More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Al Norman

Al Norman

 

Wal-Mart: Unions Love Us

Posted: 03/13/11 06:00 PM ET

Last month Wal-Mart commissioned a poll which purported to show that 75% of union members in New York City were "all for" a Wal-Mart in the city. The New York Post ran a story which began, "New York City's union workers love Wal-Mart."

The improbable results of this "poll" are part of organized effort by Wal-Mart which dates back to 2005, when the giant retailer began to use "push-polls" to counter-attack its critics.

On his way out the door in 2009, Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott told Fortune Magazine that one of the mistakes he made during his tenure was being far too slow in responding to public criticism of his company. According to Fortune, Scott admitted "he didn't take its concerns as seriously as he should have, believing instead that the negative feedback was coming from blue-state elites who didn't shop at Wal-Mart and therefore didn't understand the money the company saved consumers."

But in 2005, Wal-Mart started to push back at the 'blue state elites,' and behave more like a candidate running for public office than a retailer. Scott hired the Democratic PR firm Edelman in 2005, and created a "war room" of operatives in its Bentonville headquarters.

A prime weapon was the push-poll. In 2005, Thomas Riehle, a Democrat, and V. Lance Tarrance, Jr., a Republican, doing business as RT Strategies, produced a poll commissioned by Working Families For Wal-Mart, which concluded that:

• 54% of union households believe union leaders should make protecting union jobs a higher priority than attacking Wal-Mart
• 42% of union households believe the campaign against Wal-Mart makes labor union leaders less relevant to solving the economic challenges facing working families today.
• 44% of union households agree that the campaign against Wal-Mart is not a good
use of union dues

Working Families For Wal-Mart issued the following statement with their poll:

"The data clearly show that Americans in union households -- as well as those not in union households -- are skeptical about the goals and priorities of the anti-Wal-Mart campaign being waged by union leaders at a time when U.S. manufacturers are eliminating tens of thousands of union jobs...This poll shows that union families also support Wal-Mart."
In fact, the 2005 poll indicated that 56% of union households agreed that fighting Wal-Mart was a good use of union dues.

In 2009, Wal-Mart produced a political push-poll in Chicago in which residents were asked the following leading question:

Mayor Daley says that a Wal-Mart at 83rd & Stewart would bring 400+ jobs to the city and make fresh food available to the neighborhood; others believe jobs are not enough. Press 1 if you believe a Wal-Mart should be allowed to be built or Press 2 if you believe it should not.

More recently, Wal-Mart commissioned two polls in New York City designed to bolster its wooing of the City Council. In December of 2010, the Brooklyn Daily Eagle ran a story which began: "A recent poll commissioned by Wal-Mart reveals that 76% of Brooklyn residents say they favor Wal-Mart coming to the city." The newspaper added: "Based on these facts, it appears Brooklyn could soon have a Wal-Mart."

The pollster hired by Wal-Mart was Douglas E. Schoen, whose website describes him as "one of the most influential Democratic campaign consultants for over thirty years." According to Crain's New York Business, Schoen was hired by Wal-Mart "to counter those who would argue that a Wal-Mart poll would be biased."

The Schoen poll showed that 37% of respondents did not favor locating a Wal-Mart in their neighborhood, and 30% did not agree that New York City should have a Wal-Mart. These are remarkably high negative numbers for a retail store. As one Wal-Mart executive pointed out years ago, "Why all the fuss? We're not a nuclear waste dump."

While on Wal-Mart's payroll, Schoen also produced another poll of 400 small businesses in New York, which concluded that 62% of businesses with 50 workers or less wanted Wal-Mart to come to New York. But Schoen's poll also showed that among small retailers -- the only businesses surveyed who actually compete with Wal-Mart -- 45% refused to say they favored Wal-Mart coming to New York City. In Manhattan and Brooklyn, 42% of small businesses did not say they were favorable to Wal-Mart, and in the Bronx, 56% of small business did not say they favored a Wal-Mart.

Schoen apparently did not want the public to see his survey questions, because neither of his Wal-Mart surveys are posted on his website, nor are they mentioned on Wal-Mart's websites. But Schoen was part of Mayor Michael Bloomberg's inner circle, and Bloomberg's former campaign manager, Bradley Tusk, was running Wal-Mart's campaign in New York City.

Lee Scott may have thought that Wal-Mart was slow to respond to its critics, but the company is working overtime now producing a wall of polling data to make it appear that everyone in urban America -- including Democrats and union members -- want a Wal-Mart in their neighborhood.

No retailer in American history has ever had to divert so far from its corporate mission to do damage control on its image. Rather than focus on mass marketing cheap Chinese anythings, Wal-Mart has been forced to spend millions of dollars to sell itself instead.

If its polling numbers were better, the company wouldn't have to keep producing more polls.

Al Norman is the founder of Sprawl-Busters. His book "Slam-Dunking Wal-Mart" is a classic in community organizing strategy. Sprawl-Busters can be found on Facebook.

 
 
 
Last month Wal-Mart commissioned a poll which purported to show that 75% of union members in New York City were "all for" a Wal-Mart in the city. The New York Post ran a story which began, "New York C...
Last month Wal-Mart commissioned a poll which purported to show that 75% of union members in New York City were "all for" a Wal-Mart in the city. The New York Post ran a story which began, "New York C...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 140
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
05:00 PM on 03/22/2011
Do the people of NY also support their tax dollars going to the walmart to locate there? What about the extra costs of welfare when a walmart comes to town, earned opportunity tax credits?
There are plenty of cheap places to shop already.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Frank
My last name is FRANK so thats what I am..
05:22 PM on 03/14/2011
its actually partly the consumers fault for wanting everything dirt cheap...they will sell you stuff for next to nothing and then guess what? they will pay their employees next to nothing... and since so many people want cheap crap, they will move into every street corner or empty field in sight pushing out the little guy who cannot compete
Allthosewhowander
My micro-bio is a microclimate
03:14 PM on 03/14/2011
"Last month, Walmart commisioned a poll..." Would anybody expect them to find anything other than "facts" in their greedy corporate favor? Research paid for by Walmart finds data in favor of Walmart. The sky is blue. Grass is green. Water is wet.
12:53 PM on 03/14/2011
walmart-corporate greed at its best
RINOVirus
George Carlin was right all along.
12:44 PM on 03/14/2011
"Working Families For Wal-Mart"? Now that is a good name for a astroturfing group. Which is typical in the way that Wal-Mart fights it's critics. When you can't find a group of people to support you then you do the next best thing: make them up. Imaginary friends and supporters of the Sam Walton vision. So where does Wal-Marts PR branch end and the astroturf begin?
photo
BlueOnBlue
275 Republicans Voted to Kill Medicare
12:22 PM on 03/14/2011
I shop at Walmart when I'm at my mother's in Florida because they have decimated the retail environment around them. With Walmarts spaced so close along the major highways, the only real choice is whether to drive 3 miles north to one or 3 miles south to another.

New York, you still have a real choice. Make the choice to keep Walmart out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kevinbr38
Forward
11:57 AM on 03/14/2011
Walmart is to retailing what McDonalds is to the food industry. They both sell inferior products, and they both practice self-serving unfair policies towards their workers. You couldn't pay me to step foot into either one of them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reasonshouldrule
03:06 PM on 03/14/2011
Same here. F&F
11:26 AM on 03/14/2011
A must-see is the documentary film "WalMart: The High Cost of Low Price" which was made in 2005. It addresses the overall effects on communities in which WalMart is allowed to establish their stores; a decrease in the average retail worker's wage, an increase in dependency upon local social services (Medicaid and Food Stamps which WalMart actually advises its employees in obtaining), and a bottoming out of commercial retail real estate among other things. They often receive favorable tax deals where the community receives pennies on the dollar or often times will locate outside city or town limits to bypass local zoning laws and to deprive those same cities or towns who they maket to of those tax dollars. The Walton heirs average approximately 18 billion dollars in personal wealth (there are either four or five of them) and yet collectively contributed $6000 to charity for one of the years cited in the film. WalMart employees on the other hand, during that same time frame contributed $5 million. And a large percentage of these employees are themselves impoverished. I find it reprehensible that WalMart's Coprorate Policy is to deny these facts with an all-out PR campaign.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus!
11:10 AM on 03/14/2011
As one Wal-Mart executive pointed out years ago, "Why all the fuss? We're not a nuclear waste dump."
 
WalMart is toxic to local economies.  Proven fact.
11:09 AM on 03/14/2011
Wal Mart is the biggest single employer in the private sector in the United States. It's employees work for minimum wage with little or no benefits and are generally are below poverty limits. Wal Mart even hosts classes for its employees on how to fill out welfare forms to get aid and food stamps paid for by county property owners. America doesn't need anymore employers like Wal Mart. There isn't anybody in their right mind who would tell you Wal Mart is a good place to work, it isn't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reasonshouldrule
03:07 PM on 03/14/2011
Yes, spot on. If enough shoppers would think it through, they'd realize they are not getting a bargain by shopping there.
10:00 AM on 03/14/2011
"Blue State elites" Ha. I am a red state non elite. And I would never shop at a WalMart. They have had too much government help from every level to get as big as they are. They have devastated towns across the world.
My advice to NY would be to keep them out. Or your local shops and flavor will go away. I can see thousands of shuttered buildings.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hunn40
09:55 AM on 03/14/2011
Walmart and other big box retail stores have lowered product quality.

With their policy of driving down prices, manufacturs have no choice but compromise quality.

Home Depot is guilty of the same.

The best way to combat this is to demand Made in USA products.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reasonshouldrule
03:09 PM on 03/14/2011
I totally agree with you. The problem is FINDING products made in the U.S., including clothing, toys, and almost everything else. Complaining to store managers does no good either. This is a difficult battle to fight.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MilesToGo
09:46 AM on 03/14/2011
Mal-Wart has been a bane to business in America, and for working class Americans simply because price isn't the only factor involved in a healthy business environment. Better paying jobs across small-town America have been lost, but this is invisible to most people. Class-action law suits now plague Mal-Wart, demonstrating the actual low regard management holds toward labor, especially female labor.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:29 AM on 03/14/2011
I am conducting a poll for Walmart-

Would you rather see-
A. a planet killing asteroid hit Earth and wipe out all life?
B. a Walmart built in your city?

Press Release- Over 99% of people and small business owners prefer a Walmart be built in their city (poll question not available).

See liberals? Everyone loves Walmart.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrumpyinAZ
My opinion is worth every penny you paid for it
10:16 AM on 03/14/2011
Like I said WALMART has done more to destroy the American Economy than Osama bin Laden ever dreamed of. I have never and will never shop there unless they Unionize and stop forcing their suppliers overseas
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skatscan
10:24 AM on 03/14/2011
I'd be one of the 1%. But then again I was one of the 9% of Americans who was against the first Gulf War in 1991.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reasonshouldrule
03:10 PM on 03/14/2011
I'm with you. There were at least two of us against the first Gulf War. :-)
photo
Indigo1941
Time Traveler
08:21 AM on 03/14/2011
WalMart doesn't fix its image problems, it veils them. Now about the freshly minted homophobic market plan at Target . . .