The two of us might look like an odd couple -- one a labeled Democrat, the other a labeled Republican. We have disagreed on many issues of public policy, and still do. But one thing we agree on, and think everyone should agree on, is that our nation's policymakers should not drive us off the fiscal cliff. The ill effects could be devastating.
For starters, a recession is very likely to follow in short order. If we drive off the entire cliff, which amounts to about 4.5 percent of GDP, the combination of higher taxes and less public spending will almost certainly throw the U.S. into a recession -- maybe a sharp one. (Remember, even a garden variety recession raises the unemployment rate by over 3 percentage points.) But even if policymakers manage to avoid, say, half the cliff, and jump off what remains, the odds of having at least a mild recession are better than even.
That should be enough to make jumping off the cliff unthinkable. But just in case it isn't:
- The financial markets (and credit rating agencies) are likely to react badly to a government that seems to have lost its marbles. To this point, the stock market has mostly been rising and the bond market has been pretty stable. We interpret both as evidence that markets are convinced we're not going off the cliff. ("It would be irrational, wouldn't it?") If Congress and the president prove them wrong, look out below.
These adverse effects belie the notion that Washington could magically undo the effects of going over the fiscal cliff by reaching an agreement quickly after January 1. The recession would last only months or maybe only weeks, would-be cliff jumpers claim. Really? We fear that Humpty Dumpty may not be put back together again so easily once financial markets, international confidence, consumer confidence and the morale of the federal workforce crack. At minimum, going over the cliff is a big gamble.
The fiscal cliff is not the only budget issue confronting the administration and Congress. We have another date with the national debt ceiling, a long-run need to reduce the budget deficit substantially, an embarrassing tax code that cries out for reform, and more. But the cliff is the only fiscal issue that poses a clear and present danger to our national well-being. It is also the only one for which there is a clear and simple answer that both parties should embrace: Don't jump!
At this point, time is so short that everyone knows what we need before New Year's Eve:
- A "small deal" that is minimally contractionary in 2013,
This is not a "Democratic" or a "Republican" conclusion. It is a national imperative. As our economy struggles to emerge from the worst recession since the 1930s, 315 million Americans deserve something better than being thrown off a cliff.
Alan S. Blinder, a former vice-chairman of the Federal Reserve System, is a professor of economics and public affairs at Princeton University and vice-chairman of Promontory Interfinancial Network. Douglas Holtz-Eakin is president of the American Action Forum and former Director of the Congressional Budget Office.
More:Fisical Cliff Talks Fiscal Cliff Negotiations Obama Fiscal Cliff Fiscal Cliff Talks Fiscal Cliff
How will Donald Trump’s first 100 days impact YOU? Subscribe, choose the community that you most identify with or want to learn more about and we’ll send you the news that matters most once a week throughout Trump’s first 100 days in office. Learn more