- BIG NEWS:
- Hunger
- |
- Service
- |
- Homelessness
- |
I'm an optimist. In these days of pessimistic news about climate change, I like to surround myself with forward-thinking people. One of these is David Johnston, president of What's Working. Johnston recently received the SAM Sustainability Pioneer Award, which is considered the Nobel prize in the sustainability world.
On the same day that Vice President Joe Biden announced that the Obama administration is backing a plan to let homeowners finance the cost of energy-efficiency improvements through their property tax assessments, Johnston announced the launch of the national Home Energy Leadership Training Certification program. The goal of the certification is to create a standardized training program for people working in the field of energy-efficiency.
Like Bill McKibben (Harvard '82), author and founder of the 350.org global movement*, a worldwide energy action group that will promote demonstrations on every continent this weekend, Johnston affirms that we're at a tipping point. In this case, it's a tipping point in consciousness. "We're at a point," says Johnston, "where everything we know is out of date. What happens next is unknowable, unspeakable, and undetermined."
Can we self-organize in a state of chaos? he asks, then provides the answer. "We have to make carbon use personal, then give everyone a way to take part. We have to take the home energy audit and convert it into work."
Right now, says Johnston, fewer than 2 percent of homes in the U.S. have had energy audits. Of this group, only 10 percent have taken any action. His national certification program would take some of the $7.6 billion in stimulus money that Biden says is needed to weatherproof homes and create nearly 100 percent employment in every community.
Direct actions to reduce energy consumption will also be the focus of the U.S. delegation this December, as they head to Copenhagen and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Although I was the U.N.'s first accredited blogger at the UNFCCC conference in Bali in 2007, I don't plan to head to Copenhagen this year. Here's why:
I'm keeping my attention focused instead on the U.S. Congress. Whatever ambitious, comprehensive agreement comes out of Copenhagen, it will still require the agreement of members of the U.S. Congress for the U.S. to sign on to this international accord.
Given the partisan politics in Washington DC these days, could recalcitrant Republicans in Congress be the ones to "close the books" on the human race? If the U.S. Congress refuses to ratify the agreement that emerges from Copenhagen, will China and India also refuse to ratify it?
In spite of this pessimistic thought, I remain an optimist ... after all, the Republicans in Congress have children and grandchildren too. We're all traveling together across the cosmos on tiny spaceship Earth. The fate of the Earth is our fate too. Do you agree?
* 350.org advocates getting the world back to 350 parts per million of atmospheric carbon dioxide, the principal gas associated with global warming. The 350 ppm level is what scientists last year said is the maximum at which civilization can prosper. We're now at 390 ppm and levels are rising at the rate of 2 ppm each year.
Follow Alexia Parks on Twitter: www.twitter.com/alexiaparks
Jessy Tolkan: Five Things Obama Should Say in Friday's MIT Climate Change Speech
This is a critical time for President Obama to weigh in on climate change, as the coming months will have a lasting impact on our policy, security and quality of life going forward.
Richard Graves: Global Civil Society Starts to Take Up the Climate Challenge
When diplomats and lobbyists and nonprofit groups descend on Copenhagen this fall, perhaps the cliché that the whole world is watching will, this time, be nothing but the truth.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
The love affair with the automobile opens a promising path to sharply reducing the need for fossil fuels. This could open a way to slow and perhaps reverse climate change.
Revolutionary new technology makes possible electric cars where batteries have been superseded. They will need no recharge. Also, hybrid engines that might need to be fueled with only one gallon of water for each thousand miles of driving.
The article: 5 Steps to Revive the Auto Industry and the Economy on the website: http://www.aesopinstitute.org outlines breakthroughs leading to cars and trucks that need no fossil fuel or recharge. Later, more advanced versions will become power plants when parked, wirelessly selling electricity to the local utility.
These statements will understandably be greeted with skepticism and disbelief. However, independent laboratory validation of one remarkable breakthrough has taken place at Rowan University. It produced far more heat than can readily be explained by existing science, clearly suggesting a new source of energy is involved. The lead scientist at Rowan is now a Fellow at Cambridge University. He seeks UK laboratory reproduction. Parallel efforts have begun in Norway. It's time for our national laboratories and others to reproduce these experiments.
The Rowan validation began the process of proving that new technology can allow a barrel of water to replace 200 barrels of oil!
Radically new technologies will let the love affair with vehicles change much of what is currently believed about energy.
Let’s accelerate the process. Imagine the potential impact!
The love affair with the automobile opens a promising path to sharply reducing the need for fossil fuels. This could open a way to reverse Global Warming.
Revolutionary new technology will make possible electric cars where batteries have been superseded, so they need no recharge - as well as hybrid engines that might need to be fueled with only one gallon of water for each thousand miles of driving.
The article: 5 Steps to Revive the Auto Industry and the Economy on the website: http://www.aesopinstitute.org outlines breakthroughs leading to cars and trucks that need no fossil fuel or recharge. Later, more advanced versions will become power plants when parked, wirelessly selling electricity to the local utility.
These statements will understandably be greeted with skepticism and disbelief. However, independent laboratory validation of one remarkable breakthrough has taken place at Rowan University. It produced far more heat than can readily be explained by existing science, clearly suggesting a new source of energy is involved. The lead scientist at Rowan is now a Fellow at Cambridge University. He seeks UK laboratory reproduction. Parallel efforts have begun in Norway. Is it not time for our national laboratories and others to try these experiments?
The Rowan validation began the process of proving that new technology can allow a barrel of water to replace 200 barrels of oil!
Radically new technologies will let the love affair with vehicles change much of what is currently believed about energy.
Let’s accelerate the process!
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with