When Irish Colonel Travers eagerly accepted an appointment to the Goldstone Commission, he was hellbent on revenge against Israel based on paranoid fantasies and hard left anti-Israel propaganda. He actually believed, as he put it in a recent interview, that "so many Irish soldiers had been killed by Israelis," with "a significant number who were taken out deliberately and shot (in southern Lebanon.)" This is of course complete and utter fantasy, but it was obviously part of Colonel Travers bigoted reality.
Travers came to the job having already made up his mind not to believe anything Israel said and to accept everything Hamas put forward. For example, Israel produced hard photographic evidence that Gaza mosques were used to store rockets and other weapons. Other photographs taken by journalists also proved what everybody now acknowledges to be true: namely that Hamas, as its leaders frequently boasted, routinely use mosques as military munitions depots. When confronted with this photographic evidence, Travers said "I don't believe the photographs." Of course he doesn't since they don't comport with his politically correct and ideologically skewed worldview. This is what he had previously said about why he didn't believe that Hamas used the mosques to store weapons:
"We also found no evidence that mosques were used to store munitions. Those charges reflect Western perceptions in some quarters that Islam is a violent religion....If I were a Hamas operative the last place I'd store munitions would be in a mosque. It's not secure, is very visible, and would probably be pre-targeted by Israeli surveillance. There are a [sic] many better places to store munitions."
But that is exactly what Hamas did, despite Travers' insistence on paraphrasing Groucho Mark's famous quip, "Who are you going to believe? Me, or your lying eyes?"
Most disturbing, however, was Travers' categorical rejection of Israel's claim that it attacked Gaza only after enduring thousands of anti-personnel rockets intended to target Israeli civilians, mainly schoolchildren. In fact, Hamas rockets hit several schools, though fortunately the teachers had dismissed the students just before the rockets would have killed dozens, perhaps hundreds, of them. This is what Travers said about Hamas rockets.
"Hamas rockets had ceased being fired into Israel and not only that but Hamas sought a continuation of the ceasefire... and Israel said no."
Travers then claimed that Hamas had fired no rockets at Israel in the month leading up to the Israeli invasion:
"...the number of rockets that had been fired into Israel in the month preceding their operations was something like two. The Hamas rockets had ceased being fired into Israel and not only that but Hamas sought a continuation of the ceasefire. Two had been fired from Gaza, but they are likely to have been fired by dissident groups, [i.e. groups that were violating a Hamas order not to fire rockets]."
Again, Travers' rendition defies the historical record and tells us more about Travers than it does about what actually provoked Israel into finally taking action to protect a million civilians who were in range of the thousands of Hamas rockets that had been fired at its civilians. In fact Israel complied with the cease fire under whose terms Israel reserved the right to engage in self-defense actions such as attacking terrorists who were in the process of firing rockets at its civilians.
Just before the hostilities began, Israel offered Hamas a carrot and a stick: it reopened a checkpoint to allow humanitarian aid to enter Gaza. It had closed the point of entry after the checkpoint had been targeted by Gazan rockets Israel's prime minister, Ehud Olmert, also issued a stern, final warning to Hamas that unless it stopped the rockets, there would be a full-scale military response.
This is the way Reuters reported it:
"Israel reopened border crossings with the Gaza Strip on Friday, a day after Prime Minister warned militants there to stop firing rockets or they would pay a heavy price. Despite the movement of relief supplies, militants fired about a dozen rockets and mortar shafts from Gaza at Israel on Friday. One accidentally struck a house in Gaza, killing two Palestinian sisters, ages 5 and 13.
Despite the opening of the crossings, the Hamas rockets continued--not none, not "something like two," but many--and Israel kept its word, implementing a targeted air attack against Hamas facilities and combatants.
Not surprisingly, Travers said that he "rejected...entirely" Israel's claim that its "attack on Gaza was based on self-defense." Instead, he compared Israel's attack on Hamas to the unprovoked Fascist bombing of "Guirnica."
Travers has repeatedly claimed that "no substantive critique of the [Goldstone] report has been received." This is an out and out lie. I have read dozens of substantive critiques and have written a 49-page one myself (www.alandershowitz.com/goldstone.pdf.) The truth is that Travers has studiously ignored and refused to respond to these critiques. And of course he blames everything on "Jewish lobbyists."
Nor was Travers the only member of the commission with predetermined views and an anti-Israel agenda. Christine Chinken had already declared Israel guilty of war crimes before seeing any evidence. Hina Jilani had also condemned Israel before her appointment to the group, and then said that it would be "very cruel to not give credence to [the] voices" of the victims, apparently without regard to whether they were telling the truth. And then there is Richard Goldstone, who told friends that he too took the job with an agenda, which he says was to help Israel! Why any reasonable person would pay any attention to a report written by four people who had prejudged the evidence and came to their jobs with agendas and biases is beyond comprehension.
Alan Dershowitz: Legitimating Bigotry: The Legacy of Richard Goldstone
Richard Goldstone is an ambitious opportunist who lacks the courage of his convictions -- if he ever had any. He has always put personal advancement over principle. He is a master of rationalization and self-justification.
http://mondoweiss.net/2010/02/goldstone-co-author-the-court-of-world-opinion-is-determined-to-see-the-report-prevail.html
Ali Bazi, An Israeli Militiaman murdered two Irish soldiers - Pte Smallhorn and Pte Barrett - in an incident that might be regarded as a war crime. But Mr Bazi now lives in safety in the United States.
According to the Jerusalem center for public affairs:
"A major issue of conflict between Israel and Ireland was the two countries' interaction while Irish soldiers were serving in UNIFIL in southern Lebanon. From 1978 to 2000, Ireland's largest-ever military involvement outside its borders was in Lebanon.
"One has to keep in mind that Ireland is a neutral country with a small army. Over forty thousand Irish troops served in Lebanon, which represented a massive commitment. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, the Irish regularly called in the Israelis to threaten them and discipline them over the treatment of Irish UNIFIL troops. Ireland's foreign minister (and current finance minister) for much of the 1980s, Brian Lenihan, said that most of his sympathy for Israel disappeared when he saw how they treated the Irish soldiers in southern Lebanon, and this was echoed among the various political parties."
JMJ
The real story behind Israel's invasion of Gaza -
http://goldstonefacts.org -
Goldstone co-author: The court of world opinion is determined to see the report prevail -
http://mondoweiss.net/2010/02/goldstone-co-author-the-court-of-world-opinion-is-determined-to-see-the-report-prevail.html#hide -
Knocked for his Goldstone slanders, Dershowitz blames others for inciting violence -
http://mondoweiss.net/2010/02/knocked-for-his-goldstone-slanders-dershowitz-blames-others-for-inciting-violence.html
Irish soldiers have been a great part of the UN mandate in souther lebanon. and yes, a significant amount of un soldiers, irish ones, have been killed in sourthern lebanon at the hands of the israeli army. These are undisputed facts. Many of those same soldiers, have over the years reported that the attacks were not accidental as the IDF had claimed.
So, at least be honest on your facts. You may have many valid points, but obscuring the truth never works.
Israel already has taken steps to ease tensions by repaying $10 million to the UN to compensate for a facility it unnecessarily obliterated, and has reprimanded two IDF officers for their actions that went beyond their orders, greatly to the detriment of unarmed Palestinians, but also to the detriment of Israel's reputation, which now is at its lowest point since the founding of the state.
In spite of the fashionable criticism of Israel, which seems particularly popular among people who do not live daily under the threat of bombs, no one should forget the idiot Hamas leaders who provoked this entire crisis by sending rockets over the border attempting to murder Israeli school children. Did they think that the IDF would simply sit around listening to music or watching TV? It is the Hamas idiots who seemed willing to risk all and fight down to the last Palestinian and the result is that even the slimmest threads of goodwill on the Israeli side were snuffed out, leaving an entire generation on both sides bitter and mistrustful. No one comes out unscarred. All have tears.
And why should an investigation that started with a mandate to find Israel guilty, not be questioned?
As noted in this article, members of the investigation expound the most preposterous of lies. Lies that defy all reality and known fact are spewed forth about Israel, yet Israel should not defend against those lies?
I agree that international law should prevail. But in regard to Israel such laws are perverted to excoriate those who defend themselves from those whose sworn goals are genocide and the complete destruction of a sovereign nation.
If international law were truly applied, then Hamas' leaders would all be indicted for war crimes and crimes against humanity. In fact, much of the arab world would stand in the docket for its patently illegal war on Israel's existence.
When all is said and done, this conflict is about the arab world's defiance of international law as codified within the UN charter and UN resolution 181.
That's exactly what the Goldstone Report did, try actually reading it before exercising your vast ignorance.
Then there is the same old tired rhetoric from both sides, Hamas tell us occupation justifies terrorism, Israel tells us terrorism justifies collective punishment.
Please, from one human to another, stop what you are doing. Your ethnic bias is no longer welcome, the world is moving beyond 'Jew' or 'Palestinian', we just want an end to 42 years of occupation for the sake of both sides. Just stop.
I suggest that a really neutral commentator (not one who wishes to POSE as neutral) would have said: "We want 62 years of occupation of Palestinians AND (circa) 100 years of war against Jews and Israel to both end". If someone were to put it in those terms, I would certainly agree.