iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Andrea Kane

GET UPDATES FROM Andrea Kane
 

No Right Door on Birth Control

Posted: 02/28/2012 5:14 pm

The recent birth control debate has been disturbing on many levels, not least of which is the fact that we are even debating contraception in the year 2012. The conversation continues this week with the U.S. House holding hearings and the Senate considering an amendment addressing this issue. The current, senseless uproar has also revealed a profound lack of understanding -- especially on the part of many men -- about contraception and how it actually works for real women. Most unsettling is that some of these men are opining about, and in some cases legislating for, changes that would harm women's health.

The immediate issue is whether the health insurance plan provided to women who work for religiously-affiliated institutions such as Catholic hospitals, charities and universities should cover birth control. There has been much discussion about what this means for religious institutions, but let's focus on how this would affect real women.

Consider some of the most common misperceptions offered over the past several weeks including, "what's the problem: women can just go to a public clinic or to Planned Parenthood for birth control," or "birth control is cheap and easily available" or -- my personal favorite --"what's the big deal: you can just go to a drug store and buy it."

Now, consider a hypothetical Licensed Practical Nurse working at a Catholic hospital making $40,000 a year and raising a child as a single mom. If she wants to use birth control but her employer's health plan doesn't cover it, where do the common misperceptions laid out above leave her? Like the old game show,Let's Make a Deal, here's what's behind those three doors:

Door #1: Can't she just go to a clinic to get birth control?

The federally-funded Title X program provides free or low-cost contraceptive services for low-income women. However, Title X is already over-stretched and gives low-income patients highest priority. Because the nurses' salary is above 250 percent of the poverty level, even if she could get services, she would pay full price.

The U.S. House and a number of states are making it even harder to get publicly-funded birth control at a clinic. The House has voted to eliminate funding for Title X each of the last two years. In addition, a number of states have drastically reduced state funding for contraception in the last few years, such as Texas, which slashed its state funding for family planning by two-thirds. New Jersey, Montana and others have also cut state family planning funds.

With regard to Planned Parenthood, this is the same organization that many politicians and pundits want to put out of business, and that several states have already banned from receiving funding to provide contraception.

How about Medicaid? Because the nurse has health insurance through her employer, even if that insurance does not cover contraception, she won't qualify for Medicaid. What's more, the nurse's income, unlike many women who seek care at clinics, falls above the threshold for covering contraceptive services through all but one states' Medicaid Family Planning program, so that door is closed.

Door #2: Birth control is cheap and easily available

If the nurse doesn't have coverage for contraception under her health insurance plan, and can't get free or low-cost contraception through a clinic, she's left paying out of pocket for the contraception. For most types of birth control, she will face up-front or annual costs of about $1,000.

In addition, the methods that are "easily available" -- without seeing a doctor and getting a prescription or procedure -- are not the most reliable or effective. For the nurse to go to a separate health care provider just for birth control rather than having it be part of her ongoing relationship with her doctor means more appointments, more paperwork and more time off work.

Door #3: Can't she just go to the drug store and buy birth control?

If only it were that easy and women could just shop for birth control, as they buy shampoo and toothpaste. First, there are now about 15 methods of contraception and only a few are available without a prescription -- the most common being condoms. Furthermore, most types of birth control, including the commonly-used pill, not only require a prescription, but also one or more medical appointments to discuss your medical history with a doctor or nurse, get an exam, figure out the best method for you and get a prescription. And lastly, to use the most reliable and effective methods, a doctor or nurse must insert an IUD or implant or give a shot -- no quick trip to the drug store, after all.

Unlike Let's Make a Deal, this real-life scenario is no game at all. Birth control is not only essential to preventing unplanned pregnancy, but is paramount to women's health, educational and economic opportunity. Where is the right door for women in the real world?

 
The recent birth control debate has been disturbing on many levels, not least of which is the fact that we are even debating contraception in the year 2012. The conversation continues this week with t...
The recent birth control debate has been disturbing on many levels, not least of which is the fact that we are even debating contraception in the year 2012. The conversation continues this week with t...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 183
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
10:51 AM on 02/29/2012
Does Planned Parenthood advocate sperm, egg and embryo donation as methods to parenthood? Do they advertise that young people can donate eggs or sperm, and is there a minimum age to be allowed to donate? Is there likewise a minimum age requirement for sterilization services? Does Planned Parenthood also fund reversals? Which specific infertility services does Planned Parenthood offer?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scorpions5
Facts do not cease to exist when ignored.
10:31 AM on 02/29/2012
I am concerned about the bill before the senate which deals with"right of conscience". The bill entails the right for employers to refuse any healthcare coverage to employees that goes against their religious beliefs. This all stems from the Catholic Church and the birthcontrol issue. The can create a real firestorm. What if an employer's religion is against blood transfusions or life saving procedures? What will happen to the employee that is not covered for something like this? They will have to pay for it themselves and will cost thousands of dollars. Or how does it work if a woman, who is pregnant, has to have an abortion to save her life and her employer is against abortion? Or what if she has to have her fallopian tubes removed, or uterus removed? I think this bill is a bad bill and will cause undo stress on many people.
07:50 AM on 02/29/2012
This entire Lefty arguement is completely stupid. For one thing, it is the responsibility of the person having sex to get birth control. If you can't afford these supposedly expensive contraceptives, you should either not have sex or make adjustments to your spending so you can afford it. If you aren't smart enough to find a way to get these things on your own, you probably shouldn't be having sex. At the very least, you shouldn't throw a hissy fit about it and demand someone buy them for you.

The most important thing, however, is that this was never about the birth control to begin with. This was about the government forcing its will on private institutions. The fact that these institutions are religious in nature only makes it more more disgusting. The government has no right butting into these types of things, not matter what busybody progs may be running it right now.

This article is yet another example of the Left being willfully myopic.
08:31 AM on 02/29/2012
It is reasonable for the person having sex to obtain his own Viagra, pay for the visit to the doctor, the required tests and the prescription himself. It is certainly unreasonable for my insurance company or my taxes to pay for this.
08:43 AM on 02/29/2012
You mean men don't have sex, so they're not responsible for birth control ? Immaculate Conception is the standard, after the woman has sex by herself ?
Wow, now THAT is REAL news !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
07:40 AM on 02/29/2012
Oh Andrea, you and your FACTS!!! When have facts ever told the true story???
03:22 AM on 02/29/2012
I meant to say "just because someone says they are christian". I would also like to add that if giving free contraceptives would decrease women's health problems and would lead to even one less abortion (I'll probably get a lot of hate mail for that), then you can use my tax money to give out contraceptives to every women in the world and I would consider money well spent.
The only problem I have with Catholics is that they are against abortion AND contraceptives. If they would lighten up on the birth control their would be a lot less abortions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lynterv
Been there, have the t-shirt.
06:48 AM on 02/29/2012
F&F. No flames or arguments from me. Common sense is something the Catholic church does not deal in.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
07:41 AM on 02/29/2012
You shouldn't get hate mail for that statement, it's entirely correct! The best way to reduce the number of abortions is not to ban abortions, but rather to ensure easy and cheap access to birth control methods and sex ed both for teens and adults!
10:54 AM on 02/29/2012
Agreed. And we can nearly eliminate abortion altogether by offering free vasectomies to high school boys. Surely generous donors down the road will pay for reversals!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:56 AM on 02/29/2012
No, the issue is whether the government should have the ability to require that religious employers pay for these services, even if the services violate the employers' beliefs. It's a religious liberties argument at its core, only peripherally about contraception. A woman's right to purchase a product is not at question here; the question is whether the federal government has any business telling the woman's employer that he or she has to pay for that product. Hint: it doesn't when it would violate the First Amendment to do so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peacefuldaizy
Be the change you want to see in the world
05:59 AM on 02/29/2012
There are Americans, such as the Amish, that are pacifists and against violence even as a means of self-defense. Guess what? They pay taxes, which pay for war. I opposed invading Iraq. I still had to help pay for it. I don't think I should have to pay for insurance to cover Viagra so a man can have sex. That isn't exactly a life-saving medication.
06:09 AM on 02/29/2012
I just don't understand why this conversation doesn't keep coming back to separating the employer from the health insurance business. Employment should not dictate how much and what type of medical care one is entitled. If the government wants a say in how the insurance is provided, it should take over the industry once and for all. We can then live in a country where losing one's job does not equate to loss of medical care.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ckdogs
Veritas
02:48 AM on 02/29/2012
This is just a bunch of nonsense by right wing politicians to excite their base. And we all have to waste our time and energy discussing it and fighting about it. I hope they all get voted out of office. And that goes for the vaginal probe guys too.
02:34 AM on 02/29/2012
People really are gullible.This has nothing to do with women's rights or contraception. He's just using it to fire up his base. All he had to do was create a program, sponsored by the government, that would pay for all contraception for people that work at places that don't provide it because of religious beliefs. Problem solved.
I am what you would probably call a christian conservative ( and Male) and I have NO problem with providing contraceptive help. It stops unwanted pregnancies, protects women's health, who in their right mind would be against that? Just because someone says their our christian, doesn't make them one, so please don't lump us all together.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
07:43 AM on 02/29/2012
He did that, he said that the insurance companies had to pay for it, and they were on board with that!
06:58 PM on 03/03/2012
How does that affect organizations that self-insure?

http://stlouisreview.com/article/2012-02-29/obama-compromise-no
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sue McFarland
02:23 AM on 02/29/2012
I caught part of an interview CNN did with a real expert in these matters--only I didn't catch names, etc. so I could give proper credit. I'm assuming most of the information I gained in such a short-term, limited, and convenient way is probably somewhere online, say National Institutes of Health or even WebMD web sites. Perhaps the real emphasis on "the pill" should be on what we call it: this expert said "birth control pill" could also be called "hormonal therapy"--women use these medications for things like controlling the pain of endometriosis, severe outbreaks of acne (not the occasional pimple or two but the really bad scarring kind).. Turns out some of these meds are also good at reducing the risk of certain kinds of cancer, too. So it's not just about controlling the size of one's family or for "recreational sex"; the birth control pill (or hormonal therapy) can be beneficial in allowing women of all ages to be more functional at the various roles we all play in life.
10:04 AM on 02/29/2012
The hormonal therapy pill (good term!) is used to control ovarian cysts also. These cysts can adversely affect a woman's ability to get pregnant later.
01:16 AM on 02/29/2012
I am a woman, and consider birth control completely detrimental to women. Now men can get what they want for free without the' inconvenience' of birth, cheat on their wives without fear of reprcussion, spread disease, etc etc, and we have to pay for it. If we were intelligent, we would make sure they are fully responsible. As it is, we have allowed them to be completely irresponsible, which they have taken advantage of. Cross your legs, the cheap alternative to buying contraceptives, and also good for your self-respect. If you are married, there are natural methods for spacing birth that cost nothing and have no side effects, and after 15 years of using natural family plaaning, yes, effective.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ckdogs
Veritas
02:38 AM on 02/29/2012
How many children do you have - 14? Or do you only have sex for procreation? And what about single adults? Is sex only for married people?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rasputin66
504 reppin and 504 steppin
03:46 AM on 02/29/2012
Rick, is that you????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CharlesCT
12:55 AM on 02/29/2012
We covered all this a long time ago. Bras were burned and freedom was celebrated.
The issue today is not women's health. It is not contraceptives. It is not the church.
Just so long as JOBS and the economy are NOT talked about, these phonies are winning. They don't have a clue as to what Americans are going through. And they don't care.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rasputin66
504 reppin and 504 steppin
03:47 AM on 02/29/2012
Maybe it's not "the issue" to you, but believe me, a lot of women think it is pretty goddamn important.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mindy Czech
Cindy's wife for life.
11:55 PM on 02/28/2012
The people who make the arguments against contraception are just misogynistic and stupid. I'm sick and tired of hearing "If you can pay for lipstick, you can pay for the pill." Yeah, because we all know that Ortho-Cyclen is sold on sale for $4.99 at Rite Aid. The anger and disgust I have for these anti-birth control coverage folks knows no bounds. As soon as Obama said that employers can opt out and the responsibility for coverage falls on the insurance company, they had absolutely no argument or no right to complain anymore, yet they still are! It boggles the mind that they can continue to claim that this is about religious freedom. It is about misogyny and punishing women for having sex for pleasure and that's it.
01:28 AM on 02/29/2012
" It is about misogyny and punishing women for having sex for pleasure and that's it."

If you need birth control you must be having sex with a man, in which case it targets him as well.

I am sick and tired of these things being called misogyny. Church's are allowed to stand up for what they believe in, it's a free country. I think all this talk about misogyny is about women trying to resurrect their waning victim status. We did not debate contraception, we debated how it get's paid for.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ckdogs
Veritas
02:39 AM on 02/29/2012
Then why is Cialis covered?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peacefuldaizy
Be the change you want to see in the world
06:03 AM on 02/29/2012
Most insurances pay for Viagra. I am morally opposed to that. If God wanted a man who has erectile dysfunction to get a boner, He'd cure his ED.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Silverfern
11:40 PM on 02/28/2012
I am sure the Church pines for the good old days when they could just torture and burn heretics. Once upon a time, translating the bible from Latin to English would get you a date with the rack and a burning pyre.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peacefuldaizy
Be the change you want to see in the world
06:04 AM on 02/29/2012
lol ... true. And at least in England, if you didn't believe that the bread and wine at communion was the literal body and blood of Jesus, you'd be burned at the stake too. They didn't call her "Bloody Mary" for nothing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anon Ymous
11:17 PM on 02/28/2012
It is tiring to hear these regressives mull on about the fear that women are going to get FREE contraception....when the vast majority ..probalby 98% of employer sponsored HC plans require the employee participants to pay individual premiums to participate in the plan. NOTHING... I repeat NOTHING that comes from these HC plans is FREE to the participants. Even if the employer pays the full premium (very very rare) the participants still have to pay copays for doctors visits and usually prescription drugs. Even if there were no copay for the contraceptive prescription...getting the prescription through a employer sponsored HC would be FAR from free for the individual employee.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jinxed
starting over at 60
11:02 PM on 02/28/2012
According to the catholic bishops and the GOP no BC is the only way to go. It makes one wonder about the wives of those GOP politicians. Love must not only blind but deaf and dumb as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
imokit
no longer has missing words!
06:34 AM on 02/29/2012
There was one who withheld sex regarding the Virginia ultra sound bill...
Then again she's married to someone who announced it in the house...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jinxed
starting over at 60
06:22 PM on 03/01/2012
And how embarrassing was that...hope he got cut off for the next year or more....TMI!!!!