More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Angela Caputo

GET UPDATES FROM Angela Caputo
 

The End of a Segregated Century?

Posted: 02/ 8/2012 6:02 pm

Last week, the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research created a buzz when it released a report that suggests that Chicago -- along with communities across the nation -- is less segregated today than it was a decade ago. While "Ghetto neighborhoods persist," the conservative think-tank wrote, "most are in decline."

When I drive through the Near North Side, it sure appears to be true. My daughter's school sits in the shadow of the former Cabrini Green high-rises. And I've watched townhomes rise from the dust of the demolished public housing buildings during the past six years. The idea, Chicago Housing Authority officials maintain, was to help poor, largely African American, residents by breaking up the concentration of poverty. (My recent investigation into how they've employed the one-strike policy to move people out raises all sorts of questions about those motives though.)

Reality is that many of those former public housing residents, and even their neighbors whose private buildings have gone condo, have moved on to neighborhoods that are more racially segregated. And poorer. It's a reality that a vast majority of black people in Chicago live with.

I crunched the 2010 census data and found that 73 percent of black Chicagoans were living in roughly two dozen overwhelmingly black and largely low-income neighborhoods in 2010. That's down only a half of a percentage point from 2000. Meanwhile, the black population dipped in communities where income is up and the largest number of new jobs have been created, including the Near North, Near West and Near South sides. In those neighborhoods, the white population grew by double-digit percentages.

The bigger racial shifts, it appears, are among white and Latino people. Fewer of them live in neighborhoods where they hold a racial or ethnic majority; in 2000, 48 percent of white Chicagoans lived in majority-white communities, compared with 39 percent in 2010. The breakdown for Latinos was 53 percent and 50 percent, respectively.

Perhaps we're all putting too much emphasis on a report that suggests "all-white neighborhoods are effectively extinct." That's like saying that we're living in a post-racial society now that black Chicagoans account for 1 percent of the population in Jefferson Park and Forest Glen and nearly 1 percent in Edison Park in 2010 -- from virtually zero in 2000. (Yes, those are real figures. Breeze through the numbers yourself here.)

The report does open the door to a conversation me and my colleagues over at the Chicago Reporter love to engage in. Why are these numbers important? What do they mean for real people? A lot. A quick look at Chicago Public Schools data shows that the average standardized test score for grade-schoolers in majority-white communities is an 85 out of 100. In black communities, it's a 61. Where would you rather send your children?

The jobs numbers are just as stark. In our Loopholes piece, we found that while black communities account for nearly one-third of the city's population, they account for only 9 percent of all jobs. White and mixed-race communities accounted for 82 percent. In the Loop, which is home to one in three Chicago jobs, folks living south of 43rd Street accounted for 86 percent of those whose downtown job were lost between 2002 and 2008. Most of those communities are majority-black.

The bottom line is that there are winners and losers in Chicago -- by virtue of where we live. And whether we want to acknowledge it or not, race has a lot to do with that.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:44 PM on 02/09/2012
As a native Chicagoan, I find your article offensive..."where you want to send your kids to" (as in school)? Who made you the authority of the black and Latino communities? Also, the so called near north, near south etc terminology is something that developers made up to attract buyers into those communities...geez! Yes, gentrification has changed neighborhoods. Be real...the projects were built to keep the black population away from the white...you need to go to the Woodson Library on 95th and Halsted or the Du Sable museum of African American History and actually learn something about this city before you write another article.
01:28 PM on 02/09/2012
This is good in most respects. But I'm sorry to see the culture loss of neighborhoods that were truly unique. From Anderson Ville through the old Taylor Street to South Shore, things have homogenized and something has been lost.
12:06 PM on 02/09/2012
Spot on!
10:45 AM on 02/09/2012
What they [the government] have in mind for our “new housing†is either the penitentiary or the graveyard.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Hotz
09:55 AM on 02/09/2012
What one needs to mention when talking about Cabrini is what the entry price is for housing and what kind of neighborhood rose up from its rubble. The cold waft of institutionalized segregation, institutionalized racism is very alive and well in how the neighborhood was "magically" transformed from years of downward trending with blight and gangs to the upward mobility of 1.5m condos, a gym and a sushi bar. It may appear "nice", but it certainly involved much pushing, kicking and screaming.
08:46 AM on 02/09/2012
Segregation, referred to as racially motivated, usually occurs because of a difference in lifestyles, rather than because of a difference in skin color. When you have a select group of citizens who feel they've been wronged over the years, they generally show little self-respect for their surroundings, hence the migration of everyone else to different communities. Rather than clean up the neighborhood, it's sometimes easier to bail out. Segregation is not always bad, if it's by individual choice. If you force a poor family to move to an upscale middle-class community, you've removed them from those who most understand their issues and have now segregated them from other poverty-stricken families. It is best for the city to strive to improve the neighborhoods and give the residents something to be proud of. Racism is alive today only because those whose ancestors have suffered under it keep it alive. There is no one alive today who was ever a slave and those who suffered during the civil rights era have won their war. Let's put this all to bed once and for all and start helping each other through mutual respect, & I don't mean at the end of a handgun. Life is too precious, regardless of ancestral origin, to waste waging war. When you keep racism alive by using it as an excuse for being held responsible for your actions in a fair manner, you insult everything the civil rights movement was about. There's only one race... human!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
02:34 AM on 02/09/2012
>>>73 percent of black Chicagoans were living in roughly two dozen overwhelmingly black and largely low-income neighborhoods in 2010.


How can you be excited about a 1/2 % drop when it is still a HIGHLY segreated town? 73% segregated is like the South in the 60s.
07:04 PM on 02/08/2012
This article makes some really good points. We as a society seem to think that the demolition of public housing has reduced segregation but it's really just moved it elsewhere. "Public Housing Transformation" policies such at HOPE VI (which ironically stands for Housing Opportunities for People Everywhere), demolishes and redevelops former public housing site where only about 20 percent of the new units are set aside at the low income levels of former public housing residents. Therefore such policies depend upon moving the majority of, mostly poor African American household out for good. This typically means moving to other segregated neighborhoods that maybe modestly less poor, but in many cases even more segregated. My colleagues and I at Georgia State University of have following former public housing residents who were relocated between 2008-2009. Atlanta has demolished all of its traditional project-based public housing. Our findings are similar to what Caputo reports.
Deirdre Oakley