Darjeeling Limited in Translation

Posted October 17, 2007 | 10:50 AM (EST)



stumbleupon :<em>Darjeeling Limited</em> in Translation   digg: <em>Darjeeling Limited</em> in Translation   reddit: <em>Darjeeling Limited</em> in Translation   del.icio.us: <em>Darjeeling Limited</em> in Translation

Wes Anderson is a man who makes movies that look like Wes Anderson made them. People who've never studied a lick of film theory can identify his directorial footprint by looking at the composition of a single frame, seeing the sad-sack main character meticulously placed at middle distance from the camera in the very center of the screen, gentle sight gags to the left and right, and imagining a '60s pop song playing in the background.

Of course, all his movies are lovely in their way, and he has yet to make a bad one, but after his first four movies all looked like Wes Anderson made them, it's understandable that critics and fans alike began to wish he could make something else, something less hermetically trapped within his own head. He has tried varying his co-writers: on The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou, he swapped the genial sensibility of Owen Wilson, co-writer of the first three, for the uncomfortable misanthropy of Noah Baumbach, and the movie suffered. On Darjeeling Limited, he brought in a different actor as co-writer, Sophia Coppola's cousin Jason Schwartzman, and succeeded. He made a movie that looks like Sofia Coppola co-directed it. He's still trapped inside the head of a neurotically meticulous director, but this time he's got company.

Darjeeling Limited is a post-Gen X road movie. That aspect of the movie is summed up perfectly in an Owen Wilson line in the trailer: "Well, originally, I guess we came here on a spiritual journey. But that didn't really pan out." Schwartzman, Wilson, and Adrien Brody play the Whitman brothers, who have traveled to India to try to rediscover their fraternal bond. When the brothers are off the train and in the countryside, the movie becomes Lost in Translation in India, complete with an opening Bill Murray cab chase sequence as Murray tries to catch the departing train. The treatment of Indians in the film is much like the treatment of Japanese in Lost in Translation: their speech is untranslated, their cultural mores presented through the bemused and uncomprehending eyes of the Whitman brothers, not mean-spirited but utterly foreign.

It's not a movie about India so much as a movie about disaffected Americans drawn to India because it's so different from the society they flunked out of. It's only an hour and a half long, mercifully short for a modern film, and its modest length plays to its advantage. It doesn't have time to be cloying or overly precious. Like all Anderson's movies, it doesn't have many belly laughs, but it's hard not to smile; it's much more humane and less cutting than Zissou.

In the mood-comedy-drama sphere, Wes Anderson and Sofia Coppola have been swimming in the same pond for almost a decade now. Anderson gave Coppola's cousin Jason Schwartzman his break as an actor, the lead role in Rushmore, and then Coppola cast Schwartzman in Marie Antoinette; similarly, Coppola cast Bill Murray in Lost in Translation to play a character similar to the one Murray played in Rushmore. Roman Coppola, co-writer of Darjeeling Limited with Anderson and Schwartzman (also his cousin), was assistant director on all Sofia's movies as well as on Zissou.

Anderson and Wilson share a similar cinematic sensibility, from the signature pop soundtracks (though Coppola tends to use '80s post-punk, while Anderson favors '60s British rock) to the wry half-laugh tone of the script to the straight deliveries of the actors against a comically stylized tableau. Perhaps Coppola and Anderson just grew into their 30s together, or maybe they realized after watching each other's movies that they wanted to share the same stars and crew.

Either way, they're twin voices of a new lost generation, the suddenly grown-up former eternal twentysomethings, the kids who survived both Kurt Cobain and Friends and are comically depressed, or bleakly amused, in their own struggle to cope with normal lives and normal dysfunction in a corporate suit world that doesn't see them as young any more. Even when Coppola made a costume drama about the French Revolution, Marie Antoinette, it was self-consciously modern, a biopic of a disaffected hedonist who pigs out to a Bow Wow Wow soundtrack and speaks in today's English.

But while the movies they make are good, they are also incredibly similar to one another, and in another 10 years the two will stop being young and start being middle-aged. Like Sarah Silverman, they're running out of time to be hip, and they should start giving a thought to learning how to do something else. And I'd give them the same advice I gave Sarah -- they should try their hand at action or horror.

I'm going to keep seeing their movies till they make a bad one, which hasn't happened yet, but if they want to stay relevant beyond this decade, they'll need to branch out of the light comedy/comedy-drama genre they've defined so well. Here's a thought: what if Wes Anderson co-wrote his next movie with Quentin Tarantino, or if Sophia Coppola's next movie was about Jack Ryan trying to beat the Russians?

They might have a blockbuster on their hands. And if either of those ideas takes hold, I'll be happy to accept a story credit.

Comments for this post are now closed

 
 

Comments
11
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- rainsng See Profile I'm a Fan of rainsng permalink

Being a suddenly grown-up former eternal twentysomething, a kid who survived both Kurt Cobain and Friends and as someone who is so to say "comically depressed", I personally think Wes Anderson's movies are art, and that he shouldn't team up with Quinten Terrantino (who is also an artist in his own right) just so he can attain cross-generational appeal...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:06 PM on 10/20/2007
- monstabunny See Profile I'm a Fan of monstabunny permalink

The Life Aquatic was a good movie? You should say up front that you have an unlimited appetite for twee.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 PM on 10/18/2007
- sandhi See Profile I'm a Fan of sandhi permalink

I LOVED this movie.
I'm not one to buy DVD's, but I do have several of Anderson's movies on DVD and will get this one as well when it comes out.
That is all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 PM on 10/18/2007
- rpence See Profile I'm a Fan of rpence permalink

I knew that Anderson used lots of the same actors more than once, which is a mark of great directors or those who aspire to be great.

But all this "inside" stuff involving near-incestuous creative activity among people who were lucky enough to born into Hollywood privilege bugs me, and explains the self-congratulatory, almost smug tone of movies like "Life Aquatic"--which IS a bad movie, despite what Remington says. Mean-spirited, boring, and too impressed with itself by half.

I'm not saying the Coppolas, et al. don't work hard or are untalented. But America/Hollywood isn't a meritocracy, and you know their names opened doors that are closed to people with more talent and fewer connections.

I liked "Royal Tenenbaums" because of Gene Hackman, who overcame his doubts about Anderson to do the film.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 AM on 10/18/2007
- LittleMarymoonshine See Profile I'm a Fan of LittleMarymoonshine permalink

Our family loved this movie. We watched with the Portland, OR crowd. There were many belly laughs.
Twice the audience had a hard time getting the laughter under control to hear the next lines.
Everyone in our party agreed that we would have like to stay for a second showing.
Yes, it is full of the flavor of the other movies, but that did not detract for us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 AM on 10/18/2007
- HollywoodFilth See Profile I'm a Fan of HollywoodFilth permalink

I would like to see Anderson direct a script he had no hand in writing. Not that I think he's a bad writer or that there needs to be a division of creative labor, I just think it would be interesting to see how his visual style translates to someone else's source material.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 PM on 10/17/2007
- ThePlaylist See Profile I'm a Fan of ThePlaylist permalink

This is a terrible, terrible headline, btw.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 10/17/2007
- kkuchenb See Profile I'm a Fan of kkuchenb permalink

I don't quite understand the criticisms here. Not a thing wrong with having one's own style, even a very recognizable one. Seems to have worked for Woody Allen and Alfred Hitchcock. I have enjoyed all Wes Anderson's films, even the frosty Life Aquatic. And I agree with Wilsonfisk89 that the heart in Anderson's films is one of their greatest attributes (perhaps why Zissou didn't work so well), and it probably gets under the skin of hipsters.

Anderson and Tarantino? Now that's a movie I wouldn't pay a dime to see. Talk about an overrated, heartless director.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 PM on 10/17/2007
- sisterdebmac See Profile I'm a Fan of sisterdebmac permalink

Yeah, I've never seen an article both praise and damn someone at the same time like this one. I'm confused. You seem to be saying, "Hey, guys, I really like your movies but maybe you should make Hollywood schlock instead because you're not getting any younger and someone will eventually need to replace Michael Bay." WTF?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 PM on 10/17/2007
- Wilsonfisk89 See Profile I'm a Fan of Wilsonfisk89 permalink

Anderson has become a target lately, and I think it's unwarranted. Sure, yea, he has his same aestetic, ok, great. You are all saying that! And not much else! Nothing new or profound Alex! So many reviewers are attacking him based on his "precious" style, soundtrack, familial themes of loss and redemption, we get it! You guys can dish it out, wow! You can look at a young directors body of work and find similarities, and degrade his artistry, gee your good. What about the actual content? What about the film itself? No, you post-modern commentators are too cool for that trite right? Who cares about a tender, personal, heartfelt picture these days? Lets find some glaring inadequacies, so we can all feel so much smarter! Well, I had the pleasure of meeting Wes and Jason last week, as they humbly attended the Philly screening of Darjeeling, and they were incredibly jovial, sweet, and freindly. Filmmaking to Wes Anderson is a personal form of expression. Like Fellini or Renoir before him, he works out his life and his feelings on film. He understands his world through the camera lens, and in doing so, his audience considers thiers. While you may be contented to put down such an honest, beautiful filmmaker, who is one of the few truly unique American voices working today, perhaps we should also try to see the magic in his work as well? Perhaps we should try to celebrate the auteur in this homogenous industry? When every single reviewer gets hung up on the same petty put-downs no real discussion or appreciation takes place. Well, the studios listen. So lets marginalize an artist to make way for the next disposable film commodity to sell.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 PM on 10/17/2007
- Valkyrie See Profile I'm a Fan of Valkyrie permalink

I'm in their generation, and I own all of their movies. Unfortunately, the only one I watch with regularity would be Rushmore. They really are all the same and while I agree with the assertions made here, I don't intend to watch any more of their "all the same" movies. My money is better spent elsewhere . . . like Resident Evil 5: Let's Find Another Word For Apocalyspe, Annihalation, Extinction etc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 10/17/2007
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in


Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
Alex Remington›
 

 Site  Web ask.com