Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the
comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the
comment you replied to
View Comments:
All comments on this article are pre-moderated. This means that every comment submitted will be reviewed by a moderator before it is posted to the site. Unfortunately, depending on the volume of comments, it may take time
Everyone is talking very quite around the bed, Hillary is on life support, as everyone is pulling her life support plugs. It's a shame, she is already to dead to realize what's going on?
Less us pray, this is the end to the evil in the DEMOCRATIC party?
You're quite rude, which leads me to believe that you're ignorant as well. Would you care to have YOUR mom referenced in such a fashion? You'd do well to watch Cokie Roberts on a rebroadcast of This Week from last Sunday. She made some excellent points about people such as yourself.
If, I were Obama, I'd choose my wife (MICHELLE) as vice president. She has the education and background to be second in command. Wouldn't that be a slam to the political whore "Hillary". She's not only beat by a black man, but by a highly educated woman.
If Kennedy could take it to the convention when he trailed by 756 delegates, why can't Hillary go to the convention trailing by far less? Would it be so awful?
Well, Mr. or Ms. or Miss or Mrs. Iboucher, I will try to walk you through this.
What do you suppose is the point of running a Democratic campaign? Many would say winning the presidency of the US is one good reason. Although there are other reasons (just ask Bob Barr or Ralph Nader) the other reasons seem to pale in comparison to that one.
So if winning the presidency is the point, would you prefer to follow a winning or a losing strategy? Many (although not all) would suggest using the winning strategy.
Democratic fights taken all the way to the convention have been not just losing strategies, but DISASTEROUSLY losing strategies. I hate to go out on a limb here, but my guess is, this is why some folks think repeating that lunacy is a bad idea.
Probably seems fine to Republicans, or to Democrats who prefer to lose for some psychological reason I cannot fathom.
Of course you can't. You see, this is what we call in our history books, a DEMOCRACY. If your candidate is the best then he will win anyway regardless of how long "this goes on" as you Obama supporters put it. Have faith in your guy.
Last point, the4 reason you cant fathom why anyone would prefer to lose, check out this blog. Eerily similar to Republican sites back in the day. Hate anyone not for your guy and pretend your guy is perfect. Next you all will be riding around with O logos like those clowns did with the W. History is repeating itself.
I'll respond to this, of the several times you've cut and paste this talking point...
Ummm, yeah, Teddy DID trail by that much, and still fight on to the convention, and he is also largely credited with handing the presidency to Reagan (shady dealing with Iran and the hostages aside).
So I guess your point would be that Hillary can be the same spoiler and hand the Presidency to McCain like Ted Kennedy did to Reagan, right?
Seriously, if you are just going to cut and paste talking points, at least use more intelligent ones.
In 1980, Kennedy came into the Democratic convention at Madison Square Garden in New York City with 1,225 delegates to President Carter's 1,981, with 122 delegates uncommitted.
Kennedy stood on principle and people admired him for the fighting the good fight.
If Kennedy could take it to the convention when he trailed by 756 delegates, why can't Hillary go to the convention trailing by far less? Would it be so awful?
That is why Kennedy is STILL bloated and sitting in Massachusetts and the Democratic Party LOST to Ronald Reagan for 2 terms.
All of Hillary's "admiring" supremist constituents in every Appalacian holler, are rooting for her. They are truly representative of America's finest. She will be able to take full credit for ALL of their vast history of compassion and fairness in words and deeds. Just like Hillary, they are a "credit to their race".
No, what truly represents America is the AAs in Miss, Ala and GA, and the good white folks of Utah! (All 18,000 who voted.) Yeah, see, those people vote their principles, not race.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Everyone is talking very quite around the bed, Hillary is on life support, as everyone is pulling her life support plugs. It's a shame, she is already to dead to realize what's going on?
Less us pray, this is the end to the evil in the DEMOCRATIC party?
Nice!
You should show her being led into the lethal injection chamber by guards yelling-"Dead Woman Walking"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Magen,
You're quite rude, which leads me to believe that you're ignorant as well. Would you care to have YOUR mom referenced in such a fashion? You'd do well to watch Cokie Roberts on a rebroadcast of This Week from last Sunday. She made some excellent points about people such as yourself.
If, I were Obama, I'd choose my wife (MICHELLE) as vice president. She has the education and background to be second in command. Wouldn't that be a slam to the political whore "Hillary". She's not only beat by a black man, but by a highly educated woman.
LOL
heehee.
"We were all rooting for you".... LOL!!!
If Kennedy could take it to the convention when he trailed by 756 delegates, why can't Hillary go to the convention trailing by far less? Would it be so awful?
Well, Mr. or Ms. or Miss or Mrs. Iboucher, I will try to walk you through this.
What do you suppose is the point of running a Democratic campaign? Many would say winning the presidency of the US is one good reason. Although there are other reasons (just ask Bob Barr or Ralph Nader) the other reasons seem to pale in comparison to that one.
So if winning the presidency is the point, would you prefer to follow a winning or a losing strategy? Many (although not all) would suggest using the winning strategy.
Democratic fights taken all the way to the convention have been not just losing strategies, but DISASTEROUSLY losing strategies. I hate to go out on a limb here, but my guess is, this is why some folks think repeating that lunacy is a bad idea.
Probably seems fine to Republicans, or to Democrats who prefer to lose for some psychological reason I cannot fathom.
Of course you can't. You see, this is what we call in our history books, a DEMOCRACY. If your candidate is the best then he will win anyway regardless of how long "this goes on" as you Obama supporters put it. Have faith in your guy.
Last point, the4 reason you cant fathom why anyone would prefer to lose, check out this blog. Eerily similar to Republican sites back in the day. Hate anyone not for your guy and pretend your guy is perfect. Next you all will be riding around with O logos like those clowns did with the W. History is repeating itself.
I'll respond to this, of the several times you've cut and paste this talking point...
Ummm, yeah, Teddy DID trail by that much, and still fight on to the convention, and he is also largely credited with handing the presidency to Reagan (shady dealing with Iran and the hostages aside).
So I guess your point would be that Hillary can be the same spoiler and hand the Presidency to McCain like Ted Kennedy did to Reagan, right?
Seriously, if you are just going to cut and paste talking points, at least use more intelligent ones.
Right, and that worked out well for the party.
Who won the Presidency that year?
That's how I feel. Man this is so perfect.
In 1980, Kennedy came into the Democratic convention at Madison Square Garden in New York City with 1,225 delegates to President Carter's 1,981, with 122 delegates uncommitted.
Kennedy stood on principle and people admired him for the fighting the good fight.
If Kennedy could take it to the convention when he trailed by 756 delegates, why can't Hillary go to the convention trailing by far less? Would it be so awful?
That is why Kennedy is STILL bloated and sitting in Massachusetts and the Democratic Party LOST to Ronald Reagan for 2 terms.
All of Hillary's "admiring" supremist constituents in every Appalacian holler, are rooting for her. They are truly representative of America's finest. She will be able to take full credit for ALL of their vast history of compassion and fairness in words and deeds. Just like Hillary, they are a "credit to their race".
uhhhh, Im black, from the south, and a military veteran and I support Hillary. I guess you just proved something to me.
It's not a very good idea to antagonize democrats...
No, what truly represents America is the AAs in Miss, Ala and GA, and the good white folks of Utah! (All 18,000 who voted.) Yeah, see, those people vote their principles, not race.
uhhh? carter got his ass handed to him in 1980, partially because kennedy's stunt hurt him so badly. do you work for the mcbomb campaign?
This is effing great!
The only person who is a bigger blowhard than Hillary is Tyra! Perfect!!
This is HuffPost's Pick response -wise?
Really?
You're pure evil, Andy. Keep it up.
F*ing Hillaryious! If only....
Well it works for me, especially since I can't stand either of them.
Tyra trumps all in lign for most conceited personality.
http://www.theidaexpress.com
She's a SuperModel; conceit is her profession.
and conceit is also the profession of most politicians....who was it that called politics the show biz for ugly people? i
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with