iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Andy Ostroy

GET UPDATES FROM Andy Ostroy
 

What Our Young Folks Need to Know About Ron Paul

Posted: 12/20/2011 9:25 am

He's the Republican Party's Howard Dean, right? The independent outsider who speaks his mind, takes unorthodox positions and appears to be afraid of no one. The kind of irreverent, in-your-face candidate young people find very attractive. But do they know about Ron Paul's history of making outrageously offensive, racist comments? Probably not. If and when they do, they'll drop him like a bad check.

Ron Paul is the Bee Gees of politics. And just like young people in the 1970's were clueless that the hip "Saturday Night Fever" disco band had an even greater run as a 60's rock band, they're gonna find out that Paul has a big past as well, albeit a very dubious one. Right now he's benefiting from an upsurge in support following the implosions of the Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann and Herman Cain campaigns, as well as the apparent swift failure of Newt Gingrich 2.0. In fact, new polls show him as the front runner in the Iowa caucuses, and a real threat to Mitt Romney, especially if he breaks off and runs as an independent.

But young folks need to go back and read the Ron Paul Political Report and the Ron Paul Survival Report from about 1989-1994 to gain further insight into the radical extremist mind of the candidate who's winning their hearts. Here are some examples of his incendiary remarks:

-"Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the `criminal justice system,' I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."

-"If you have ever been robbed by a black teen-aged male, you know how unbelievably fleet-footed they can be."

-"Order was only restored in L.A. (after the riots) when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks."

-"We don't think a child of 13 should be held responsible as a man of 23. That's true for most people, but black males age 13 who have been raised on the streets and who have joined criminal gangs are as big, strong, tough, scary and culpable as any adult and should be treated as such."

-"What else do we need to know about the political establishment than that it refuses to discuss the crimes that terrify Americans on grounds that doing so is racist? Why isn't that true of complex embezzling, which is 100 percent white and Asian?"

Paul's also written that black protesters should gather "at a food stamp bureau or a crack house" instead of the Statue of Liberty; that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. "seduced underage girls and boys;" and that people with AIDS "enjoy the attention and pity that comes with being sick."

Over the years Paul has either denied he's made these statements (claiming someone else wrote them) or says they've been taken out of context.

"It's typical political demagoguery," he said. "If people are interested in my character . . . come and talk to my neighbors."

Well, it's hard to imagine any other "context" for these racist rants. And as for whether he's the actual writer or not, the offensive comments were made in his newsletters under his byline. Claiming there was a ghostwriter is a pretty lame excuse for someone whose entire foundation and principles rest with personal liberties and responsibility.

Paul is a 1950's-era Texan who's on record saying he doesn't believe in the 1964 Civil Rights act. He's an angry old man with dangerous views about minorities, civil liberties and how America should be governed. He's not just some awe-inspiring, patriotic Thomas Paine-like elder firebrand who deserves the admiration and respect of our youth. To the contrary, his virulent positions blatantly contradict what America truly stands for.

I know Howard Dean. I've supported Howard Dean. Ron Paul is no Howard Dean. The sooner our young citizens figure this out the better off they, and America, will be.

 

Follow Andy Ostroy on Twitter: www.twitter.com/AndyOstroy

FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 472
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
01:42 AM on 12/23/2011
Ive already had like 4 of my comments rejected, and NONE of them had any profanity or any violation of the rules contained in them.
01:19 AM on 12/23/2011
Its becoming very clear why Ostroy dislikes Ron Paul: he is the ONLY GOP candidate that has an actual chance of beating Obama. Until today, Ostroy has NEVER written ONE article on Ron Paul. Ostroy claims that RP has no chance and there should be no attention given to him, yet Ostroy just wrote a story attacking him [thus giving him attention] because the mainstream media is bringing up the newsletters--why? Because Ron Paul is surging in the polls! Thats why! Why wasn't this newsletter story important during Ron Paul's TWELVE election wins as Congressman? Why weren't they important when he won every single straw poll in 2008 and this time? Its because the story is BOGUS and no one [unless to attack for political purposes] believes this crap! If it was a REAL story and this REALLY was important to Ostroy, why hasn't he written about it BEFORE now???? This is a 20 year old story, and Ostroy is just NOW writing about it??? I guess Ostroy is soft on racism then!
12:20 AM on 12/23/2011
Andy, answer this: If I began a newsletter and called it "The Andy Ostroy Political Report" and your name was in HUGE letters and my stories talked about things that you abhor, would you ADMIT you wrote the things that I actually wrote? What if you didnt even know about the newsletter until 10 years later? Would you still fess up and admit you wrote the content? I would guess the answer would be a big "no" to both questions, right? You would go on TV and tell others you did not write the material and you would show your contempt for it right? Then tell me please, how would YOUR actions be any different than what Ron Paul has already done [MANY times now I might add]??
10:56 AM on 12/26/2011
I'm sure if he was the one who started it and he hired you and made nearly a million dollars a year off of your writing, then defended them in a dozen interviews four years after the most controversial ones were written (five years before he started denying he wrote them), he'd probably take responsibility.
06:38 PM on 12/22/2011
I'm a young person quote that understands American poilitics and media are born from racism and bigotry. Try again. Ron Paul 2012. Only thing catching up is the truth about American tyranny.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Andy Ostroy
11:15 PM on 12/21/2011
Nice to see CNN (and others) picking up where I left off on this yesterday. Sorry, you Ron Paul fanatics, his racist past is rightfully catching up with him... http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/12/21/ron-paul-gets-defensive-over-past-newsletters/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:10 AM on 12/22/2011
So you are boasting about a blog that you cut and pasted from the weekly standard that ran an article from Reason over three years ago. It's funny to think that you actually believe that you were the one to start this ball rolling. By the way I would brag about plagiarizing!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Andy Ostroy
07:36 AM on 12/22/2011
My piece, and Paul's blatant racist comments, speaks for itself. Sorry that your guy is back on the hotseat, where he should be. Only a fool thinks "I am not responsible for hatred that goes out in my name" is a credible defense.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:13 AM on 12/22/2011
so you take credit for plagerizing from the Weekly Standard that ran a three year old article from Reason?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mc1135
11:00 PM on 12/21/2011
Even if Ron Paul made these remarks, I'd take him over a president who's legalized indefinite detention of American citizens even if found innocent... A president who has assassinated American citizens with NO trial.

I mean, Ron Paul is being nailed to the wall for POSSIBLY writing some slightly off-color but mostly innocuous comments, yet we currently have a guy in office who's systematically dismantling the Constitution and Bill of Rights. A man who's reversed hundreds of years worth of Common law dating back to the Magna Carta up to and including Posse Comitatus.

In Barack Obama's America, we're ALL slaves, regardless of our skin color... So keep pretending these comments from a Ron Paul newsletter 22 years ago mean anything in comparison to the atrocities of the Dictator Obama.

Keep pretending the American people will buy that.
photo
Trapped in Arizona
This, I believe* (*subject to change)
08:55 PM on 12/21/2011
This article crystalizes what has always troubled me about Ron Paul. Also, for those who say these are not "his" (Paul's) beliefs, then why does Mr. Paul give so many different accounts as to what he did or did not authorize; what he has or has not read that was published under his name, etc., etc.? Moreover, when these candidates find themselve painted into a corner (of their own making), they then do the expected: The "media" is attacking me (a la Palin, Cain, Gingrich, etc.). That is exactly what I saw Mr. Paul doing today as he took off his microphone to end an uncomfortable interview on the issue.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:08 PM on 12/22/2011
He ended the interview because the interviewer obviously does not understand English. She kept asking the same question. I would have done that to and so would any other no-nonsense person.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marc Lewis
A 'Wobbly' Progressive for 50yrs
08:00 PM on 12/21/2011
One thing after another comes to light about the past of the Repub hopefuls. What do the TeaPots come up with about Obama? They can't find his "complete" birth certificate. Wow! And thanks for the info. Andy!
photo
AlfredE69
Liberty Lovin' Tree Hugger
08:45 PM on 12/21/2011
Obama is worse than Bush.

Unlike Bush, Obama started a war without getting Congressional approval
I don't think Bush went after medial marijuana patients like Obama is doing
I don't think Bush ordered an assassination of a US citizen without a trial.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marc Lewis
A 'Wobbly' Progressive for 50yrs
04:48 PM on 12/22/2011
May I remind you that the Bush administration started a war with a sovereign nation by lying to Congress and the American People, killing thousands of Iraqi's as well as the United States Citizens who are members of our military establishment. Without the "Weapons of Mass Destruction" lie Congress would have never gone along with it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:09 PM on 12/22/2011
Well Obama is responsible for letting guns get smuggled into Mexico which were ultimately given to the cartel. When is the last time you killed someone with words?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marc Lewis
A 'Wobbly' Progressive for 50yrs
04:36 PM on 12/22/2011
Pretty thin, don't you think? Well, I guess you don't but still you are putting the total blame on the President (as if it was his idea) for the screw up of a Government Agency. An Agency that, in fact, had been following this ill advised plan since the previous Administration.
photo
AlfredE69
Liberty Lovin' Tree Hugger
06:46 PM on 12/21/2011
Andy; why do you support a war-monger; someone who is actively harassing medical marijuana patients? Some one who is not only continuing Bush's wars, but adding some of his own? Someone who has Wall St insiders advising him? Some one who extended both TARP and the Patriot Act? Wake up Andy, it's not too late.

If Bush did what Obama has done, you'd be all over him.
04:18 PM on 12/21/2011
I like how Andy only replies to the short posts and doesn't follow up on the longer ones of those who obviously know more than him about the issue. Anyone who supports Paul has known about the news letter for some time and if they didn't, they have had it crammed down their throat for the past 9 day. Yet he is still climbing in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Dakota. Most of his supporters already knew. If they didn't they know by now. No one believes it. No one cares. His support continues to grow. I realize that is a little redundant but so is your article.
03:04 PM on 12/21/2011
If Ron Paul did write these, and was not afraid to do so at the time, shouldn't there be at least one audio or video clip of him saying anything even remotely similar? If he had no problem writing that, he certainly wouldn't have a problem saying it. I think that the fact there is no evidence of Ron Paul ever saying anything like that is conclusive proof that these were not his writings and that it was an unfortunate case of him lending his name to other writers. Further, it is important to note that after Ron Paul discovered what was in these newsletters, he immediately changed the staff responsible for writing them. That right there shows that not only did he not write them, but he is adamantly against them (and his speeches and pro-black policies regarding civil liberties prove that as well).
04:59 AM on 12/22/2011
You have a very odd idea of what constitutes proof.
03:01 PM on 12/21/2011
I'm a black male and traditionally conservative democrat and I have heard ALL the things that these news letters say and guess what? I don't even care and am I still a ron paul supporter. Why? For one, I don't believe he wrote them or endorsed them like he says and it is inconsistent with his libertarian rhetoric but more importantly Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate that actually vows to do something GOOD for the black community. What I am saying is that I would take a racist that sticks to his guns on his vow to end the wars aboard and the wars at home (war on drugs) than a BLACK PRESIDENT who has done nothing for the black community and I am not the only black person who feels that way. So what else you got cuz dat ain't enough!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:43 PM on 12/21/2011
Thank you Treyday247. Great post.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Teri L
01:57 PM on 12/21/2011
“I still want to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in their pickup trucks" ~ Howard Dean

"I know Howard Dean. I've supported Howard Dean. Ron Paul is no Howard Dean." ~ Andy Ostroy

You got that part right.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chichora123
11:38 AM on 12/21/2011
Racism is collectivi­st idea. It is fundamenta­lly opposite to the Idea of Libertaria­nism. The central tenet of Libertaria­nism is the protection of individual­'s rights. Nobody is allowed to violate anybody else's fundamenta­l rights. Racism violates this basic principle of Libertaria­nism.

Ron Paul, who is a staunch Libertaria­n, is not a racist. Period.

Ron Paul is the only candidate talking about ending the disastrous war on drugs which disproportionately effects African Americans. Too often, silly minor violations result in sending young kids to Jails and they come back in to society as more hardened people. Besides, war on drugs is just about as successful as the prohibition was.

Ron paul is the only candidate defending the due rights of everybody including muslims who are put under the state sponsored suspicion because of the patriot act. Ron Paul is absolutely NOT A RACIST. End of discussion.
11:21 AM on 12/21/2011
Instead of quoting the reports, why don't you just show them to me ? And what makes you believe that they are in fact Mr Paul's remarks ? Indeed they "may" have been in his reports, (I have yet to see the proof) but it does not mean he wrote them. Mr. Paul is way too smart to make such outlandish remarks. Silly
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Andy Ostroy
01:56 PM on 12/21/2011
yes! why bother holding him accountable for what goes out under his name when we have you to explain it all for us!
02:57 PM on 12/21/2011
Quote from your article...

"Here are some examples of his incendiary remarks: ............"

Note.... you said "HIS" remarks. So Mr. Ostroy, did he say them? Write them ? And now you would like to backtrack and just say they went out "under his name". So which is it?

So glad I could help.

He is different. I could see someone sabotaging his newsletter, before I could see him saying those things, especially in print. The man is not stupid.
photo
AlfredE69
Liberty Lovin' Tree Hugger
06:50 PM on 12/21/2011
I hold Obama accountable for extending the Patriot Act. I hold Obama accountable for harassing medical marijuana patients. I hold Obama accountable for trying to get out of the troop withdrawal agreement with Iraq. I hold Obama accountable for hiring Wall St insiders. I hold Obama accountable for starting a war with Libya.

Andy, would you support Obama's policies if a republican did the same?