More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Alex Cornell du Houx

GET UPDATES FROM Alex Cornell du Houx
 

Make US Strong

Posted: 12/06/11 09:26 AM ET

America's greatness does not come solely from its military might, but also from its unique role as a force to provide stability and opportunity in the world.

While this ability stems in part from our military, it emanates also from the values we hold that help make other nations "great." WWII was won largely because America won the battle for the hearts and minds of the international community. The Greatest Generation helped rebuild the countries that were ravaged by the war in order to facilitate the growth of healthy, free societies.

Today, the same kind of international development is needed if we are to succeed in fighting terrorism. I saw this firsthand when I deployed to Iraq with the Marines. Our military superiority could not win the battle alone. Instead the combination of a strong military with a robust development program helped pave the way to much more stable country.

This fight does not just need the use of force, it needs the construction of good schools, effective police, and safe communities. Yet there are those in Congress who want to cut funding for international aid. Even though Director Petraeus and former Secretary Gates agree this development is needed, Conservatives in Congress are unwilling to make the investment in America's, and indeed the world's, security.

Our military is eradicating terrorism. International development will make sure it doesn't come back. Congress wants to cut funding for many government programs, but international aid should not and can not be on the chopping block. America can be great again, as long as we remember and act on the values that made us great before.

To see more, check out the Make US Strong Campaign's new ad, GI JOE.

 

Follow Alex Cornell du Houx on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Alex_Cornell

 
 
  • Comments
  • 1
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:08 AM on 12/08/2011
the only problem with this is that it shouldn't General Petraeus and the Secretary of Defense that decide about international development. In the last 15 years, USAID has become weaker and increasingly tied to the whims of the DoD. the military/development nexus is a still evolving field, but it's a potentially dangerous line to mix those who destroy with those who rebuild. long term sustainable development comes with trust, stability, and a strong and active civil society. i agree that funding for ODA cannot be cut, in fact it should be increased...through an increase in the autonomy and the budget of USAID.