More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Andrew Reinbach

GET UPDATES FROM Andrew Reinbach
 

#OccupyWallStreet and the American Heart

Posted: 10/06/11 10:57 AM ET

The #OccupyWallStreet protests have legs. There's no doubt about it.

If you don't believe it, just take a look at the live feed some genius put on the web.

What you won't see is a bunch of angry, middle-aged folks -- some armed -- complaining about government. Instead, you have people, many young, who know something is wrong in America -- and want to make it right for everyone. It's joyful, and inclusive, and means no harm.

Of course, voices from the right have already pulled out their jeering slogans, and otherwise try to twist the available evidence into some sinister union/commie plot to subvert America.

But I doubt that will hold, if only because your average Tea Party member agrees with the #OccupyWallStreet analysis -- that government has forgotten about its citizens and works instead for the guys who pay for their campaigns.

If you want proof of that, consider that both Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich support the protests.

That the right will probably not recognize what they have in common with #OccupyWallStreet and attack it instead is too bad. There's an opportunity here for Americans to reach consensus and unite for the People, instead of a clutch of special interests.

But while I want that, what I expect is to hear talk radio rattle on about the dark forces behind #OccupyWallStreet -- George Soros, certainly, and any number of other figures from Hollywood and whatever so-called enemies of America come to their minds.

It's even possible that as the protests gain strength and attract more media attention, some right wingers will decide enough is enough, and begin counter-demonstrations that could take an ugly turn. Then, of course, they'll try to pin the blame on the kids.

In fairness to those right-wingers -- if in fact they appear -- most are sincere patriots who, just like the #OccupyWallStreet folks, know that something is wrong in America and want to bring it right. This is why they're so uncompromising; they honestly believe they're in a war for the soul of America. And let's face it -- if that's your premise, and you love your country, no self-respecting patriot could do anything else

The difference between these people on the right and the #OccupyWallStreet folks is that the people they trust have turned them into foot soldiers for their own purposes. And now that their tactics have scared the bejesus out of the country -- à la August's debt ceiling showdown -- many of them honestly seem to be at a loss to understand what happened, when they thought, as right wing voices insist, that they have the numbers, the guns, and God on their side.

Of course, they don't represent anything like a majority and have high negatives in many polls. But that shouldn't prevent Americans from understanding that these are people who want to do the right thing for their country.

Meanwhile, the nation's swing voters seem to be giving the economic and political facts a hard look, drawing sensible conclusions about where this is taking us and what should and shouldn't be done about it, and, from what I can tell, are coming down on the #OccupyWallStreet side.

As many of you may know, I live in Central New York. This, of course, is far from people who think they have the inside skinny on anything. And I've found that a genuine advantage in understanding what's really going on in the US.

So today, I was talking to the chimney sweep who came to fix my chimney. And he agreed with me that the right wing solutions bruited about not only aren't adequate to the scale of the problems we face, but don't even address the world we're moving into; that going forward, the challenge facing America isn't how to maximize individual liberty, but how to keep the lid on in a country that not only won't take care of people cast adrift -- by forces beyond their control -- but won't give them the opportunity to help themselves.

This, it seems to me, is what the #OccupyWallStreet folks are talking about when they chant that they're the 99 percent -- as opposed to the 1 percent that now owns pretty much everything. In other words, they're addressing the real concerns of real Americans. And that gives the movement, or whatever you call it, justification, a broad base, and strength.

The right-wing can cry class warfare all they want. In the long run, people don't support political ideas they can't justify, and if nothing else, America simply isn't a country that will tolerate the sort of mean-spirited policies the right has been trying to sell us lo these 30 years. They could put them over when everybody thought they were getting rich, but now, not so much.

Look at it another way: I think #OccupyWallStreet has history on its side, and that the right, as the Chinese say, has lost the Mandate of Heaven. If the #OccupyWallStreet people can make their case the right way, they could make the coming election about the 99 percent.

And that would be a good thing.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 84
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
11:45 PM on 10/10/2011
You lost me at...

"... the challenge facing America isn't how to maximize individual liberty, but how to keep the lid on in a country that not only won't take care of people cast adrift...."

Please elaborate?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Andrew Reinbach
is Grand Vizier of ReinbachsObserver.com
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
12:11 AM on 10/12/2011
Sorry. I am open to new ideas, but with my limited schedule and attention span, you are going to need to be more concise, that these long winded articles. Good ideas require very little explanation, and supporting logic.

So, back to the original premise. How is it possible/necessary to effect the widest distribution of wealth/resources, on a finite planet, while flatly ignoring freedom?
12:03 AM on 10/07/2011
Mr. Reinbach:

You state, ‘What you won't see is a bunch of angry, middle-aged folks -- some armed -- complaining about government. Instead, you have people, many young, who know something is wrong in America -- and want to make it right for everyone. It's joyful, and inclusive, and means no harm.’

Actually what people see are an unwashed, misinformed, angry group of takers who are angry because other people are tired of giving them free stuff through government transfers. The unemployment-insurance-leeching and welfare-enjoying ‘takers’ are part of the problem in America. Throw in the sleazy unions and their duplicitous habit of financially supporting the same people with whom they will be negotiating their fat entitled contracts against the interests of the beleaguered taxpayer and you can see that this protest has devolved into an organized effort to get the government to take from others and give them. It is this poverty of spirit, morals, and ethics that is hollowing out the United States from the inside, making this protest ‘joyless’, ‘exclusive’, and ‘ruinous’ to America.

Kai
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Andrew Reinbach
is Grand Vizier of ReinbachsObserver.com
08:33 AM on 10/07/2011
These means-spirited dismissals of a genuine movement are beginning to surface from the right wing, but I doubt the American People will pay them much mind; The long strings of adjectives and twisted analysis, emerging from a consistent, single perspective, are the sort of strident propaganda that used to be a feature of the far left during the Cold War--emerging, I might add, directly from Moscow--and from the KKK during the Civil Rights Movement. They tell readers nothing about the protestors--but everything about the writers.

As far as I'm concerned, such writers can peck away. They're directed at the choir, and remove any doubt about what they're made of. What the writers don't realize, though, is that this stuff does nothing to pursuade the people the writers need to reach--the undecided--and in fact works against them. So to repeat, peck away, Kai, by all means.
12:43 AM on 10/08/2011
correction: against capitalism and for redistribution
11:10 PM on 10/09/2011
Mr. Reinbach:

I agree with you and, James Madison, on the Constitution as a living document that can be updated and reinterpreted; disagree that means a wide range of expanding powers can be imputed to it that are not explicitly stated or enumerated. Either add or clarify amendments through the legislative process or curtail current overreach.

On your second point, I would agree with you that there is no data, yet, proving the numbers of OWS because the movement is not even fully defined and its goals determined. However, if what I am seeing is their mission statement and goals, then I am fairly certain that few Americans will tolerate it for long. But like I said, I support the rights of OWS to make themselves look as foolish as they want in public through the first amendment.

I agree that the fascist overreach of government and the abrogation of individual rights is becoming so cloying that producers will have to start moving elsewhere. I am 3 years into the 7 years I need to become a citizen of Hong Kong. A few points about Hong Kong: it was Milton Friedman’s ideal government and is currently ranked #1 for economic freedom:
02:01 PM on 10/09/2011
Right on Kai-Hk, let me add one point I would bet a weeks pay the majority of these protesters are protesting against what they voted for in the first place.
11:11 PM on 10/09/2011
No doubt!
05:50 PM on 10/06/2011
It's great to see both young and old finally beginning to address the massive corruption that exists in our government. There needs to be a separation of business and government.

What we have now is a third world government. This movement needs too and will grow into millions of people.
04:36 PM on 10/06/2011
Election? Pretty funny. This isn't about 2012. Its about NOW. The system is totally, absolutely, irretrievably corrupt. It doesn't matter who is put in office. The system will corrupt them or block any real change. My, God, doesn't anyone see this now, almost 3 years after Obama's election?
Wall Street needs to shut down. Closed for business, just like in the days after 9/11. And all of congress needs to be put on administrative leave, without pay (they aren't working for us anyway, why should we keep paying them?)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
05:45 PM on 10/06/2011
I agree with you that our government is almost hopelessly corrupt. Many millions of us see this. So who has the power to close Wall Street and put Congress out to pasture? I don't see very much hope of a peaceful route to such events.
08:38 PM on 10/06/2011
The ONLY way for this to result in change peacefully is for those at the heart of the protests to maintain a non-violent consciousness. We have many historical examples of this, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, and most recently the Arab Spring. Even within our own political system we have the Chicago demonstrations of 1968, which eventually led to the fall of Nixon, as the violence perpetrated by Daley's police helped give popular empathy to the anti-war movement. There is a huge population that could descend upon NYC and DC, the 14 million unemployed.
03:52 PM on 10/06/2011
" As many of you may know, I live in Central New York. This, of course, is far from people who think they have the inside skinny on anything. And I've found that a genuine advantage in understanding what's really going on in the US."

Correction - You find living there is an advantage to understanding what is going on in a large urban setting. Your residence in Central NYC grants you zero points for knowing what's going on in the US outside of NYC. You and other city NYC dwellers are just like the arrogant religious leaders of the past. You believe that you are the center of the universe and because everything and everyone revolves around you and your experiences that makes you the expert to decide what's best for all. What unbelievable arrogance. I bet your also a pusher of going GREEN and making those who dare drive pay dearly for the ability to do so. Because you don’t need a car and you're city is the center of the known universe that means no one else anywhere on the planet needs a car either and so its should be a luxury item.

BTW - I see you're a right-wing basher / left wing over. That means you're just as suckered as the right-wing foot soldier you make fun of. The only diff between you and he is you’re a slave patron of the left side of the fake Left-Right paradigm in American politics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
05:29 PM on 10/06/2011
For me, Central New York means Syracuse and the surrounding area "far from people who think they have the inside skinny on anything." No one would describe Manhattan that way. You are confusing New York and New York City.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Andrew Reinbach
is Grand Vizier of ReinbachsObserver.com
08:10 PM on 10/06/2011
No ad hominem attacks, please--especially ad hominem attacks based on nothing. I live in a rural township with 250 houses--not Central Park--so what we've got here is a sort of free-floating anger based on nothing in particular, masquerading as truth unveiled.Try to focus on the facts and substantive discussion please, Blue.
03:26 PM on 10/06/2011
I think maybe Americans are smarter then some think. my (certainly not a liberal) 90 year old mom agrees with the protesters. She is a little frighten by the methods but agrees some one has to do something.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FeelinGroovy
Expat in Mexico
04:01 PM on 10/06/2011
Exactly what methods is she frightened of?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
05:47 PM on 10/06/2011
It is frightening that our whole representative democracy depends on such protests succeeding and making effective changes to our government and economy. It scares me to think that they won't achieve anything, and then we'll really be cooked.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennidus1680
04:38 PM on 10/06/2011
And it wont be the bought and sold politicians.
01:56 PM on 10/06/2011
Could this be the start of "The End in 2012? Maybe it's the end of the top Heavy economy which in return will end everything else and turn each of Us against the other. EVERYTHING that is top heavy will topple in time. If it is and I know it's a far out way of thinking but if it is I stand with the 99% who don't have, but will not go away and be quite so the rich to continue pillage the regular person. "Something has to give" and Will.
OccupyWallStreet folks and you around the country, it's Washington too who is pulling the strings and controls Wall street.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ecolke
Measure a man by how he treats animals.
12:25 PM on 10/06/2011
You nailed it, Mr. Reinbach. Some people and most media have had a difficult time wrapping their brains around this movement. I've heard condescending news reports (thanks so much, Erin Burnett, CNN!) and I've read news articles that portrayed this occupation as frivolous.

Witnessing from afar, I see the frustration in people as the scale continues to be weighted against the ordinary citizen, and reducing the load for the richest of the rich. Repeal Citizens United. Start there as that has allowed the richest of the rich to pump as much money as they want to buy off the politicians.
12:00 PM on 10/06/2011
Any protest to our current political situation is long overdue. No longer should greed and corruption be allowed to cripple our goverments ability to govern. Brought to the brink of default by a congress which no longer functions for the good of the American people. The only question left to me is "where can I sign up?"
12:25 PM on 10/06/2011
This crowd belongs in Washington as nothing is more corrupt or incompetent that the
government. Expecting government to solve the problems it created is lunacy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FeelinGroovy
Expat in Mexico
04:05 PM on 10/06/2011
Since the guvmint and Wall Street are in bed with one another, I think what the protesters are doing and where they are doing it is appropriate. AND I would like to see the same number of protestors in front of the White House.
11:49 AM on 10/06/2011
The Real Problem:

"Nearly half, 48.5%, of the population lived in a household that received some type of government benefit in the first quarter of 2010, according to Census data."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FeelinGroovy
Expat in Mexico
04:06 PM on 10/06/2011
Yeah, it's not the wars and the plundering done by Wall Street and government officials. No problems there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
05:50 PM on 10/06/2011
And let's ask ourselves why 48.5% of the population lives in families receiving some sort of government assistance. Could it be because the 1% has monopolized so much that nothing is left to sustain those on the lowest tiers of income and wealth?
photo
SpitfireMK9
I'm an Itchybiscuit.
11:14 AM on 10/06/2011
As an outsider looking in, I can't but see comparisons between these current right-wingers and another group in another time and place which rose and fell in a short 12 years. The vehemence is the same. The unalloyed, fact-free propaganda is the same. The urge to browbeat more moderate and sensible voices is the same. The 'if you're not with us you're against America' rhetoric has to change and I, for one, know that America's 'better selves' will prevail. I'm just not sure at this point of the ultimate cost to your great country.
Chinawanderer
A biography should never be micro
11:33 AM on 10/06/2011
Considering that the so-called conservative policies of the last 30 years were rooted in selfishness masquerading as "liberty," I could never understand why they thought they had a moral high ground. And I never could understand why that high ground was ceded to such immoral ideas to begin with.
12:28 PM on 10/06/2011
I suggest you learn the difference between a meritocracy and socialism in which
bureaucrats control ownership and distribution of resources. Or easier, just study
the history of Cuba and Russia to decide which is best.
11:03 AM on 10/06/2011
Just giving OWS goals/demands a cursory read tells me, and I only speak for me, that I want nothing to do with this movement. I do not want them co-opting Dr. Paul's supporters and destroying all the hard work we have done or jeopardizing it in any way by anyone of them putting the good doctors reputation or candidacy at risk by any shenanigans they might perform. The press would have a field day.

We may agree on auditing the Fed but that is where we part ways. They do not honor or uphold the Constitution, they do not believe in individual liberty, they are collectivist anti-capitalists. Dr. Paul supports peaceful civil disobedience, they have promised to use violence to achieve their demands.
See http://www.dailypaul.com/181356/occupy-dc-adam-kokesh-video-should-make-rp-supporter-wary-of-the-occupy-protests

Their goals/demands are: from their website http://occupywallst.org/about/

Republicans and Blue Republicans vote for Ron Paul 2012...our only hope to restore this nation. OWS wants to destroy this nation.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
doneflyin
my micro-bio isn't
10:55 AM on 10/06/2011
Maybe these young people will reclaim the moral high ground that was conceded to the conservatives and the Republicans 30 years.
The conservatives, the economic Royalists can no longer lay claim to that moral high ground. Their authoritarian, ruthless, greedy policies are now nakedly visible.
They don't even try to hide it anymore. All those with open eyes and minds can see it.
10:43 AM on 10/06/2011
If they want Wall Street out of Washington DC, pass the Fair Tax (HR 25) and cut spending to 11% of the GDP. True Tax reform like the fair tax will be the only way they system will change. This Occupy Wall Street thing would have been a lot more effective if it had been Occupy and Audit the Federal Reserve instead.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Andrew Reinbach
is Grand Vizier of ReinbachsObserver.com
10:55 AM on 10/06/2011
The best way to do what you suggest is to revoke Corporate personhood, since it would vastly reduce the influence of corporations on the government by vastly cutting lobbying. I don't think right wing solutions are appropriate here, and I'd say most Americans recognize that. Certainly, there's wide agreement among economists that cutting spending as you suggest will cut the GDP--2% for every $50B in cuts, according to Goldman Sachs--and thus wildly expand unemployment while maximizing our nation's problems. So I'd suggest your idea is a non-starter.
11:14 AM on 10/06/2011
Government spending has increased by $1 trillion per year in 4 years. During that time the private sector has contracted, not expanded. The claim that GDP would decrease by 2% for every $50B in cuts is absurd. It is based on faulty economic models that can't replicate the past let alone predict the future. The closer you look at the details of specific projects the worse the spending looks. When federal money funds local projects they magically cost much, much more than when local governments fund them themselves. They don't build bridges to nowhere on their own dime.

Though the moderators seem to not like me posting on this thread so who knows if this will even show up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Leland
10:57 AM on 10/06/2011
Actually, our country's economic problems are not caused by "taxes," fair or not, but result from not enough Americans working:

http://www.flixya.com/blog/3201910/Beautiful-Butterflys
Chinawanderer
A biography should never be micro
11:31 AM on 10/06/2011
Everybody I know who is either unemployed or underemployed wants a decently paying full time job. Our economic problems are NOT that Americans don't want to work; it is economic policies that made work contingent, low-paying or just plain outsourced. The simpler realitiy is that businesses no longer wants to pay for the people who actually produce wealth in our society--the people who do the actual work.

Want more Americans working--protect American industries and punish the outsourcers with tax penalties.
10:34 AM on 10/06/2011
Wow is all I can say for the way this group is compared to the "Tea Party". I know that ideology can effect how people perceive things, but wow. I have never seen a group that puts forth more consistently uninformed opinions. Yet the left wants to turn this uninformed group into heroes. Though I can hardly blame the protesters for those opinions since that is simply what they have been told by the left and their President time and time again. The average "poor" person in America has a higher standard of living than the average person does in Europe. The average poor family with kids here has air conditioning, a computer, 3 color televisions hooked up to satelite or cable, a dvd player or vcr, video game system, refrigerator, stove, oven, microwave, cell phone, cordless home phone, clothes washer and dryer.

We have the most affluent society in the history of the world. The idea that we don't give people in this country an opportunity to help themselves is absurd. The belief that taking more money and giving it to the government will do that is even more so. The government isn't a benevolent entity. Spending by the government has increased by over $1 trillion per year in 4 years. What have we gotten for that? Smoother roads? Billions in fraudulent loans to companies owned by Democrat party donors? That is who the Democrat party helps, not this group of kids who have been tricked into believing emptypoliticalrhetoric.
photo
SpitfireMK9
I'm an Itchybiscuit.
12:22 PM on 10/06/2011
You rail against emptyrhetoric but that's all your comment consists of. I'm in Europe (the Scottish part) and I can categorically say you're talking out of your hat. The BBC runs documentaries on poor people in America and I've never heard of anyone in Britain queuing at a food bank 'cos they couldn't afford to feed themselves.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hmdjr
02:43 PM on 10/06/2011
Wisdom from Scotland. F & F
11:05 AM on 10/07/2011
If it is on the BBC it has to be true right? There is a higher percentage of fat people living in poverty in America than in the general population. In 2009, only 0.5% of households had a member of their household eat a meal at a food bank on even one occasion. 99.5% of households never ate at a food bank once. The US is a big country of 300+ million. If you want to make anything look prevalent you can if you search long enough and only capture things that support the argument you want to make.
photo
la fourchette
There is no reason not to follow your heart
03:55 PM on 10/06/2011
...and I am an American living in France. I'm able to live on far less here (for a very healthy, comfortable life) than I'd be able to live on in the US. My sister, living in the US, is waiting for her job to be shipped overseas any day now so the corporation for which she works can 'save' money. She's in her 50's and fears she'll not be able to find aother job - ever.

No. The average "poor" person in America does not have a higher standard of living than the average person in Europe. (And where I am, all citizens have health care coverage.)
11:15 AM on 10/07/2011
Data says that the poor here have a higher standard of living. The fact that your sister may or may not lose her job means what? Most anyone might lose their job, but it doesn't mean that they will. Even if she were to lose her job what is the alternative? Efforts to make it tougher to fire people have always resulted in lower employment rates. As far as cost of living is concerned it kind of depends on where in France you live versus where in the US. Though overall the CPI is 25% lower in the US than in France.