I've been watching with great interest as of late the amount of hate stories written about Governor Palin. Oh yes, we are a country that loves our drama. And we are certainly a country that can, at times, be accused of going to extremes. But one thing is certain about our Palin Hate Affair -- the biggest winner will be: Sarah Palin.
With Palin's public re-emergence today on Oprah, the media's Palin Hate Affair got fully underway. Sarah is, amongst other things, a cancer of the GOP, dumb, and heck, even fodder for a musical. Newsweek sees nothing wrong with using a picture from Runners World for their cover story. MSNBC is well, being MSNBC, and showing their inner-misogynist so familiar to us from 2008.
And somehow the extremism of the Palin Hate Affair reminds me of another recent political extreme: the media's love affair with candidate and then President Obama. The problem for Obama, as I recently wrote at The Daily Beast, is that all great love affairs come to an end. And quite inadvertently, our media set up Obama for an epic fall from grace. How could Obama possibly live up to the branding image that our media was so willing to propagate? Simply impossible.
There is another side to the Palin Hate Affair that also feels quite familiar -- it's called misogyny. This should also be familiar territory after the way Secretary Clinton was treated in 2008. As Katie Couric noted just after Hillary dropped out: "Senator Clinton received some of the most unfair, hostile coverage I've ever seen" and undoubtedly this hurt her chances at becoming the Democratic nominee. Sound familiar?
And just like with Hillary, the Palin Hate Affair would not be complete without a gang up by a group of women who consider themselves to be "feminists" (whatever that term connotes these days). These "feminists" are contributors to an "antidote" to Going Rogue called Going Rouge-Sarah Palin, An American Nightmare. If you read the list of women experts contributing here's what you'll find: most of them hated Hillary too. Check the list and Google their writings for 2007 and 2008 and you'll find every excuse possible as to why supporting the DNC's first viable woman candidate for President was not the right thing to do. Who's crying now?
Here's the thing about extremes -- what they lack in longevity they make up for with excitement. Sure our media is having one heck of a time turning Sarah Palin into a modern day Sarah Good; but at some point there will be period of examination and discovery. A mea culpa of having stepped over lines whose consequence will be a judgment of keystrokes. As as Sarah Good's final words to her accuser would predict his demise, so to, will this extreme come to an end. And the unwitting winner of the sympathy vote will be: Sarah Palin.
Arianna Huffington: Sunday Roundup
Prepare for the latest Palin media onslaught. An hour with Oprah, a multi-parter with Barbara, and appearances all across the country. An initial read shows Going Rogue doesn't reveal much. No surprise there. This isn't about the book, it's about the book tour -- which includes a politically convenient stop in Iowa -- and the money. Besides, it's not like there's much we haven't already learned about Palin since she burst onto the national scene. We even know when her water broke during her last pregnancy. Talk about overexposed. In the end, I expect this will be one of the most mocked books of the year -- and one of the biggest bestsellers. Palin fans will find much to love, but I doubt a single doubter will be converted. It's a 400 page Rorschach test. With no index.
Palin's title: 'Going Rogue' - Mike Allen - POLITICO.com
Oprah Winfrey-Sarah Palin interview for 'Going Rogue' shows TV ...
'Going Rouge' To Come Out Same Day As Palin's Book | TPM LiveWire
Playin the victim might sell a few books, but it's not going to get you elected.
I for one think she has no intention of running for anything except a fat check.
And the Presidency just doesn't pay that well and she'd have to work too hard..
You also said one other thing that is completely "spot on": " Sarah is, amongst other things, a cancer of the GOP, dumb, and heck, even fodder for a musical."
Look at the microscopic scrutiny with which they view the President.
There is nothing misogynistic about applying the same "rule" to a woman that's put herself in the public and political arena.
This site has an excellent analysis:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/11/18/805704/-Dont-Get-Palins-Appeal-Try-a-Little-Harder
"If you are one of the people obsessing over how "stupid" Sarah Palin is and how "dumb" her supporters are, then take a step back and force yourself to remember the lessons of 2000 and 2004.
Remember,in particular, that there is a large swath of the American public who sees themselves as victims of the very kind of force you embody when you attack Sarah Palin for lacking intelligence. And those people have money to spend and votes to give."
Did the hatred of Bush backfire?
Fortunately, they're such a tiny minority she doesn't stand a chance on the national political scene.
Dan Quayle was just lucky the Internet was around while he was in office. We Cheeto-munching, basement dwelling bloggers would have skewered him as well.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/11/poll-obama-still-beats-palin-and-other-gopers-but-palin-improves-a-little.php
Good luck with your repubs, hopefully one day you'll grow up and be able to make your point like an adult.