iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Amitai Etzioni

GET UPDATES FROM Amitai Etzioni
 

Obama Should Pull a Truman

Posted: 07/09/2012 11:36 am

More speeches, photo ops, and minor policy modifications will not save the flailing Obama presidential campaign. He needs to produce a drama, an event that will highlight the core of his message in ways that will deeply speak to the public and stay with it. I am not speaking of drama for drama's sake, to grab headlines, but for a showdown on a very real issue. In effect the number one issue: the way the gridlock in Congress prevents the economy from recovering, by not enacting the jobs bill and blocking a deficit cutting deal.

To proceed, Obama should pull a Truman. In 1952 the United States economy was threatened by a strike by the steel workers, whose employers refused to make a deal. (In those days, steel was a crucial commodity for a well functioning economy.) When the strike dragged on and on, President Truman invited the head of the steel workers union and a representative of the steel industry to the White House. On arrival they were told "this is not a social visit." Truman informed them that he would keep them in the White House until they struck a deal. It was reached the same day.

President Obama should invite Speaker of the House John Boehner, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell for a summit on economic policy, to start say at 5 pm. At 7 pm the White House Press Secretary should ask the TV networks to make room for a major announcement to follow at 9 pm. The two hour interval will generate a great buzz, as people -- here and aboard -- will speculate over what the president will announce and gain the president the audience that is called for.

At 9 pm, the president would state that leading business and labor leaders and economists from all over the political and professional spectrum warn that the American economy is about to fall off the cliff, that is fall into a deep recession, unless major steps are taken to deal with jobs, whether or not to extent the Bush tax cuts (and if yes, which ones), whether or not to extend the Social Security tax holiday, and how to reduce the deficit by spending cuts.

The president would state that these matters cannot wait because they must be treated before January 1, 2013, and if we wait until after the elections to face them, there will be very little time to work out the details in a post-election lame duck congressional session, even if then a basic deal is struck. Moreover, experts of all stripes warn him that the financial markets, which abhor uncertainly, will not wait much longer for the US to put its house in order and threaten us with another 2008 type of crisis or worse, given the fragile state of the global economy.

The president will conclude that hence he felt compelled to take extraordinary means, and invited representatives of both parities to the White House to work out an agreed upon deal concerning all of our burning economic issues, leading with job creation and deficit cutting. They have been diligently working since 5 pm in a White House that is closed. The Secrete Service is ensuring that no one will leave until they found a way to prevent a loom national catastrophe. The Army has set up cots in Roosevelt Room, in case the negotiators need to spend the night, and the White House staff stands by to bring the negotiators whatever they need from their homes, such as medications, their favorite toothbrush, or teddy bear. The Mensa is preparing meals. All cell phones have been turned off, to prevent the negotiators from being distracted by contacts with the media and from posturing.

The president may well have to add that he has been informed by the leaders of both parties that they feel that they have to consult with other leading members of their respective parties. He will explain that he informed the negotiators that they can ask as many members of Congress as they wish to join them in the White House; that additional cots were ordered, and that the Navy was instructed to set up a field kitchen on the South Lawn to serve whatever number is needed, if be it the whole Congress. However, the president would note, whoever joins the negations will stay, "until I can come and tell the American people that we found a way to pull away from the cliff and found a new road that leads the American economy to a higher growth rate, lower unemployment, and lower deficits."

Amitai Etzioni is a University Professor and professor of international relations at The George Washington University and the author of Security First (Yale 2007). For more discussion, see icps.gwu.edu.

 
 
 
FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 312
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
parlimentMike
Terrorists keep you in fear
12:19 PM on 07/10/2012
There is no part of Truman in Obama. He is pressing his message now - "do it your way, as long as I get mine!"

Truman didn't like War Profiteers. Truman didn't like Dino's. Truman didn't tolerate a runaway Military Industrialist Complex.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skywalk
Left of Center and Job Creator
09:38 AM on 07/10/2012
I like it.
09:05 AM on 07/10/2012
Obama needs to pull a Truman all right. How about starting with "The Buck Stops Here" instead of making up all these sorry-ass excuses as to why he has failed as President?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoSandwiches
08:43 AM on 07/10/2012
And If the republicans turned down the invite ? I
08:25 AM on 07/10/2012
Keep dreaming. If the president had done something like this 6 months into his term, the public would have loved him for it. But he has shown time and again that he doesn't have the stones to deal with today's Republicans.
photo
victorianism
Theultrathinnothingnesshasabeautifulendforusall.
10:06 AM on 07/10/2012
The 'stones' here are so intriguing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
A level Head
Consumption not investment requires subsidy
07:41 AM on 07/10/2012
"At 9 pm, the president would state that leading business and labor leaders and economists from all over the political and professional spectrum warn that the American economy is about to fall off the cliff, that is fall into a deep recession, unless major steps are taken to deal with jobs, whether or not to extent the Bush tax cuts (and if yes, which ones), whether or not to extend the Social Security tax holiday, and how to reduce the deficit by spending cuts."

In truth Simpson/Boles has already provided this blueprint at the behest of the Obama Regime.

It was promptly rejected by that same regime.

The political arena is not a labor management give and take. The differences are philosophical and both sides are equally entrenched.

Let the people speak in November and then we will see which philosophy is preferred by the citizens. From there we might move forward.

Panic based actions will solve nothing and perhaps make things worse as evidenced by the dismal failure of stimuli spending. It is past time to fix causes rather than serving up palliatives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SamuelLBronkowitz
Disgusted American
07:53 AM on 07/10/2012
This revisionism only works on the sleeping. The "failure" of the stimuli was not because of the spending, but rather, the weight of the tax cuts in the stimulus package. Where spending was actually done, economic activity rose notably.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
A level Head
Consumption not investment requires subsidy
08:36 AM on 07/10/2012
UNTIL the free money expired ... At which time the faux jobs disappeared.

WHAT TAX CUTS do you refer to ..... I see no evidence of any ... Do you mean the cut in projected spending increase that STILL resulted in more spending ...

Truly Orwellian
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cegrubbs
07:34 AM on 07/10/2012
"the flailing Obama presidential campaign. " is defining Romney as a rich, job exporter, with bank accounts in tax havens, who puts his dog on the roof. He has won the Latina vote, the women's vote, the younger vote. And it is July.

Next show Romney up as an incompetent governor who didn't do his job. The GOP as a tea party that can't govern.
07:34 AM on 07/10/2012
This president has proven ineffective. Let's see, it went from if I don't get it done in 3 years I should be a one term president to 1) We are still dealing with the problems he inherited (Which he knew of from the start) 2) The Tusnami had a great effect on our economy, 3) Europe is out of our control and is dragging the US economy down, 4) Economic Headwinds, 5) The Arab Spring cause prices to go up, 6)The stimulus projects weren't as shovel ready as I thought, 7) and on and on.

Harry Truman said the "Buck Stops Here"...Barack Obama says "The Buck Passes here".
09:00 AM on 07/10/2012
This is what happens when your lone credential is that of "Professional Politician", and you install political hacks like Eric Holder.
What's dangerous is that the U.S. has a growing dependency on Govt, and BHO is trying to harness this, grow it even (ala the Food Stamps ad campaign), and will lock in that group of voters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Barry O Bama
07:06 AM on 07/10/2012
President Obama already cut government spending, solved the debt crisis, pulled the country out of recession, and lead the us through 28 months of continual job growth with not one financial crisis or economic disaster. I think the president knows what is best for the country. Congress would be wise to listen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
A level Head
Consumption not investment requires subsidy
07:44 AM on 07/10/2012
The budget is higher today than 4 years ago -- How is that a cut

The deficit has increased by a greater amount than ever before -- More debt does not cure debt

Job growth that leaves 15% of us unemployed is not a solution

The financial crises has never come to conclusion.

The economy IS an economic disaster
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mwade002
01:39 PM on 07/10/2012
obama cut government spending and solved the debt crisis

3.8% to 7.8% = 97% net unemployed is on bush
7,8% to 8.2 % = 3% net unemployment on obama
photo
Annieke
Rules are not necessarily sacred, principles are.
05:41 AM on 07/10/2012
Now that would be a nice scenario!
05:30 AM on 07/10/2012
The author lost me with his description of the Obama campaign as "flailing". THe man is ahead in every poll! He has ignored the advice of his own side's hopeless elitists and is hammering Romney in a calculated way that is having exactly the desired result. If you want to see "flailing" look at Romney's reaction to the Bain attacks, the outsourcing attacks, the tax return attacks - and all of that is about to get much much worse. Romney has demonstrated that he is good at one thing - getting money from obscenely rich people to "invest" to make even more obscene profits for them. In this case, the "investment" they're trying to buy is our democracy.

The rest of it was also nonsense. As if Boehner and McConnell would show up! Of course they'd use the opportunity to make the President look foolish. That's what they DO. That's all they do.

Ordering the high muckety mucks to sleep on cots and eat at field kitchens - yes, I'm sure Fox News wouldn't make any hay out of that at all. President Dictator! That's one of their favorite themes!

As if it would be helpful to freak out the entire nation by telling them we're facing an economic crisis so severe that Congressional leaders have to be put under house arrest. Yes, that would be just awesome.

The whole piece is just silly. Obviously Obama knows a LOT better how to win a campaign than this professor does.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
marshhen
Northern by birth, southern by choice
07:38 AM on 07/10/2012
So was jimmy carter ahead of Reagan at this point in his campaign too. It does not bode well for a sitting incumbent who is 50/50 in the polls.
07:51 AM on 07/10/2012
Obama is not Carter. He is both politically much smarter and temperamentally far tougher.

And Romney is DEFINITELY not Reagan. Reagan had charisma. Romney has anti-charisma. He also has a terrible bio - spoiled rich boy makes himself rich at the expense of the American worker. He can never overcome that biography, even if he had political talent - which he clearly does not.

Don't be lulled by that R talking point. It's whistling past the graveyard. The R plan is to carpet bomb us with lies and slander close to the election, which has been Romney's only tactic. I think it's very likely that technique has jumped the shark with the American people. We know who's paying for all those lies and we know they don't have our interests at heart.
photo
Electriq
A haiku would have been a bit showy.
09:54 AM on 07/10/2012
Spot on.

Fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allen Jenkins
Virtual Ferroequinologist
04:42 AM on 07/10/2012
You have mistaken President Obama for a leader.

Industry would not even budge no mater what bills are passed because of the pending costs of the Affordabull Care Act of catastrophe.
photo
Annieke
Rules are not necessarily sacred, principles are.
05:42 AM on 07/10/2012
You mean, the leader who ordered the killing of Osama bin-Laden? The leader who arm-wrestled the US Armed Forces to abandon DADT? Or the leader who saved the US car industry from total bankruptcy and did that in a fashion that was so successfull that now Mittens is claiming it was his idea.

Obama/ Biden 2012!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
A level Head
Consumption not investment requires subsidy
07:49 AM on 07/10/2012
No, the FOLLOWER who simply continued the Bush policy against bin-Laden

No, the spoof who thinks something as minor as DADT has any real importance outside of a very small minority.

No, the person who has no understanding of Capitals risk / reward system and rather than allowing a normal flow interjected public money to save Union Jobs, Nationalized the industry, and stole from bond holders.

THAT LEADER
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allen Jenkins
Virtual Ferroequinologist
09:46 AM on 07/10/2012
Dubya captured Saddam Hussein and nobody saw that as leadership...he was just doing his job.

A non-military experienced civilian argues with combat experienced truth about political correctness?

Ford did not participate in the buyout/stimulus and is doing fine thank you...the key thing to remember is that the United Brotherhood of Automotive, Aerospace & Agriculture Implement Workers(UAW) think they owe Obama a vote.

What about the economy?

What about controlling illegal immigration?

The House of Representatives have introduced 28 jobs bills...where was your leader?

Where is the budget?

$1-Trillion was borrowed from the Chinese. Why?

The national debt is $4-Trillion greater since Bush left office created by Obama.

Millions of Americans are out of work and the promised drop in unemployment has not happened.

Islamic persecution continues whilst Christians are being chastised by our own government.

But that's OK for now, the Taxed Enough Already(TEA-Party), along with dozens of like minded citizen PACs are standing by to lead this country out of the mess that is this current administration.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sammybuddy
08:24 AM on 07/10/2012
Nonsense!! Is this one of your Fox "News" soundbites which comes with no back up facts or figures? Sounds like it!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allen Jenkins
Virtual Ferroequinologist
09:48 AM on 07/10/2012
Thank you for correctly spelling Fox.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gensully52
03:28 AM on 07/10/2012
And then i woke up.......
02:34 AM on 07/10/2012
Obama is Bush III. This is Bush's third term. I don't know why you think Obama is something he isn't. He supports free trade. He has told you several times in speeches that these jobs aren't coming back ....in that he won't allow them to. He expects us to all be PhDs and work for NASA innovating stuff. That is his jobs plan. Oh, and amnesty for illegals and more work visa programs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:32 AM on 07/10/2012
I'm not sure if Etzioni has the right scenario in mind, but the sentiment is quite correct. Instead of the constant lament about Romney's election treasure, Obama needs to fully engage in explaining the ideas behind his administration, and pointing out the complete and pre-meditated obstructionism of the Republican't Party. There's still a long ways to Nov., and the President has begun to articulate his ideas. I just hope it's not too little, too late.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
A level Head
Consumption not investment requires subsidy
07:51 AM on 07/10/2012
The LAST thing Obama wants the average American to have is an in depth knowledge of the ideas behind his Administration.

The small inkling we had resulted in massive election turnover in 2010.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:30 PM on 07/10/2012
Ridiculous. What happened in 2010? There are now representatives in the House who have no idea how governance works, and are staunch ideologues who are more concerned with their mental clarity than than the lives of American citizens. Name one idea behind his administration that Obama needs to hide. It's quite easy to make these veiled charges of hidden motives, which usually turn out to be nothing more than vague assertions of Obama's
"otherness".