iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Al Gore

GET UPDATES FROM Al Gore
 

Extreme Weather Disaster Area: This Is What the Climate Crisis Looks Like

Posted: 07/15/2012 9:20 pm

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has named over 1,000 counties in 26 states as disaster areas -- the largest declaration in history -- as a result of the recent drought, wildfires and other extreme weather events threatening agriculture and many other industries across the entire country. As scientists have told us, this is what the climate crisis looks like.

2012-07-16-droughtmap2.jpg

 
 
 

Follow Al Gore on Twitter: www.twitter.com/algore

FOLLOW GREEN
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,361
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (17 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:27 AM on 08/14/2012
BALANCE & BETTER DECISION MAKERS is the answer. We are out of $ and the climate change issues WILL get worst! (alot of people will die-lets try to minimize it NOW by making BETTER DECISIONS today- For Tomorrow) WHY in GODS name aren't we trying to FIX the problem? Are people really THAT stupid to think it will fix itself? Mother nature can and will get rid of men-if things aren't balanced properly (Who do you think you are?) Let's protect what we have left- make efficent the resouces we have left and do what we can to FIX the problem and yes that means corporations need to help BALANCE the TOXINS put out there, BALANCED REGULATION NOT GREED!
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
04:33 PM on 07/23/2012
American Geophysical Union
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Earth's climate is now clearly out of balance and is warming. Many components of the climate system—including the temperatures of the atmosphere, land and ocean, the extent of sea ice and mountain glaciers, the sea level, the distribution of precipitation, and the length of seasons—are now changing at rates and in patterns that are not natural and are best explained by the increased atmospheric abundances of greenhouse gases and aerosols generated by human activity during the 20th century…

In the next 50 years, even the lower limit of impending climate change—an additional global mean warming of 1°C above the last decade—is far beyond the range of climate variability experienced during the past thousand years and poses global problems in planning for and adapting to it. Warming greater than 2°C above 19th century levels is projected to be disruptive, reducing global agricultural productivity, causing widespread loss of biodiversity, and—if sustained over centuries—melting much of the Greenland ice sheet with ensuing rise in sea level of several meters. If this 2°C warming is to be avoided, then our net annual emissions of CO2 must be reduced by more than 50 percent within this century.

http://www.agu.org/sci_pol/positions/climate_change2008.shtml
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:16 PM on 07/22/2012
This is what an fascist opportunist looks like.

Al Gore (whom I once voted for) advocates a false solution that makes him wealthy, while pushing the poorest people, with the smallest foot prints off the cliff of subsistence. Carbon tax applied to the cost of things, food, water, utilities, fuel, medicine with over 3.5 billion people living on less, LESS than $2/day, we can expect mass suffering, and starvation.

While robbing from the poor, and servicing the rich, and more centralized banking, Cap and Trade allows the biggest, wealthiest polluters to go on polluting, by buying their way out of it with carbon speculation swaps. This is called the “selling of indulgences”.

Carbon tax is indeed a tax added to the price of EVERYTING, and we are being taxed by the United Nations, a non-democratic governance, that appoints its members out of corporate sponsored Non-Government Organizations (NGO’s). That’s institutionalized revolving door politics, the very definition of fascism. This is taxation without representation.

Back before he became U.S. President Obama served on the board of directors for the Joyce Foundation when it gave CCX nearly $1.1 million in two separate grants that were instrumental in developing and launching the privately-owned Chicago Climate Exchange, which now calls itself “North America’s only cap and trade system for all six greenhouse gases, with global affiliates and projects worldwide.”

Essentially Obama helped fund the profiteers of the carbon taxation program that he then steered it through Congress.
06:55 PM on 07/23/2012
A revenue neutral carbon tax could distribute the proceeds evenly to everyone.

Those who used the average amount of carbon would neither gain nor lose. Those who used a lot would pay more in taxes than they get back. Those who used less than average would get more money back than they paid in taxes.

This would be extremely simple to implement and arguably quite fair (we would simply be reimbursing people for damage done to the environment they use). But it would penalize the rich and reward the poor, so CONSERVATIVES pushed the notion of cap-and-trade that addresses the same problem in a much less direct and efficient way, but puts less of a hit on the rich.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:50 AM on 07/25/2012
I absolutely agreed that polluters should pay reparations, then corporations, and banks should up with greater anti-trust laws, however we have to take a pragmatic approach to the situation at hand.

Any scheme of taxation that does not exempt the essentials of survival must NOT be implemented. The UN’s own report concedes that their scheme would place a disproportionate burden on the poor. That’s putting it lightly.

It’s not about paying taxes, and getting returns. It’s a scheme that simply adds cost to the price of things, unlike sales tax that is honestly labeled, and exempts food and water. This scheme would be easy to implement, but in no way fair. Where does this back end reward to the poor manifest? Will they be able to feed their families while they wait? I’m still waiting for my stimulus package check.

Finally, the program is to be implemented by unaccountable governance WITHOUT checks and balances. If you read their treaties they don’t propose REAL solutions, their agenda has only dealt with 1) Taxation 2)Enforcement Powers 3)Private ownership of forests, savanna’s, and water bodies in the name of carbon sinks.

My slim hope for the future resides in the fact that the millennial generation never talks in the antiquated paradigm of left wing, right wing. They know it’s us (99%) verses them (1%). Globalism is the new word for imperialism, and the UN serves the 1% percent by design, notice their calling for a 90% population reduction. The 99% minus 90%, Carbon
09:02 PM on 07/22/2012
It's been raining a lot for the last few weeks.....how can we have a drought here in the Tampa Bay area of Florida?

We have so much water that it is too bad we can't share with the mid west.
09:15 PM on 07/22/2012
We will take that water please send it over my back yard is getting yellowy and i much prefer the green grass.
08:16 PM on 07/22/2012
Hmmm ... Suddenly help from the Feds doesn't look so bad to those "red" states - Ironic. It's kinda like "we don't like Obamacare but we like everything in it". This is an enormous disaster and we need to wake up - I'm awake ... are you ???
06:56 PM on 07/23/2012
Suddenly? They've been on the dole for decades.
07:58 PM on 07/22/2012
"The U.S. Department of Agriculture has named over 1,000 counties in 26 states as disaster areas -- the largest declaration in history"

We use this classification way too much now, the only reason it's done is so that localities can get some free money . . .

We had a tornado here in my city and it wiped out about 10-12 homes . . . we were a disaster area.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grainysmith
I heart worms
07:04 PM on 07/22/2012
I listened to a radio program that talked about global climate change. They said the one upside is we might prevent the next ice age. The downside is we are going to have much higher temperatures, more floods, more fires, ocean levels rising and economic collapses. I think it is too late....we know who to blame.
06:18 PM on 07/22/2012
so why did this happen last century?
06:12 PM on 07/22/2012
you had one of these last century,
frankly, I find it completely retarded,
to say that you live on a planet in a chaotic universe,
a planet,
which you also say was,
subject to very catastrophic chaotic events,
in both religion and science,
and to say that it is changing is like some bizarre new discovery,
and that human is doing it?

There is no doubt we have an effect on our environment but it has way more to do with plant life and natural forces than anything else,
this planet will change with or without you,
you seem to have no concept of time,
nor have the capacity to understand it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
metinphilco
06:03 PM on 07/22/2012
I am so disgusted and scared by this weather. It is too damn hot to do anything but stay inside and try to keep cool for 4 months out of the year. This should be the #1 concern of all Americans. New York will be under water by the end of the century. Yet politicians just shrug their shoulders. Unreal. Why would anyone want to try and have kids when the end of the planet is near??
05:58 PM on 07/22/2012
A conveniently and financially rewarding "truth".
HenryT2
You can't fight a fire or THE SYSTEM from within
05:53 PM on 07/22/2012
Amazing that it's almost a diagram of red states. And they seem to gain more and more climate-change deniers every day. I seriously wonder if the change in weather is messing with their minds. I mean, look at Indiana. That state, and Michigan, always seemed to be wrong geographically to be red. (So no explanation why Michigan seems to be turning red).

Mississippi and West Virginia and some of the dust bowl states are the only red states that managed to miss the major effects of climate change. Maybe the dust bowl already affected the minds of residents of those states during the original man-made environmental disaster.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thedirtman
...already have a job, thanks
04:06 PM on 07/22/2012
Big oil owes me one planet. I accept cash.
06:20 PM on 07/22/2012
if big oil owes you you cash,

then you owe them the food you ate,

maybe you shouldn't get any now?
03:34 PM on 07/22/2012
It is beyond the point of pointing fingers on whether man or nature causes claimate change. It issue is, it is happening, andif it continues, has drastic consequences for our planet. At the very least, people need to prepare for the worst while still hoping for the best.
04:30 PM on 07/22/2012
I don't think it's beyond the point of pointing fingers on whether man or nature causes climate change: there is no doubt that man is continuing to add to the demise of our life on this planet by his commitment to fossil fuels. The impact can be lessened with commitment to ending such appalling dependence on gas, coal and oil with haste. Perhaps the consequences won't be so drastic... not that drastic in any degree is good. Relatedly, Big Ag massive promotion of the consumption of flesh adds enormously to methane output into the atmosphere, another villain worth pointing fingers at!
curmugin
You kids stay off my lawn.
09:17 PM on 07/22/2012
Wish I could agree. Really I do. But CO2 in the atmosphere takes decades or centuries to disperse. If America stopped producing methane and CO2 today it would have no effect this century even if we were the only source. No matter what reason for the change in the climate we are, in the words of the philosopher Letterman, "So Scroooed".
03:21 PM on 07/22/2012
One other comment about fossil fuels... isn't it totally absurd how coal is advertised as "clean coal" when there's nothing clean about it? And how 'bout "natural gas" as a description in advertising that's trying to take advantage of "natural" imagery when there is nothing natural about getting it out of the ground. It is way more accurate and truthful to call it Fracked Gas. As for fracked gas, wait to the truth of all that drilling makes its way into the headlines and becomes identified as a true threat to the subterranean environment, aquifers, and atmospheric release of methane... the next great environment disaster might well be brought to you by those fricking fracking companies. I sure hope it's not too late when this country wakes up to the destruction fossil fuels is causing in every corner of the world, including yours!