iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Andrew Winston

Andrew Winston

Posted: April 16, 2010 10:39 AM

The Serious Problem With the Tea Party "Philosophy"

What's Your Reaction:

As we enter what will be ugly negotiations over a climate and energy bill in this country over the coming months, there are sure to be angry outcries of government overreach and intrusion. And we know where the hub of those protests will be coming from: the Tea Party.

So it's worth looking at who these folks are, and the NY Times yesterday did us all a big favor by reporting on poll results on these citizens. The title of the article, in what was a very kind interpretation of the data, was "Poll Finds Tea Party Backers Wealthier and More Educated."

Yes, Tea Partiers are a bit wealthier and educated, but the poll also makes clear that they are whiter, male-er, angrier, and well, more racist -- 25% believe Obama favors black people over white (vs. 11% of the general public) and they are "more likely to say that too much has been made of the problems facing black people" (yes, that pesky history of slavery, repression, and civil rights issues). But all of that demographic data, while interesting, is a side show. The core of this movement is an un-nuanced, unthinking belief that government should be smaller no matter what.

This perspective is making it hard to do anything of scale in our country, such as building and investing in infrastructure (e.g., a new energy grid) or pass broad legislation to tackle as big a problem as climate change. Imagine a Congressman proposing that we spend what China is laying out on high-speed rail ($300 billion in the next three years) or even the hundreds of billions we need to spend on crumbling infrastructure. He or she would be pilloried by Fox and likely run out of office.

I could easily be wrong, but I don't think we used to debate whether we needed things like roads, bridges, sewers, and rail. Republican President Eisenhower built the Interstate Highway System after all. Without infrastructure, led by government, we can't grow and evolve (but that's the point of the movement isn't it?). So now we've got a rising portion of people thinking government equals bad, full stop.

What's really interesting about the article is to see how disconnected from reality the Tea Partiers are about what government does for them (see my earlier post on what small government means in reality). So, the point of this blog was actually just to share the end of the Times article, which made me laugh out loud. Enjoy...

But in follow-up interviews, Tea Party supporters said they did not want to cut Medicare or Social Security -- the biggest domestic programs, suggesting instead a focus on "waste."

Some defended being on Social Security while fighting big government by saying that since they had paid into the system, they deserved the benefits.

Others could not explain the contradiction.

"That's a conundrum, isn't it?" asked Jodine White, 62, of Rocklin, Calif. "I don't know what to say. Maybe I don't want smaller government. I guess I want smaller government and my Social Security." She added, "I didn't look at it from the perspective of losing things I need. I think I've changed my mind."

We're going to have trouble having real, substantive debates in this country if we're not reality-based. As I read quotes like that, I think, well, it's better to laugh than cry.

 
 
 

Follow Andrew Winston on Twitter: www.twitter.com/GreenAdvantage

As we enter what will be ugly negotiations over a climate and energy bill in this country over the coming months, there are sure to be angry outcries of government overreach and intrusion. And we kno...
As we enter what will be ugly negotiations over a climate and energy bill in this country over the coming months, there are sure to be angry outcries of government overreach and intrusion. And we kno...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 56
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
05:42 PM on 04/18/2010
I look forward to watching the country unify around Wall Street reform and campaign finance reform. Nobody believes corporations are humans nor have any place in politics.
photo
BLACKCAT66
A realist with a rich inner life
02:46 PM on 04/17/2010
Some defended being on Social Security while fighting big government by saying that since they had paid into the system, they deserved the benefits

In other words they want to reap the benefits but screw future generations out of the basic saftey net that they currently enjoy.
10:25 PM on 04/17/2010
so brainwashed

you do realize that only YOU and your BOSS pay into Social Security right?

has NOTHING to do with the Government Debt.

and it was paid into for almost 30 years before the first payment was paid out

Now Add Inflation
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
02:28 PM on 04/18/2010
Glass houses, Reaganomicist.

"so brainwashed"

Your economic "ideas" only outlasted Soviet communism by two decades before it, too, fell under its own weight, and that only *three* decades after Reagan put Friedmanomics into practice in the United States. So really, when you think about it, Soviet communism at least took four decades longer to bankrupt itself than you & your Chicago boys' best effort at an economic system. Go read a book. Make it one by Naomi Klein.
11:51 PM on 04/18/2010
Right. And only YOU and YOUR BOSS pay into the federal treasury, from which that evil government pays for things like the military, schools, libraries, museums, national parks, highway maintenance, etc.

Has NOTHING to do with the Government Debt.

Except when we stop collecting taxes from the top 5% of earners. Or when we start wars for no good reason. Or when the economy suddenly implodes and no one is able to pay into the treasury anymore, yet we still need to pay for that military, those schools, those national parks and those highways.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rufnnuts
08:22 AM on 04/17/2010
All along it was clear to me the Tea Party "movement" was the same old angry white male backlash we've seen in the past. The same demographic that provided the angry backlash to the Clinton election.

We forget that 65% of white voters in this country did not support or vote for Obama. It was minorities along with 35% of whites, mostly young progressive whites, that gave Obama his victory. Given these facts it is no surprise that the majority of whites have aligned themselves with the Tea Party movement. After all, it is just the same old republican themes wrapped in a different package.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnnC0725
10:59 PM on 04/16/2010
The problem with the left philosophy is that it is government based, instead of freedom based.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:26 PM on 04/16/2010
The problem with the randists philosophy is that it is the product of developmentally arrested cognitive domains seeking to conceal the malady under the pretense of freedom.
12:07 AM on 04/17/2010
Both philosophies are indeed flawed. Arguing for either is merely pointless, when all people are truly egocentric/ethnocentric etc. I share views with both 'sides,' and I am a voter for whomever I deem MOST in line with my views. I am an avid follower of the constitution mostly, and the beliefs of our founding fathers. I am compassionate in my own way, and that is why I love freedom. I cannot pass up a donation, whether it is at McDonalds, Borders books, Petco/Petsmart, or a gas station collecting money for (fill in local sick child here). I honestly just don't like being told how I should donate and to whom. I am also very against the war on drugs, but that is a whole different ball game. To be truly free is about impossible in any form of civilization, but I would like to remain as 'free' as possible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnny g locker
10:43 PM on 04/16/2010
There are now more government workers than private sector workers. Government makes no money of it own. It can only tax the productive. In that sense, it is a cancer. When it gets too big, it kills its host.

That is why government needs to get smaller. It is unsustainable. Not hard to understand.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:31 PM on 04/16/2010
When willful ignorance gets too pervasive, it kills its host and many others. That is why people need to become less ignorant. Not hard to understand. Your format is too simple for the problem, but there you have it.
11:49 PM on 04/16/2010
A little research please - according to OPM there are around 2 million civilian federal employees (this does not include members of the military) as of 2009. The latest data from the BLS shows that there are over 154 million employees. So as you can see there are a few more private sector workers than government workers. I think you are confused with the accurate statistic that the Federal Government is the largest single employer in the country.
08:06 PM on 04/16/2010
Jeramiah Wright is not supposed to represent the democratic party, even if he is a supporter. Right? Why take a few tea party members opinions and attach them to the entire group? I do not see Al Sharpton being accused of racism, when Al Sharpton says a black girl was raped because of the color of her skin. I think Obama is too cautious not to offend ANYONE just like most of the people in our country. That is the problem. Spare me with the mention of slavery, repression, etc. I would have expected someone to write such powerful things to be educated with them. Slavery was started when? By Who? Why? Affirmative action...is that okay in your book? Just curious. I do not see color, nor do I care. I see equal people, with equal CAPABILITY to make their own way and not have to rely on my tax dollars to support them. I am all for doing away with SS and Medicare. I am disgusted at the ignorance of people, the lack of attention that is paid to our constitution, and the direction we are heading. I was at a Tea party rally yesterday. I went alone. I didn't have a sign. I was there listening and observing. I suggest you all do the same.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RyanCSmith
Locke for people, Hobbes for corporations
08:33 PM on 04/16/2010
There's a big difference between Jeremiah Wright and the Tea Party. The Democratic Party ran as far and fast as it could from Wright. The GOP is actively encouraging and courting the Tea Party.

Deeds speak more loudly to me than pretty sentiments.
10:04 PM on 04/16/2010
I was using Jeremiah Wright in reference to a single tea party member that the author has quoted. You can not take a piece and say it represents the whole. The entire GOP is not behind the tea party, but the base of the tea party is smaller government. The ideas of our founding fathers.
photo
RealityBaseCamp
My micro-bio did not meet someone's guidelines!
08:43 PM on 04/16/2010
I dunno, man. . . Only Repubs are allowed to use guilt by association, you know.
10:06 PM on 04/16/2010
Why should anyone?? I am neither Democrat nor Republican. I disagree with guilt by association for the most part.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sonia Vivar
A bundle of joy !
05:30 PM on 04/16/2010
In a way I feel sorry for the tea baggers, pumped up by special interest groups
and released to spread the message, that intolerance is embedded in who we
are as Americans.
03:08 PM on 04/16/2010
For a unique look at the Tea Party Movement, its historical context, and its most likely disposition, you may want to read an in interesting article at:

http://funks2.wordpress.com/2010/04/16/the-trip-to-nowhere-on-the-tea-party-express/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sonia Vivar
A bundle of joy !
05:42 PM on 04/16/2010
a good read, I shared, I hope you don't mind.
10:23 PM on 04/16/2010
Very unique look...very bad example of informative opinion....
12:40 PM on 04/16/2010
President Obama said yesterday that the TEA Party people should thank him for cutting their taxes.
Obama must think Americans are stupid. Because of the health care bill there are staggering new costs to Americans, as well as less high quality health care available. The are now 47% of Americans that pay NO federal income tax and I am sure those free loaders do like Obama. The actual hard working Americans paying the bill for all of Obama, Pelosi, and Reid's socialist agenda are mad as hell. Obama, the liberals and pro-socialists may make fun of the TEA Party movement, but wait until November and see how much they laugh. We are tired of an over spending government that even provides free cell phones and 300 free minutes to people at the tax payers' expense. No one helped us buy a house or car. We earned our own way in life. Tax payers are also supporting the health care of up to 20,000,000 illegal aliens while the politicians and the American Homeland Security chief allow them to stay in this country. Meanwhile, I have read there are 8,000,000 illegal aliens working in the USA, while 15,000,000 REAL Americans are unemployed. Many of these illegal aliens work in skilled construction jobs such as carpentry, brick and stone mason, plumbing, etc.. These are high paying jobs that should be filled by Americans. Obama and the Democrats see these illegal aliens as future Democrat votes instead of criminal invaders.
photo
raleigh1997
Oh no officer, I forgot my papers and/or ID!
02:55 PM on 04/16/2010
As a CPA who holds licenses in Virginia, Maryland, Washington DC, and NY, I find YOUR POST IS RIDICULOUS AND TOTALLY WRONG.

Moreover, I work on software that is used by the IRS, and I can assure you that the tax rates for 2009, are low for most tax groups with where the AGI is less that 250,000. If you had half a brain, before posting your idiotic comment, you would have taken the time to compare the tax tables for years 2008 to those of 2009. In addition, did you know that those so called “freeloaders” who don’t pay taxes were also ‘freeloaders during the Bush Administration?

While I’m not and have never been illegal, I am an immigrant who is now a US Citizen. My parents came to this country to study a Yale University and subsequently my father worked for the World Bank. I’m certain though, that in the eyes of people like you, I’m still not worthy because you hate those who are different. I feel sorry for you because you will go to your grave a bitter, unhappy and a hateful person blaming others for your pathetic life.

I am successful and a professional and I pay over 30% of my income in taxes, how much of your income did you pay?
03:55 PM on 04/16/2010
WTF???? What do you not understand the word "illegal". It sounds like YOU and YOUR family did it the right way.....thanks for that! It's the poeple NOT coming to this country legally.... this country is not equipped to handle the massive amounts of illegals.

Bush, Bush, Bush.....YES....now let's FIX IT, not continue it!
11:58 PM on 04/16/2010
As the son and grandson of coal miners that lived in a very rural area, I managed to become senior engineer for Virgina, Kentucky, and West Virginia for the corporation I worked for. I worked from 60 to 80 hours per week for 38 years until my retirement.

Surely at your salary you can afford a dictionary to discover the definition of "illegal". As half Irish and half Cherokee, married to a Latino I have nothing against any ethnic background in a person. I hate no one. I am disgusted with freeloaders though. People that live in large cities with access to public libraries, free job training at tax payer expense, and jobs nearby, yet are too lazy to obtain an education, speak well, and earn their own way in life. Millions that do drugs and drink all day while honest people are working. I was against the heavy spending during the Bush administration, but it pales in comparison to the disaster Obama is causing. It sounds like you are very insecure with who you are and therefore felt targeted by my comments. As far as the IRS goes, I would like to see it abolished and a flat 12% tax on every single person in the USA. That would be truly fair, instead of having 10% of the citizens pay 70% of the taxes. I truly believe Obama is a Marxist at heart and is destroying the America that was so successful.
03:02 PM on 04/16/2010
And how many of that 47% are seniors who've worked their entire lives and are living off of social security?

And either taxes for 95% of people went down under Obama or they didn't.

I also love how conservatives like to assume that THEY are the only people in this country who work and pay taxes...guess what? So do I, and I'm not "mad as hell".

And people make fun of tea partiers because they deserve it in many cases...you all are mad at high taxes, yet expect to get LOWER taxes AND eliminate the deficit at the same time...I guess that can work in imaginary land, but it doesn't in reality. Further, if you all's concern is the deficit, wouldn't you be for higher taxes NOW and lower spending?
photo
raleigh1997
Oh no officer, I forgot my papers and/or ID!
03:34 PM on 04/16/2010
Totally agree with you MoeB.

I spend most of my year immersed reading and deciphering the tax code so that we can update our software and then I sit down at home and hear so many comments on how Obama and Pelosi have raised taxes and the deficit, blah, blah, blah….. all I want to do is scream! If I had a dime for every time one of these tea baggers incorrectly sited tax code, I’d be rich.

Unlike you though, I am mad as hell. Mad that my tax dollars are more than likely being distributed to the ‘non-working’ tea baggers while I put in 60 hr weeks – today being an exception because I’m taking a day off.

I don’t care what FOX news reported, from what I’ve seen trolling around here in the DC area, these people are NOT highly educated!
10:26 PM on 04/16/2010
Well a way to lower taxes and eliminate the deficit is STOP making a deficit...stop pushing expensive ideas, bailouts, etc. I don't think this is about conservatives/liberals at all. It is about the idea of throwing more of all of our money at things while trying to reduce the deficit...it would be one thing if they raised taxes with a master plan of reducing the deficit and not ADDING more expensive programs ie. healthcare reform.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
huffy2001
11:49 AM on 04/16/2010
I had to laugh yesterday when I heard the Teabaggers were out protesting budget cuts in NASA yesterday. I guess big govt means the "govt I don't want." Little, good govt, means "govt I DO want." They're like all right wing reactionaries (i.e., Republicans)...lying hypocrites.
01:02 PM on 04/16/2010
You do realize NASA is basically a drop in a swimming pool in terms of budget? Also they are responsible for quite a few inventions and modern designs. Things that provide value to the entire country.

So curious by paying out money for healthcare for people and entitelement prograsm... what does the country/govt actually get out of those programs? Nothing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:16 PM on 04/16/2010
hmmm. so " A Hundred Million American People Staying Alive" is a benefit that you actually can't comprehend?

But you can appreciate the billions spent on a Mars Rover?

wow. i don't really know where to begin...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reasonshouldrule
08:03 PM on 04/16/2010
So the well-being of human beings is "nothing" in your view? If you don't think humans have any intrinsic worth, how about the productivity those human beings add in inventing all those things you think do provide value?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GreenPlanet
11:44 AM on 04/16/2010
Yeah, when you turn, 65 or get close to age 50, you will wish that there was Medicare, Social Security, or even the government.
11:52 AM on 04/16/2010
Nice pointless statement without any facts. Social security won't be around when I turn 65 at the rate it's going. This year we will pay out more than we take in for the first time ever. It goes bankrupt soon enough without some osrt of reform.

Medicare it wouldn't hurt but to be hoenst I pay in more than i will get out of it and that too will go bust without reform. I'd be better off managing my own funds towards that. Not to mention I always will be picking up LTC insurance to prepare for the future.

If I were to retire today I need 2 million dollars in cash/investments to be able to survive. By the time I'm 65 that will probably be clsoer to 6million. If you think I'm betting on the govt to take care of me your crazy. There's a reason why I'm in the middle class at 26 because I refuse to rely on others to support me and so that means excelling in work and making more money than most.

I am alredy putting money into different investments for retirement. I dont' expect social security/medicare to be there when I retire. Certainly not at the level of payouts we have now... not enough people to support that.
03:07 PM on 04/16/2010
When you pay into ss/medicare, you are paying for the PREVIOUS generation, not yourself...so the next generation will be paying for YOUR retirement...that's a sacrafice of living in a CO-dependent society.

And while I congratulate you on being middle-class, you are naive (either willfully or not) if you believe that you are some self-made person. You aren't. Any number of people helped you get to where you are today.

MOST people in this country work for a living, just like you...most people excel at their jobs, just like you...stop trying to make yourself into some glorious exception.
11:23 AM on 04/16/2010
A lot of the older generation feels that way because they did pay into a system for 50 years. It's not unexpected that they would feel attached to those programs. I'm 26 I'd personally would like to see Social security done away with. Medicare too and I certainly feel the same about the new healthcare. I'm paying into social security now and won't ever see a dime when I do retire. I'd rather manage my own retirement then let govt handle it. our govt was designed to be ineffiecent so we couldn't end up with a dictator again. That inefficency is exactly why I don't want the govt handling anything like social security, healthcare or many other area.

infrastructure makes sense because it's the only way it would get done. Same for military. but I'm honest enough to know the govt doesn't do those effecently either. Talk to a defense contractor or a govt employee and find out how quickly money gets waste on admistration and other beauractric bs.

We need some infrastructure upgrades sure but now is hardly the time spend more money. At some point debts come due and with everything else being signed now we can't afford to add more. You have to give up things sometimes. People forget that. The govt is doign exactly what caused this economic crisis - unchecked spenidng.
photo
raleigh1997
Oh no officer, I forgot my papers and/or ID!
02:57 PM on 04/16/2010
Mike2984 go back to school please and learn how to write.
03:54 PM on 04/16/2010
I spent 30 seconds writing up a quick post while working and you want to point out spleling mistakes and grammar mistakes from typing several paragraphs quickly?

Good way to disagree with my point that our government was designed to be inefficent from the moment of it's inception. And since the goverment can never get a program in under budget or at least with the budget they were originally given, I have no desire to see goverment expanded in any form.

Some of us have jobs to perform instead of proof reading and crafting a expertly written post on a website. I'll save that time for e-mails and contracts.