iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Original Meaning of the Olympic Games


Let the Beijing Summer Olympic Game begin! The once-reclusive China has now commandeered the world stage by celebrating its first-time role as a host of the Olympic Games. To be sure, the Beijing Games were planned and have subsequently arrived in the midst of controversy. Besides its massive investments in needed infrastructure, China was forced to deal with a catastrophic earthquake in the Sichuan province in May, from which it is still reeling, and continues to struggle against the odds to decrease Beijing's stubborn smog. In addition, China's approach to dealing with political activists, including its crackdown on uprisings in Tibet, and its economic ties to Sudan continue to fuel criticism from human rights groups (as well as from President Bush, who is the first U.S. president to attend an Olympics on foreign soil). Although an Olympic boycott is now a moot question, I suspect that the Chinese government is ambivalent about its coming-out party because of the unrivaled mix of problems and promise that it has had ─ and continues ─ to face as host of the 2008 Summer Olympic Games!

It is estimated that some four billion people from around the world will have watched at least part of the Beijing Games before the XXIX Olympiad comes to a close. And in light of the state of the world at this very time, it is both fitting and instructive to view the Olympic Games in historical perspective by reflecting upon the original meaning of the Olympic Games in Ancient Greece, the birthplace of the Olympic Games, as well as by reminding ourselves of the original intent of the first, so-called "Modern" Olympic Games. As a proud Greek-American, it is my honor to share such a perspective in the hopes that it will place what is currently happening in Beijing into a meaningful context.

Ancient Olympic Games:

Although the first recorded Olympic Games were held in the Village of Olympia, Greece, in 776 BCE, it is not certain that these Games were the first ones to be held. Historians and archeologists, while not totally in agreement, believe that the Games were first held between 1370 and 884 BCE. The origin of the Games too is unclear and there are several competing legends; however, we do know that it takes its name from Olympia, a sanctuary site for the Greek gods. The Sanctuary of Zeus in Olympia housed a 12 meter high statue in ivory and gold of Zeus, the father of the Greek gods. This statue was one of the ancient Seven Wonders of the World.

The first Olympic Games, it is important to note, were religious festivals held near the shrine of the god in whose honor they were instituted, as well as were held in honor of deceased heroes (a concept displayed in the funeral games for Patroklos in Book 23 of Homer's epic poem, The Iliad). The Olympic Games were also held in the context of many ancient fertility festivals involving any number of gods and goddesses who were worshipped at the sacred site of Olympia. These festivals, which were held every four years, became so vitally important in Greek life that they were used as the basis for the Greek calendar in which the term, "Olympiad," was used to refer to the period between two Olympic Games.

It is important to underscore that sport and athletics were of prime importance to the ancient Greeks and most cities in ancient Greece had public gymnasiums where people gathered to train and, interestingly, to relax. The Greeks also believed that a healthy body was essential and that it naturally accompanied a fit mind and a healthy life. Sport, of course, was viewed also as good preparation for war, since the Greek armies had to be fit enough to march long distances, carrying all their heavy equipment, and then begin the fight with the enemy.

2008-08-12-2.jpeg

The ancient Greeks, moreover, were highly competitive and believed strongly in the concept of agon, or "competition," "contest." The ultimate Greek goal was to be the best. All aspects of life, especially sport and athletics, were centered around this concept. It was therefore considered one of the greatest honors to win a victory at Olympia. The fact that the only prize given at the Greek Olympic Games was an olive wreath illustrates this point. In other words, Olympic athletes competed for honor, not for material goods.

From the beginning, the games at Olympia served to strengthen the Greek sense of national unity and pride. Huge crowds would gather for the Games and some of the distinguished guests included Plato and Socrates. The tremendous physiques and abilities of the competitors aroused the imaginations and creative talents of artists, poets, sculptors, and writers. When the Games eventually lost their underlying religious significance around 420 BCE, they became a wonderful celebration of athleticism and the arts, which is how we still view them today.

Even though the ancient Olympic Games were fiercely competitive, their peaceful nature was always a distinguishing characteristic that made them unique. In this regard, one of the more extraordinary stories about ancient Greece is that during the Olympic Games, all fighting stopped. In other words, the athletes, who were often soldiers, were permitted to leave the military to participate in the Games and were guaranteed safe passage through enemy territory. No matter how long or how fierce a battle had raged, for seven days before and seven days after the Olympic Games (and, of course, for the period of the Games themselves), no fighting was allowed. Indeed, it was considered disrespectful to the gods to engage in conflict during this period! Against this backdrop, consider what is occurring around the world during the Beijing Games. Wouldn't it be great if all fighting stopped even for such a short period?

2008-08-12-1.jpeg

There are several reasons why the ancient Greeks espoused and practiced this fascinating policy in regards to the Olympic Games. First and foremost, the Greeks, as noted above, viewed the Olympic Games as a religious festival. It was therefore their duty to attend and/or participate in the Games, and duty to the gods was more important than duty to their city-states, which were fighting the wars in the first place! Second, many of the best athletes were also soldiers whose commanders did not want them to leave the fighting. With a truce in place and the fighting halted, these soldier-athletes were free to compete in the Games and then return to the fighting when the Games had finished. Third, some of the best athletes were not skilled fighters and were not even part of the military. Since war was so much a part of life in ancient Greece, victorious soldiers came to be heroes for their city-states and role models for the youth. Having the Olympic Games and showcasing the athletic talents of men (women had not yet become participants) who were not soldiers allowed city-states to celebrate heroes and role models who might not be the best fighters.

Modern Olympic Games:

The Olympic Games, as reported, were held every four years from 776 BC to 393 AD, when they were abolished by the Christian Byzantine Emperor Theodosius I. They then lay dormant for roughly 1,500 years. It wasn't until the late 19th century (AD) did the so-called "modern" Olympic movement begin. And it was a French aristocrat by the name of Pierre de Fredy, the Baron de Coubertin, who, fortunately for the world, founded this movement. Influenced by the events of the late 19th century and his education, Coubertin developed a passionate belief that sport and athletic competition possessed the power to benefit humankind and encourage peace among the nations of the world.

When he was just 17 years old, Coubertin began to think about the weaknesses of the French people who were trying to recover hope and self-respect following the Franco-Prussian War. He believed the solution was helping to develop character in each individual. He saw that competing for a place on an athletic team developed qualities of character which was the opposite of what the French schools at that time believed─they thought that games destroyed study. He was convinced that he should devote his entire time and energy to changing these ideas in France. He decided to start at the bottom because, as he expressed it, "the foundation of real human morality lies in mutual respect─and to respect one another it is necessary to know one another."

Coubertin, of course, drew his inspiration from the ancient Olympic Games. Like the Greeks before him, his vision and determination, fueled by his authentic commitment to the ideals of "Olympism," created a movement that, like no other, united athletes and nations of the world in peaceful celebration and competition. It was in 1894 when Coubertin finally was able to rekindle the ancient Olympic spirit and founded the International Olympic Committee (IOC). Two years later, the IOC gave birth to the modern Olympic Games by awarding Greece the opportunity to celebrate the first modern Olympiad with the 1896 Athens Games. And to this day the procession of nations marching in the opening ceremony of each and every Olympic Games gives Greece, the birthplace of the Olympic Games, its traditional place at the start.

We have the Baron Pierre de Coubertin to thank for bringing back the ideals of Olympism and for giving us the chance to experience one of the most universally recognized events and symbols of peace in the world. Let us not forget the following fundamental principles in the Olympic Charter as we watch the 2008 Beijing Summer Olympic Games unfold:

"Olympism is a philosophy of life, exalting and combining in a balanced whole the qualities of body, will, and mind. Blending Sport with culture and education, Olympism seeks to create a way of life based on the joy found in effort, the educational value of good example, and respect for universal fundamental ethical principles."

With these principles in mind, let the Olympic Games continue!

Read more HuffPost coverage of the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games

Follow Alex Pattakos on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DrMeaning

 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:16 PM on 08/16/2008
Thank you for helping us all remember the meaning behind the Olympics. With all the hype and focus on medals and competition, the intention --- and maybe what matters most --- is easily left unnoticed.

This year, the Olympics has had a deeper meaning for me. It started with a young Masters Student who showed up on my path earlier this year --- in English, her name is "Shiny." She is studying in Munich and lives in Shanghai. She returned home to China for the summer. In a message I received from her last week, she had this to add from her unique perspective---it seems perfect to share in this discussion:

"The Olympic games are very exciting. I think the most exciting thing is that people get to know each other (as well as others' culture and spirit) through the games and work their best to cheer their people. I love all the nice moments endowed by excellence around the world!!

Somehow we are doing the same thing in a different way, to know each other, to listen, to share, to grow and pass the torch of knowledge throughout nations. Let us enjoy the Olympics and pass on the friendship and peace with our hearts and souls!"

The rich history you shared in this post and reminder of the Olympic Charter has added still another level of meaning to the whole experience. Thank you, Alex.

Debbe Kennedy
Founder, Global Dialogue Center
Author, Putting Our Differences to Work
www.globaldialoguecenter.com
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Alex Pattakos
02:35 PM on 08/16/2008
Thanks, Debbe, for your very meaningful comment! And I want especially to thank you for sharing Shiny's enlightening perspective with us. It is obvious that she sees and resonates with the deeper meaning of the Olympic Games experience.

By the way, I would like to alert you and the Huffington Post community to my upcoming contributions on "Living with Meaning," which will be a regular feature of the Living section. So stay tuned!
06:28 AM on 08/13/2008
Many thanx for all the interesting replies...

Michale.....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:07 AM on 08/13/2008
A couple of points. Although the only prize at the games was non monitory the prize for winning was that you would earn vast sums from the other events during the year as champion. The games were not for amateurs in any way that we would understand it. They were professional athletes who happened to take part in one non paid competition per year.
If I remember correctly fighting did not stop during the games. Athletes were given safe passage but armies engaged in combat did not stop fighting during the games.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Alex Pattakos
10:02 AM on 08/13/2008
Thanks for your comment. As you can imagine, the Games "evolved" over the years, even during Ancient times (some 320 Games had been conducted before they were terminated). Regarding your first point, the purpose of winning still was not money, even though many champions were rewarded handsomely afterwards. The primary motivation was the glory and honor that came with participating in the Games. Insofar as your second point is concerned, there is not agreement here either. For instance, when the Macedonians gained ascendancy, they weren't interested in the peaceful nature of the games.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:48 PM on 08/12/2008
It gradually became clear to many that the amateurism rules had become outdated, not least because the self-financed amateurs of Western countries often were no match for the state-sponsored "full-time amateurs" of Eastern bloc countries. Nevertheless, the IOC, led by President Avery Brundage, held to the traditional rules regarding amateurism. In the 1970s, after Brundage left, amateurism requirements were dropped from the Olympic Charter, leaving decisions on professional participation to the international federation for each sport. This switch was perhaps best exemplified by the American Dream Team, composed of well-paid NBA stars, which won the Olympic gold medal in basketball in 1992. As of 2004, the only sports in which no professionals compete is boxing and baseball (though even this requires a definition of amateurism based on fight rules rather than on payment, as some boxers receive cash prizes from their National Olympic Committees); in men's football (soccer), the number of players over 23 years of age is limited to three per team.

Advertisement regulations are still very strict, at least on the actual playing field, although "Official

Wickopedia
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Alex Pattakos
10:12 PM on 08/12/2008
Nice analysis. Thanks for the food-for-thought.
05:50 PM on 08/12/2008
It is one of the many problems of the Olympics. As the article states "" The ultimate Greek goal was to be the best." In the modern world of professional sports "to be the best" means you have to have the best trainers, facilities, &tc. and devote yourself to the sport 24/7/12. No amateur can compete with this.

Should the Olympics limit itself to amateurs? In my view it should. Professionals have world championships enough to earn their livings in. An Olympic medal should be something amateurs could strive for, their ultimate goal, without having to compete against the artificial constructs of technology and science that are modern professional athletes.

But it won't happen.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Alex Pattakos
10:13 PM on 08/12/2008
Very well said. Being the "best" doesn't mean that the end justifies the means.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Russell Bishop
Author, Productivity Consultant, Executive Coach
05:41 PM on 08/12/2008
Thanks for creating this great piece. Timely, useful and a great reminder of where the planet needs to go.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:35 PM on 08/12/2008
I second the motion. This was indeed a fine and timely piece. Now all we need is a fine and timely Peace.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Alex Pattakos
10:11 PM on 08/12/2008
And thank YOU too! Indeed, we ALL need a fine and timely Peace!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Alex Pattakos
10:06 PM on 08/12/2008
Thank you, Russell, for your very kind review!
03:38 PM on 08/12/2008
This seems to be the perfect thread to ask this question...

I was always under the impression that to participate in the Olympics one has to be an AMATEUR athlete. I even recall that some had their medals taken away because it was discovered that they had played professionally or semi-pro way back when..

When did this change???

Michale.....
07:10 PM on 08/12/2008
In the 1970s, according to Wikipedia. But it had become a dead letter long before, because of state support for athletes from Soviet-bloc nations.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Alex Pattakos
09:57 PM on 08/12/2008
Thank you for responding to Michale's question. The notion of "amateur" in our postmodern age has obviously taken on a new meaning!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Alex Pattakos
10:05 PM on 08/12/2008
Thanks, Michale, for asking this question. Interestingly, the amateur vs. professional dispute also plagued the Ancient Games, especially during the Roman era.