Israeli Envoy's Flawed Message

06/17/2015 02:25 pm ET | Updated Jun 17, 2016

Former Israeli ambassador Michael Oren is getting some attention for his claim in a memoir to be published next week that President Obama "abandoned Israel." The book is sure to be a hot debating point this summer in the American Jewish community and possibly beyond.

The US ambassador to Israel, Dan Shapiro, in a highly unusual move and using blunt, but appropriate language, has questioned Oren's facts. "Michael Oren published an imaginary account of what happened," Shapiro said in a Hebrew-language interview with Army Radio. "I disagree with what he wrote. He was an ambassador in the past, but he is now a politician and an author who wants to sell books. Sometimes an ambassador has a limited point of view into ongoing efforts. What he wrote does not reflect the truth."

Oren's book also apparently contains an outrageous and incendiary attack on Jewish-American reporters who cover the conflict. According to commentator Chemi Shalev of Haaretz, Oren believes that Jewish journalists are largely responsible for American media's anti-Israel coverage and the 'double standard' it applies in its coverage of the Jewish state. Oren also writes that the antagonism towards Netanyahu shown by Jewish journalists such as Thomas Friedman of the New York Times and Leon Wieseltier, late of the New Republic who recently joined the Brookings Institution, resembles "historic hatred of Jews."

Attacking the messenger seems to be the new tactic of the Israeli government. This week, it issued a preposterous cartoon portraying "clueless, gullible western journalists" covering Gaza. It truly shows the pathetic depths that Israel's public relations has sunk to.

Israel seems blind to the fact that its problem is not poor PR or biased reporters or "self-hating Jews" or a "hostile" President of the United States. The problem lies with the policies of the most right-wing government in Israel's history -- a government that wants to continue to build settlements, maintain and deepen the occupation and has no serious plan or intention to make peace with the Palestinians.

Oren's book is another example of the way Israeli officials simply miss the point. His basic contention that the strength of the U.S.-Israel relationship depends on there being "no daylight" and "no surprises" between the two nations does not stand up to scrutiny. In the past, there has frequently been daylight between the President of the United States and Israel on key issues. And there have been plenty of surprises going in both directions.

The real, underlying strength of the U.S.-Israel relationship does not come from the papering over of disagreements or a determination to keep them private but on the common values that the two nations share which derive from their founding documents and core principles. To the extent that one or the other partner strays from these principles, the relationship is going to experience difficulties.

The current tension between the United States and Israel can be attributed to a fraying of those very values by a succession of right-wing Israeli governments. Specifically, the steady, inexorable expansion of settlements and the persistence of what has become an almost 50-year occupation of another people is slowly eroding and degrading the sense of shared values that binds Americans to Israelis.

Prime Minister Netanyahu has abandoned the two-state solution as a serious policy goal -- if it ever was one for him -- and most of his cabinet is on record as being vehemently against it. Israel is no longer seen as being serious about reaching peace with the Palestinians and seems content to rule them against their will indefinitely.

A two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains a fundamental American interest as well as the only means of guaranteeing Israel's long-term security while preserving its Jewish and democratic character. An Israeli government that sincerely committed itself to that goal and worked to bring it about would see a sudden improvement in its relationship with the United States and as well as the rest of the international community. It's either that or producing more silly, childish cartoons blaming reporters for all of Israel's woes.