- BIG NEWS:
- The Fed
- |
- Holiday Sales
- |
- Banks
- |
- Personal Finance
- |
Berkshire Hathaway just made its largest acquisition ever, buying Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation, a railroad company, for over $35 billion. This is a large bet by the most successful investor of all time that the US economy will improve and prosper.
Actions speak louder than words. What does that action mean for investors? For one thing, it reflects Buffett's confidence in the prospects of the economy, prospects upon which a railroad company depends. And Buffett is convinced that economic activity will pick up. In fact, he is confident enough that he is willing to use debt and issue Berkshire shares, two methods he had only used sparingly in the past, in order to close the deal.
This should also tell you something about valuations in general, particularly those of large cap stocks, and especially in comparison to other available investment alternatives.
In the last nine years, U.S. equities have lost almost half of their purchasing power (adjusted for inflation). Treasury bonds have done much better. Because it is easy to extrapolate the most recent past into the future, so many people are now gloomy about the future prospects of equities.
But history shows that past periods where bonds outperformed stocks have been great times to buy stocks.
According to Jeremy Siegel from the University of Pennsylvania, in all previous cases of 10-year periods where stock returns have been negative, subsequent 10-year returns were over 10% real, more than double the return of government bonds.
So every time stocks have performed poorly for 10 years, they have performed better than average for the next 10 years, and beaten bonds by 2 to 1 on average.
In the 20th century, not exactly a calm, worry-free period, stocks in America had a real (inflation adjusted) return of 6.9% a year, versus 1.5% for Treasury bonds.
Yet in 1932, investors were melancholy about stocks. The entire world was in depression, capitalism seemed like a failed experiment, unemployment was 25%, and Nazi Germany was advancing. But the S&P rose 34.8% a year over the next five years.
And in 1949, U.S. budget deficit as a percent of GDP was much higher than it is today, communism was spreading, and the Soviet Union was threatening a nuclear annihilation. Stocks rose 23.2% a year for the next five years.
The past decade was the worst for stocks in 70 years. We just experienced the most severe recession since the Great Depression ended. And I believe our experience in the coming decade will be similar to the historical examples above. If stocks revert to their 20th century mean, they will post high real returns, and significantly outperform bonds.
And Warren Buffett is betting that way.
Alan Schram is the Managing Partner of Wellcap Partners, a Los Angeles based investment firm. Email at aschram@wellcappartners.com.
Alice Schroeder: Warren Buffett and the Business of Life: Part 2 of 7
Buffett would always love reading newspapers, but his investing was tightly focused on simple businesses that were as close to immortal as possible. Newspapers no longer qualified.
Fortune's Stanley Bing: Has Warren Gone Off the Rails?
Warren Buffett is investing $32 billion in Burlington Northern Santa Fe, the nation's 2nd largest railroad. At first blush, this is radically counter-intuitive. A railroad? Isn't that hopelessly brick-and-mortar?
Alice Schroeder: Warren Buffett and the Business of Life: Part 1 of 7
Warren Buffett is never more himself than when he is given the chance to invest in something he wants at a price of his choosing.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Buffet is looking at carrying to nations food supply along with natural resources.
What it means is that Buffet now believes in Peak Oil and is adjusting his portfolio accordingly. The trucking and airline industries will die or shrivel up to 1/10 their current size. Rail and ship will be the only economical mode of travel, just like before the fossil fuel orgy. What I am actaully kind of afraid of is what fantasy the republicans will concoct to deflect their responsibility. It will almost certainly mean another war.
American Coal shipments to Red China so they can pollute the Earth, California especially will be a big recipient of this, a good bet on Buffet's part, no way to lose voting or betting against humanity...!
Don't let him get all four! We'll have to pay $200 every time we land on them.
Take a ride on the Reading....I thought the same thing when I read the news this morning.
Dang! The man buys a railroad. Smart move...one day there will be no fuel for airplanes...good long term investment.
Bring in the jobs.
Follow the coal. BNSF is the biggest transporter out of the Powder River Basin, the biggest supplier by far of coal to US utilities. Berkshire Hathaway also owns MidAmerican Energy, the owner of major coal-fired boilers in midwestern states that put a giant new plant online in 2007 at Council Bluffs. Note also that BNSF has within the last few years held utilities for ransom when coal couldn't be delivered on time.
Buffett is securing the supply chain, plain and simple.
Buffett - as usual - is playing a long-term game.
Securing his supply-lines is definately part of the picture. But the man also knows that 'eventually' commerce will pick back up in general, and that energy efficiency dictates that trains will be a significant player in interstate transport relative to trucking when it does.
What does it mean for us little guys?
I guess it means we're losing at Monopoly.
Many some jobs for some people.
Jobs aren't created by rich people buying and selling companies.
Jobs are created by poor and middle class people working, getting paid, and buying.
He has something up his sleeve. BNI carries the most coal and thus will be destroyed by cap N trade. Remember the Jim Hansen "trains of death"? Buffet knows something else and has another plan. He is not buying a transport, he is taking advantage of inside information or is plotting a new scheme. Stay tuned.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with