More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Amy Siskind

Amy Siskind

Posted: December 3, 2009 07:51 PM

Obama's Misogynistic Associations Haunt Him

What's Your Reaction?

It's not been a particularly good press week for two well known misogynists: Rick Warren and Larry Summers. Both men were early selections of President Obama.

If we are to judge our president by whom he surrounds himself with, then what do Obama's selections of Warren and Summers tell us? That Obama's version of diversity does not include gay and women's rights. And in fact, the selection of Warren and Summers will likely be a continual source of salt on the wound of inequality.

President Obama's Inauguration was presided over by Rick Warren. Although Warren is perhaps best known for his opposition to gay rights, he also believes that women are second class citizens. Specifically, Warren's Saddleback Church has encouraged battered wives to stay in their abusive relationships. Hundreds of viewers wrote on our blog about their personal experiences at the hand of Rick Warren's church. Saddleback Church's advice to abused wives: "she" should make a better meal, or "she" should keep the home cleaner, or be a better wife - then "she" wouldn't deserve the beating that her husband delivered.

Warren is back in the news this past weekend for his ties with a Ugandan pastor who is helping to spearhead legislation which, if enacted, would result in the execution of HIV-positive gay men. Warren's unwillingness to condone this legislation sheds further light on his beliefs. How shocking it is to fathom that Obama would choose to be inaugurated by a man so antithetical to any brand of diversity.

Larry Summers, Obama's pick for Director of the National Economic Council, also made news this Sunday. This time a Boston Globe article revealed that Summers ignored warnings about investments while at Harvard, costing the University's endowment $1.8 billion.

Obama's 2008 selection of Summers was troubling. Summers is infamous for a speech he delivered while President at Harvard where he claimed that girls were genetically inferior in mathematics and science. Summers also has a history of being unable to work well with others - especially women.

In 1998, Brooksley Born, then chairwoman of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission, warned Alan Greenspan, Robert Rubin, and Larry Summers of the risks inherent in not regulating derivatives - the esoteric instruments that would eventually tank our economy.

Michael Greenberger, a senior director at the commission at the time, noted: "Brooksley was this woman who was not playing tennis with these guys and not having lunch with these guys. There was a little bit of the feeling that this woman was not of Wall Street." Summers chastised Born that her suggestion would hurt financial markets, so shush! We all know how this story ended.

Summers also refused to heed the warnings of another woman, Iris Mack, while at Harvard. When Iris expressed concern about that Harvard was inadequately managing the risk inherent in derivative products held in its portfolio, what did Summers do? Fire her.

Finally, Obama's appointed Summers despite his ties to the same Wall Street firms that he is meant to watch over. In 2008, Summers was paid over $5 million from DE Shaw, one of the largest hedge funds in the world. Summers also received $2.7 million from some of the Wall Street banks that were recipients of government bailout money in 2008. Also in 2008, Summers was paid $135,000 by Goldman Sachs to deliver one speech -- the same Goldman Sachs that was the single biggest beneficiary of money that was drained out of AIG.

There's an old adage: you roll with dogs, you get fleas. Well President Obama must be pretty darn itchy right about now. Obama's selection of Warren and Summers is a constant reminder of where women and gays stand in Obama's pecking order.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 64
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
09:36 AM on 12/07/2009
I'm with you on Rick Warren, but the attack on Summers is unfounded. All Summers did is have the audacity to articulate what a lot of cognitive scientists have been asking based on research: Is it possible that most men and women are wired differently in a manner which makes men better at some things than women and vice versa. The other logical question is how much of a role does "culture" (society norms, education expectations etc.) play vis a vis genetic components? As a trained academic with a Ph.D., I was dismayed to see Summers' comments taken out of context and him attacked by people who don't seem to care about academic freedom and inquiry if they don't like a particular question. Many of Summers' critics were simply academic thugs and the thesis that he is somehow a mysogynist for asking that rhetorical question is yet another example. I'm a strong liberal in my politics, but these attacks on Summers lack intellectual integrity and are, thus, unfair.
12:25 AM on 12/07/2009
Facts, verifiable facts supportable by evidence especially in the Google and YouTube era, don't matter to Ms. Siskind. Play "fast and loose", dwell in the very far, conspiratorial edges or do simple research regarding the president's position on women's issues? Instead, sling the misogyny charge mud and see if it sticks. The president has appointed or nominated strong and powerful women to key and powerful positions, including women on Ms. Siskind's own recommended lists and perenial press releases. Over and over, the president has acknowledged the burden faced by women in the weak economy. The president's sister has recounted the action taken by her brother when he observed the transition between a teenage girl and womanhood. As the only father figure, unprompted, he bought her what was needed, "the book", provided awkward explanations about bees and of course made the obligatory visits to colleges. Those are Maya's testimonies. Recently, Maya found and offered for publication their mothers Ph.D thesis; work by another strong woman, the president's mother, who provided home schooling to both her children and set high standards. Btw, isn't the president a basketball buddy with Ms. Rice, Ambassador to the UN? Ms. Siskind still believes that Sarah Palin should be given a second look and favours her as potential candidate for the Whitehouse. Siskind did vote for Palin in 2008 and promises to do so again in 2012. Facts are indeed stubborn. They will not just go away.
01:41 AM on 12/07/2009
Amy Sisskind, in fact, relies on some solid factual information available to anyone who is capable of reading mainstream media or surfing the internet and/or appreciating various search engines, one of which would be google!

The wunder boys of finance with whom President Obama has surrounded Himself appear to be not only dangerously clueless with respect to the economy itself (Geithner/Summers-who himself got fired from Harvard for mismanagement!) but also suffering from an extreme overdose of sexism that cannot be camouflaged. Rubin, Summers' and Geitner's boss backin l996 told Brooksley Born to shut up and tried to prevent her from publishing her Concepts paper where she exposed the Credit Default Swaps as the most dangerous form of financial derivatives. That other fool, Greenspan had lunch with that brave woman Ms Born and told her "we don't need to control fraud. Markets do that themselves! What fraud?"!

Then Obama starts bowing and kissing Faith posteriors of the likes of this Warren neanderthal who'd gladly have "gays and women move to the back of the bus!".

Just watch PBS' "The Warning" doc.-- you'll soon see how right Amy Siskind is in her great analysis of the Obama misogynists!

And remember Obama's own code sexist comment re his female opponent:

"Periodically, she feels 'down' and starts launching attacks against me to boost her appeal"

"Her claws are comin' out" "She's likeable enough"

Well, sweetie, start educating yerself!
photo
sippewissett
We are ALL Americans, not just the noisy few.
02:36 PM on 12/06/2009
Is this the best you can do to defame Obama? These are puny. Judge him by his appointments in which women figure prominently, including onto the Supreme Court. In contrast, how about writing about GOP views of women -- beyond being handy as mistresses, that is.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:52 AM on 12/06/2009
Siskind is a perpetual Obama-basher and PUMA. The stretches she takes to get to her conclusion that Obama is somehow a closet misogynist are downright Glenn-Beckian. She is also a huge Palin supporter and would chose that crazy snowbilly over any man for POTUS.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:27 AM on 12/05/2009
The only way you could possibly sustain the delusional belief that Barack Obama is in any sense a misogynist is by deliberately blinding your eyes almost totally to reality, and substituting a whole other vision entirely.

The President is a man who has been surrounded by strong women his entire life, by choice and by chance, and appears to be totally comfortable in such company.
03:09 PM on 12/04/2009
"If we are to judge our president by whom he surrounds himself with, then what do Obama's selections of Warren and Summers tell us?"

Obama has Valerie Jarrett, Christine Romer, Kathleen Sebilius, Hilda Solis, Hilary Clinton, Janet Napolitano, Lisa Jackson, Sheila Bair and Susan Rice as a few women who have Obama's ear. Not to mention his working with Nancy Pelosi has a big impact on Obama.
I find it troubling that the writer left out the fact that Obama signed the Lilly Ledbetter law as one of his first laws he signed giving women the same rights as men on the job.

"President Obama's Inauguration was presided over by Rick Warren."

Rick Warren gave the invocation, he didn't preside over the inauguration. Reverend Joseph E. Lowery gave the benediction. Lowery is a staunch supporter of gay and women's rights. Why did the writer fail to mention this fact? While I agree that Warren is a bigot, his reading of the invocation does not mean he has Obama's ear.

Obama doesn't listen to Larry Summers when it comes to some kind of misogyny. However, with his horrendous economic record he shouldn't be given the time of day. But I'm pretty sure Obama's experiences with being brought up by a single mother and all her struggles and having a strong woman such as Michelle as his spouse is far more influential when it comes to womens issues.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Smithn
Different strokes for different folks.
05:11 PM on 12/04/2009
Thank you for voicing my opinion of this piece as well. FYI: The Summers Harvard accusations were proven incorrect. I read he was gone from the Harvard position two years when they experienced their financial difficulties. Frontline did an awsome documentary that Ms. Suskind did not incorporate in the above piece either.
photo
StevenKeirstead
Photographer and Biologist who happens to be gay.
02:13 PM on 12/06/2009
Right, Dr. Drew Faust, a woman, has been president of Harvard during the financial crisis, but I would not fault her either. Presidents of colleges do raise funds, but usually do not oversee the endowment investments. Harvard has their own investment arm, a bright group, but they were not able to avoid losing money in this recession. Dr. Faust and her administrators are now in the hard position of reducing spending at Harvard, cutting staff and not replacing professors who leave. In any case, blaming Dr. Summers for Harvard’s current troubles is dubious at least.
02:49 PM on 12/04/2009
The author's support of Sarah Palin, both here and in the article she wrote on The Daily Beast, show that it doesn't matter what a person's positions are to this author--what matters to her is only whether or not the politician is a woman. Sarah Palin's positions on choice, religion, guns, everything flies in the face of what progressives believe and what is needed for civil rights - woman, gays, minorities, etc. President Obama's picks have been as varied as the make-up of this country and while I do agree with all of them, I do believe that whatever shortcomings the President has, he is light years ahead of Sarah Palin and her politics. If you really want to set us back decades in terms of civil liberties, follow the author's advice and vote for Sarah Palin, no please do not!

This author is bat-s#@t crazy just like her hero Palin.
04:01 PM on 12/04/2009
Typo: meant to write I do not agree with all of [ the President's picks].
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TooLooze
Someone should do something about all the problems
08:33 AM on 12/05/2009
Great research!
02:09 PM on 12/04/2009
Previous commenters have already done a good job of highlighting the most glaring holes in your argument, Ms. Suskind. I won't belabor any points.

But your choice of premise baffles me: 'Guilt by association' is a pig that just doesn't fly. Republicans gave that very same premise every last bit of wherewithal during the '08 campaign (Ayers). Unsuccessfully.

I'm curious why you, apparently, believe you'll more successfully pull off the flying-pig magic trick, when the Republican masters of campaign illusion could not.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
abigail1
01:40 PM on 12/04/2009
um, Warren did not "preside" over the inauguration, Diane Feinstein did. Warren gave the Invocation. And Reverend Joseph E. Lowery, a staunch supporter of civil rights for gays and women, gave the benediction.
01:38 PM on 12/04/2009
Why do so called champions of causes need everyone not only to think what they think but how they think, it's never about what you get done, it's about how, when and who was sitting at the table. Maybe that's why it takes decades for them to get anything done.
photo
kathy001
Don't bogart that duck
11:58 AM on 12/04/2009
Sorry, this is just too much of a stretch. I work for a company owned and run by hard right-wing bible thumpers. They still buy into the birther nonsense and were convinced that Obama was going to put his hand on the Qur'an instead of the bible during his inauguration. I'm a liberal and an agnostic no amount of contact with these people is going to change me or rub off on me. By the way, except for their political beliefs, I really like them.

Warren said a prayer at the inauguration - period. Obama has always said he intended to work towards incorporating all sides of all issues to find a central position that would benefit everyone. Like it or not (and I don't), Warren is a piece of that.

I don't like having Summers in the position he is in simply because of his professional history but I'm not about to equate his personal misogynistic proclivities with Obama's.
photo
Daphydd
Lets play some music
11:57 AM on 12/04/2009
Ms. Siskind: I believe your last post was on a similar theme, that disliking Sarah Palin is basically misogyny. And now another article accusing the President of being a closet misogynist. Me thinks you are a bit paranoid, tending to see what you fear everywhere, and I challenge you to write about something else, for example, the myriad OTHER reasons to call into question the selection of Summers and Geithner. As for not championing gay issues, do you recall what happened to Bill Clinton when he championed gays in the military? His political leverage with Congress was gone in the blink of an eye. I would look to this president to weigh in on these issues no earlier than late in his first term, and if he gets a second one, very heavily then. In the mean time, Obama is trying to accomplish historic achievements in areas like health care, which are difficult enough without giving new ways for the right to attack him.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teva
10:43 AM on 12/04/2009
Amy, I find some of your assertions very difficult to believe, particularly concerning Pastor Rick Warren. Although I have never been to his church, I have read the book written by his wife, Kay Warren, in which she describes her involvement with people affected by HIV/Aids in Africa and India and many other countries (including our own), and how her heart for these people had changed her husband's heart as well several years ago. I recommend that you read Mrs. Warren's book and also that you go to their church website, saddleback.com, and read their HIV/Aids Initiative to see that they do care for people affected in this way.

In a book written by Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, Failing America's Faithful, she actually lifts Rick Warren up as a person who is very generous and had a dramatic change of heart in his life. Maybe you should check this out as well.....it's mentioned in the last few pages.

I also do not believe your statement that Rick Warren is encouraging battered women to stay with their abusive husbands! Looking at this from a Biblical perspective only, women certainly have grounds to leave when they are being abused! Therefore, it would be counter to God's Word for him to promote this action. There are many Christian based organizations and churches that either operate or contribute to shelters housing women and their children who have had to flee their homes in fear of their husbands.
12:01 PM on 12/04/2009
While I agree the article is very unfair towards Obama. Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Rick Warren has not bothered to distance himself from Uganda's proposed despicable legislation that calls for the state sanctioned murder of gays. His attitude seems like, "What's the Big Deal?" I wouldn't pay two cents to be around Warren.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:14 AM on 12/04/2009
I agree with the author. However, I have to wonder how much of this is cultural in the African-American population at large. Anecdotal evidence would suggest that homophobia and misogynistic tendencies exist in great abundance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcwtts1
Elections have consequences
01:17 PM on 12/04/2009
Are you crazy? With the Old White Man party hating women? Your ignorance about the African American community is startling and typical.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atmus
01:19 PM on 12/04/2009
Have you looked at the past history of caucasian white males in this country????

As a whole within this nation you will see both tendencies through out all races. And all upbringings.

But on a large scale African Americans are typically not homophobic nor misogynistic. Of course you have to be mindful of different age groups, backgrounds, etc. But as a whole, I would say look towards your caucasian brethrens before any African Americans.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
09:58 AM on 12/04/2009
Looks like we have to break out that old Internet joke about who you'd like as a head of state from the following choices again:
A) Runs with ward heelers, consults astrologers, chain-smokes, drinks half a dozen martinis a day, affects an elitist image, and cheats on his wife with multiple mistresses
B) Thrown out of office twice, sleeps until noon every day, drinks a large amount of brandy before going to bed every night, smokes cigars, and used drugs in college
C) Decorated combat veteran who reinvigorated his nation's collapsed economy, never smokes, only has the occasional beer, and never once cheated on his wife
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
11:50 AM on 12/04/2009
I for one do not get it...
photo
sippewissett
We are ALL Americans, not just the noisy few.
02:41 PM on 12/06/2009
If you're going to include cryptic profiles of past presidents, offer more of them and flattering/bad profiles of them in each party. Cherry-picking, like Siskind's article, is easy, cheap and utter nonsense.
06:14 AM on 12/07/2009
Oh chill out Einstein.