ask.com


Hillary Clinton's latest game - when she's not busy saying that Barack Obama isn't a Muslim "as far as I know" - is tantalizing supporters with the idea that Obama could wind up as her vice-presidential choice on a so-called Dream Ticket.

It's a genius strategy: Democrats, forced to choose between Hillary and Barack, don't need to choose after all, since they both could run together - as long as Barack is at the bottom of the ticket, of course.

Let's leave aside for the moment the question of why the candidate who has more delegates would somehow be relegated to the vice-presidential slot. That's the kind of Clintonian logic that I'm too unsophisticated to grasp.

Let's focus, instead, on this puzzle:

In her relentless attack ads before the Texas and Ohio primaries, and in public comments since, Hillary has said that Obama is not ready to pick up the "red phone" and serve as Commander-in-Chief. If that's true, why would she imperil the nation by choosing him as her vice-president?

Last time I checked, the vice-president was one heartbeat away from Commander-in-Chief. Which means, if anything should happen to Hillary, Barack Obama would be picking up that darned red phone.

Oops.

Now, before I get accused of misogyny - which seems to be the reflexive response of certain Hillary supporters whenever she is criticized - let me say that her talent for making blatantly contradictory statements without any sense of irony or shame makes her every bit the equal of a man. In this case, the man I'm talking about is Bill Clinton.

(Oddly, Samantha Power's "monster" comment was slammed by some Hillary supporters as being misogynistic, too - kind of a reach, given that it came from a woman. My only beef with Ms. Power is that her comment demonstrated too much restraint. I guess she already used "a problem from hell" to describe something else.)

So let's get back to Hillary's selection of a not-ready-for-red-phone-maybe-a-Muslim as her vice president. Instead of trying to sell us on the Dream Ticket, why doesn't Hillary call her accountant at 3 A.M. and ask him to email her a PDF of her tax returns? Sharing them with us shouldn't be such a big deal. Unless - and this is just a wild guess - is there something in those returns, say, about where her 5 million dollars she loaned herself actually came from, that might torpedo her candidacy?

Not as far as I know.

Andy Borowitz is a comedian and writer whose work appears in The New Yorker and The New York Times, and at his award-winning humor site, BorowitzReport.com. He is the host of "Countdown to '08" at the 92nd Street Y on Tuesday, May 13 at 8 PM with his special guests Susie Essman (HBO's Curb Your Enthusiasm) and Jeffrey Toobin (CNN, bestselling author of The Nine. For tickets, go to 92y.org.


 

Comments
144
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
collapse CharlotteNH See Profile I'm a Fan of CharlotteNH

"It's a genius strategy: Democrats, forced to choose between Hillary and Barack, don't need to choose after all, since they both could run together - as long as Barack is at the bottom of the ticket, of course."
Genius, no - disingenuous, yes. The Clinton campaign made a huge tactical error by running Hillary as the "incumbent" and not having a strategy after Feb. 5th. Now, even though she is trailing in both pledged delegates and the popular vote, she is again spinning reality by implying that she would be willing to put Barack second on the ticket - such arrogance!
Samantha Power goes (as Hillary demanded) but Wolfson stays? I'd much rather be called a "monster" than "Ken Starr-ish".
When is the media going to take Hillary to task about her experience. Unless she is willing to release her tax return, her papers etc. from her eight years as First Lady, and elaborate on her 35 years of experience, that argument should be disqualified.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 AM on 03/09/2008
collapse SShaw490 See Profile I'm a Fan of SShaw490

Great post, Andy. I particularly loved the idea of Hillary calling her accountant at 3 AM and asking him to email her a PDF of her tax return. While he's at it, have him include one of Bill's donor list to his charities. I'm not questioning where the charity money went or whether the charities are good things - I'm just kind of wondering who all may have donated large sums of money to them and who might have an expectation of future access to the highest levels of governmental power in the future. I'd say that's a reasonable request. After all, those donors have to get statements at the end of each year showing how much they gave - it shouldn't be too hard to compile those statements into a report of who gave how much.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 AM on 03/09/2008
collapse Silpat See Profile I'm a Fan of Silpat

This would in fact be a "Dream Ticket" for McCain because if Obama becomes Hillary's VP (not likely of course), McCain will play sound bites over and over again of her calling Obama inexperienced and unfit to be "Commander-in-Chief". LOL

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:54 AM on 03/09/2008
collapse charley0008 See Profile I'm a Fan of charley0008

Dear Andy;
I liked your quick note, it was a good one, now let your Auntie Charley tell you what is really happening:
This new Clinton chatter is indeed a clever albeit very cynical (and I would suggest dishonest) strategy and it is all smoke, mirrors and super delegates. She cannot win without the super delegates, period!
No would dare seat the delegates from Michigan or Florida so it is a do-over or do-nothing option.
But, even if they sat the delegates from Michigan & Florida AS IS - she still does not have enough delegates. In a do-over she can not win enough delegates.
The only way Hillary Clinton can get the nomination is to steal it, with the help of super delegates and high pressure tactics on Obama delegates that will make the last few weeks sound like childs play.
To those who were listening carefully the Clinton camp made no bones about stealing the nomination after Obama won his 11 straight. Andy dear, ignore Michigan and Florida thats a diversion.
They plan to steal his delegates and let the super delegates chose 'the best person for the job" thereafter. So it is all about super delegates and pressure tactics on Obama's delegates (now that they have warmed them up by savaging their candidate) and it is a scam!
It is not super delegates being scammed, it is African American democrats!
You can be sure that there are a lot of super delegates out there that might be willing to play into the scam unless African Americans catch on fast and let it be known that they are not buying into the scam. Remember Andy dear, a Democratic win would be tough indeed without the support of African Americans so it is risky game. (Hillary has a back-up plan though that is why she is campaigning for McCain at the same time. It's her way or the highway! If it ain't her she wants it to be McCain.)
Pointing to the Kennedy/Johnson tickets as a historic precedent about how bitter rivals set aside their differences is all crap - everyone knows that Obama would never accept a Vice Presidency with Hillary Clinton. Al Gore could write the book on the hazards of association with the Clinton's, were he so inclined.
However, I think it is much more fundamental and less political than that; It would go against everything Obama believes in and one of the things I think he genuinely believes in, is that character matters. I also think he was quite prepared to enter this race and accept that he might not win, he was clearly the underdog (and still is, no matter what spin and whining the Clinton camp does.)
But I also think he was both intelligent and thoughtful enough to recognize it had to be this year, not because of him, but because of the readiness of the American people to make fundamental changes in their country on both sides of the aisle.
Now some have argued that this new Clinton strategy is all about calming African Americans while she savages Obama with her pernicious personal attacks on him, even as she appeals to the lowest common denominator; the racist and the "he's a Muslim with an agenda" smear campaigns.
"As far as I know."
But I don't think it is about calming African Americans at all during this primaries a) because I think they have written them off as a inconvenient obstacle, and b) they are so blinded by their own narcissistic belief in their ability to fix everything after the fact, that they are focusing on setting them up instead.
Now, I allow that some maybe right when they say there is another side to this, ( a side-winder so to speak) a means for the Clinton camp to split off some African Americans votes and let them feel good about it, with the 'we will give your 'boy' the second seat, train him up, and then he can run for President' schtik!
Personally I don't think many will buy into that but I could be wrong.
So it is about boxing the African American democrats in, then relying on the super delegates to make them accept that everything that could be done, had been done but Obama declined and there was nothing left to do but accept it and move on to fight the Republicans.
I can hear them now, in sympathetic tones, (the more gifted actors among them will even feign surprise) " He was offered the vice-presidency because Hillary really wants him and we as a party really need him. We really wanted to have them both, we really admire him, he is so talented, so intelligent and so inspirational he could have assured a win over the Republicans - they would have been unstoppable! It would have set him on a clear path to run for President next time, but he declined, so what can we do? (They will skewer him with the )It really is a blow to the party! But for the good of the party, we have to put our disappointment aside and move on. This is bigger than any one of us. So we have to do our best to beat back the Republicans without the 'dream team.' " Yada yada yada..........
OMG Andy, as I write this I can see Bill Clinton with that little quiver in his voice, on the verge of tears, "if I had only known" (like he did in Rawanda after he let 800,000 people die). I can just see him consoling the African American delegates and all else who will listen with his "all my life I have dreamed about voting for an African American." ( The same Bill who out of sight of African Americans will not even call Obama by name!)
So what is next?
You can expect rumors probably just before or right after Pennsylvania (well seeded by the Clinton camp) of private discussions between Obama and Clinton. (Hillary will find some excuse to talk to Obama or perhaps it will be Bill, it could be about the price of rice in China, because it does not matter) The rumor will be all about the beginning of negotiations for a 'dream team ticket' but It will be non-specific and tamped down as very hush, hush. After seeding the rumor expect all in the Clinton camp to deny it!
Got the game now?
That's my boy!
Love
Auntie Charley









favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 AM on 03/09/2008
collapse FreedomLoverX See Profile I'm a Fan of FreedomLoverX

It's a dream ticket. She's dreaming!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 AM on 03/09/2008
collapse CaseyBabes See Profile I'm a Fan of CaseyBabes

And we're having the nightmare with her as the central figure.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 AM on 03/09/2008
collapse Jedi007 See Profile I'm a Fan of Jedi007

I have an idea that would stop the Democratic Party from destroying itself.

A large group of uncommitted super delegates need to form a pact against negative smear campaigning. They should let both contestants know that there will be consequences for either candidate for damaging the party. They should put together some criteria and keep count of each qualifying smear. When you get to five, you just lost 50 delegates. When you get to ten, you lose another 50.

That would scare both of them straight. Talk about yourself and why we should elect you and not why the other person is bad. We have to win the White House.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 AM on 03/09/2008
collapse Sloane7 See Profile I'm a Fan of Sloane7

Andy you're really on a roll. Nicely done.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 AM on 03/09/2008
collapse KQuark See Profile I'm a Fan of KQuark

Patronizing Obama is not going to get it done Billary.

How mighty white of you.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:23 AM on 03/09/2008
collapse darlingdem See Profile I'm a Fan of darlingdem

I sure hope Democrats and the media don't fall for this latest nonsense from the Clintons.

Senator Obama DOESN'T NEED to run on a ticket with Hillary. By all measures (pledged delegates, number of states, popular votes), the nomination will eventually be his...assuming the super delegates don't vote against the will of the people and steal the election from the rightful winner. (This would be very hard to take again after the disaster of 2000.)

Clearly, Hillary wants to win the support of the super delegates by making them think she'll agree to have Senator Obama as her VP. And, if that doesn't work, she thinks that Senator Obama will then have no choice but to have her as his running mate...thus positioning her as the heir apparent in 2012 or 2016. Either way, she thinks that she will eventually be given what she believes is her due...to become the first woman president. She's constantly saying "Let's make history together" in her stump speech. Heck, her book is even humbly titled "Living History." I say, GET OVER YOURSELF, HONEY. THIS ELECTION ISN'T ABOUT YOU. Senator Obama could say the same thing...but that's not what drives him.

It's SO obvious that Hillary and Bill can't stand playing second fiddle to any Democrat. The fact that Senator Obama is becoming the standard bearer of the Democratic party is driving them crazy...and is making them more and more desperate. I can only imagine how the Clintons would try to steal the show and undermine his presidency if she were his VP.

More importantly, Hillary (and Bill) are and will always be two of the most polarizing figures in American politics. Why in the world would Senator Obama want Hillary as his VP...when she would be such a drag on the ticket...and when there are others worthier than she could ever be? So many voters can't stand the Clintons...and they've brought this contempt on themselves with their misconduct, lies, shamelessness and scorched earth politics.

No...absolutely NOT. Hillary isn't fit to shine Senator Obama's shoes....much less share the ticket with him. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, Hillary....THAT'S where this is headed. You might as well start getting used to it.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 AM on 03/09/2008
collapse uheardme See Profile I'm a Fan of uheardme

Youre right. The point is a lot of old White dems, like Clintons, would prefer Black dems to shine their shoes, not run for President.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 03/09/2008
collapse Jandie See Profile I'm a Fan of Jandie

Hillary "Rotten" Clinton thinks she is so clever, since she won Ohio/Texas (although only gained about 4/5 delegates), she is now playing cheap psychology by now saying that she is "willing" to put Obama on the VP ticket - WHAT?? She is still losing, she is still behind him by about 130 delegates, she still needs to continue to cheat and continue to lie and keep on stabbing him in the back in order to win.

The three state wins DID NOT give her the lead - she is still a loser and I hope that Obama will never contemplate such a ridiculous notion as to be on the same ticket with her.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 AM on 03/09/2008
collapse Thad See Profile I'm a Fan of Thad

"It's a genius strategy: Democrats, forced to choose between Hillary and Barack, don't need to choose after all, since they both could run together - as long as Barack is at the bottom of the ticket, of course."

Of course.

Except that she's obviously hoping that Obama returns the favor in the likelier event that he's the one at the TOP of the ticket.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 AM on 03/09/2008
collapse keriheb See Profile I'm a Fan of keriheb

The woman is morally, politically, and totally schizophrenic! We have already experienced Bush and his hoard. Enough is enough.

I'll tell you a dream team, McCain/Hillary Clinton! Now that is a dream team. Put them both in the toilet and flush it. THAT IS MY DREAM!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 PM on 03/08/2008
collapse The5thW See Profile I'm a Fan of The5thW

Rush Limbaugh has subverted democracy with the help of a gang of mind controlled Brownshirts who despise popular government. In any other country the US would invade and restore the rule of law, or the UN would take over all election functions, but the reaction of the "Democratic" party is to whine about this irrelevant hack.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 PM on 03/08/2008
collapse kingfishstew See Profile I'm a Fan of kingfishstew

FUNNY TRUTH / NEWS:

Girl depicted in the Monster's 3 A.M. add shocked and dismayed that her image has been used to promote the Monster's campaign. Apparently she grew up to be an Obama supporter.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_030708WAB_hillary_ad_KC.328ab14f.html

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 PM on 03/08/2008
collapse Redmom See Profile I'm a Fan of Redmom

Obama as VP?

He's too smart to get "gored" by the Clintons.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 PM on 03/08/2008
collapse kellygrrrl See Profile I'm a Fan of kellygrrrl

The shift in my view of Hillary Clinton in just one month's time is drastic.

15 years I spent admiring, respecting, defending the Clintons.

now, I am struggling to find a way to force myself to vote for her, on the off-chance she is the Nom.

If I was Obama, I would not take a VP offer from her.

and there is NO WAY IN HELL I'd trust her at my back as VP.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 PM on 03/08/2008
collapse americansheep See Profile I'm a Fan of americansheep

If Hillary, by some miracle, gets the nomination then I would hope for the future of humanity that she would not choose O. for her VP since he is obviously unqualified according to her. And in turn I would be profoundly dissapointed in O. accepted after the S that they've thrown at him.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 PM on 03/08/2008
collapse ShawnMichel See Profile I'm a Fan of ShawnMichel

Sorry, Billary, not buying your little tactic, one meant for idiots and nonthinkers.

That is to say, most of the populace of the United States.

Hopefully a sufficient number of actually aware, actually awake human beings have caught on to this crap and thus can stop it.

Obama should absolutely not choose Billary as VP. Before he does that, I'd recommend he choose someone slightly more principled--like Josef Goebbels.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 PM on 03/08/2008
collapse zull2 See Profile I'm a Fan of zull2

It's sarcasm. It's a subtle jab at those who still think that even though Obama has the majority of the delegates, they have to "keep him in his place" by offering him the BOTTOM half of the ticket.

I don't see it all as racism though. It's a case of two neurotic dogs trying their best to dominate each other, after years of abuse. I'm talking about, obviously, two halves of the Democratic Party.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 AM on 03/09/2008
collapse robXdion See Profile I'm a Fan of robXdion

Umm zull2,

You just described the racial bigotry of an idea like this, then you turn around and deny it. What is THAT about? This shows many people like you recognize racist thought patterns but consciously deny it because it makes you uncomfortable.

It is what it is.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 AM on 03/09/2008
collapse MysticMichael See Profile I'm a Fan of MysticMichael

With all this talk of a Clinton/Obama "dream ticket" in November, HRC is clearly trying to portray herself as the reasonable, selfless and conciliatory one, by manipulating the good intentions of naive, unsophisticated and ill-informed voters who don't realize that it's just another con. Her intent is to put public pressure upon Obama to make some sort of reciprocal gesture, by committing himself to run in the general election with her.

Neither HRC nor Obama really wants to run with the other, but if Obama agrees, then he's stuck with her. If he doesn't, then she'll try to portray him as the selfish one who doesn't care about party unity - an astonishing display of brass from someone who's behaved as she has. But it's just another example of the Lewis Carroll "logic" of the Clinton campaign, in which she can throw ever type of smear and innuendo imaginable at him - but as soon as he tries to defend himself, he's the one who's allegedly being "aggressive" and "divisive"...

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 PM on 03/08/2008
collapse starboymikey See Profile I'm a Fan of starboymikey

Neither HRC nor Obama really wants to run with the other,
________________________________________________________

No, but circumstances may well push them both that way.

My guess is that the "official" offer will be made first by Hillary, shortly before the convention, when it's clear that either she will lose, or there will be a protracted fight going many ballots, which she will probably lose.

I believe her team is more than smart and cynical to have "war gamed" multiple scenarios of how thing could go down, and she and Bill are now gingerly testing the water, with Bill saying a Hillary/Obama ticket would be unstoppable. As others have pointed out, this is pretty ironic, given the fact that she's been saying that Barack Obama is thoroughly unqualified to be president, and implying that McCain would be a better choice.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 AM on 03/09/2008
collapse davg See Profile I'm a Fan of davg

Spin is Billary's middle name. Look how they spun last Tuesday, as if it was some kind of big win, a turning point. Fact is that, from something like a 20 point deficit a few weeks earlier, he lost Ohio by only 10. That's still a significant loss but considering the deficit, it's someting that, if the tables were turned, Clinton would have hailed as a victory. He lost the primary in Texas by 4 pts, but is running away with the caucus by 12 points (41% of the returns in). If this holds, he wins more delegates from Texas and can officially claim himself to be the winner of that state. Vermont and Rhode Island were about a swap. The upshot is that she narrows the delegate gap by < 10 delegates and narrows the popular by a little too. So I really don't see a big win here. And considering that there are only a few states left, it's really too little too late. And look what she had to do to get this modest win. She had to go negative, use fear tactics and spend about al lof her money in the process. But wait....

In the Clinton play book, if all else fails, cheat. You guessed it, let's play the Florida/Michigan card. Let's play on the idea that they would be disenfranchaised if they don't have a redo. The fact that the people of FL and MI didn't show up at the polls when they were supposed to doesn't matter (if I did that, I know my vote voice wouldn't be heard and I wouldn't expect it to). The fact is that they thought so little of their all important right to be heard that they, through state officials that were elected by people of both parties, threw their delegates on the floor in an act of defying the rules. The DNC itself thought so little about this all important right to participate that they actually stripped them of their delegates. And finally, if a nominee was chosen after Super Tuesday, no one in the whole country would give a poop about what the people of FL and MI thought. So much for the sanctity of their right to be heard. So who really wants these states to participate? Well, it certainly doesn't help Obama. So who does that leave? And wo's spinning this as some sort of infringement on people's rights? It's disgraceful.

Hillary/Obama ticket? Are you crazy? Why on Earth would he want to stain his reputation by associating himself with the dirty politics, negative attacks and fear mongering.

I'm an Obama supporter, but I'd support Hillary if she won fair and square inside the rules of the game. If she wins after pulling FL and MI into the mix, I'l lcampaign for McCain, just to prevent soiling the White House with 4 more years of lies and dirty play.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 PM on 03/08/2008
collapse FWerke See Profile I'm a Fan of FWerke

No, no, we can't vote for McCain to punish the Dems if Hillary steals the nomination.

Who wants 9 right-wing idealogues on the Supreme Court?

Who wants unending wars in Iraq, Iran, Syria, etc?

My niece is being redeployed to Iraq this July -- nice to see that the surge worked out for us so well that we'll see our relatives over there in danger for another 100 years or so.

I personally believe Barack will bring the troop levels down quicker than Hillary, if she brings them down at all.

But if we have a better chance to win against McCain with an Obama/Clinton ticket, then let's go for it.

Clinton/Obama, however, is a whole different ugly animal I hope we don't have to contemplate.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 AM on 03/09/2008
collapse Silpat See Profile I'm a Fan of Silpat

Hillary knows that she is losing plain and simple. The only reason she is offering to make Obama VP is in hopes that this would prompt the Party powerbrokers to "give" her the nomination.

Hillary is in essence saying "Look! If making Obama the VP will get me the nomination then fine, I will do it". Problem is she also said the Obama is not fit to be Commander-in-Chief, which is an essential requirement for the VP.

Just goes to show Hillary don't really care about America, but only about becoming President.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 PM on 03/08/2008
collapse CaptainVideo See Profile I'm a Fan of CaptainVideo

It's 3:00 A.M. and the red phone rings. Hillary answer it. And the voice on the phone says "Bill has been caught in bed with an intern again. How should we handle it?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 PM on 03/08/2008
collapse CaptainVideo See Profile I'm a Fan of CaptainVideo

Somebody should ask Hillary if Bill was ready to pick up the red phone when he became President.
After all, Obama has a lot more experience at the National Government level than Bill had (zilch).
I'm sure Arkansas is a fine state with fine people. But being governor of a small rural state does not give one any experience to handle the red phone.

Obama and his surrogates should keep asking that because it would create a dilemma for Hillary. She can't very well say that he was not. But if she says he was, people would start comparing Obama's experience with Hillary's and see that Hillary is, once again, talking out of both sides of her mouth.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 03/08/2008
collapse RogerHWerner See Profile I'm a Fan of RogerHWerner

I suggest Hillary ask herself if George Bush was ready to answer that 3AM phone call. I mean after all, she voted to permit the guy to take us to war and he was less qualified than Bill Clinton or Barak Obama but who on paper at least was almost but not quite as qualified as Hillary Clinton. Would someone please explain if she's so concerned about who answers that phone call she was able to bring herself to vote for war with an unqualified man as commander in chief?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 PM on 03/08/2008
collapse americansheep See Profile I'm a Fan of americansheep

And for that matter neither was GWB (being the Governor of Texas is largely a ceremonial position) but there is one major difference: George Bush is STILL not qualified to be President.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 PM on 03/08/2008
collapse xcrunner77 See Profile I'm a Fan of xcrunner77

Barack should not take the VP slot. He will be in first place by every measure you can think of at the end of the primary season, including the one that matters -- most delegates. If superdelegates want to override the will of the people as expressed in the last year, let him make them do it openly. I hope he tells everyone he was offered the VP slot and refuses to go along with the sham. Let the Democratic party machinery pay the price at the ballot box in the fall.

Barack will have more votes, states, delegates than Hillary. He is therefore already the nominee. He needs to start running against McCain and act like Hillary doesn't exist -- just as she act likes every primary and caucus that she has lost never took place.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 PM on 03/08/2008
collapse ColinSF See Profile I'm a Fan of ColinSF

Seems that Hillzilla's flowcharting logic always leads to her being nominated for President. She is honored to be in the race with Obama - as long as he supports her nomination over his own. Shame on you Obama (aka Healthcare distortionist), unless he supports Hillzilla for President and be her running mate. Wink wink Obama (aka Nafta-gate), no good for the country, unless he is under her on the ticket - is there a sexual innuendo there? Words that I would not waste on Hillzilla: accurate, believable, candid, correct, decent, exact, factual, fair, faithful, forthright, frank, guileless, honest, honorable, ingenuous, having integrity, just, kosher, literal, open, plain-spoken, precise, real, realistic, reliable, righteous, scrupulous, sincere, square, straight, straightforward, true, true blue, trustworthy, truthful, unfeigned, unreserved, veracious, and veritable. I would never invite her into my living room.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 PM on 03/08/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in