and that the law should be a place where anyone could turn for justice.

And although that vision has always remained a work in progress, Hubert Humphrey and Walter Mondale and Paul Wellstone and generations of progressives made this country what we dreamed it could be for millions and millions of families.

And while our vision was broad, the policies we fought for--from the social safety net to workers' rights to investment in our manufacturing sector--were grounded in values that began as "progressive," but have become simply American.

---

And having built that America we're all so proud of, it's now up to us to save it.

Progressives, in a way, are the new conservatives. We want to conserve what we fought to build. And the right-wingers who call themselves conservatives are the ones who want radical change in the way our government works, and the way our country works.

Newt Gingrich went on "Meet the Press" last month and said that the Ryan plan that would end Medicare was "right-wing social engineering," that it was "too big a jump." He has spent the month since apologizing--but for once in his life, Newt was right.

Actually, that's not fair. He was calling for electronic medical records years before the rest of the country got on board with the idea. So he was right the one other time. Gotta give a guy credit.

But ending Medicare, like privatizing Social Security, is astonishingly radical.

Part of the middle class promise is that, after a lifetime of hard work, you'll be able to retire and enjoy the fruits of that labor. Medicare was established to secure that promise. There was no private insurance market for people over 65 back in 1964. And if Republicans destroy Medicare, there won't be one now. The average Social Security benefit is $15,000. The average out of pocket health care cost for seniors under the Ryan plan would be over $12,000.

So if Republicans eliminate Medicare, America will become a country in which you can never retire--and once you physically can no longer work, you are desperately poor until you die. That is a radical change to our society.

The Republican agenda is a radical vision in which Medicaid is slashed to the bone--in which we start to balance the budget on the backs of, literally, our most vulnerablecitizens. Say you have a parent who suffers from dementia and lives in a nursing home. If Republicans pass these Medicaid cuts, you'd better be ready to take that parent in. That is a radical change to our society.

The Republican vision is one in which we cut billions from job training and education and infrastructure--the things that enable ordinary Americans to find good jobs, enable businesses to find the customers and trained workers they need to grow, and enable middle class families to build real economic security. All these cuts, just to fund more tax cuts for people who are richer than any people have ever been in the history of the world.

It's a vision in which workers have no protections from their employers, ordinary Americans have no access to the courts when they're wronged, and big corporations control everything from our media to the Internet to our democracy.

After decades of fighting against any interpretation of the Constitution that secured basic rights for all Americans, conservatives have somehow found in that text special First Amendment rights for oil companies.

The growing gap between rich and poor, the failure of our generation to leave our kids the America we inherited from our parents, and the inability of our political system to respond to these crises--for today's Republican Party, these are features, not bugs.

The right wants America to be a nation of social Darwinism in which the powerful are protected by the government, and the rest of us are on our own.

To achieve it, they'll say things they know aren't true, disown ideas they used to support, contradict themselves on everything from how the legislative process shouldoperate to how weather works. They'll let the government shut down, let us default on our debts, bring our country to its knees to fulfill their ideological fervor.

---

So how do we stop them? Well, I haven't been in politics my whole life. But I think we always win when we work together and stand on our values. Medicare, and Medicaid, and investment in infrastructure, and public education, and workers' rights, and civil rights, and equal rights under the law--these aren't just good progressive ideas, they're examples of traditional American values.

And when Republicans talk about destroying these things, they're talking about turning their backs on the America we've built. They're talking about ripping apart the fabric of our society. They're talking about a transformation of our country--about undermining our tradition so radically, they might as well be tearing stars off the flag.

And we should say so.

Here in the home of Humphrey and Mondale and Wellstone, I urge you all to stand up for the America our movement helped to build. Stand up for the principle that we should grow together instead of growing apart. Stand up for the principle that we all do better when we all do better.

Be proud to stand for Medicare and Medicaid. Be proud to stand with workers. Be proud to stand for a government that invests in America, a legal system that respects the rights of all individuals, and the progressive values we've fought so hard to defend. Be proud of who we are and what we've built.

We have a tough fight ahead. But it's one we have to win. It's not just the Democratic Party that's depending on us. It's the American middle class. And it's the American tradition, one that we helped to create--and one that we must now protect.

Thank you.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 822
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:01 AM on 07/01/2011
Franken makes a number of excellent points, but spoils it by painting the right-versus-left, ultraconservative-versus-progressive, feudalism-versus-democracy-with-a-small-"d" conflict as a Democratic-versus-Republican battle. Those of us in what's left of the middle class have learned and/or are learning that the Democratic Party isn't on our side, even if some individual Democrats are--and the party doesn't always allow those individuals to vote against destructive, corporatist legislation.
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
11:52 PM on 06/30/2011
Thank you, Al, I _knew_ you'd make a great Senator, and you have proved me right! THANK YOU also for not only delivering this speach at Netroots Nation, but also bringing it here, for us.

Most sincerely, your supporter,
Richard
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martin Houde
I am no microbe
01:39 PM on 06/28/2011
Rightists say that poor people are poor because of their own faults. They even say they "choose" to be poor. To them, Progressives only want to give them money they don't deserve.

They fail to realize that this is help to give them a level playing field. You don't choose to which parents you are born from, Christians, Muslims, rich, poor, lawyer, trucker, alcoholic, single-mother, full loving family, etc.

Just because you never knew your father and your mom had to raise 6 kids alone doesn't make you underserving of a fair start. It doesn't mean you deserve to get trampled on by some rich people's kids who don't know any better.

Private enterprise will never truly give you that level playing field. Only the government can.

The American Dream is that anyone, with hard work, can succeed. With the utmost privatization of everything American, from commerce to health care to legal rights, the corporations are destroying that Dream, in the name of the very same Dream...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tweed7t
wear sunscreen and dance
02:16 PM on 06/28/2011
The republicans believe that unemployment goes up only when a bunch of people in unison across this country and unknown to each other decide "lets be poor". Ah, maybe a comet passing earth to close causes unemployment, nothing to do with banks, wall street or corporations. Its the workers fault.
05:59 PM on 06/28/2011
No dear heart, Republicans believe that the policy makers in Washington decide that they want us to "be poor" because they can manipulate us better when we are down and out. It is not the workers fault, and it is not the business' fault as a rule, it is this wacko government and its stupid policies.
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
11:54 PM on 06/30/2011
Very well written, Martin, and a good complementary piece to what Al has shared with us.

Fanning you for that!

RT
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martin Houde
I am no microbe
01:30 PM on 06/28/2011
Amen.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:31 PM on 06/27/2011
Al, I love you. You stand up for the underdogs. Right now, the ordinary citizen is the underdog. You know that Humphrey and Mondale are the boogie men for the DLC corporatism sellouts, yet you challenge them directly! Thank you.

Vote for the Progressive Caucus in the primaries and the Dems in the general. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Leadership_Council
http://www.dlc.org/

Versus the Real Progressives, the Liberals, the Progressive Caucus
http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/
Read their budget! It's the only one that solves the problems.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:57 AM on 06/27/2011
what mr franken fails to mention is that its democratic wild spending spree over the past several years that have us in this situation. merely increasing taxes will only give the dems more money to waste. big spending cuts need to be made. it will hurt, but not as much as the pain our grandchildren will feel if it isnt done.
09:59 AM on 06/27/2011
Where have you been from 2000 to 2008 when it was the republicans that took a surplus and ran the biggest deficits this country had seen up till then and took the national debt from 5 trillion to 10 trillion dollars.
The democratics have not helped but to say it is all there fault is crazy. The last budget that GWB sent to congress had a 1.3 trillion dollar deficit. Some will say that his last budget was not passed , but it still had a 1.3trillion dollad deficit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftalwaysright
don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining!
10:01 AM on 06/27/2011
You seem to have forgotten George Bush's two wars that helped put us in debt and giving tax breaks to the rich at the same time. George also initiated the "Home ownership plan" that allowed people to buy homes with no down payment and investment companies to bundle these risks and sell them which helped put us in debt. And don't forget TARP, another mistake that has brought us to this point. Democrats are willing to cut back if the big tax breaks are widdled down which wouldn't make a dent in the "have's more" income. I just hope the Dems and the Prez stick to their guns on this one. Dick Cheney said "deficits don't matter", and Bush ran with it.
RSK1177
Concerned
08:18 AM on 06/27/2011
Since the Democrats are using class warfare in their talking points and attacks against the Republicans, what exactly is the definition of middle class? What annual income? What net worth?The real median household income today is $49,777 vs. $50,112 in Jan. '09. Poverty rate , individuals is 14.3% vs. 13.2% in Jan. '09. Number of unemployed now is 14.6 million vs. 11.6 million in Jan. '09. In the last two years, Obama and the Democrats have managed to lower median household income, increase the number of people in poverty, increase the number of people unemployed, and a few other key indexes. The numbers can be verfied by the Bur. of Labor Statistics. If anyone's hurting the middle class, thank Obama, Pelosi, Reid and the rest who have been in power for the last two plus years.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fouritiswritten
09:55 AM on 06/27/2011
if you had an inch of intelligent collective data you would know that statistics like this has a 6-10 year back drop so what we are experienceing now are from policies that happened or developed six to ten years perviously . so blame this mess on the bsh administration and big business and wall street and the unwillingness to regulate them...obama, pelosi or ried had nothing to control the policy's of george w bush and karl rove.......
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:33 PM on 06/27/2011
Class warfare is the pastime of the rich. The poor are just trying to survive.

"I hope we shall . . . crush in [its] birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations." Thomas Jefferson

"When economic power became concentrated in a few hands, then political power flowed to those possessors and away from the citizens, ultimately resulting in an oligarchy or tyranny." John Adams

"As riches increase and accumulate in few hands . . . the tendency of things will be to depart from the republican standard." Alexander Hamilton

"We can have democracy in this country or we can have great concentrated wealth in the hands of a few, but we cannot have both." Justice Louis Brandeis
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:14 AM on 06/27/2011
the only middle class, if you've noticed, are government workers. what are they going to do? pay each other?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martin Houde
I am no microbe
01:44 PM on 06/28/2011
Of course not.

Yet corporations are working very hard to make it so.
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
12:06 AM on 07/01/2011
You mean government workers are only middle class, right? Sure, what else would you expect? Should they work in poverty? Or work to be rich?

If you meant that the middle class is only made up of government workers, that's preposterous, but a plausible plan for the Republicans.
07:06 AM on 06/27/2011
You certainly have that correctly, if we give back any more (which the average working american has been supporting government for YEARS ) there will be no more AMERICA as we have known it. No more land of the free or home of the brave. We should make them change it to home of the greedy, self serving, morally corrupt .....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
behumane
01:54 AM on 06/27/2011
Where the debt comes from aka where our money goes:


http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2011/05/chart-day-where-debt-comes
01:05 AM on 06/27/2011
Just like the first collered president Bill Clinton as he passed NAFTA and we watche the jobs go south. Maybe he was a Republican.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wssweeps
right is right
07:32 AM on 06/27/2011
No! he was a typical democrat.
10:09 AM on 06/27/2011
Please get your history right. Yes Clinton did sign NAFTA into law but it was George HB Bush that
negotiated it.
photo
BlueGorilla
I Prefer Civilisation To Conservativsm
11:50 PM on 06/26/2011
I agree wholeheartedly ,but as a Brit would change one of his terms.What Al describes as middle class describes our much of our working class.We had growth..in fact the liberal idea that progress was continuous was very much alive until the dark days before Thatcherism..when investment was discouraged and asset stripping unemployment grew ,where unions were called"the enemy within" as somehow they were less British than the outsourcers
My dad was a car worker,a steel maker,who worked hard ,my mum did too in dead end job's on supermarket check outs.I benefited as a child from free eye tests,dental care,education and all of the other things that civilised capitalism for the wealth producers,the hard working men and women who made other people rich,but wanted a bit back in return.This was the post war deal for our brave men and women who had helped defeat the Nazi filth.Our welfare state went further than America's ,though if America's greatest leader Roosevelt had lived longer in good health,then I might not be saying that.
The truth is that for genuine equality of opportunity,all society's need a welfare state,good quality education ,a ladder of opportunity and a health system that prevents the parents of all children from dying young of preventable disease.We also need a bit of fairness when it comes to wages..not some Walmart style slave labour system that makes the poorest take two or three jobs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martin Houde
I am no microbe
01:48 PM on 06/28/2011
I'm in Canada. Same here.
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
12:12 AM on 07/01/2011
While we are two great peoples separated by a common language, I very much appreciate your comments here. I think our term "Middle Class" is roughly analogous to your "working class", but with a little bit more white-collarism on the upper end of it - Doctors, lawyers, and other working professionals who aren't "blue-collar" laborers. But then, since we speak the same language, I have no really good idea what your term "working class" really entails.

Anyway, thanks for posting. F&F.
photo
BlueGorilla
I Prefer Civilisation To Conservativsm
06:58 PM on 07/01/2011
There seem to be a few definitions of what working class means here..some people extend it to anyone who relies on a wage either as their only or their major income,so from street cleaner to doctor.Some people include only blue collar people in their definition.My parents were blue collar,though my dad's job as an engineer's driller was skilled so we had a level of income that was quite good..especially in the post war era where blue collar workers achieved a big rise in pay,particularly if well unionised.I would imagine that as we became slightly better off,we would have been classed as middle class in America (moving out of social housing,more disposable income,occasional holiday etc)..but in Britain we were solidly working class due to blue collar jobs of my parents,their level of education (no qualifications from school,no higher education) and cultural habits.We British are reckoned to be obsessed with class though..I don't think that is always true and if it was then it is less so now.I think one key difference between postwar US and UK in this respect is that people felt proud to be working class in Britain..and no higher earning factory worker wanted to be middle class..whereas in America being able to feel part of the middle class was a widespread aspiration.Thanks for your reply and I hope the above was useful.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Crabtree
11:37 PM on 06/26/2011
A billion seperate victims in the democrat party..It is always some-one elses fault you have never acheived financial independence ..never gained ground on anything you attempted.. always the rich mans fault......DNC philosophy..create more victims and never lose another election..without victims.. no democrat party...a sad fact
02:39 AM on 06/27/2011
there are many financially independent people in the Dem. party---many on welfare call themselves conservatives.......at least you could be a little creative with your lies
photo
liljoe62
Thoughts that the LEFT cant DEFEND!
09:38 AM on 06/27/2011
Sorry to inform you, but hes telling the truth! You need to put DOWN your donkey pin, and look what your party is REALLY doing! Creating a nanny state, where everyone has healthcare ,from birth to death sounds great. However, paying for it is a little difficult! Maintaining it, is almost impossible! I dont have anything against the thought, just putting it into action, well, thats very iffy! she43, you really need to think hard about what you right about someone else, it might be construed as name calling, without proof! Calling someone a liar, is easy, proving it is where you are in trouble!
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
12:13 AM on 07/01/2011
"It is always some-one elses fault you have never acheived financial independen­ce"

PERFECTLY describes most red-state inhabitants - and they're in red-states because they do what again? Oh, that's right, they vote Republican against their own self interests.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
archstantn
I came, I saw, I conked out
10:31 PM on 06/26/2011
I'm convinced that it was Reaganomics that sunk the middle class in America. Exporting our manufacturing capacity overseas, cutting taxes for the rich, and breaking unions. A service economy is what Reagan promised for future Americans.A nation of butlers, cooks, waiters, gardeners and nannies hardly defines an economic juggernaut. Franken is right, but, explain that to the base of the Republican Party. Folks who should know better....It can't be done.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
everything news
I have no bio.
11:05 PM on 06/26/2011
Yeah, Regan thought that "trikle down economics" (Reganamics) would be the answer.
No way, that rich money never trickled anywhere but into the banks.
photo
liljoe62
Thoughts that the LEFT cant DEFEND!
09:41 AM on 06/27/2011
All I know is, during Reagans administration, I was making about TWICE as much money, as now! When Clinton took over, I had to work 2 jobs, just to make ends meat! Back to 1 job ,when Bush ran the show! Now looking for ANY job, under Obama! Whats up with that?!!
01:04 AM on 06/28/2011
What else should a Republican operative expect?
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
12:16 AM on 07/01/2011
It took a long time for his policies to come home to roost - they really started hitting home hard during the early years of W.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
everything news
I have no bio.
10:28 PM on 06/26/2011
I totally agree with everything you said. It was an excellent article that made me long for the good old days only in the fact that the middle class flourished and the country was not falling in the toilet.
All those that want to change everything for the worst must not know what it was like then.
Parents did not have to worry whether they could make it with their savings or would they have to ask their children to pitch in. Social security was the right addition to a familie's income and security. The children could easily get a college education,as the generations before could not,
people could own a home, the American dream way, there were two cars in a garage, families could take their children on summer vacations, mortgages were paid and people could own a home outright.
So were are we now? All of that is gone for the middle class. Only the rich can do those things without worriyng about anything. Lucky them. A country without a middle class is like a third world country, only very poor or very rich living in mantions. But we must restore those days if only the rich are a little less selfish and more patriotic for the love of their country.
08:52 AM on 06/27/2011
You are full of it. I am middle class, retired teacher, own my own house, have two cars, sent my kids to camp, took vacations, have a very nice savings account. Teacher pay was never huge like it has been up north (no unions where I live), but I live the American Dream. It has only been since Obama was elected that I am feeling a little bit of a pinch.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftalwaysright
don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining!
10:11 AM on 06/27/2011
Good for you but I have no doubt that without unions the working stiff would still be making poverty wages with out them. They were formed by working people because that was the only way to improve working conditions and pay, you benefited from them whether you admit it or not.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
everything news
I have no bio.
09:37 AM on 06/29/2011
I worked in a high school as a secretary for 22 years and it was thanks to the Union that all of us got great health insurance, pensions that are helping us stay above water. For being a teacher you sure have a funny way of expressing yourself. I am full of it? Those are my opinions as yours are yours. No need to be rude.