iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Amy Haberland
 

She's Not Your Mother's Wedding Photographer

Posted: 06/14/2012 12:40 pm

It may be going back a little too far in time, but the old guy under the black cloth is long gone. Women are the new power players in the wedding photography industry, with their numbers growing daily. When I first became a photographer 20 years ago, my colleagues were predominantly men, but as the years have gone by I've noticed a shift. I attend many networking events for wedding photographers and I can't help but notice that I am surrounded by enterprising women. Are men staying home, do they avoid these events or is there something more to it?

I decided to consult with some real people who make a living selling the equipment to see who's buying. EP Levine has been around since the 1950s in Waltham, Mass. when nary a female wedding photographer could be found. I asked owner Jay Callum what he has noticed in recent years. "There's definitely been a demographic shift. The crowds used to be older and a lot more men -- you now see more, if not the majority, of the new people coming into the business are women."

Scroll down for photos by talented female wedding photographers

Women photographers are leading the way with gorgeous blogs, styled shoots and Pinterest boards. Wedding album manufacturers and gallery wrap houses court them. The wedding blogs have become the dominant force with brides-to-be: women are becoming "knotties" -- as devotees to The Knot are sometimes called -- as they prepare for their big days. One of those blogs is The Wedding Yentas; I asked Alison Friedman, owner and editor, what she thought contributed to the new trend: "Female photographers are connecting quickly with today's bride. Today's bride wants to make quick decisions and wants to feel like she's part of a network of wedding vendors who understand her and her vision, hence the vendor-client turned girlfriends phenomenon. This makes sense because a wedding photographer spends all day and evening with the couple, and that special female friendship grows out of working together on the bride's happiest day."

But don't be fooled! It's not all about girl talk, these women know how to run a business, they know the secret: it's to treat your brides like you'd want to be treated and let word of mouth begin. WPPI, Wedding and Portrait Photographers International, is one of the largest professional wedding photo groups with an annual conference and trade show in Las Vegas that boasts 16,000 attendees. Even they have taken notice with classes like The "She" marketing Phenomenon.

And I say it's all good! After all I'm a female wedding photographer and longtime ardent feminist. Why shouldn't women be thriving in a business which is usually paid for by women?

I spoke to Boston-based Lisa Rigby, a rising star, about what it means to her to be a female wedding photographer. Here's what she had to say:

I never considered being a woman any kind of obstacle to wedding photography. I know that modern grooms are more interested and involved with weddings than in the past, but so much of wedding biz is still about relating to women. I usually ask couples I meet with if there's a "decision maker" about the photography, and in boy-girl couples about seven times out of 10 they'll say it's the woman. I do feel that I'm sensitive -- especially with portraits -- to the things that women will pick up on about themselves. Women are generally more visually scrutinized than men, although that's changing somewhat. I have a lot of first-hand experience with how women judge their own appearances, and I also know what it's like to feel that judgment coming from others. So when I'm photographing, I'm really aware of the things that this woman might pick up on or scrutinize when she sees these photos of herself later. I know that this woman wants to be beautiful -- and she is beautiful and it's just a matter of me picking up on her beauty and trying to focus on that with the photos. If you can help a woman see her own beauty, that is just worth so much.

Women photographers are hard to replace because women know what women want. We want beautiful pictures that capture real-life feelings and emotions. We want someone to come to our wedding who will respect our feelings and wishes. We want someone who understands us. Whether we are behind the camera or in front of it -- we want the very best!

Below, photos by Kate McElwee and Leah Haydock:

Loading Slideshow...

 

Follow Amy Haberland on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Realitygal

FOLLOW WEDDINGS
It may be going back a little too far in time, but the old guy under the black cloth is long gone. Women are the new power players in the wedding photography industry, with their numbers growing daily...
It may be going back a little too far in time, but the old guy under the black cloth is long gone. Women are the new power players in the wedding photography industry, with their numbers growing daily...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 20
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nino Bookman
01:43 PM on 06/16/2012
Check out Nawal at The Pic Chick in Atlanta, GA - she is great!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lilbunnyfufu
Its all fun & games until someone uses Force Choke
10:54 AM on 06/16/2012
Two years ago I was in 3 weddings and attended another 4. All had female photographers but one and that's the one that not only did the bride and groom have the most hassle getting their prints but they were also the least creative.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thinklongterm
Conservatives are a disease....we are the cure.
09:34 PM on 06/18/2012
And that proves what?
05:38 PM on 06/15/2012
Gender has nothing to do with talent or ability to succeed
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:36 AM on 06/15/2012
Check out Liz Duren in Charleston. She's a genius!
01:56 AM on 06/15/2012
I have to strongly disagree with the comment by ScreenName05 - there is a huge difference between professionals and a relative with no experience. Many of the reasons to use a professional are described in the article so I will not repeat them. And I have never heard of a wedding photographer who would say they give you "no guarantee you will even get photos." That's ridiculous. You don't need to spend a zillion dollars, but spending a competitive rate will ensure you do get photos that you'll always love look back on. (BTW, I am NOT a professional photographer.)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Benjine
06:57 AM on 06/15/2012
quite right Anne!!! I've written my own thoughts below this absurd comment
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ScreenName05
10:35 PM on 06/14/2012
Do yourself a favor, spend a $1000 and buy a good digital camera, give it to a relative to practice with for a month or so, and let them take your wedding photos. 

1.  You will not have to pay  a professional $3000 to $5000 up front with no guarantee you will even get photos.

2.  The quality will be about the same.

3.  You can have the originals to produce all of the copies you want for the price of printing

4.  You can edit the photos yourself with photoshop

5.  You will save about $3000

6.  You will make a lot of wedding photographers mad and put the wedding industry in its place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Benjine
07:14 AM on 06/15/2012
Full disclosure; I am a professional wedding photographer.

ScreenName05's advice is misguided. I'm afraid you have little understanding of what is involved in shooting a wedding to the satisfaction of your clients - the bride and groom. What it is to compose a shot originally or just beautifully, the stamina required, the planning that goes into the day, the way that you need to interact with your clients and the guests, where you need to be standing to capture those precious moments that can never be repeated. As for learning Photoshop? Good luck with that!

The quality will be "about the same" ... ? Oh really?

Also, do you seriously think that the kinds of wedding photo gear that will produce the quality your clients are looking for can be bought for a mere $1000? ? That's just a wrongheaded notion. Each of my lenses (and I have 4 currently) costs a minimum $1000 - some up to $2500. And you NEED these kinds of lenses to get the results required. The flash ALONE costs $500!!! For $1000 you'd be lucky to get a low end nikon/ canon DSLR with a kit lens.

Hire a professional. Don't risk it. This day will never be repeated. It also will go insanely quick so in the end you have just your memories and the photos (and a video if you are into that).
10:52 AM on 06/15/2012
I suppose everyone should also do themselves a favor and do their own decorating, and their own catering, and their own invitations, and hey, why not save the money and sew their own dress?

Craftsmanship requires skills, which are not learned on a weekend and often not for free. If DIY is what you want, then by all means knock yourself out, but give credit to a professional's hard work where it's due.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ScreenName05
02:00 PM on 06/15/2012
When yo realize that the typical couple throws away $30k or more on a wedding, and that money could be a down payment for a house, or pay of college bills, and if invested would be worth nearly a million dollars by the time they retire,

YES, absolutely.
05:01 PM on 06/14/2012
And I thought the reason wedding work was getting thin was that people were too cheap to hire a professional- now that everyone knows someone with a digital camera. I didn't really see much of anything that was groundbreaking in the pictures, but I love the one of the couple with the eyeglasses.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thinklongterm
Conservatives are a disease....we are the cure.
09:31 PM on 06/18/2012
Yea I wasn't that impressed either.
04:30 PM on 06/14/2012
Kate's photography is absolutely stunning. I've been a fan of hers since she lived out here in Seattle, and I've always said that if I ever get married, I'm flying her back to take my photos.