More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Amitai Etzioni

Amitai Etzioni

GET UPDATES FROM Amitai Etzioni
 

The Me-Too Democrats: No Narrative, No Policy

Posted: 06/ 8/11 12:17 PM ET

Sometimes a small observation speaks volumes. Recently CNN's Gloria Borger reported that when she asked Democratic voters what the Republican message was, they regurgitated it easily and correctly. When Borger asked them what the Democratic message was, the voters couldn't respond.

I have strong reasons to believe the GOP message is totally wrong on empirical and moral grounds. We do not need less stimulus right now, but more; we do not need less regulation, but more. We need to focus on job creation, not debt reduction, right now. And "leaving the money in private hands" will not do it, as many of the private hands are overseas (China, for instance, holds many of the treasury bonds we are using to finance our debt). And tax cuts for the rich lead them to save more, not to spend much,

However, the Me-Too Democrats have allowed to the GOP to make deficit-cutting the leading agenda of Washington policy discourse, despite the fact that according to a February 2011 Gallup poll, 35% of Americans felt unemployment was the most important problem facing America; only 11% said the same of the deficit. Another February poll conducted by Pew found that 44% of Americans held that the job situation was the economic issue that worried them most, while only 19% said the deficit worried them most. Even amidst all the recent talk of a debt crisis, an April Gallup poll showed that the top two concerns of Americans were still the "economy in general" and unemployment ranked by 45% of Americans listed as their top concerns, while the deficit and debt were so ranked only by 17%. And, as the special House election in New York just showed, one of the few things the Democrats have going for them is that they are known as champions of Medicare -- yet the Democrats keep saying that they too are willing to cut Medicare, only differently and to a lesser extent. The Democrats may hope that the voters will prefer their watered-down Republican agenda over the harsher GOP one, but they cannot presume the candidate the Republicans finally settle on will be a Tea Party mutant. On the contrary, after the primaries, the GOP candidate will very likely move toward the center.

Meanwhile, the Democrats must do better than arguing that the continued horrible job news, including the recent uptick of the unemployment rate to 9.1%, is merely a bump in the road, that the economy "is going to take a while" to mend, as President Obama put it. And they add that the tsunami in Japan and the Greece-EU debt crisis are at fault, and they soon will be behind us. The Democrats thus act as if they have a secret message from the gods of economics, that without any new major endeavors or policies , the economy will return to a strong growth, unemployment will fall, and -- voila! --they will carry the day, all without having to take the political risks involved in coming up with an active, interventionist economic agenda.

Nobody really knows what the economy will do next. If one had to bet, it would be safest to assume that the economy may recover some, but that it will continue to exhibit a rather anemic growth rate and high unemployment well into next year. Above all, the continued effort -- to which the GOP and the Me-Too Democrats seem to be leaning -- to take out four trillion dollars from federal spending over the next ten years, while states and cities are slashing their budget, is likely to make investors even more reluctant to start or expand enterprises and employers to hire people.

The Democrats need an agenda of their own. If more stimulus is impractical, they should call for massive outlays for retraining the labor force and public works that develop new domestic energy sources. They would be better off, even if the GOP succeeds in blocking such moves. They would demonstrate that they understand that what we now need is to focus on job creation, and cutting the deficit has its place -- later.

Amitai Etzioni is a University Professor at The George Washington University and the author of The Moral Dimension (The Free Press, 1988).

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 200
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paperless Tiger
10:32 AM on 06/09/2011
The Democrats got spooked in the mid-terms so they doubled down on the compromises. Your assessment of the economic situation is correct, and nothing short of a New Deal is going to fix it. Unfortunately, the electorate is in such an extreme state of denial that they reject anything that resembles social reform.
10:28 AM on 06/09/2011
When Borger asked them what the Democratic message was, the voters couldn't respond.

The professor is correct. A combination of poor messaging, poor senate leadership and lack of media coverage has made the democrats ineffective.

How about a message saying the democrats want to shrink the republican party to a size so that it could be drowned in a bathtub.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
10:17 AM on 06/09/2011
I have repeatedly complained that the media (Huffington Post included) will follow any crackpot with an (R) after their name around like a puppy, but a Democrat would need to throw himself in front of a bus to get any media airtime. Unfortunately Mr, Weiner has proved my point a bit too literally. Republicans have Fox News and a dozen pundit-filled 'think tanks' to remind them over and over and over what it is they're 'supposed to believe'. Point to one media organ that reflects back to the left an image of themselves and reminds them what it is they ideally should stand for. Huffington Post in one editorial in four, I suppose. That TV series "Boston Legal" was refereshingly liberal, but has been off the air for years now.
10:11 AM on 06/09/2011
Enjoyed reading your article. I have a concern for the threat to not raise the dept ceiling. I think the foreign countries are starting to realize that we are not going to work together to solve are problems. They sense that we are failing and are starting to move away to limit the damages. All the countries holding are dept and using are dollar for trans actions such as trading oil are going to look for away to reduce their exposure. All this is really going to have a negative snowball effect on are economy. I believe Obama is smart enough and has enough respect from foreign leaders to do this if we would support him.
Giordano Bruno
Flaming Librul
09:56 AM on 06/09/2011
Wonderful aricle Professor. I especially love the part where you said that if we leave the money in the private sector that jobs will be created, "overseas." CEOs are paid for reducing costs, doing more for less, etc. It makes sense economically in a global economy to offshore jobs and benefit from cheaper labor costs, which typically make up the largest part of overhead in business.

The Democratic leadership, top to bottom, is rudderless. Talk to anyone on the street who hasn't bought the tea party baloney and it is obvious what is needed. Reorder Priorities (Get out of Iraq and Afghanistan for starters), Hold China accountable for trade violations, and pull back on unfavorable trade agreements (especially the ones that benefit one side only), Concentrate on infrastructure and green technology, provide affordable health care for all Americans, and perhaps most important of all, revitalize our public education system. In sharpening the distinction between parties, I would cast the Republicans as the party of greed and corruption, those who would allow US business to continue to rape and pillage our economy. I would at the same time portray the Democrats as those who care about the working man. (Can anybody find John Edwards talking points???!!!! Good lines even if he turned out to be a bit sleazy!!). Enough bipartisanship already.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AsISaid
09:14 AM on 06/09/2011
Excellet commentary.

Had Obama been an ideologue, he would have set out bold parameters and directions, against which opposition would be judged.

Instead, he felt he needed to create cooperation between the factions that control the country and lost whatever edge he had. This 'kumbaya' mode is fine, if the fight is not vicious and with so much at stake as reality shows.

I've said from Day One that the Democrats not only didn't have a message, they had no direction. Those that delivered the Democratic message were terrible. Basic questions went unanswered. Challenges were unanswered. 'Facts' were skewed against them. They looked weak because they appeared to have no convictions in what they were doing.

I can't find two people who know what the health care bill does, as an example.

You can't lead if you confuse your followers. The one thing that ideologues have as an edge is conviction - right or wrong doesn't matter. Conviction looks like strength - and, it provides direction even when things start to go wrong.

There are many reasons for the apparent weaknesses of Congressional Democrats and the appearance of a lack of conviction on the part of Obama. But, whatever the reasons, it's very disappointing. We need fighters for leaders. We need to get behind ideas and feel like we are part of progress.

Instead, we acquiese too easily. Compromise before compromise is necessary. We sit back and get attacked without a strong voice to defend our ideals. It's disheartening.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carol Gebert
09:00 AM on 06/09/2011
I am one that agrees that more stimulus is needed. However, the track record of our stimuli indicates that we decide details based on political gain, not cold-headed economic ones. For that reason, I am dubious about the wisdom of putting those decisions in the hands of politicians.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The best politicians are for free!
08:35 AM on 06/09/2011
Those companies that sent American jobs overseas need to hear their countries call for patriotism and stop the greed for cheap labor and bring them home, Americans need to stop buying substandard products at high prices, buy American and save a job!
09:28 AM on 06/09/2011
The movement of American factory jobs and white-collar work to other countries is part of a positive transformation that will enrich the U.S. economy over time, even if it causes short-term pain and dislocation, the Bush administration said. The embrace of foreign "outsourcing," an accelerating trend that has contributed to U.S. job losses in recent years and has become an issue in the 2004 elections, is contained in the president's annual report to Congress on the U.S. economy.

"Outsourcing is just a new way of doing international trade," said N. Gregory Mankiw, chairman of Bush's Council of Economic Advisors, which prepared the report. "More things are tradable than were tradable in the past. And that's a good thing." The report itself, under Bush's signature, offered similarly encouraging words, asserting that "when a good or service is produced more cheaply abroad, it makes more sense to import it than make or provide it domestically." Mankiw and the president's report contend that the U.S. economy ultimately will benefit when the production of goods and services finds its way to the nation that can render them most efficiently.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A30194-2004Feb10

In the last four years they owned congress, Republicans voted 11 times to reward corporations that create jobs and profits overseas. The cost added directly to the deficit. One impact is the loss of 42,400 factories (6 million jobs) between 2004 and the end of 2009.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The best politicians are for free!
10:01 AM on 06/09/2011
F&F and it is never to late to change course and correct this mistake those jobs weren't lost they were stolen from the American people, it is time to voice opinions and bring them back, companies that want to operate in a foreign land for cheap labor need to stay in those countries, every American should boycott them until they bring our American jobs back!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
vietveter
Wish ididnt know now what ididnt know then
02:33 AM on 06/09/2011
I thought we were going to talk about making jobs. I know that is best done at the local level but there are no local funds available.

Can we count on some federal dollars to: repair, patch or replace concrete on bridges, remove paint inspect and repaint steel on bridges. Some federal funds would get a bunch of bridge inspection teams up and running. A watch one - do one - teach one type of O J Trainning and the State of Georgia would be greatful. We would no longer need to close our eyes when driving over or under some of those structures. The cost to tool-up each crew of five would be under four thousand dollars and I will carry my crew in my truck - your fuel & your insurance and up keep. We could rent compressors and jack hammers scaffolds and bucket trucks as needed. I am ready to rock and roll.

So where are the bucks?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:19 AM on 06/09/2011
There are no Federal dollars, they would have to be borrowed.
09:05 AM on 06/09/2011
All money spent by the Federal Government is borrowed, including the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Yemen and Pakistan. The real question is priority. Do we invest in nation building abroad, or do we build our own nation? Most Americans opt for the latter.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:15 AM on 06/09/2011
Not if we'd quit making war, rescind the tax cuts, stop subsidies to big oil, etc.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The best politicians are for free!
10:04 AM on 06/09/2011
Squandered in Iraq and Afghanistan, and in the bank accounts of the wealthy that are starving the middle class and poor........... Americans from all walks of the middle class are getting the shaft while the gold is going to the wealthy!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lynda Groom
02:21 AM on 06/09/2011
Both sides of the debate are afraid of the truth. Over 70% of the economy depends upon consumers buying stuff they may not need. The consumers are more worried about their jobs and their homes, if they have one. Government can't change that and neither can Obama and the GOP trying to create more tax breaks for the fortunate won't change anything either.

Demand is probably the only thing that might create jobs. Maybe the buying public will rescue the economy, but I would'nt bet on it anytime soon. The recession has many deep rooted causes, The GOP is stuck in neutral regarding the equally obvious revenue part of the equation, believing that cost cutting is the only solution. Wishing so won't make it happen friends.

Both sides are at fault, but the GOP is driving the bus off the cliff.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Katherine Schock
Over the hill,liberal,organic gardener
11:46 PM on 06/08/2011
After years of corporations taking their manufacturing facilities overseas to cheap labor markets, I agree that public works projects and retraining workers for new job opportunities is necessary. Yes, it may still take years to rebuild the economy to where it once was, but if we don't invest in our own country and it's citizens, who will? The banks care only about their own profit, and basically if the corporations who own our elected officials don't start investing here in the U.S. then what good are they? People with jobs spend money, pay taxes and invest in their communities, something that Wall Streeters don't do!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:17 AM on 06/09/2011
fanned and faved
10:38 PM on 06/08/2011
It is business that creates the jobs, so let's take more of their money so they can make more jobs?
It is taxes that keeps the businesses from creating more jobs here. The U.S. has the highest corporate tax rate in the world, at 39% is it any wonder that business keeps its money in the bank or overseas?
It's not the big business that this hurts it's the small business because they can't afford to take their business overseas where their not taxed as much so the small business stays small and can't hire more people after paying all the taxes.
The biggest employee in the country is the one that's killing the country, Big Government and all it's free stuff. So with the largest payroll and it's large giveaway program and the continued borrowing and spending and no one wanting to actually face up to the truth you can expect a mighty fall.
So hunker down folks and get ready for the shakiest ride of our lives.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:38 PM on 06/08/2011
I think we ought to raise taxes until every Fortune 500 Company moves overseas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigmadd
Retired Teamster & Vet USN
12:19 AM on 06/09/2011
No problem they do buisness here they pay taxes here, if not there will always be some company to step in and take their place and if they stay adjust taxes on how many Americans they hire and how well are they paid and what the benifits are. You would be surprised on how much our debit would shrink. Workers pay taxes and the the corporations would pay their share also. More people working more buisness sell more taxes paid now why is so hard to understand. This race for cheap labor is costing everyone from big buisness down to the poor.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
vietveter
Wish ididnt know now what ididnt know then
02:14 AM on 06/09/2011
OK, IT IS A DEAL

but only if you go to train the new employees
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigmadd
Retired Teamster & Vet USN
12:02 AM on 06/09/2011
We already gave big buisness historic low taxes so do you see any jobs here? I say tax the hell out of them they ain't doing us any good anyhow.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:29 AM on 06/09/2011
Exxon Mobil employes 83000 workers who pay taxes and provides the energy we need to heat our homes and run our economy. What are you providing?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carol Gebert
08:54 AM on 06/09/2011
Like many Americans, you seem to live in a bubble. History is irrelevant. What matters is the landscape of options that exist on a global scale today. The US has one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world today. Of course that motivates them to move operations elsewhere.
10:03 PM on 06/08/2011
"and cutting the deficit has its place -- later. "

The problem is that it's always "later".

Respectfully, Mr. Etzioni, the time is now. Later is too late. Now may already be too late.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
RacerX
E pluribus unum
11:12 PM on 06/08/2011
No its not always "later". Go way back in history and study the period between 1992 and 2007 and you'll see that what you are saying is not true. Any of those years was a good time and in many of those years the deficit actually was reduced.
06:35 AM on 06/09/2011
There were some years that the deficit didn't rise as fast as in other years. But, the public debt has been steadily mounting for three decades. In those years where it seemed we had a surplus (very few of those), it appeared so because the government raided the SS account, leaving IOUs in place.

The wars and the bailouts were Bush's excuse. Military spending to "re-arm America" was RR's exuse. Stimulus and shoring up the banks was Obama's excuse.

There's always an excuse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigmadd
Retired Teamster & Vet USN
12:21 AM on 06/09/2011
Roll back Bush era tax cuts the deficit would shrink.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reasonable111
12:34 AM on 06/09/2011
actually this is not true. The deficit commission has stated that it will take spending cuts and tax hikes to do this. Read up, you are incorrect.
09:54 PM on 06/08/2011
"We do not need less stimulus right now, but more;"

Why is reality so hard to fathom?

WE DON"T HAVE THE MONEY
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:37 PM on 06/08/2011
Sure we do. The problem is it is going into stupid wars instead of helping people here in America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigmadd
Retired Teamster & Vet USN
12:06 AM on 06/09/2011
If you we the average American you'd be correct but if you mean The wealthest and the corporations who get corporate wefare then yes we have plenty of money.
06:38 AM on 06/09/2011
Yes, and we need the "plenty of money" to keep the economy going, not to fund endless government programs (most of which don't foster economic growth).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bessielil
trying to organize hummingbirds
09:40 PM on 06/08/2011
Excellent article, and, as William Bendix used to say in 'Life of Riley' , "What a revoltin' development this is." Obama being painted as a flaming liberal is laughable. He's compromised the very tenets that enthralled us during the election.

The GOP keeps running the narrative, and we Dems seem to have lost a backbone as well as our own perfectly respectable story and vision.