More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Alex Remington

Alex Remington

Posted: March 2, 2010 01:33 AM

Hackers: A Comically Inept Movie With Perhaps the Worst Computer Visuals of the '90s

What's Your Reaction:

Once upon a time, the word "hacker" had a sort of outlaw cachet. At the beginning of the boom of the internet and World Wide Web -- say, the early '80s to the late '90s -- computers were ubiquitous but mysterious, seemingly limitless in capacity. And hackers were the wizards who understood them, manipulated them, and bent them to their will. A few movies were made to dramatize the new world of viruses and hackers, from 1983's Wargames (rating: 80) to 1995's The Net (rating: 59) andHackers. The computer world they depicted bore little resemblance to the one the rest of us inhabited. By the time of The Matrix (rating: 86), it had reached the point of self-parody.

But Hackers sank below absurdity. Computers in the movies never work the way they do in real life -- according to the "No Windows Rule" of the San Antonio Express-News's Harry Thomas, "No film uses either the Windows or Mac operating systems that the rest of the world uses on a daily basis. All movie computers have their own OS that pops up in windows that make aesthetically pleasing sounds and respond to everything with busy little noises." In Hackers, the internet is a psychedelic trip, viruses speak, and the battle between hacker viruses and corporate antivirus software is visualized on a video wall showing a picture that looks like a cross between Missile Command and Rez. It doesn't help that the rest of the film looks terrible as well, with production values resembling the reenactment interstitials of a PBS documentary.

The film hasn't been entirely forgotten, however, for two reasons. An incidental phrase on a background sign in one shot of the movie, "Trust Your Technolust," has become a bit of a catchphrase on the internet, serving as the slogan for the Hak5 show on the Revision3 web network. The other reason, of course, is that it stars a young, briefly naked Angelina Jolie. The rest of the cast is mostly forgettable, though it's bizarrely stacked with "that guys" and people who went on to do far more interesting things, including Felicity Huffman, Matthew Lillard, Latin heartthrob Marc Anthony, Penn Jillette (of Penn & Teller), Lorraine Bracco (who played Dr. Melfi on "The Sopranos"), and Wendell Pierce (who played Bunk on "The Wire").

While the actors were no great shakes, and star Jonny Lee Miller was fairly awful, the real blame for the movie's ineptitude has to be laid at the feet of the director, Iain Softley. A former music video director, he's only helmed 6 movies, and they mostly aren't good: along than Hackers, he also directed K-PAX and The Skeleton Key. (I kind of liked his costume drama The Wings of the Dove (rating: 67), but I've always had a thing for Helena Bonham Carter, and it's the kind of movie that sounds like it ought to be directed by a Brit named Softley.) So he's kind of a hack. But music video directors aren't usually apt to make movies as visually clueless as this one. Perhaps cinematographer Andrzej Sekula is to blame, though Sekula certainly did a decent job with Pulp Fiction (rating: 90). Tarantino knew what he was doing, though. No element of this movie bears a strong director's stamp. Instead, it comes off like an amateurish mess, an out-of-touch cash-in attempt to portray youth culture by a group of people without a clue. Not even Angelina Jolie -- or her obvious assets -- can save that.

Rating: 20
Crossposted on Remingtonstein.
 

Follow Alex Remington on Twitter: www.twitter.com/alexremington

 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:58 AM on 03/05/2010
A little self-righteous aren't we? The movie is a cult classic which is the reason you're still talking about it today and has spawned cultural references 15 years later. It has little to do with partial nudity from Angelina. You could see her in full nudity, in her best performance, Gia if that floats your boat. The movie was meant to be fun and not taken too seriously.

While there were some clear inaccuracies, a significant amount was based on real life techniques and real life events.

I'd also tell people to go check out the soundtrack because that was also terrific.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DuffyShort
Born in in a segregated world..
05:37 PM on 03/03/2010
I challenge you to go back and view Wargames again. It was a very well done movie.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Alex Remington
06:13 PM on 03/03/2010
I love Wargames. I gave it a rating of 80 on a 100-point scale -- 60 points higher than Hackers. I think it holds up wonderfully. (And I think we can safely say that it's by far the best work Eddie Deezen ever did on screen.)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AGarcia
01:56 PM on 03/03/2010
Lousy, terrible, stupid, schmaltzy, yet innocent and wonderful in a strange way. I'd watch it again for a good laugh and Jolie's vamp looks and posterior. Parker Stevens on a skateboard, what else to you want?
09:00 AM on 03/03/2010
Mixed in with the unrealistic is at least one realistic part. It shows a team of hackers working tag time all night to make a hack, in contrast to the 30-second-hack which is standard in the movies. And at the beginning it throws in some social engineering when an employee gives up info to a hacker who they think is a legitimate employee. The movie also makes it clear that hacking takes a lot of background work, like collecting hard to find computer documentation. I second the question, "Why are you bringing this up now?".
04:48 PM on 03/02/2010
The movie has become a minor cult hit because it was big, dumb colorful fun and no one in their right sense of mind thought that this movie had ANY semblance of reality. Some of us are just able to enjoy a movie on its own merits.

I don't quite understand why why the writer felt the need to blog about a movie that's 15 year's old to make his point about hackers. What's the next blog going to be about, how Richard Pryor didn't really synthesize kryptonite by substituting nicotine for one of the ingredients?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Eris23
Justice is in indefinite detention.
05:11 PM on 03/02/2010
There's one element that's left out which, in my opinion, is the biggest insult. "Emmanuel Goldstein," the so-called expert hacker behind 2600 magazine, was apparently consulted for this film to make sure it was "real." LOL!

The movie may have ended up being a big colorful joke with an absurd plot. But, that apparently wasn't the intent. This was "The Room" with a bigger budget.

On a side note, one of the best and most fun big budget "Hacker" movies of this time frame which deserves mention is Sneakers. There's the difference between something that is playful and creative while toying with what is real versus something that is a complete Hollywood cash in hack. It would have been fitting if "Hackers" was simply called "Hack."
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
03:28 PM on 03/02/2010
Don't forget how those Hollywood computers all respond to plain English commands such as "access restricted files" rather than all the headache-inducing stuff you see with Java and C++.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IMEHO
04:08 PM on 03/02/2010
Yes that is funny.
02:47 PM on 03/02/2010
"Hack the Gibson" also made it into the geek vernacular.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IMEHO
01:19 PM on 03/02/2010
Just a note here, the director totally messed up the casting for the Skeleton Key. Great plot great movie but Kate Hudson should not have been the leading actress. Kate is great in comedies but she didn't have the edge to pull off the role. The saving grace performances were Gena Rowlands, Peter Sarsgaards and Joy Bryants. Kate and Peter had almost no chemistry so him flirting with her, and vice versa fell so flat. Also the tension between Gena and Kate was so forced, it was like one could see they were probalby friends in real life and trying hard to "scare" each other. The movie should have a sequel with Joy Bryant, Peter Sarsgaard, and David Morse. Bad casting on the director's part he should have realized those people wouldn't gel. But good movie just needed another leading actress
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
12:56 PM on 03/02/2010
The term "hacker" didn't originally have any criminal overtones. Back when the Internet was the Arpanet a hacker was just a really good (although potentially somewhat undisciplined) programmer who could solve problems or make prototypes faster than your normal non-super-human programmer.
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
03:27 PM on 03/02/2010
Actually, "hacking" was originally MIT slang for playing practical jokes.
04:16 PM on 03/02/2010
it did when they try to release the davinci!
NO!!!!!
12:31 PM on 03/02/2010
Welcome to "You're Wrong Night." Jolie's hotness in that movie more than makes up for any and all flaws it may have.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
12:56 PM on 03/02/2010
Well its all subjective when it comes to hotness. I've never found Jolie to be hot at all and certainly not nearly hot enough to make up for that movie.