More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
Alonso Zaragoza

GET UPDATES FROM Alonso Zaragoza
 

Chicago Deserves a Political Makeover

Posted: 02/21/2012 1:37 pm

Just last week, one of the most ethically colorful political officials in the state called me a coward for calling him out on his nepotistic ways. FYI: I just happen to be running against him for the seat of 31st Ward Democratic Committeeman. I blasted my opponent with a slightly mean, but totally true Valentine's Day ad in the Chicago Sun-Times. My method might have been a bit mean, but it was absolutely necessary. Nepotism and patronage might have been useful in old Chicago, but they have no place in today's society.

This isn't the way government is supposed to be. Our elected officials are supposed to work for us, but lately my family has to work harder just to pay the taxes that support conflict of interests like this. Just last week, we were voted the # 1 city in the country when it comes to corruption­! To top it off, the number of registered voters in the city is at its lowest level since at least 1942. Chicago residents can't just give up, curse politics and politician­s, and stay silent. If we do, then the Berrioses and Burkes of the city will just continue to play their games and mishandle our hard-earned taxes. Right now, I'm picturing all of them swimming around Scrooge McDuck-style in a vault in City Hall laughing at the predicted voter turnout for March 20.

Everyone has someone fighting for their interests, except for the residents of the city of Chicago. Our state legislature gave $100 million to Sears and CME but allowed social service agencies such as Hull House to close. Our mayor is cutting library services but can raise millions to hold the G8 summit downtown. Our City Council is wasting time discussing the positioning of cable satellite dishes, but isn't doing anything about the increasing gang violence that is affecting our city. We need leaders that can mobilize our community and create resident-led organizations that will fight for the interests of tax payers and hold other elected officials accountable. For a long time now, attorneys and corporation lobbyists have bought the attention of the people that we voted into office.

It doesn't have to be this way. Like Professor Dick Simpson said, we can change the culture of corruption in our city one politician at a time. We can and we should. With your help and your vote on March 20th, we can change the way the political system has not been working and make tax payer interests the voice that matter the most to our elected officials. Staying home this Election Day isn't an option. Chicago should be #1 in many things, but never in corruption.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
yesythegreat
I'm just wasting time
12:26 PM on 02/22/2012
I love the fact that you pointed out how leaders are more willing to protect corporations rather than social services. Also that many politicians prefer to fight for stupid issues like the satellite dishes rather than the violence plaguing our neighborhoods. I had to move from an apartment I loved with an excellent landlord because the violence in my neighborhood was horrible. I have two children and I didn't want them to be exposed to that. I hope that you do get elected and live up to the expectations you are setting. It's rather easy to make promises, the hard part is keeping them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:19 AM on 02/22/2012
If all of the aldermen were to disappear tomorrow nothing of value would be lost.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
niumarmion
a temporary being
08:06 PM on 02/21/2012
At least Chicago is honest enough to not pretend that there is more than one political party.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lifer2006
07:28 PM on 02/21/2012
We need to start somewhere without much fanfare. let's fire 98% of these hacks and start a new.
06:15 PM on 02/21/2012
I love that Zaragoza did this. It was a brillant move against Joe Berrios. I'm lucky enough to have the opportunity to vote against Toni Berrios next election. I'm hoping the people of Logan Square wake up and vote for Will Guzzardi. She is the one who financed her daddy's campaign with her big pharma money.
03:12 PM on 02/22/2012
I agree. The 39th District deserves better. Toni is a good girl, but good doesn't cut it anymore.

If you look at the Sun-Times article, J.B. said

-“This is a year-old story — they do a good job,” Berrios said of his relatives on Tuesday.-

We should expect more from public workers than just a good job. They should be great so that tax payers can get a bigger bang for their buck. But when your related to the person that you hire, those employees should be doing an incredible job, not just a good job.
05:20 PM on 02/21/2012
Mr. Zaragoza is an insightful and thoughtful man. Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us. If everyone (or even a small, vocal minority) in Chicago thought the same, huge changes could be made. I regret I don't live in the 31st ward so I could join you.

I think it is disgraceful that the "lifetime" politicians get to dictate everything to the populace. Mr. Emanuel became a shining alternative to the "business-as-usual" Daley administration but alas, he is just a shameful clone of the last 25 years. It is no wonder that Chicago is the most corrupt city in the country.

Let us not forget the least effective governor Illinois has seen in decades. The best thing I can say about Mr. Quinn is that he hasn't been indited like his predecessors.....yet!!! What Illinois needs is to run EVERY politician out of the state with tar and feathers. Then maybe we could start over.
01:12 PM on 02/22/2012
Quinn hasn't been great. He's an honest man trying to work in a corrupt system and struggling. Also the state has no money. I would start with Madigan if you want to get anything changed in Illinois. Berrios is probably the most blatant nepotist in Cook County and is exactly what is wrong with this state and city. If you want to change nepotism you have to lower the signatures required for independent candidates that is the only way you can get good independent people with the interests of the community at large elected. The amount of signatures required makes it easy for dynasties to be the norm in politics. They also should allow people to sign online. Walking around getting signatures is silly at this point in time. We need to be focusing our energies on solutions not going around trying to build political machines based on giving out jobs and contracts.
03:00 PM on 02/22/2012
I have to disagree with your idea of allowing online signatures, but I do agree with your idea of lowering the number required. I actually didn't have very many issues gathering my signatures. I spent $100 drafting the petition and having my union printer make the copies of it. My senior parents and I collected the majority of the signatures going door to door following the free poll sheets I obtained from the Board of Elections. We actually collected the maximum number of signatures allowed and had more valid signatures than Berrios. Getting on the ballot isn't difficult if you plan ahead, dot your i's, and put enough effort into it. (Frivolous signature challenges excluded).

Good independent candidates run all the time. Jeremy Karpen and Miguel Del Valle are just two examples. The problem is that they can't seem to raise enough resources and volunteers to mount an effective campaign.
03:00 PM on 02/22/2012
Resources are hard to come by unless you come from a wealthy family that can supply your cash at hand. The majority of the "progressive" politicians don't want their names to appear on challengers State Board of Election donor sheets so they always respond to a donation request by saying "I don't want to get him mad at me but I'll try to help you out under the table". In politics, nothing good ever happens under the table. So independent Democratic candidates have compete by hosting $10 and $25 fundraisers and random campaign donations. Which is fine by me, I'd rather have 5 community residents attend a meet and greet and have a lengthy quality conversation at $10 each then have one non-resident pay $50 for a fancy fundraising event and 3 minutes of face time. Some volunteers are afraid of retaliation from the powerful incumbent or are so sick of immoral politicians that they have mostly given up on the democratic system. I value each of mine, every single one.

Online signature collecting might be easier, but easier isn't always better. Having conversations on a one to one basis, door knocking, it does have an effect on voter apathy. If it wasn't for the door to door signature requirements, we wouldn't stand a chance against the machine.

www.new31.com
04:04 PM on 02/21/2012
Alonso, if you mean what you say, I would vote for you in a heartbeat. All politicians should represent the taxpayers/voters and not just special interests.

In today's America or any other America, there is no time to waste on a politician who doesn't stand up for his constituency.
03:07 PM on 02/22/2012
Thank you Rockdewd. We need to start expecting more from the people we elect. We can't put the blame just on their greed and ignorance, the majority of the fault falls on us for re-electing them or for settling with our meager options and choosing the lesser of two evils.