More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Alan Singer

Alan Singer

Posted: November 8, 2010 03:39 PM

Among the arguments made by advocates for charter schools is that they expand consumer choice and that given the state of education in many inner-city minority communities experimentation with alternatives can only help the situation. As buzz words, choice and experimentation always sound good. After all, we know about the disappointing performance of many students in inner-city schools under the current educational system so why not try something else?

Unfortunately, we already know what will happen if private-for-profit charter school companies take over K-12 education in the United States because for-profit proprietary companies have already successfully invaded what used to be called "higher education." These companies have defrauded the government, left families deep in un-repayable debt, and cheated students out of an education.

The federal Department of Education recently published a list of suspect businesses masquerading as colleges and issued new rules to protect students from aggressive or misleading recruitment by private, for-profit, institutions. For-profit colleges received $26.5 billion in government-funded student aid in 2009. Tax dollars insure student loans and the government must pay them if students default.

One of the worst offenders is the so-called University of Phoenix, a "university" in name only, operated by the Apollo Group. Phoenix currently enrolls over 280,000 students nationwide. It makes its money by recruiting students who are eligible for federal Title IV financial aid programs. Over 90 percent of Apollo's net revenue in 2009 came from federal money.

Phoenix advertises that if offers flexible-degree programs for "working learners" who have jobs or other obligations that keep them from attending school full-time but who want to garner credentials that will improve their income and employment possibilities. However, according to its 2008-2009 records, only 9 percent of its customers "graduated," the average debt per customer is over $13,000, less than half of its customers repay loans, and 13 percent of them are currently in official default on loan payments.

Phoenix's parent company, the Apollo Group is also under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission for illegal insider trading in company stocks.

Another large proprietary school accused of misrepresentations and under investigation is Kaplan University with 138,000 customers, a loan repayment rate of only 28 percent, and a default rate of 17 percent. Kaplan, which is the largest and fastest-growing division of the Washington Post Company, boasts, "We build futures." It is unclear, however, what kind of futures the company actually builds.

Kaplan started as the American Institute of Commerce in 1937, changed its name to Quest College, and became Kaplan College when purchased by Kaplan, Inc. in 2000. It changed its name again, to Kaplan University, when it was granted permission to offer graduate-level degree programs. It is currently based in Davenport, Iowa, has offices in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and online student support centers in Florida, Illinois and Arizona.

Almost all of Kaplan's customers take online courses of dubious quality. For a while California's public community colleges allowed students to take some courses at Kaplan and transfer credits that would count toward their degrees. However, in 2009 the University of California and Cal State University systems, concerned about the quality of Kaplan courses, canceled their agreement with the company

Kaplan University has an open admissions policy, which means there are no admissions standards other than eligibility for federal Pell Grants and student loans. Kaplan was one of 15 for-profit colleges cited by the Government Accountability Office for malfeasance and three former academic officers have filed a federal lawsuit accusing the "university" of defrauding the United States government out of more than $4 billion. They allege that Kaplan enrolled unqualified students, inflated student grades so they could stay enrolled, and falsified documents to obtain accreditation. The company's response is that the lawsuit should be dismissed because it lacks the specificity required in a federal fraud case.

In the movie Waiting for 'Superman', cute kids and desperate families plead for access to charter schools. But the movie is little more than propaganda for a well-financed campaign to undermine public education in the United States so edu-businesses can pick up the more profitable pieces. They need to divert us with the cute kids and their families because few people would buy their product if they realized it was being pushed by companies like Phoenix and Kaplan.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 48
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
08:05 AM on 11/12/2010
This is not fair to public schools because Charter schools have an unfair advantage when competing against public schools since they tend to be smaller and free from regulations. Charter schools have access to federal funds and other revenue sources. Education is not what it use be freedom ,its a business.
- Antasia Brown
09:47 PM on 11/11/2010
I Believe charter schools are just in it for the money and not education. The public schools education are better because they teach a different way and help us gain knowledge because of the way they teach, that right their shows a lot about the way charter schools are run.
08:32 PM on 11/11/2010
I believe charter schools are not for our children because they don't provide the same education as public school provides for us because the education that we get in schools helps us gain knowledge about the topic we are learning but the charter school doesn't teach us as much.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sarahinez
03:49 PM on 11/11/2010
As Deep Throat said, "Follow the money." For-profit educational groups at every level are making record profits and their stocks have been soaring. What do they know about the allocation of tax money that public school supporters don't know?
01:56 PM on 11/11/2010
So far he has lost $400 million in education funds. LOST another $270 million in NJ Transit funds for the tunnel he canceled. WAY TO GO! That's over HALF A BILLION this guy has lost right off the bat.
He is on a mission to bust the teacher union and PRIVATIZE public education. He probably has ties to Univ of PHX and Kaplan Univ. Wake up and go to war with this guy. War has been declared on you! The worse he makes public ed out to be, the more of a case he will make to let Corp America take it over and he gets a fat pay day.
Chris Christie does not care about education.
Chris Christie does not care about children.
Oh yeah and George Bush STILL does not care about black people!
10:21 PM on 11/10/2010
Charter schools have always be a part of education, I believe that the real problem is that many of this schools are getting together with companies and becoming more of a business and they are not caring much about the education that the "customers" are getting. The students are slowly becoming just customers and some are not getting a good service, like with Phoenix, only 9% students graduated. That means that in the end 91% of the other students/customers wasted their time, energy and most of all money.
05:06 PM on 11/10/2010
Charter School are defenatley trying to benefit themselves as well as the richer. They are not taking our education seriously. It will be such a disappointment if charter school companies took over K-12 grades. Our economy is worse how it is, and on top of that now they trying to make us pay for our education. Its unbelievable to what this has come to ! I dont think this right at all and something should be done ASAP.
PKMKII
My micro-bio is empty
02:00 PM on 11/10/2010
It's unrealistic to paint all charter schools as either "reforming experiments that improve the entire system" or as "greedy attempts to make easy money off the backs of the government and children." It varies depending primarily on the intentions of those who set up the charter school in question. I don't think you could look at a charter school like Harlem Children's Zone and say "Those people don't care about educating the youth."

The trick with charter schools is to hold their standards (and, therefore, the funding) to a stringent standard. If they're not performing at or above the public schools in the area, yank the government funding from them. Don't let the ones who are obviously just looking for a cut of the funding to pay for their lifestyles continue to suck up government money.
09:53 AM on 11/10/2010
i believe that charter schools is not in it for the people's education. i think that they just are in it for the money. me coming from a school where i had to pay to get educated, its not worth it. i was getting worse grades when i had to pay for my education. i believe that charter schools and private schools does not prepare you for the real world. i dont think that charter schools or private schools should take over because if people can't afford it than less children will be going to school.
09:51 AM on 11/10/2010
Charter schools are notorious for cutting corners and agressive marketing schemes to advertise to be something that they are not. For example the Gulen Movement Charter School Chain profess that their Turkish teachers are Euporean Scholars, when in fact many of there teachers have no crditials what so ever. Another alarming fact is that many of their teachers are here on H1-b visas for their math and science departments claiming that they cannot find any quailified Americans to teach in there fields. They claim there is a shortage of good math science and other techniqual teachers here in America and they can do a better job at it. The cost to the tax payer is currently 4,200 per H-1B holder. The staff is typically 30% Turkish. So charters schools have in a sence outsourced American teaching jobs. These Gulen charter schools typacly have names like Lotus, Sonoran Science, Harmony , Magnolia science academy. Just google search Gulen Charter and see what oppurtunites these charter schools have opened the door to and where your tax dollars are going for with these schools
08:51 AM on 11/10/2010
I think chater schools are not seriously taking the education of the Student. Students should not pay to get educated. The economy is bad and meanwhile the minorities are struggling with money and cannot afford to pay for their child education. Many minorities can afford to attend public schools but when it comes too college they cannot afford to go to it. Education should be a right for the student.
08:05 AM on 11/10/2010
i think charter schools are not what we need. they only benefit themselfs not even the students. they only care about the money and dont think about the education and how we have to pay to go to college and they want to make us also pay for a regular education that is a right.
07:59 AM on 11/10/2010
As a public school student i know our opportunities are limited. The government little by little is taking every possible opportunities from us the minority away. I feel that this shouldn't happen because our only way to get out of poverty is to go to school and get a degree, but if this opportunity is being taken away because not everybody will afford to go to charter school or be lucky enough to get in it. Therefore, if this happens then that means that many people will drop out, which means the level of poverty will increase, which will cause our economy to become worse.
03:52 AM on 11/10/2010
Yes i do believe that we should try anything other that what we are doing right now but this is not one of them. Currently we don't pay for education throughout k-12 and we are barely able to manage with this economic crisis so imagine that this happens, that this choice that they say would be good for us is achieved, then what. If private for profit charter school companies take over K-12 education in the United States it is most likely that we wont be able to pay them entirely from our pockets so we would have to get help from the government and that is exactly what they want us to do. The Apollo Group that runs the University of Phoenix did exactly this, they purposely did this to make money by recruiting students who are eligible for federal Title IV financial aid programs. Over 90 percent of Apollo's net revenue in 2009 came from federal money. Just think about the corruption that is going to plague the U.S if this happens.

-Manuel Cordero
01:23 AM on 11/10/2010
It will be a real shame if private-for-profit charter school companies took over k-12 grade levels in the United States. Now that our economy is getting worst and that the rich are getting richer meanwhile the poor are getting poorer attending college is only a dream. Unlike years before minorities cannot count on financial aid anymore or any type of help because of austerity. Therefore, most students right now may not even attednd college anymore because of the financial problems. This then brings me to question why would companies now want to make students pay for education that right now they are receiving for free? I strongly oppose to this because this will mean less and less minorities will get to educate themselves which will mean that there will not be any progress in years to come.