iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ann He

GET UPDATES FROM Ann He
 

Grade Inflation: Killing Innovation

Posted: 04/ 2/2012 8:51 am

First conceived in the pre-k years by "nurturing" teachers who doled out "Fantastic Job!" and "Genius Work!" stickers to chicken-scratch drawings, reinforced in high school through easy A's on sloppily constructed papers, and manifest at the collegiate level in the form of undeserved summa cum lauds, grade inflation pervades American academic culture. It may appear, at first glance, to be a harmless way for educators to encourage intellectual curiosity, but in reality grade inflation has accomplished the very opposite. Deflated standards have become the crutch of laziness, essentially depreciating the value of genuine academic endeavors. As a result, the American education system, once touted by Thomas Jefferson as the basis of democracy and progression, fails to prepare the students for the real challenges of a globalized society.

The 'A,' a once-coveted mark reserved for only the most exalted feats of student performance, is now a commonplace occurrence -- an expectation, even. Take Harvard for example, where in 2001, A's and A-minuses constituted a solid 51 percent of grades and a whopping 91 percent of the class graduated summa, magna, or cum laude. The effect is to devalue academic rigor and cheapen the real worth of an honors degree. When, at Harvard, "a quarter of all honors go to students who do not earn honors in their major," those who may have considered taking on the additional burden of a thesis because of genuine passion in the sciences or arts are deterred by the meagerness of the payback. The disincentivization of hard work isn't just found on the collegiate level -- it takes root in high school. The majority of AP U.S. History students, my peers, agree that the grade gap between a "Sparknotes" understanding and a truly insightful understanding of the subject is negligible and not worth the effort. When studying for two hours yields the same A as studying for 20, why waste the sweat, blood, and tears? However, strife is necessary for real success -- the light bulb wasn't invented because Edison got everything right on the first try.

In response to the alarming percentage of collegiate honors students, Jamshed Barucha, the dean of Dartmouth College, says, "To be an honors student is to create your own intellectual work in a these or a science lab -- to have had a transformative experience." Lenient grading policies discourage the arduous effort necessary to realize the full potential of a student's interest in a specific field of study, closing off possible roads that may have led to innovation.

As near-4.0 GPAs become the norm, students begin to expect A's out of their courses and choose classes based on where they will receive the highest marks for the least time commitment. This creates an effectual market out of education with grades as a commodity, compounded by the pressure of scoring a high GPA to show off to college admissions officers, or later on, corporate recruiters, law schools, business schools, or medical schools. From a 2004 survey published in Project Innovation, 61.4 percent of undergraduates take a class to "get a good grade" as compared to 25.3 percent who claim to take one to "learn new information to apply to their lives." Moreover, a greater fraction of these students believe that a letter grade should be determined by a modified curve -- a form of grade inflation -- rather than predetermined cutoffs, which would set objective standards and deflate grades.

What's alarming is that professors, jaded by their lackluster students and the modern GPA system, respond to such demands -- adding 10, 12, and 14-point curves to batches of low test scores, conducting classes as informational spoon-feeding sessions, and giving out 100's on free-response questions as if it were perpetually Christmas and the three-letter scores were candy canes. What this does, essentially, is create a group of unqualified students who go on to become unqualified professionals in our society. And let's be honest, do you really want an open-heart bypass from someone who fumbled his way through med school?

When, despite all of the bubble wrap, students still aren't able to garner that expected A, they drop out. This is precisely why grade inflation and grade obsession is a threat to the nation's crop of science and engineering students. Ironic, since grade inflation is least prevalent in those fields. But because examinations in the sciences are based on mastery of objective material, there is less room for a teacher to excuse mediocrity. The problem comes when a budding mechanical engineer notices the 10-point gap between her objective science averages and her inflated humanities scores.

"Students who have a bigger gap are more likely to not persist in these science classes and are pulled toward their non-science courses," says Ben Ost of the Cornell Higher Education Research Institute, who recently uncovered the correlation between low grades in introductory STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) classes and higher STEM dropout rates. With its famously low ratio of science and engineering degrees as compared to other countries, the United States cannot afford to stand by idly as the GPA monster plucks and consumes its future civil engineers and nuclear physicists. As former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan testifies, "Excellence in science and engineering helps a country to be technologically innovative and economically competitive."

Exaggerated GPAs and depreciated college degrees -- the byproducts of rampant grade inflation -- have turned America from the country of opportunity into the country of underachievement. Our culture of consumerism has created a subculture of grade inflation, and the culture of grade inflation has conditioned us into a generation of fools who demand an A-plus for C-minus caliber work. What we have left is a rapidly depreciating stock of human capital, an inventory of ingenuity too meager to meet the demands of competitiveness and interdependence in a globalized society. And yet we think we'll cultivate the generation that will cure cancer, create world peace and solve global poverty? Thomas Jefferson is surely rolling over in his grave.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:52 PM on 05/05/2012
Harvard accepts 6% of Freshman applicants. It denies people with perfect SATs, great ECs and out-of-this-world life stories. That 6% includes valedictorians, salutatorians and other super-achievers. If 91% of them have latin honors, then I wouldn't be surprised.Now, if that happened in Ohio State (no offense), NYU (a great school, but no Harvard) then that's rampant grade inflation, but for Harvard and the top universities, a majority of students that get honors should be the norm - that's why they got accepted in the first place. Even at the top universities with big populations (Public schools), such as UCLA and UC Berkeley, GPA averages are only 3.3 and 3.36 respectively. To get latin honors, you'd have to get 3.68+, with a 3.9 for Summa Cum Laude. No grade inflation here too. Grade inflation may happen in the lower-ranked schools to bolster their student's job placement and grad school chnaces which translates to better stats for the university, but it doesn't matter in the long run, because grads from the top unis destroy them and have usually deserved what they worked for.
11:28 PM on 04/04/2012
I'm currently in college for engineering. The only curves we see in classes is when EVERYBODY in the class fails a test because the prof screwed something up and made it impossible to finish the test in the time given. The scores are then moved up from F's to C-'s, i.e. barely passing. We engineering students all joke that the only REAL majors are engineering majors and science majors. Our definition of a real major is if you have free time outside of studying to do things during the week with friends, it's not a real major. I have straight A's in my gen-ed courses and mostly C's and B's in my engineering classes, and I'm frequently up after midnight studying or doing projects. I haven't even had to study at all for most of my gen-ed classes so far. It's ridiculous.
09:47 AM on 05/05/2012
I was once a chemistry major myself, and I do understand where these sentiments are coming from. I remember back in the day, my friends and I would get so pissed at students from the other majors because all they do is party and get drunk every single night. But now that I think about it, is science and engineering the only worthwhile thing in this world? Science and engineering people all like to think they are superior over everybody else just because they think they are smarter than everybody else. They challenge the theory of multiple intelligence, insisting that the only "legitimate" form of intelligence is logical-mathematical ability. What about Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology? they're deemed as CRAP because they aren't really objective anyway. Where's the mathematical proof for all their armchair speculation?

Viktor Frankl once critiqued science and engineering for these. Due to our obsession for reductionism and empiricism, we have stripped ourselves of our humanity. I'm gonna throw this back at you: what makes you think that music, arts, and literature is any less important than science and engineering?
07:45 PM on 04/02/2012
GPA is now divided into Weighted and Unweighted. I believe Unweighted was invented by some moron who thought there is meaning to expanding 4.0 to 5.0 because honors classes deserve a few more decimals on paper. Recently, I started to see 5.4 GPA; the sky has been lifted to 6. Soon, it will 7, then 8, then comes 9........The system is meaningless nowadays because someone inserted his/her shallow creativity.

Similar to the athletics world....I wonder "If one day all athletes must take steroids just to gain a ticket to the Olympics, will it still humanly real?"
07:10 PM on 04/02/2012
This occurs at college as well, but grade inflation is highly subject dependent. STEM departments have inflated grades to a much lesser extent (if at all) than most of the other departments. It is not uncommon for STEM students to transfer to other departments and find out that they can move from C's to A's and cut their study time in half.

Certainly I don't see grade inflation in my daughter's IB courses - they are very demanding. The online AP Biology course is worse.

My 14 year old daughter is NOT getting all A's - and this is girl who got a 34 on the ACT in 10th grade.
Zip Zinzel
If a Nation expects to be both Ignorant & Free . .
02:22 PM on 04/02/2012
YOU GO GIRL !

FANTASTIC ESSAY.
Sorry to say, that your intellect far surpasses the vast majority of the adults in our country today, and maybe a large number of the educational establishment as well.

It also saddens me deeply to know how much of the educational establishment wants to completely remove Measurability from education, or at most, only endorse NO-STAKES Testing

HOWEVER, I am also deeply troubled by ACCOUNTABILITY Movement in Educational Administration, that wants to blame our educational problems all on what they term as lazy & Stupid Teacher, and especially their Unions.
The methods that they propose to evaluate Teachers have proven to have a reliability approaching that of palm-readers & crystal-ball-gazers

THE NUMBER-ONE REASON FOR DUMB KIDS
. . is DUMB Parents

MY SUGGESTIONS- Prev Posts
IF WE REALLY WANT TO IMPROVE PUBLIC EDUCATIONS
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/Zip_Zinzel/obama-no-child-left-behind-waivers_n_976796_109376283.html

RUNAWAY MAINSTREAMING
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/Zip_Zinzel/high-achieving-students-fordham-study_n_972517_109033165.html

CRITICAL-THINKING?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/Zip_Zinzel/student-test-scores-rate-teachers-brookings-study_n_984063_110502509.html

DISASTERS IN TEACHER EVALUATION
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/Zip_Zinzel/obama-no-child-left-behind-waivers_n_976796_109373136.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ally Solver
Problem Solver Extraordinaire
12:30 PM on 04/02/2012
This is just a symptom of things wrong with America. Americans need to be hard working, self-reliant, taking personal responsibility instead of making it easy on everybody. If no one fails, then everyone fails.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KatRB
Diversity is fabric of America
11:47 AM on 04/02/2012
I worked for a large school district for 20 yrs. Not as a teacher but as a programmer analyst responsible for the student database.

One year I remember a high school teacher who was shifted to a non-teaching position for a year because he refused to cave in to parents who complained the grades he issued were too low. Administration was more friendly to parent concerns rather than supporting the teachers.

My son was in high school at that same time (not enrolled in that teacher's course) and attended honors classes. When he did poorly in them I asked why and he told me that the classes were a social game. He had expected a challenging curriculum and instead was amongst students who wanted the extra points in their GPAs and could care less about being challenged to learn something.

In my job I also remember more than once when parents challenged how a GPA was calculated because it affected their child's ranking for college and scholarships.

And I remember my son telling me (after he graduated) that he told his French teacher he could skip going to class for the rest of the semester and still ace his final test. The teacher called his bluff and my son spent that class time wandering the halls trying to stay away from security guards.

He aced his French final by the way.
11:44 AM on 04/02/2012
At some point over the last twenty years or so, some genius decided that everyone deserves a chance to go to college. The truth is, some people are just not cut out for higher learning.

"The world needs ditch diggers too." Judge Smales
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
11:28 AM on 04/02/2012
The U.S. Army discovered in the 1990s that not all college graduates can read. It now gives new lieutenants, all of whom are college graduates, a basic literacy test.
photo
yakmeat
Nearly all of us are both makers and takers.
11:09 AM on 04/02/2012
This is a real problem. Over the last 20 years or so, I've been to many high school graduations in small rural towns, (I live in Montana) and I've seen classes of 26 people somehow produce 4 valedictorians and 2 salutatorians. At the risk of sounding like a grumpy old guy, when I was in high school this did not happen. Usually, there were two students who far outperformed the rest academically, and they were in constant competition to see which one of them would be the class valedictorian by the time graduation came around. Someone had to come in a close second.

Today, having worked at a university, I see the effects of this. Students get their first B- and are beside themselves with shock and disbelief, because they've "always been a straight-A student". Often, when looking at the work they submit, the B- feels generous, to say the least. Syntax, grammar, and cogent organization and articulation of thought are lacking to an embarrassing degree. I think about how these kids will elect our leaders and care for us in our old age, and I fear for our future.

I'm pleased to see a teen address this issue. Perhaps if more of them realize what's going on, they'll begin to push for change within their schools and universities.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jody Dobis
11:09 AM on 04/02/2012
Our culture has changed dramatically from one in which quality and achievement was an ideal that most tried to achieve and few accomplished. As a result, our accomplishments had both meaning and, more importantly, value. When higher education decided to be a business, it lost it's luster and respect as an institution that was not compromised by excesses of capitalism gone bad. It wasn't that long ago that the national news media decided on profits over substance and we all know how that has turned out in short order. When my older sister graduated from Indiana University in the late 1960's, she had reason to believe she received a diploma worth more than it's dollar cost. Today, the ability for almost any high school graduate to attend a certified college program has led to outcomes not unlike the recent housing bubble that allowed the purchase of a home with little to no assets. Striving to be the best and brightest is a goal we all should strive for. Being the best and brightest should remain rare or the goal becomes meaningless. Don't be surprised if Donald Trump starts a university. I forgot. He did.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:52 AM on 04/02/2012
Continued from post below:

Once I tell them that I actually expect more from them than what they've given me, I get one of two answers. The first is that they can't do any more than what they've already done. They thought they understood the question. It's my method of grading and my expectations that are impossible! They pay for the class and they expect me to give them a good grade. (I literally had one student yell at me because he couldn't find one of his identifications terms anywhere on the internet when he was studying. When I reminded him that it was a term that I mentioned in several lectures and could also be found in the textbook, he yelled, "Do you expect me to write down everything that you say?" He made it to his *junior* year and never learned to take good notes.)

The second answer I get from students is the one where they look at their tests, look at my comments, and actually use my comments to produce better work on the rest of the assignments for the class. It's like once they realize that someone expects them to make an effort, they'll actually make an effort. These are my favorite kinds of students. They're intelligent, hardworking, and care about their grades and their futures. It's just a shame that they didn't learn that they needed to make an effort to get a good grade until they got to my class...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:51 AM on 04/02/2012
I'm a current adjunct professor now at two universities. I don't inflate grades. I don't curve. After the first assignment of each semester, I always have a handful of students in a panic. They didn't get As. They got Cs or Ds. They didn't understand why.

After a review of their papers/midterms/etc. I show them that the work is essentially "half-arsed" - that in order to get a higher grade, they have to put some time into crafting a good answer with details that show me they've actually learned something from the class. Plus, although I'm not an English prof, I expect them to use good grammar and spelling. There is no reason for not being able to write in complete sentences at the college level, still their papers are filled with incomplete and run-on sentences.

To be continued...
10:23 AM on 04/02/2012
I was an adjunct at a major university for several years during which time I was "scolded" by the department dean for my grading policy. I taught CS courses which allowed objective scoring of both tests and projects grades from these were used to calculate the final course grade - very black and white. Until too many students were assigned B and C grades then I got the memo from the dean. Adjust your "bell curve" because "we want to keep the students in the classes". This is why a few years later as a hiring manager when I interviewed recent graduates from the school at which I had taught I discovered that the graduates had barely functional knowledge of Computer Science.
With all of this I still believe that there are students who won't settle, students who seek intellectual challenge and growth, but I agree that the majority of degrees granted today are by-and-large worth less than 25 years ago.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
moonflowerjewelry
Buy American made, no excuses.
09:49 AM on 04/02/2012
Byproducts of the American sense of entitlement and the prevalence of helicopter parents. I enjoyed this analysis. We have lost the urge to learn for learning's sake, which fuels our decline into the Dark Ages.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jody Dobis
11:25 AM on 04/02/2012
Intrinsic values is what once drove the goals and objectives of education. At some point, higher education was narrowly sold and purchased primarily as a means to higher wages. I considered that the turning point at which education became a commodity unlike the purchase of a car or home. I was always taught by my parents and teachers that hard work and the pursuit of good grades and academic achievement was a goal unto itself. Should you receive a financial reward, that was an added benefit. Those values appear as pie in the sky for today's America.