Le Deluge

What's Your Reaction:

It's time to admit that the Right Wing has achieved its main goal and that all the sturm und drang now drifting from those quarters is an attempt to change the subject in hopes we won't notice.

Hopefully, they won't dodge the blame, but like it or not, they got what they wanted: The government will have to shrink under the weight of a national debt that quadrupled under Reagan/Bush I, leveled off under Clinton, then doubled again under Bush II.

For an excellent presentation on the facts of the national debt, click here. But take my word for it -- that debt's eating us alive. And while the guys who did this to us sit around the pool, the rest of us will have to live with the consequences -- intended and otherwise. The only good news is that even though they don't realize it, the Right Wing has strapped itself to those unintended consequences, and unless the nation is suddenly seized with a fit of forgetfulness, the result, for them, shouldn't be pretty.

That's because the crisis they created will do a lot more than just shrink the government. The $12 trillion in debt we have today is enough to make our creditors wonder if we'll be able to pay them back, which reasonable fear, in turn, is making them wonder if the Dollar can remain the world's reserve currency. And it will make us a second-rate power.

Calls to replace the Dollar with a basket of currencies are widespread these days, because as far as our creditors go -- that includes Japan, Great Britain, Brazil and Canada, not just China and Russia -- it's strictly a matter of self-preservation.

Japan, for instance, owns $751.5 billion in US Treasuries. The Dollar has been falling for over a year; what would you be thinking, if you were Japan's Minister of Finance? You can bet he and the world's other Finance Ministers are not just sitting around, waiting for something to happen.

And when the Dollar becomes just another currency in that "basket", it'll come out of our domestic hide, in the form of higher borrowing costs across the board. For us, that means slower economic growth.

Will that mean government will shrink? You betcha. But first, governments will try to hold on by selling off assets. Think: Bridges;.harbors. hospitals. the Interstate Highway System.

Then will come the cuts in programs. But they're unlikely to be what the Right Wing thought they'd be; so-called entitlements will probably be last, not first.

Why? Because at some point, while the government will have to look at cutting future benefits for those 55 and under, Social Security and Medicare are what keep most parents from having to rely on their kids when they retire. With the cost of living still on the rise and wages stagnant, will the kids of those 55-year-olds really be able to shoulder the costs? And will they want to? So the main pressure will be to keep those cuts to a minimum as voters pressure their Congressmembers out of self-interest -- one of the mainstays of Right Wing philosophy.

And since the public recognizes that lax regulation of business is much of what got us into the economic mess we're in today, its appetite to cut regulations further is unlikely to grow; if anything, the public will want more of it. So those functions of government will not shrink very much -- not such a bad thing, if the proof is in the pudding.

Since we're not going to be defaulting on the national debt, that leaves our presence overseas -- including defense, which is $663.8 billion in the 2010 budget, or almost half the $1.5 trillion deficit.

Despite predictable screaming from the jingo Right, the question will become: What are we defending? The job of global cop?

Do we really need that job, or the armies that go with it? Or a 284-ship Navy -- including 12 aircraft carrier battle groups costing $35 billion a year? What about the Air Force's 5,573 aircraft?

We may very well have the greatest military the world has ever seen, but thanks to the Right Wing, we're on the verge of being unable to afford it, or being the world's preeminent power, much longer. We're more in the way of being like a family with two vehicles -- a family sedan, and a Porsche.

As those tough times drag on -- and in the wake of what's still being called "the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression," the economic consensus is for very slow growth and high unemployment for years to come -- domestic problems will come to the political fore. People's sentiment will be to look after our own. So much for the Porsche, no?

Oh, and by the way, taxes are going to rise, whatever the Right Wing says. As The Economist magazine wrote in May 2009: "Having spent a fortune bailing out their banks, Western governments will have to pay a price in terms of higher taxes to meet the interest on that debt."

The alternative, it says, is to allow their currencies to depreciate, or their economies to inflate, to be able to repay their debts with cheaper money. All of which brings us back to that basket of currencies, and what it would mean when the Dollar loses its reserve currency status. It has all the inevitability of something from Aeschylus.

If there was every a time for the country to come together to deal with a common problem, this is it, but as we said earlier, the Right Wing is trying everything to change the subject so we won't remember who got us into this disaster. They're proving, every day, that they're simply not reliable partners.

Not that the Democrats are showing any backbone. But, willy-nilly, we can't let the Right Wing shuck their responsibility for making the United States a second-rate power -- an unintended consequence if there ever was one, but one they're certainly guilty of.

That fact's got to be raised as often as possible, in as many forums as possible, by as many people as possible, so that even if things get as bad as that might get, the poisons they've released on the body politic can be dissipated -- never, we hope, to return.

 
 
Comments
10
Pending Comments
0
View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FogBelter   01:48 PM on 2/09/2010
When I think of "Le Deluge", Mr. Reinbach, I think of the $750 trillion dollar unregulated derivative fraud cloud. An immense bubble that everyone worldwide was happy about creating because of the profits realized from the fraud, but no one considered the ramifications of when it popped. I'm not sure whether the Sovereign Wealth issues emerging will be what crashes that bubble or the 5 million mortgages that will default this year, but that $750 trillion dollar bubble popping makes the impact of the US Government's $12 trillion dollar debt minuscule by comparison.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Andrew Reinbach   06:02 PM on 2/09/2010
What's your point? That BIS number is the notional amount--face value--of all the derivatives in the qworld, not the amount of money at risk. That includes every sort of derivative--including plain-vanilla interest swaps, which are innocuous. So the number is completely meaningless, except as a means of changing the subject by confusing the issue. You seems to be trying to create a false equivalency, probably intended to deceive people who don't know better into thinking the national debts isn't important in the greater scheme of things. That is a fundamentally dishonest posture. Furthermore, the point of the piece is the effect of the national debt on the United States--not the effect of a (speculative) default of every derivative in the world. Of course, I could be worng--maybe you're not a right wing popagandist who doesn't care what he says as long as he can engage in teh politics of personal destruction, followed by a call for civility.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FogBelter   09:45 PM on 2/09/2010
Mr. Reinbach, I happen to believe that it is pointless to focus on the National Debt, because the United States will never be able to make good on it anyway ... we've passed that point.

The United States needs to spend whatever is necessary to re-employ the American people, repair the infrastructure, etc. The US Bond rating would never drop because US Treasuries infect the portfolios of practically every other nation on earth and it would be a case of mutually assured economic destruction if devaluation should occur. Same for the greenback, the other nations may want to move to a basket of alternate currencies but that would negativelly impact the value of the hoard of reserve dollars they hold. In short, we have poison pilled the world.

As for assigning blame, Presidents Ronald Reagan through Bush43 own the lion share of it ... and Corporatist Bill Clinton's cooperation with Phil Gramm's deregulation insanity added fuel to the fire started by irresponsible Republican spending.

One main problem is that both parties have been co-opted by corporate interests to the detriment of the nation. Remember the National Debt represents money going into someone's pocket. It didn't just evaporate.

We will have to agree to disagree on the $750 trillion dollar derivative fraud cloud ... you say it is a meaningless number, I say it represents a massive, ,unstable, unregulated institutional fraud bubble. Hopefully you are right and I am wrong.
photo
ewilder   09:53 AM on 2/09/2010
I said this back in 2003 when Bush borrowed 3 trillion from China to fight the war in Iraq.
The problm is that most people don't understand the issues of national-debt in a global economy; and they do have very short-term memories.
And after decades of rightwing jingoistic blather about national defense, most Americans don't get how really unnecessary and how dangerous it is to have the global military commitments we've made and the military industial complex that is required to support these.
Just one small example: last week, the Pentagon woke up to the fact that the actual projected cost of the new F-35 fighter-bomber amounted to 11 BILLION dollars EACH. The projected cost of the entire program is 300 billion dollars - nearly FOUR times the amount of money delegated to domestic infrastructure repair in last year's stimulus package.
Since most voters don't grasp big business/big military issues, since there's a lot of media blather covering up for them rather than exposing them, and since our politicians are in the tank with corporations - well, let's face it, America will become a third-rate power, and soon everyone will recognize it.
seawolf77   07:00 AM on 2/09/2010
The prescription drug benefit coulda payed for healthcare for ALL of us. Need I say more. Is it not clear they would rather give to the old.What was the name of that movie "No Country for Old People" where Tommy Lee Jones tells a story of how old people were killed for their Social Security checks. I wish more stories like that would get out.
higherstrategy   10:49 PM on 2/08/2010
wow

from a 'propagandist' point of view

just wow
Countess   05:46 PM on 2/08/2010
The south has always wanted a weak central goverment and now that they control the republican party their dream is a step closer to reality.
seawolf77   07:24 AM on 2/09/2010
The south only wanst to nag and bitch and moan just like their women tell them to do. They couldn't find a pair with 2 hands and a mirror casue their women would be right there to cloud it and take their hands and put it on their.....
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
fr33d0mhawk   08:03 AM on 2/09/2010
The South has never wanted a weak central government, they want a weak liberal government but a strong theocratic conservative big government, think Taliban style. The South wants Big Govt in the most intimate aspects of every day life in America, but government only there to punish, like an abusive father or big brother, never there to help, only there to kick you in the teeth if you are down. The Souths idea of smaller government would be to not help one bit during Katrina, but send in troops to shoot black people for being black. The biggest lie ever told was that conservatives ever wanted smaller government, smaller like the Taliban, maybe.

Twitter Edition