iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Allison Gaudet Yarrow
 

The Sex Ed Women Really Need

Posted: 08/28/2011 12:32 pm

Where I grew up, in the buckle of the Bible Belt, sex, when it was discussed at all, was presented as something to be feared -- it bred diseases and unwanted babies. I got my first inklings of what sex actually involved not in a classroom but rather from
rumors spread by girlfriends in the bathroom at sleep-away camp. My first classroom sex talk was a "beware the period" lecture that took place after the boys were safely removed to play kickball. In high school, my teacher -- Ski Slope Barbie's doppelganger, resplendent in metallic sweats -- gesticulated toward a plastic skeleton's (nonexistent) vagina. She meekly presented the alarming facts about diseases, unwanted pregnancies and AIDS, for which my state had some of the highest rates in the country.

If there's one thing women share, it's proverbial horror stories of early sexual discovery -- in classrooms, bathrooms or late night sleepover conversations. Which is why New York State's recent mandate that sex education in public schools include birth control methodologies and advice about when to become sexual be rolled into a mixed-gender health class is a good thing.

There is every indication that people who have sex education are better adjusted sexually," said Professor of Anthropology at Rutgets, Dr. Helen Fisher when I called to ask her about it. The new law puts New York leagues ahead of states like Georgia, which prioritizes abstinence and does not require contraception, and Montana, which requires no sex education at all.

But the difficulty we've had establishing informative, effective, non-cringe-worthy sex education in the U.S., and the bad experiences so many of us had with sex ed, raise a larger question: How does sex education shape how and if women become healthy sexual beings?

First of All, It's Not 'Organ Recital'

Fisher said students years ago nicknamed sterile, fact-based sex education "organ recital." She sympathized with them -- it becomes easy to disconnect from a subject taught in a boring way. Under this umbrella can also fall abstinence-based education and the oodles of evidence proving that just teaching teens to avoid sex not only doesn't prevent them from having sex but also could put them at an increased risk. Rates of unwanted pregnancy and STDs are higher among groups who are only taught not to have sex. When sex ed does lead women to delay sexual experience, Fisher points out, they often engage impulsively later without protection or knowledge.

In other words, limiting resources and only pointing to body parts on a chart or diagram are not ways to produce sexually empowered women. Instead, they lead to women who are misinformed, or just bored. Director of The Medical Center for Female Sexuality in New York, Bat Sheva Marcus eschews, "Reproduction-and-How-Not-To-Get-Pregnant Education," in favor of a tender approach that includes -- wait for it -- how to have sex in the first place. Now that is interesting. She employs the analogy of breastfeeding, an activity that is natural and difficult, and one women must learn how to perform. The same goes for sex, she says. Marcus champions giving women a road map to demystify the sexual experience, and then encouraging them toward informed.

Learn How to Say No -- And Yes

It can take a lifetime to learn how to choose sex with the right person, but it's important to encourage young women in that process. "Not telling you that you should or shouldn't," she said. "Simply telling you how to handle what goes on, emotionally, physically, spiritually and how to handle parents and pressure." Sex ed should also help teens handle those difficult, uncomfortable conversations with parents about sex. Fisher said that young women should learn how to manage persistent boyfriends' unwanted advances, and also, how to say yes. Good sex ed also teaches women that they can consent to or refuse birth control methods, said Fisher. As men and women age, they are more likely to use female methods -- pills, IUDs, diaphragms -- than male ones, like condoms. When they reach their late 20s, 44% of women and 45% men exclusively use female methods of birth control, according to data from the Guttmacher Institute. Fisher stresses that women telling partners what they want should not be limited to pleasure, but also when setting ground rules.

It's All About The Teacher

Remember Ski Slope Barbie, my sex education teacher? "As a teacher, you teach things your way and 90% of communication is nonverbal," said Fisher. Especially when it comes to instructing students on the basics (and later, finer points) of sex, the teacher's body language and confidence are incredibly important. My teacher was afraid and unsure, which suggested that sex was something to be afraid of and unsure about.

Sex is Fun!

At any point in your own sex education, did anyone mention that sex usually is, and should be, a good time -- and good for you? For many of us, the answer is no, and this is information young women deserve to have, said Fisher. There's a reason it evolved as a good experience," she said, before listing the many physiological benefits of sex: It reduces stress, boosts the immune system, is quality exercise and drives up dopamine (the pleasure chemical) in the brain. Informing young women of the physiological benefits of the sexual experience may alleviate some of the emotional, social and moral pressures and fear of the unknown. All of which can lead to a much more fulfilling, empowered sex life later on.

 
FOLLOW WOMEN
Where I grew up, in the buckle of the Bible Belt, sex, when it was discussed at all, was presented as something to be feared -- it bred diseases and unwanted babies. I got my first inklings of what se...
Where I grew up, in the buckle of the Bible Belt, sex, when it was discussed at all, was presented as something to be feared -- it bred diseases and unwanted babies. I got my first inklings of what se...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 149
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:43 PM on 10/19/2011
AGY, this is a brilliant article. I feel the same way about how empty sex ed was, or is. My sex ed was about body parts, and had no real pertinence to my life at the time. Kudos to NY for their position on and method of teaching sex ed. All facets should be covered. I am so pleased to know they are teaching also that it is FUN and HEALTHY. Our company mission is to remind people that sex=happiness=longevity, and sex is 100% organic!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
isfturtle
01:23 AM on 09/06/2011
Sex ed is one of the few things that I think my school system did right. They started in 5th grade, separating the boys and the girls, basically giving anatomy lessons and discussing the changes that occur at puberty. Then, in 6th-8th grade it was similar, but with added lessons on "the value of postponing sexual activity until marriage" and a brief discussion of STDs, as well as discussions about peer pressure. Then in high school they started talking about contraception, and the classes were no longer separated by gender. (The curriculum was, of course, more complex than this brief summary, but I feel that those were the important points.)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:12 PM on 09/05/2011
Only in the third world and most of America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
12:59 AM on 09/04/2011
Maybe a workable compromise would be to teach sex education but first make sure that all of the information being presented was incorrect. Should be make both sides to the debate over sex-ed unhappy, which would represent a fair and balanced approach.
12:24 PM on 08/31/2011
OK so lets look at things a little differently, biologically the human race is a 2 piece group, 2 of one piece doesnt fit, wont procreate. Now if you remove the GOD from the rules set forth in the book called the bible then you would see that there are common sense rules/guideline to follow and they were there to keep people healthy and safe, for sex, for food preparation, for where to put your latrine, etc. There was no OB/GYN, no hospital with wide spectrum antibiotics and such.
SO the rules ARE true and right. For the people who chose to not believe in God, try reading some of it as a basic rules for safe living.
for you women ever have a severe pelvic infection, or men have to carry your significant other in to doctor like a medicine ball,,, I did. Poor girl was in severe distress, her previous lover was not well versed in hygiene.
Now as for sex education, its too bad the parents WONT teach their kids anymore but then the liberal teardown artists have made a mockery of schooling, rather than teach thinking, reading , writing and history(so they dont make same mistakes as in past) they want to teach socialism.
If you treat a teenager with certain respect like they are moving into young adulthood then teach them EVERYTHING, including all of the issues with promiscuous sex and diseases. Google diseases caused by homosexuality, the facts are scarey !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrMJG
Working towards a better world
12:18 AM on 09/03/2011
So, you suggest that sex ed is ONLY to induce fear? Teaching hygiene MUST be a part of any god sex ed program. Abstinence ed even ignores even this part as, at least the programs I know and have dealt with as an educator in public school, wish to only say don't do it. We need to as well make sex a mutual decision, engaged in for good, and yes, pleasurable reason, with BOTH gender empowered to protect themselves. If not, well, we leave this then to the streets and the results of unhealthy sex and unwanted pregnancies simply will win out.

MORE and better detailed education, no matter WHAT the subject is NEVER a bad thing (though age will be a part of how much detail, irregardless of subject).
06:04 PM on 09/08/2011
Also, googling something does not make you an expert. There is a lot of crap on the internet. A lot. There are exactly 0 diseases caused by homosexuality. There are STI's that can be transmitted by both heterosexual or homosexual sex, but homosexuality does not "cause" any separate disease. So why would they be blamed any more than we should be?

It is amazing how homophobia always ends up looking exactly like racism. In the early 1900's people swore that it was Eastern Europeans, Italians and Jews bringing disease into America. Since the beginning of black slavery Americans swore that black people were dirty people who shouldn't be allowed into the same waters as white people because they spread disease. Now, apparently, disease is actually caused by homosexuality (how is that even biologically possible - sex can transmit but not cause a disease. Are there websites claiming that gay people give birth to virus and bacteria? That thought is ridiculous). I guess we always want to point the finger and blame society's problems on others and there will always be some group who largely doesn't control the media who has to sit back and take it.
05:57 PM on 09/08/2011
The bible gets slavery wrong. SLAVERY. So excuse me if I see it as an interesting piece of history with some wonderful insights but many pieces that should be left in the time it was written. As a woman who has had plenty of sex prior to marriage, I have never had a consequence. Because I was educated in how to protect myself I haven't had any problems at all from having had sex. So why is the bible's method (especially when historically Christians have never really followed it) more effective than my own.

Here's what we know, children from abstinence only education including the young people who wear promise rings) are equally as likely as their counterparts to have sex before marriage, but they are far less likely to have safe sex. That's a problem and is a good picture of what it looked like in the (ever glorified) 1950's, when teenage pregnancy was so ridiculously high. Countries with more permissive (and as I see it healthy and less sexist) sexual attitudes have FAR lower rates of HIV, STIs and teen pregnancy. Their children also initiate sex later and are more likely to state love as the reason for first sex. Having healthy, open discussions about the facts about sexuality is seeming more effective.

Here's a fact, the #1 way in which women globally are exposed to HIV is within their marriage. Marriage isn't magic. But a condom is 98% effective when used correctly.
02:25 PM on 08/30/2011
Correction needed: New York State has not mandated sex ed, as this article states - I wish they had! New York City has mandated two semesters of comprehensive sexuality education in its schools. However, the rest of the state has no mandate or guidelines on how to teach sexuality. See the NYTimes on August 10th: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/10/nyregion/in-new-york-city-a-new-mandate-on-sex-education.html
12:11 PM on 08/30/2011
Sex education in schools is a failure. Everyone knows it's a joke, barely passes the laugh test. It doesn't just embarrass the kids, it literally "humiliates" them, in the worst sense of the word. Enlightening? I would say degrading. To all concerned. The legends among kids are legion, for example, how they like to ask the sex ed teachers "innocent" salacious questions, just to get to watch the teachers humiliate themselves further. Then laugh at them behind their backs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OneWoman
I came, I saw, I commented
06:19 AM on 08/30/2011
But here's the rub: I don't believe our culture wants to raise "sexually empowered women". I think we need to tackle THAT problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sister Bluebird
11:06 PM on 08/30/2011
That much is obvious just by turning on the television.
12:28 PM on 09/01/2011
Bingo!
10:20 PM on 08/29/2011
http://www.prolife.com/FETALDEV.html check the facts, on development God Willin, and on issues w/ sex and this perceived 'okness' or 'safety' w/ it....God Willin save it, and keep it as a Gift and Calling if it's towards you By GOD, and not an 'entitlement', 'fun time', or 'worldly right' which God Willing it's truly/fulfillingly/strictly not Lord Have Mercy be i wrong or offbase PLGB....save it and pray on it folks....Lord Have Mercy when i hadn't done so Peace, Love, God Bless, Glory Always Be!!!

let's not 'stifle the Truth', but promote prayer n discernment in these and all matters, that's the True and Right Way to go! Amen
02:46 PM on 08/30/2011
Hey, Joan, he's YOUR imaginary sky friend, they are YOUR imaginary sky friend's "rules," YOU have fun pretending and leave the rest of us the hell alone.

KTHXBAI
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ConfuciusSay-
Aglets: their purpose is sinister.
11:32 AM on 08/31/2011
Mixing religious guilt with sex has been a great failure of humanity for centuries.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Niki Spencer
Church. And. State. Already separate. For reasons.
12:43 PM on 09/01/2011
It seemed to work out well for the puritans... they escaped Europe and bred like bunnies populating an entire new nation with their special brand of backwards thinking!
05:09 PM on 08/29/2011
This article outlines exactly what we do here at the Center for Relationship Education. We teach the science of what makes relationships work and what makes them fail. The Center for Relationship Education is dedicated to educating, equipping and empowering individuals with the skills necessary to develop healthy relationships, build strong lifetime committed partnerships / marriages and form safe and stable families for the well being of children, adults and communities. Sometimes we forget that healthy relationships are essential for great sex!
www.myrelationshipcenter.org
Respectfully submitted,
Joneen Mackenzie RN
04:35 PM on 08/29/2011
Can we spend a moment being open to the idea that we can educate our children AND teach them to not sleep around? I have no religious preference, nor am I a fan of absolutely being a virgin until marriage, but I would like to see quite a lot of people think at least twice as long before they sleep with someone ("sleep" being a euphemism of course) and come to an informed decision. A person can have knowledge and values simultaneously. I don't promote absolute abstinence; only more discretion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trekbette
Country Before Party!
01:03 AM on 08/30/2011
Excellent advice.

I think it is important to respect yourself and your partner, and the best way to show that respect is with protection. And never sleep with someone you don't respect and who doesn't respect you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sister Bluebird
11:07 PM on 08/30/2011
Excellent advice for sane humans everywhere.
Thanks for making me smile.
:)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Niki Spencer
Church. And. State. Already separate. For reasons.
12:50 PM on 09/01/2011
Very true. If spoken to directly and respectfully children would absorb the information they are given to protect themselves. It shouldn't be up to MTV to teach kids to practice safe sex! If given the RIGHT info early on, they would be more prepared to make more informed choices into their adulthood. Imagine how much the spread of STDs would have been slowed if we had been given this knowledge 30 years ago? It's because knowledge is power, but ignorance and fear make people easier to control.
04:12 PM on 08/29/2011
Sex in our society has either been glamorized by such media outlets as MTV (without discussing any negative consequences) or shied away from by most teachers and parents. I am in high school and almost all quality information about sex I have obtained myself, for both my mother and teachers preached abstinence and the horrors of unwanted pregnancies. Now, I consider myself to be a very educated and sex-positive individual, but it was not through the encouragement of a sex ed curriculum. Even in this day and age, sex is treated as something shameful and taboo, and negative views toward it are usually associated with religion. If educators would show the youth of America that sex is not something to fear or be ashamed of, and it can be done safely and enjoyably in a comfortable situation that doesn't necessarily have to be between a husband and wife, maybe it would produce the sexually empowered individuals mentioned in this article (which was great). Also, it appalls me that there are states with no sex ed requirements whatsoever.
03:28 PM on 08/29/2011
I was very lucky. I attended a private high school where we were provided with honest, open, and informative sex education as freshmen. Later in high school, when many (but not all) of my peers started having sex, condom usage was the norm, not the exception. We understood our options and we understood the stakes. This allowed everyone to make informed choices.

I think high quality sex education is so important. Not only does it ensure safe practices, but it allows young people to make good decisions about whether or not to have sex, decisions that they are less likely to regret later in life, and to have more positive first encounters with sex.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelly Jade
12:18 PM on 08/31/2011
I went to a Catholic high school
Same here

Funny how that works (even in a catholic school)
11:37 AM on 08/29/2011
"In other words, limiting resources and only pointing to body parts on a chart or diagram are not ways to produce sexually empowered women." The problem is that this is not the goal of most sex-ed programs in this country.
photo
french queen13
my beloved is mine and I am his
09:57 PM on 08/28/2011
Organ recital - LOL kudos to whoever coined that phrase. It pretty much sums up the sex ed I had at school in the late 70s.
09:19 PM on 09/02/2011
Organ recital probably sums up the sex I had up until my late 20s! LOL
photo
french queen13
my beloved is mine and I am his
11:04 PM on 09/04/2011
LOL!