This early in the season, a presidential primary debate is essentially about winning the battle of the buzz. On a crowded stage, the objective is to separate oneself in a way that captures media attention and drives post-debate conversation. The contender who best accomplished that in Monday's CNN New Hampshire debate is Michele Bachmann, the Minnesota congresswoman with a singular talent for seizing the spotlight. Compared to her six male opponents, Bachmann came across as scrappy and forthright. You may disagree with every word she says, but there's no question the woman has the courage of her convictions.
Bachmann's fluency as a presidential debater complicates the fortunes of her rivals. Her ideological purity makes Mitt Romney look all the more wishy-washy. Her vivacity heightens the mind-numbing dullness of fellow Minnesotan Tim Pawlenty. Her can-do gumption reduces Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul to the status of cranky old men. Her social conservatism puts Rick Santorum to shame -- Bachmann can trump Santorum's seven children with a whopping 23 foster children of her own. Only Herman Cain is as plainspoken and conversational, but politically he appears not ready for prime time-for God's sake, the man mispronounced "Chile."
Bachmann has the performance mechanics down pat. She knows how to deliver her message in sound bites, and she rarely shrinks from addressing the question on the table. Unlike some of the other stuffed shirts on the stage, she seems like a real person. This is a political skill that cannot be underestimated.
Bachmann's one glaringly weak moment of the debate was an ambiguous, contradictory response on gay marriage. Her position on the matter is muddled; about the only thing that's certain is that she stands outside the mainstream of popular opinion, on this as on most other social issues. The congresswoman's response on gay marriage represented a rare misstep, and it highlights the vulnerability she will face as a national candidate forced to step outside her right-wing comfort zone.
If Bachmann's performance now lifts her into the varsity ranks of Republican presidential contenders, Gingrich and Santorum just got pushed further to the sidelines. You have to wonder how many more debates they will get invited to, or what right-minded person would give either of them a dime. As for the others, Ron Paul will always be Ron Paul, which is to say more contrarian than viable candidate. Pawlenty performed adequately, but he needed to gain serious traction in this debate, and clearly that did not happen. Romney managed to emerge relatively unscathed, despite predictions from the pundits that he would serve as the debate's punching bag. That said, he's still not very likeable.
To the chagrin of her less media-savvy opponents, feisty Michele Bachmann lives to fight another day. Long after most of these other candidates have vanished from the race, it appears likely she'll still be standing.
Joe Cutbirth: Why I'm Calling It *Gulp* for Michele Bachmann
Assessing the First GOP Debate
Who won the Republican debate?
New Hampshire Debate: Short-Sighted Candidates Miss Opportunity to Rebrand GOP
Fact-checking the GOP debate in New Hampshire
Gibbs Counters GOP Message in New Hampshire
GOP Debate: Presidential Candidates on Abortion, Marriage, DADT
Romney remains strong on Afghanistan
Live blogging the first GOP debate: Saint Anselm College, NH
The Question for Tonight's GOP Debate About the Bush Tax Cuts
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Obama | Romney | |
|---|---|---|
| Electoral Votes (270 to win) |
332 | 206 |
| Obama | Romney | |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 65,899,660 | 60,932,152 |
| Percent | 51.1% | 47.2% |
| Democrats* | Republicans | |
|---|---|---|
| Current Senate | 53 | 47 |
| Seats gained or lost | +2 | -2 |
| New Total | 55 | 45 |
| Democrats | Republicans | |
|---|---|---|
| Seats won | 201 | 234 |
Social Issues? Should these really be the purview of the Federal Government? Why not let the states handle those? What are the national regulations for a driver's license? What is the federal age requirement for the consumption of tobacco or alcohol? What are the federal statutes governing divorce or marriage? (OK, you saw that one coming.) Do we really need MORE federal government?
I don't believe that the definition of marriage should be changed just because 2-3 percent of the population, homosexuals, wish it so. Sure, grant them the rights, but let's not call it marriage.
Abortion? I abhor the abominable practice, BUT it is the law of the land. Get over it.
Happy Dae
http://ShoeStringGenealogy.com
Since she and her husband believe that gayness can be un-done, there is no need for gay marriage.
You can learn to be heterosexual, according to Bachmann and her husband Marcus, who un-gays gays at his counseling service in Minnesota.
His center accepts government payments for this unquantifiable service, so it's a win-win premise for Michelle. Personal enrichment via payments, and less gays on the streets.
That's not admirable to you?
The 2012 election is going to be an all out brawl between left and right.