For some reason it has become impossible to take the stance that the WGA Negotiating team has not performed up to task without being demonized.
I couldn't find it more obvious that they are not behaving as businessmen, they are behaving as writers. And writers HIRE businessmen to negotiate for them.
I support the writers. I work with writers. But I am consistently frustrated by the naivety and ignorance of the negotiating "strategies." Attempting to back huge conglomerates into a corner with hostile vernacular, asking for jurisdictional increases, not doing any sort of due dilligence in researching what they were up against, ad infinitum. Someone please tell me what is there to defend. And the negotiator that was hired, is underequipped for this particular negotiation. The DGA has Ken Ziffren and Gil Cates (a director AND a successful businessman).
Yes, you CAN support the writers without supporting the way the strike is being handled. But like Mr. Baldwin, as my frustration increases I care less and less about what was a fair cause.
I'm glad I saved my money.



Loading comments…

Posted December 26, 2007 | 05:47 PM (EST)