More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Amitai Etzioni

GET UPDATES FROM Amitai Etzioni
 

Playing Only Defense?

Posted: 06/14/11 05:23 PM ET

Sometimes a very limited exchange of words captures well a much greater issue. This was the case last Saturday during the weekly presidential radio broadcast and the Republican rebuttal.

The GOP commentary was delivered by Congressman Adam Kinzinger. He went right on the attack about the wrongheaded policies that are at to be blamed for high unemployment and left no doubt about whose fault it is. He stated:

There's been a lot of talk this week about how our economy isn't creating enough jobs. I can tell you that here in the president's home state, every day, we hear about a company that's looking at leaving or is already on its way out the door. And why? Because taxes are too high, regulations are too burdensome, and the government won't stop spending money it doesn't have.


Why? The congressman added, because Obama broke all the promises he made: that the stimulus would work, that unemployment would be kept below 8%, that 90% of the jobs would be in the private sector. Typically, the Republicans also argue that the reason is that the economy is overregulated and overtaxed.

The president was strictly defensive -- and asked for patience. "Too many folks are still struggling to get back on their feet. I wish I could tell you there was a quick fix to our economic problems. But the truth is, we didn't get into this mess overnight, and we won't get out of it overnight. It's going to take time." He then curtsied to the private sector. "Now, government is not -- and should not be -- the main engine of job-creation in this country." He acknowledged that the government could do a few things -- such as getting the National Manufacturers Association to give a stamp of approval to credentials given by community colleges, a minor move at best.

The president typically did not mention that the GOP forced Congress to cut a $12 billion program that would have beefed up the community colleges in a big way into a mere $2 billion program. The president than disclosed that "On Monday, I'll travel to North Carolina, where I'll meet with my Jobs Council and talk about additional steps we can take..." and some more such look, see, I am moving, with very little substance.

Granted, it is good for the president to show that he cares. And it might be true that announcing lots of mini-steps will make it look like he is knocking himself out to tackle an issue that until very recently did not seem to be his main concern. Also one may argue that if Obama puts together a major job drive that would entail a retraining program many times larger than the small one he launched and included major grants to states to hire more teachers, police, and public construction jobs, the GOP would block it in Congress. However, then it would become clear who has a major job-creation program and who is sabotaging it. Then the president could stop playing only defense and also go on the offense, making clear who is to blame not only for how we got in this predicament, who caused the massive job loss to begin with, but as well who stands in the way of getting the economy picking up speed, just when it started to take off.

Amitai Etzioni is a University Professor at the George Washington University and the author of New Common Ground (Potomac Books, June 2009).

 
Sometimes a very limited exchange of words captures well a much greater issue. This was the case last Saturday during the weekly presidential radio broadcast and the Republican rebuttal. The GOP comm...
Sometimes a very limited exchange of words captures well a much greater issue. This was the case last Saturday during the weekly presidential radio broadcast and the Republican rebuttal. The GOP comm...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 151
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Awake-and-Sing
named after a great play written by Clifford Odets
01:22 PM on 08/02/2011
Not a chance. The President doesn't do "leadership". He only does "centrism" regardless of where the line is drawn.
11:57 PM on 06/17/2011
The craven failure of the Democrats to accomplish anything significant or lasting while in control of the House, the Senate, and the White House leaves me empty, of hope, support, and give a damn. The primary obstacle to liberal and progressive policies in America, is the Democratic party. The rhetoric in the country is always so shrill because the differences between parties is so meaninglessly technical. We need more than trivial technical legislation, and nameplate changes. We need a Party or movement for big lasting change, that is not run by the same corrupt old guard. A pox on them all. Change the system, or don't waste your time.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Awake-and-Sing
named after a great play written by Clifford Odets
01:23 PM on 08/02/2011
Vermont Progressive Party.

www.progressiveparty.org

It does not take corporate cash and has elected members of the Vermont Legislature.

it should go national.
10:08 PM on 06/15/2011
I wish Obama would go off the defensive. But he's too worried about being called offensive by his Republican friends that he will continue to fiddle around while the national economy crashes and burns.
photo
akutan
Black Conservative
06:53 PM on 06/15/2011
Shovel ready?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Schaef
01:14 PM on 06/15/2011
Yeah, 28 months is "overnight" for this president.

But don't worry, I'm sure he can identify a lot more "shovel-ready projects" for us.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gray Mouser
Former Republican
01:43 PM on 06/15/2011
You are a great example of what is wrong with the approach we see on your side of the political spectrum.

Well done.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Schaef
08:28 AM on 06/16/2011
There's a witty rejoinder to this, but apparently it is okay only to call people teabaggers directly, and not to make oblique references to people who use such a disgusting term as evidence of their alleged ideological superiority, so it looks like you don't get to read it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
citizen of the universe
"Lois, Mom, Mama, Mommie, Ma"
12:12 PM on 06/15/2011
I'm confused. Republicans won the House saying they would create jobs. They have yet to pass a jobs bill. Just once I would like the focus to be on the people who are responsible for legislating, instead of the false sense that Obama can somehow do a end run around CONGRESS.
photo
Jack Daniels Esq
Hold the ice
10:54 AM on 06/15/2011
Private US businesses are thriving - Feds are dying - who does Obama work for ... jess sayin'
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
satanlite
If ur neibor wtchs Fox Nws wtch ur neibor
12:24 PM on 06/15/2011
Keep drinking your IQ.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
10:09 AM on 06/15/2011
You're kidding, right? Everything must be a compromise - usually to the detriment of the people - and bipartisanship - no matter how it works against us.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:56 AM on 06/15/2011
I am all in favor of removing all regulation on corporations if the corporations are willing in advance to pay the legal costs of defending against the depradations they are sure to cause.

Any notion that rampant greed is self regulated by any market is so naive as to be a criminally insane act by whoever utters it.

Can anyone point out where capitalism has created a paradise for anyone but millionaires? Can anyone point out where at least 50% of corporate entities have behaved honestly, ethically, morally & straightforwardly in their dealings with their customers and the public?

Greed never brings out any good in humanity, It brings forth the lowest, most venal parts of our characters.

Not regulating industry has never brought forth anything other than corruption in our elected officials who can be bought cheaply and easily. There is also the misery such corruptions bought and paid for by corporations has always created.

Lets not regulate anyone on anything. Lets stop issuing drivers' licenses. Forget about social security, military service, marriage licenses, business licenses. Lets trust our citizens to be altruistic and well behaved. In fact why should we have a police force, fire departments or even an insurance industry. Lets eradicate all building codes and all that road maintenance really should be paid for by the guys who use the roads. We can hire a for profit corporation to maintain the roads based on using some coercive collection method whenever a person is seen using the
10:19 AM on 06/15/2011
Also, FnF'd :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Schaef
01:18 PM on 06/15/2011
"Can anyone point out where at least 50% of corporate entities have behaved honestly, ethically, morally & straightfo­rwardly in their dealings with their customers and the public?"

Can anyone point out where at least 50% of politicians have behaved honestly, ethically, morally & straightfo­rwardly in their dealings with their customers and the public?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:00 PM on 06/15/2011
Where right wingers and other worshippers of mammon are involved honesty is abhored with all due vehemence since it gets in the way of theft, corruption and abuse.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trusk
09:01 AM on 06/15/2011
So the point is that even though he has done very little to boost the economy he should take hard stands on everything to make the GOP appear to be obrtuctionists so that we will all believe this is all their fault? I have a much better idea. Maybe he can actually do something to boost the economy, then he will get credit for boosting the economy.
itolduso
lateral thinker
10:01 AM on 06/15/2011
The President ALREADY sent money to the states to hire teachers, law enforcement officers, and firemen.....and Repub Govenors and Legislatures used that money instead on plugging budget holes and giving corporate tax breaks and incentives....and then fired tens of thousands of teachers, police, and firemen. The President ALREADY sent billions of dollars to the states for public infrastructure projects....and Repub Govs and legislatures turned down the money, others delayed the projects, and some even diverted the funds to other projects that would not result in new jobs or offer any stimulative effects. The President has worked very hard to pull this country out of Bush's depression.....the party of 'He%l NO' is what's holding us back.
10:42 AM on 06/15/2011
Agreed Itolduso and if we don't continue to blast the forgetful masses with this truth, Americans will forget the 8 years of insanity from Bush and reward the repubs with the Presidency.

They do nothing for the masses of repubs unless they are rich and powerful, but those politicians get them everytime with one lie and scare tactic after another. It is disgraceful. Already millions of Americans actually believe the economy should have turned around in 90 days after Obama was in office so clearly 2.5 year is simply inexcusable. How unintelligent, how mis-informed and how lazy our electorate is in not educating themselves on the realtiy.

We don't live in a dictatorship but a republic! The president does not craft legislation he signs it. The repubs promised to focus on jobs day one and have yet to do it six months later. That is the reality. Don't forget that Americans!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:57 AM on 06/15/2011
Let me ask you what the previous administration did? Did you like the wars based on lies and paid for by borrowed money? Did you enjoy the tax relief for the ultra rich? Did you enjoy the housing crash? Did you like the $5 trillion dollar suplus that vanished with the wind? Did you approve of reneging on the oath to uphold and defend the constitution which was explained by the president that after all the constitution was just a piece of paper?

What is there about conservatives which leads them to believe that the GOP is benevolent towards the common American man when it is only benevolent towards the uncommonly rich ones?

If wish you may point out to America which legislation the GOP has originated and passed that stood with the average american against the wishes of the rich ones? You may cover the past 50 years. Don't hesitate to search far and wide.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Schaef
01:28 PM on 06/15/2011
I enjoyed the tax relief to lower-income individuals, yes. I'm not particularly pleased with anything being paid for by borrowed money, which is why I was pleased to see revenues rise and deficits fall in the four years between the tax cuts and the housing crash, and also why I was pleased to see fiscal conservatives stand against another trillion flushed away for bogus bailouts, at least the first time.

I did not enjoy a recession that Bush had warned us about and which was exacerbated by 9/11. I did not enjoy the eruption of a 30-year housing bubble built on government collusion with banks and topped off with the reworking of the credit derivatives market into the mess we have today by the very man who is now in the President's cabinet as the Secretary of the Treasury.

I'm not interested in standing "against the wishes of the rich" because they are people, too. My freedom is their freedom. And I don't think dividing American citizens into classes and using legislation to set them against each other is going to make the country better. Curiously, I always thought this was the ideology of the progressive mindset. Apparently it's just that their prejudices are different.
photo
Buckeye54
...the One your mom warned you about!
08:59 AM on 06/15/2011
We need to create a Jobs & Infrastructure Spending Fund. Allow the Treasure Dept. to sell Treasury Bonds that pay 1% more interest over the current rate. All funds raised through this process would be spent on job creation, job-retraining and offering zero-percent loans to state & local government and private corporations that invest in new manufacturing jobs or infrastructure.

Let the Chinese buy the very bonds that will put our unemployed back to work and help rebuild our crumbling infrastructure. The positive benefits to our economy will more than outweigh the additional interest that we pay on these bonds.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gray Mouser
Former Republican
01:48 PM on 06/15/2011
It won't get past the GOP controlled House, and the GOP in the Senate will block it procedurally every step of the way.

If it makes sense and it helps, they cannot allow it. It would only server to get Obama re-elected and enable the Dems to regain control of Congress. They just cannot allow that to happen. It would signal the end of their party and the end of the party for the plutocrats and evangelicals supporting them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:13 PM on 06/15/2011
Are you nuts? This totally contrary to Republican ethics, moral and ideals. Nothing that will aid the middle class or poor must be allowed to happen till the GOP is bribed to change course.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bg66astoria
Research Helps
08:32 AM on 06/15/2011
He hasn't "taken the offense" for 3+ years. If he & his "team" had put forward legislation through the Dems in Congress for high-speed rail funding, energy conservation & universal building weatherization incentives & fighting for his staff & judiciary appointments right from the start, he would have at least shown the GOP to be the obstructionists that they are. But he refused to fight for those causes just as he didn't fight for Universal Single-Payer Medicare/Medicaid for ALL, to repeal the worst parts of the "PATRIOT" act, etc.

In short, he & his out-of-touch with reality Clinton cadre of "trusted advisers" have fiddled while the economy burned up, have ignored big issues & wrongly talk compromise when what they do is capitulate.

The only non-jobs program that's worse than the POTUS' is the GOP "destroy all jobs" for poltical gain strategy that they have implemented since Obama was inaugurated.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trusk
09:02 AM on 06/15/2011
Maybe he should just do something to boost the economy? And forget about bad ideas like high speed rail.
10:20 AM on 06/15/2011
High speed rail is a fantastic thing, and would add jobs, and make us less dependent on airlines for so much domestic travel.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gray Mouser
Former Republican
01:52 PM on 06/15/2011
WTF? Do you realize what you just said? High Speed rail would be a huge infrastructure project that would CLEARLY benefit the economy.

Business 101: Business grow when people spend money on the things the sell or provide. Full stop. People spend money when they have money to spend. Jobs, with their wages and salaries, provide that money to them to spend on goods and services business are trying to sell to the market. High speed rail creates jobs, provides income, and enables the cash flow into the economy to help businesses.

That is, unless those businesses then take those monies and employ folks outside the US are buy the goods for the project from outside the US.

High speed rail would require jobs in the US and the materials and services would also be US stationed.

What, in that, do you see as non-productive? You have been listening to FOX or some other GOP propaganda network too much. You need to broaden your understanding.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:28 AM on 06/15/2011
If Obama wants job creation he will have to become a Republican. It's not going to happen.
10:21 AM on 06/15/2011
He already is, and it didn't happen.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gray Mouser
Former Republican
01:53 PM on 06/15/2011
What a joke that statement is.
08:01 AM on 06/15/2011
So. . . . Professor, it appears to me, as I read your article, that what you have done is articulate very well the half-hearted, half-baked ideas that President Obama has floated to create these elusive jobs, and then you seem to say that IF he were to come up with some fundamentally different ideas, then he could take them to Congress, and IF they didn't pass them, then he could say, "See, it's Congress's fault." That's a lot of daydreaming, professor, but what you tacitly acknowledge in your blog is - - President Obama's ideas, so far, aren't worth a tinker's dam. And the rebuttal speech that you draw our attention to, articulates that very well by describing the current state of the job situation, and President Obama's inability to do anything about it.
Tell me, Professor - - - can you re-read your own post again, and let me know - - WHY aren't you a conservative republican?
10:49 AM on 06/15/2011
Fox and the robots over there has taught you well huh? Your statement is ridiculous. Congress legislates, the President signs law. You can deny all you want, but Republicans are the reason the job market is still poor. It is by design. If they legislated from the house a jobs bill and was signed by this President...and it worked in time, Obama would get the credit. You people (repubs) don't want Obama to get the credit, so you will destroy this country to get the white house back.

Spin it anyway you want. The HOUSE is to come up with legislation that passes and moves through the senate before the President signs. You repubs were going to concentrate on jobs on day 1 in January....6 months later you have yet to move. Because it would be to the detriment of your power grab. I will never let you repubs forget that reality.

We don't live in a dictatorship. So Obama couldn't do it on his own. There are 3 houses of government and you repubs control the one that you will use to attempt to steal the whitehouse...even if you destroy Americans in the process...because you are so anti-American!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:02 AM on 06/15/2011
jkc1945

Have you noticed that the overwhelming majority of the right wingers who chime in to assert that Obama is failure have virtually no fans? I wonder why that is? Could it be that you only make sense to those who are as addlepated as you are?
07:31 AM on 06/15/2011
The Republican idea of tax cuts work ask california who who would be losing even more jobs if not for tax cuts.......
said Friday that it will keep its headquarters in the Chicago suburb of Libertyville after the state promised the company $100 million in tax breaks
city of San Francisco.... The mayor and other city officials are offering the micro blogging company a big tax break to stay
California's entertainment industry for five more years, approving up to $500 million in additional tax credits to help keep movie-making jobs in the state.

The California Film and Television Tax Credit Program enacted in 2009 has already helped keep some $2.2 billion in film and television production and 25,000 crew jobs in California, said Assemblyman Felipe Fuentes, a Sylmar Democrat, arguing for the extension
07:46 AM on 06/15/2011
There needs to be some sort of law that prevents big corporations from playing one state against another in a battle to attract business from other states through lower corporate tax rates. The big corporations always win and the people of all states always lose (via cuts to needed services or layoffs and wage cuts to state employees to offset the lower corporate tax rates).
07:57 AM on 06/15/2011
So it doesn't matter if the consumer has to pay more, which is most likely the middle class and poor, as long as " state employees " who are paid out of the tax payers money that they worked for. The government needs to what, tell companies that they need to keep the highest tax rates and wages so......
09:43 AM on 06/15/2011
well, seeing as how the constitution allows for a federal system with states rights I don't see how you do that. Or for that matter why: If your states system is superior, why shouldn't it be rewarded by the market with more industry and jobs. Industries don't need to be taxed. And what was that about "wage cuts to state employees" tripe, where does that happen? States need to compete, not only with each other but with countries like China and Mexico to retain capital to create business and jobs (where the tax revenues come from)