The announcement by Twitter that it was hiring it's first Washington, DC based employee to focus on the company's relationships with the Federal Government has pretty much turned the #gov20 search on Twitter into a "hire me" free for all. The company's CEO, Evan Williams (@ev) has been inundated with tweets, offers, blogs, etc. It started just a few days ago -- and thanks to the magnifying message power of Twitter, there are already dozens of blogs, "hire me" campaigns and other social media attempts by individuals to grab this "plum" job.
As I said on Twitter: I AM NOT APPLYING SO PLEASE TAKE THIS AS ADVICE, NOT AN APPLICATION -- from @ideagov: " am working on short blog: "Gov 2.0 and #Twitter Finally Meet" - with caveat: I AM NOT APPLYING. #TWITGOV - just "ideas" #gov20 cc @ev" 1:40pm June 9, 2010
It is fascinating to watch, actually. But as a Government 2.0 Innovator, and a former Government Relations Executive for Paramount Pictures, I have some pretty specific observations and ideas, if you will. I got hired at Paramount after working in the Executive Office of the President, under President Clinton and being a traveling advance staffer as well. So I knew plenty of people in Government AND had deep existing relationships. Even then there was a steep learning curve when applying technology needs to the Government Relations arena.
1. Twitter needs a Government Relations expert who also is a social media expert. Not the other way around.
2. Twitter has already had issues with the Government, and the media -- Iran Election being example #1. In that situation, because they had no one on the ground in Washington, DC last summer (2009) when the Iran Election broke into the open -- when there were media reports that the U.S. Government had asked Twitter to continue to provide service in Iran - they had very muddled response. This would not have happened with the right person with deep government ties and social media crisis management in place.
3. True Government Relations is mostly pretty quiet behind the scenes work. It is not usually done through the amplified medium of social media -- unless that is a specific aspect to a specific initiative. Writing blogs about how great you are does not translate into you being able to handle a myriad of personal relationships and levels of Government with discretion. Discretion is key to Government Relations.
4. Because of the Giants amongst us like Microsoft, Google, Facebook -- Twitter's entry into the Government space has to be taken carefully. The Giants have armies of lobbyists, lawyers, pr firms, etc. The Twitter person needs to be able to navigate these waters with firm decision making. Time spent getting up to speed will only hurt the company, and its investors like Union Square's Fred Wilson. This goes back to my first point. Twitter needs to hire someone known in the #Gov20 space -- but also known in DC. IN Government. No offense to my peers and friends applying for this job -- but it clearly says that they are looking for a DC area person who already has Government experience. That really means connections, access and understanding of the policies and ethics surrounding these changing times.
5. It is great to see so much enthusiasm for using this opportunity to tell Twitter how this post could be used to change their technology. With all due respect -- let the incumbent of that position dictate that. If you are applying to be a Government Relations person, than you really should be showing your depth of contacts, access and ease of penetration into the Federal swamp, as it is. Showing us fancy SEO and blogs is great for marketing. But can you walk Twitter into Federal Agencies? Can you deal with a politically charged White House and House and Senate, not to mention the FCC, FTC, DHS, CIA, FBI, IRS and all the others you will need to?
Linkouts to other helpful discussions on the Twitter hiring:
GovTwit
Adriel Hampton
Andrew P. Wilson
Follow Alan W. Silberberg on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Ideagov
Lundy reinforces culture change for Gov 2.0
Government 2.0 Movement Seemingly Passes By Twitter, Inc.
What Does Digital Divide Mean to Gov 2.0?
Gov 2.0: NASA Readies Mission-Oriented Cloud Computing
Good post, as always and great insights. I agree, the person needs to be of DC, understand Government (All Branches, State, Local, etc..) but also get technology.
It is interesting that Twitter is also looking for someone that is entrepreneurial as well. That is the antithesis of Government.
People used to working in Govt and big companies (I was there, big time, with Fannie Mae and FedEx) are used to WAITING for permission to do things. The do research. They go to meetings. They brainstorm. They rarely DO anything.
Entrepreneurs, on the other hand, don't really ask anyone for permission. They just do.
Of course, entrepreneurs ask permission. They ask the permission of prospects, customers, investors, etc... They are savvy. They know who to talk to and who to network with.
They have to. Or no one will care about their company or product.
Critically, I think, they know how to get things done with few resources.
Perhaps Twitter thinks that whomever is in this role (he or she) will be really "starting up" not just a new office but also a new line of business for Twitter.
So, my recommendation to Twitter would be to look hard at if the person has had to DO.
Rather than wait for permission.
Regards,
Shaun Dakin
@ShaunDakin
@EndTheRoboCalls
A @Mashable Open Web Award Winner
And Candidate for the Twitter Govt position at @TweetGovt #HireSD