More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Alec Baldwin

Alec Baldwin

Posted: October 24, 2010 10:30 PM

In the October 25th issue of the New Yorker, Nicholas Lemann presents an interesting portrait of Harry Reid. For those, like myself, who are relatively unfamiliar with the details of Reid's hardscrabble upbringing, Lemann brings an angry, driven, methodical and philosophically galvanized Reid into focus. The fact that a man of Reid's background (and being from Nevada) is not a staunch Republican should serve as a great inspiration to Congressional Democrats who want to maintain their majority and remind voters of the ultimately good and transformative power of a courageous and creative federal government. Whereas some would not carry a dime in their pocket because it bore FDR's image, Lemann writes:

Other than a few close relationships, like the ones with his wife, Landra, and with Mike O'Callaghan, what most reliably draws warmth from Reid's tempered-steel heart is New Deal liberalism. He likes to say that his parents' religion was Franklin D. Roosevelt; practically the only good thing that ever happened in the life of his father was joining a union. "The American government is the greatest force for good in the history of mankind"; Social Security is "the greatest social program since the fishes and loaves." Sig Rogich, a Nevada adman who worked in George H. W. Bush's White House, and who, like most establishment Republicans in Nevada, is backing Reid over Sharron Angle, told me that during many evenings at his house he and Reid have relaxed to old Woody Guthrie songs on the CD player -- "poignant songs about society and the poor."

Reid, however, is in real trouble. Reid's opponent is Sharron Angle, another incurious, cookie-cutter, late-model neocon who demonizes that part of the federal budget that does not stimulate the Dow with every other word out of her mouth. Lemann concludes the article by writing:

European governments get into trouble by overloading on pensions and other expensive benefits; American governments get into trouble by practicing a kind of casino liberalism, in which credit flows too easily, everybody goes too deeply into debt, and if the growth ever stops, everything crashes. Now Nevadans are being presented with a great clash of social visions: help from Washington with Reid versus less of Washington with Angle. The stakes are real, not rhetorical. Reid's reëlection campaign is about the role of government in the United States. Obama's reëlection campaign will be about that, too.

Here, once again, is where we are with the election just a week away: the choice between someone like Reid, who largely pulled himself out of dispiriting poverty yet acknowledges his debt to a progressive federal government, or Sharron Angle, who is not an unintelligent woman, but merely vague in the way that many anti-government Tea Party types must always be. They must remain vague, at times numbingly so, in order to conceal the preposterously transparent sleight-of-hand of their fiscal policy. Tax cuts at the federal level often simply transfer obligations to state and municipal governments. Where, one might ask, does Angle think the necessary funds will come from, as more and more Americans are out of work and may remain so for a considerable amount of time?

Christine O'Donnell has attempted to present herself as Palin 2.0, yet the original Palin looks oddly listless and tired on the circuit these days and she has done virtually nothing to expand or freshen up her act. Like some Charo of the Chugach, Palin grinds out the same quips and winks and seems even less prepared for 2012, in any capacity, than she did in 2008. O'Donnell styled herself after the wrong role model, and obviously failed to understand that Palin's future in national politics is anything but secure. However, Angle's vagueness, along with her charmless, trudging delivery, seem to be working, as she finds herself in a dead heat with Reid.

I agree with Lemann that Reid vs. Angle typifies what is dividing Americans this election year. I just hope that all Americans will carefully consider one question as they go to the polls. Who do you think will lend you a hand should things get even worse?

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,410
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (19 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Godbey
09:15 PM on 11/14/2010
Hi Alec,

Please write about your experience with Parental Alienation, that is a subject close to half of America who get divorced and have their children isolated and alienated from them. I have many women friends whose ex-husbands are abusing their children this way. And as many men.
12:35 PM on 11/08/2010
Please run for office. Please. Please! You have a voice that people on both sides listen to (even if the right hates to, you still make them laugh). I won't be able to vote for your state office run, since I am registered in Illinois - but I'd go on tour with you as your makeup and hair person! You are larger than life and have a style that's a little sexy and scary! People would vote for you and I think we'd see you moving higher in politics over the years. Please, oh please run!
07:52 PM on 11/07/2010
"You should vote for whoever will give you a lending hand" This is really pathetic. JFK is turning over in his grave. What happened to "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country". Baldwin's analysis is the opposite.
04:45 PM on 11/05/2010
"IT IS NOT TIME TO CELEBRATE....IT IS TIME TO GET TO WORK"

The reign of government tyranny is close to an end.."We the people have spoken." Obama could very well be the end of things if the upper hand had not stepped in! This was an awesome Mid-term election and 2012 is gonna be better...but "Boehner said it better than anyone else..it is not time for victory celebration it is time to get to work..until unemplyment is stable,small business owners are secure enough to hire and when the government stops making all spending decisions as well as other decisions that will have a never-ending impact on the futre of our children..Government does not need to be in control that is why they are always making excuses!" I may live in Va but was born a Buckeye!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JAGJR
11:32 PM on 10/31/2010
Less Government everywhere EXCEPT regulating & TAXING CORPORATIONS.
10:54 PM on 10/31/2010
If you're asking if either one of these people will lend you a helping hand...you're in bigger trouble than we imagined!

Not everyone in the Fly Over States asks ourselves when we vote, "Hmm, what am I going to get from this fraud if I elect him?"
03:15 PM on 11/01/2010
At least your name is accurate
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zell
10:53 PM on 10/31/2010
Alec, You have posed a great question for We, the People............If we believe the polls, they will say, "We want to elect to the Senate and the House of Representatives, people who have consistently voted against our interests 100% of the time in the last two years on helping the unemployed, increasing the possibility of jobs, and getting tax cuts for the middle class............
photo
wonketteRAWKS
Hypocrisy is prevalent in BOTH parties!
10:27 PM on 10/31/2010
Can we choose "none of the above"?
09:29 PM on 10/31/2010
The "casino liberalism" description in the Lehman quote is fairly apt. Juicing up available credit in the Great Depression was sound pain management at the time, but Americans did get addicted to the stuff forever afterwards. The US now suffers from from a lack of talent relative to the large numbers of social climbing parasites who eagerly participated in the housing bubble while times were good, and now vent their anger at anyone in a position of authority who will not or cannot soothe their damaged egos. Obviously the Tea Party is against the "casino liberalism" that made this state of affairs possible, but until they articulate a constructive way out of this mess, I'm sure the mud will continue to fly.
09:16 PM on 10/31/2010
DID ANYONE WATCH REAGAN'S BUDGET DIRECTOR ON 60 MINUTES TONIGHT?

The REAL point of the story was after 12 minutes. quote "the wealthiest 5 percent made more money since 1980, than was previously created by mankind". And to think, it took the guy that started this economic nightmare (Reaganomics) rolling to point out this sickening fact.

Is ANYONE going to argue that every boom and bust, which ultimately gives the WEALTHY a tremendous BUYING OPPORTUNITY, isn't somehow planned and orchestrated? Think about it.

Recent Bloomberg headline "America's wealthiest income growth QUINTUPLES during the last 2 years"

DISTURBING? To say the least.
09:54 PM on 10/31/2010
ok...someone flagged me quoting Reagan's budget director as "abusive"......hmmm...could it be? Does Ms Palin really have that much time on her hands to read my lil old comments?

Wow...who knew a lil white kitty could hold so much power! ahhhh...the internet...greatest invention since all pine kitty litter (Aristocat brand is my favorite...doesn't stick to my lil paws)
10:01 PM on 10/31/2010
reminds me.... I gotta call my broker tomorrow
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robjh1
That Job Just Isn't Into You!
08:58 PM on 10/31/2010
Doesn't any one get it? The more the media attack Sharron Angle the stronger she gets. Take this woman serious for the simple fact that she aims to defeat Reid. It doesn't matter that she isn't as astute as her opponent. She is fighting this thing to the bitter end.

"and we are not saved..."
08:51 PM on 10/31/2010
"The American government is the greatest force for good in the history of mankind"; Social Security is "the greatest social program since the fishes and loaves."
Government is God?
I thought Dems believed in the seperation of church and state?
I guess only if it isn't the Church of Government.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
new beginning
Practice random acts of kindness-change the world
09:45 PM on 10/31/2010
fanned ya been!
10:03 PM on 10/31/2010
I thought Sweet Baby Jesus was God? I'm confused
photo
JakeMontero
Independent thinking
08:50 PM on 10/31/2010
i think she wins and you will move to Canada -- this time ...
08:56 PM on 10/31/2010
We can only hope.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VioletDatura
_-*-,,~*~_-*-,,~*~_-*-,,~*~
01:32 PM on 11/04/2010
Right after poor Rush leaves the states because of our Socialized Health Care.
08:57 PM on 10/31/2010
LOL, that's right, Alec was supposed to leave America when Bush won
08:46 PM on 10/31/2010
I love and enjoy reading Mr. Baldwin, I'm in Nevada and mobilizing friends and family to vote for Reid and the rest of the Nevada Democtratic ticket
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ASMom
10:25 PM on 10/31/2010
Go get em, and good luck! Thanks for doing it!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ladybuc99
Sanfordite
03:47 PM on 11/01/2010
Someone flagged your post as abusive! LOL

We've been infiltrated by Faux Nation... ;-)

Go Arizona! Make the right (I mean left) choice!
Viper
Former repub, still repenting
08:39 PM on 10/31/2010
Ironically, Angles only pay is as a part time subsititute teacher...a government job... and her Husband is a retired federal employee... whose pension and healthcare take care of her.

The Hypocracy! She hates your soc secuirty, but not her husbands government form of soc sec.

She hates medicare, but not her government supplied healthcare.

Regards
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Comicoffee
real analysis paired with a hefty dose of sarcasm
11:22 PM on 10/31/2010
Not surprising--hypocrisy is practically a founding principle of the Tea party.