On Sept. 21, Texas executed Lawrence Brewer for the murder of James Byrd in 1998, and on Sept. 22, Georgia executed Troy Anthony Davis for the murder of a white police officer, Mark MacPhail, 22 years ago. None of these murders can be justified. Yet, for all the apparent differences between these two cases, both shed light on the enduring legacy of racism and lynching in America.
While Davis' case gained international attention -- the Pope, former President Carter, the former FBI Director William Sessions and eight former prison wardens all called for a stay of execution, given the lack of physical evidence connecting Davis to the crime and the overwhelming doubt cast by seven witnesses who recanted their original testimony -- the cases appear vastly different, in part because Davis' sympathetic character stands in stark contrast to Brewer, the self-avowed white supremacist.
Yet both cases instruct us about white American racial amnesia. As James Cone writes in his recent book "The Cross and the Lynching Tree," "what it invisible to white Christians and their theologians is inescapable to black people."
What is invisible to white Christians and their theologians is the history and enduring legacy of lynching in the 21st century.
What is invisible to white Christians is the connection between the crucified peoples in America -- including Troy Davis -- to the cross of Jesus Christ. Disproportionate arrests, prosecution, capital sentencing, and application of the death penalty against African Americans and Latinos belies any claim that the administration of the capital punishment is rational or fair.
In its recent study, "Struck By Lightening: The Arbitrariness of the Death Penalty 35 Years After Its Re-instatement in 1976," the Death Penalty Information Center is clear that race and geography too often play dominant roles in the application of capital punishment. The influence of race in who is prosecuted for the death penalty and who is not, racial bias in sentencing, unfair jury selection processes, and appeal and post-conviction processes prone to irreversible error result in a death penalty system that disproportionately selects brothers and sisters of color and those who have killed white victims.
More than 75 percent of murder victims in cases resulting in an execution were white, even though nationally roughly 50 percent of murder victims are white.
Of 138 people exonerated since 1976, more than 60 percent are men of color, predominantly black and brown and economically poor. Illinois did not place a moratorium on the death penalty until it realized that it was about to execute 13 innocent men of color in 2000. It is high time for the nation to follow the example of Illinois and execute the death penalty itself.
According to a 2011 National District Attorney's Association study, nearly 98 percent of district attorneys in states that apply the death penalty are white. In my home state of Louisiana, 97.5 percent of DAs are white and only 2.5 percent are African American. Of 291 Louisiana state judges, only 18 percent are African American. White Americans tend not to have any clue why these numbers ought to be disturbing in a so-called "post-racial" society.
Given the history of our nation, the pervasive ways that we are taught to associate whiteness with innocence and blackness with criminality, we need to shift our collective assumptions about racial bias in the entire judicial system, including legal education. There is too much data pointing to the fact that even whites who claim to hold values of racial equity actually act out of racial bias. Scholars, such as Michelle Alexander in "The New Jim Crow" and Devah Pager in "Marked: Race, Crime, and Finding Work in an Era of Mass Incarceration," have demonstrated how white racial bias permeates U.S. society.
Studies of the death penalty in Louisiana, among many other states, find that those who kill whites are two to three times more likely to be sentenced to death than those who killed blacks. In California, those who killed whites were four times more likely to be sentenced to death than those who killed Latinos. Although African Americans constitute 13 percent of U.S. population, 41 percent of all death row inmates nationally are African American. This disproportionate application of the death penalty to African Americans is even greater in death penalty states that have a history of lynching, including Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana and Texas.
Brewer's case may seem less obvious in how it represents the enduring legacy of racism and lynching in America. Yet, how many Christian congregations and theologians remember that James Byrd, a black man, was dragged to death behind a truck by Brewer and his white friends? How many know that it is rare for a district attorney to prosecute cases involving an African American or Latino victim?
While most white Americans and their churches do not support the overt white supremacy of Lawrence Brewer, the deafening silence of white Christians in the face of a system that disproportionately imprisons and executes men of color is chilling. The relative silence of white Christian America ought to be terrifying.
It is time to find our religion, white America. It is time to find that our redemption is fundamentally linked to our brothers and sisters of color, who we incarcerate and execute. It is time to contend with our complicity in the enduring legacy of lynching in the contemporary practice of the death penalty and how this contradicts our claims to be Christian and democratic.
Follow Alexander Mikulich, Ph.D. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MikulichAlex
James Abbott-Thompson: Troy Davis: Sacrificing the Innocent
Capital punishment in the United States - Wikipedia, the free ...
Death penalty statistics from the US: which state executes the most ...
Death Penalty in America Divides Country, Christian News
Death Penalty in the United States - Pros and Cons of ... - US Politics
Death Penalty : Pictures, Videos, Breaking News - Huffington Post
A problem I see however is the language that was used by some people supporting Mr Davis. The headline here is a perfect example. It's inflammatory and sensationalistic, aimed at getting the base fired up. However, that same language is going to fire up the other side as well.
I'm not a religious person but I have read the bible and I understand that no matter what is said by others, the bible is actually pro-death penalty. But at the same time this reminds me of Exodus, when God sends Moses to Pharoah he instructs him on what to say and do and to bring Aron etc, but God also tells him how He'll harden Pharoahs heart as well, so essentially God recognized it as pointless. Unfortunately that appears to be the case here as well.
As far as linking it with Christianity, there are many who would say that it is distinctly NOT Christian behavior but my stance on that is that if someone calls themselves a Christian then they are a Christian of their own particular flavor. Some flavors are vile.
Yes there is a problem. And yes, many so-called christians are vehemently vocal in both their prejudice and their hypocrisy. But it wasn't white Christians who executed Davis, it was the legal system. Our legal system is flawed. Our nation is racist. And how hard have we tried to exclude God and any hint of religion from our government? And we still blame white Christians? Seems to me there's plenty of blame to go around.
The problem isn't white Christians, the problem is the human heart. True Christianity (admittedly something that is rarely seen in these days) seeks to break down the barriers, to help the hurting, to comfort the grieving, to care for the needy, and to defend the innocent.
We, as a nation, have gone to great extremes to remove God from among us. And it sure looks like we're getting pretty good at it. Look for things to get worse... because without God it sure isn't going to get any better.
And the statement that "How many know that it is rare for a district attorney to prosecute cases involving an African American or Latino victim?" is pure nonsense. People are prosecuted for killing blacks all the time. A lot of murders, as it happens, have black victims. The statement that nobody is prosecuted for these crimes is laughable.
As to the statistics on victims, you can parse them many ways, depending upon what crimes you view as similar. But even if you could show that those who murder blacks are not being punished as severely as those who murder whites, the obvious response should be to punish those who murder blacks more, not punish those who murder whites less.
Such as?
You offer some excellent suggestions for on how to avoid committing crimes and rightly warn of the peril of landing yourself in the criminal justice system. Now all you need to do is explain how this will help the people who do all the things you suggest, commit no crime, but are wrongly accused anyway - possibly in some part as a result of prejudices.
For my part, I'm not sure which bothers me more - the disparity in charging and sentencing based on color and/or income or the assumption that revenge is justified. Not to be cruel, but I'd love to survey family members and loved ones of people whose murderers have been executed a year or so after the execution to see if they really feel all the much better. I'd also like the stats on how people feel when the executed murderer was proven innocent after the execution.