iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Ann Pettifor

Ann Pettifor

Posted: September 25, 2009 04:03 PM

The G20: Rebooting the System

What's Your Reaction?

Today the Summit of world leaders -- the G20 -- ended in a spirit of good cheer. World leaders are united, they're confident and they're looking forward. They have looked closely at the system that crashed, and decided simply to reboot it. It appears we have all been fooled: there is no bug in the operating system that is the international financial architecture. It simply needed to be switched back on.

This they have done. Of course they didn't just switch it on. They met first in London in April, made a statement, and threw some of our money at the problem. On Friday they made another long statement, a resounding commitment to sustain and defend 'an open world economy based on 'price stability' and market principles.' And then they vowed to throw more taxpayer money at it.

$6 trillion by the end of next year, since you ask. And just in case more cracks should appear in the architecture, central bank governors will continue to dish out free money ('expansionary policies') to the banks -- 'for as long as needed.'

"Taken together," declared the G20 on Friday, "these actions will constitute the largest fiscal and monetary stimulus and the most comprehensive support program for the financial sector in modern times."

You heard that the first time. For the financial sector. Not for suckers like you and me.

However, while G20 leaders are confident that the system is sound, they acknowledge that there is one glitch in the works. Bankers' bonuses.

So they put their minds to what to do about bonuses, and it's no secret: they disagreed. In the end they decided to do very little. Why? Well, news had filtered through to the conference that bankers were in trouble: they had made only $5.2 billion trading derivatives last quarter. The G20 resolved to bring them back from the brink. All mention of capping bonuses was erased from the Summit Communique.

And then they started putting their money where their mouth is.

As a small contribution to boosting the construction sector, they're setting up a permanent new office. To cheer up their friends in submerging markets, they've appointed additional directors from China, Brazil, etc. Then, to show they're serious about creating jobs, they're hiring a few admin staff.

To help the poor of the world, they shuffled the deckchairs on the board of the International Monetary Fund. No doubt this will cheer up those families in drought-stricken Kenya whose babies were snatched by starving hyenas.

Then Gordon Brown rallied all the Mums of Africa and Asia: "We need to work together," he said, "to make the policy and institutional changes needed to accelerate the convergence of living standards and productivity in developing and emerging economies to the levels of the advanced economies."

So there you have it. A triumph of leadership and international diplomacy. Expect the global economy to go from strength to strength -- and our leaders to go down in history for their courage, their foresight and their wisdom.

And don't worry your little heads about bugs in the system.

 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 21
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
joebaggadonuts
Civilization: Evolutionary pathway of choice.
02:20 PM on 09/28/2009
I believe the G20 could do better. And they will be forced to.
01:54 PM on 09/28/2009
i think everyone should watch this talk by elizabeth warren of the COP about the collapse of the middle class, to get where we are coming from. we see both parties as controlled by corporate interests. we want an economy that is democratic, not one in which a company who lays people off = a rise in their stock price. that pits the economy vs. the people.
Warren's talk: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akVL7QY0S8A
anarchist ideas: www.anarchistfaq.org

Obama may say he is against the protests at the G20 this week publicly, but you can bet he'll be using the protests as a threat to try to get the banks to agree to the limited reforms he wants soon enough. he will say, "look, you deal with me, and agree to these reforms, or you'll have to deal with these angry mobs of people more and more in the future...."

it's just like how MLK used to specter of more riots to get leaders to the table and get civil rights enacted.

support these protesters: http://www.resistg20.org
indy media on the protests: http://indypgh.org/g20/

the bigger, louder, and more often protests like this happen, the better the reforms will be. the more room progressive dems will have to push on obama, and the more room he'll have to push on the banks.

explaining myths about direct action: http://www.crimethinc.com/texts/atoz/twelvemyths.php

fight back against the capitalists' attack on us!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kendraro
deadhead echelon peacenik mom to Marley the awesom
12:38 AM on 09/28/2009
I'd like someone to explain why this was necessary

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etv8YEqaWgA&feature=player_embedded
01:51 PM on 09/28/2009
you have to understand who the police really care about and really protect.

it sure ain't students or regular people. police first and foremost protest PROPERTY (which is 90% of the law), and 1% owns 95% of the wealth(property) in this country, so guess who they don't really cae about:
US!

www.organizepittsburgh.org
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mountainweb
Conservative Commonsense
09:06 PM on 09/27/2009
Hey, shuffling the deckchairs is a time honored way of "appearing" to vote for change when in reality, nothing gets accomplished except stuffing the pockets of the politicians...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bioluminescence
02:35 AM on 09/27/2009
The G20 is the rich nations club. It covers two thirds of the world’s population, 80% of all trade and collectively produces 90% of the world’s income. Its main job is to administer capitalism which is in deep crisis. The UN says global unemployment will reach 220 million by the end of the year. That's a worldwide unemployment rate of 20 per cent.

For most American's a G20 summit is when "we" the rich nations talk about "them'" the poor nations. But, guess what, capitalism has no borders. Many Americans already live in a third world country in their corner of America. They face negative wealth, no job, no home, no medical care and no prospects. Some of the poorest people in the world live in the world's so-called number one democracy.

So it should be a surprise to no one that the G20 offer no answers because they are administering the very capitalist system which produces unemployment, deep inequalities and poverty for the many. Without inequality for the many capitalism cannot survive for the benefit of the few.
12:57 AM on 09/27/2009
I loved those left wingnuts outside protesting. A few left wingers cause havoc whenever they protest. The right wingers on the other hand can protest without calling on SWAT to control them.

So who are the real threat to peace and stability? Let the arrests records speak for themselves.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BARRISTER
07:08 AM on 09/28/2009
Thou art surely a jester! Lest you missed it, the article had a point and it was not about protests.
07:18 PM on 09/26/2009
The first priority of the G8, G20, IMF, World Bank, etc. is to aid the corporations they serve.
09:32 PM on 09/26/2009
Immoral and soul-barren at best.
03:24 PM on 09/26/2009
When capitalism was collapsing, we saw very clearly how quickly "free market" principles went out the window, even with Republicans like Greenspan and Bernanke, and DLC types like Geithner and Summers. The governmnet made a maximum effort to save Wall Street and other big capitalist institutions, so they could get back to playing Monopoly as soon as possible.

Reform of the IMF and making the G-20 permanent were small steps in the right direction, though, and in this century there will have to be more changes along those lines as capitalism becomes an ever-more globally integrated system.

From Obama, the most that can be expected are some timid, cautious baby steps in that direction, for he is always afraid of straying to far from conservative and big business opinion. He is better than Neanderthals like Bush-Cheney, who still thought they could impose US hegemony on the world like it was still the 1950s, but we are no longer strong enough to do that. We are in decline, while new powers are rising more very year.
02:54 PM on 09/26/2009
I just had hoped things might be different with a change of leadership
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
GlenParked
02:39 PM on 09/26/2009
The unholy alliance of government and business will eventually collapse on itself and I suspect the resulting global landscape will be far bleaker than even the most harrowing of futuristic science fiction films has ever been able to paint. So corrupt is the system that the only way to fix it is for it to completely crumble, allowing saner minds, divorced of greed, to build it anew. I look forward to that day.
06:20 PM on 09/26/2009
that day isn't far off now.
12:08 PM on 09/28/2009
The wealthy will be sure to stay safe inside their armed gated communities and cities - I fear we ordinary folk will be the ones that will live in a crumbling world.
09:00 PM on 09/28/2009
once more-wake up!

That is the plan, and it is to be feared, for sure. The rich will emerge like cockroaches after the dust settles and take right up where they left off. It will take more than an economic collapse to cleanse those vermin.
09:52 PM on 09/28/2009
and one more time-

That is the plan, and it is to be feared, for sure. The rich will emerge like cockroaches after the dust settles and take right up where they left off. It will take more than an econ.omic coll.apse to cleanse those vermin.
01:36 PM on 09/26/2009
Thanks. You recognize that there is a problem. It seems most other experts are wearing blinders.

50 years ago Veblen was on the Econ 101 reading list. You knew what a potlatch was. Since then Econ has evolved into a kind of orthodoxy that ignores intrinsics.

The new view focuses on the flow of money. It is like taking the blood pressure of a sick person. As long as the blood pressure is high enough you know you will not lose the patient. You can pump saline into the patient to keep the blood volume up. You can provide stimulants to keep the pressure up.

But what if the patient is also starving, is simply not getting enough nutrition? The blood pressure is OK now but eventually the whole body will run out of power from lack of calories.

Ethnographers tell us that otherwise mild epidemics can be devastating for hunter-gatherers because the flow of nourishment stops.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beeswalking
What's so funny about peace, love and understandin
01:28 PM on 09/26/2009
Big gov. supporting big business thievery. Shocking! (sarcasm, heavy sigh, hanging head in defeat)
photo
Hiphopcrates
Kicking the money lenders out of the Temple
12:30 PM on 09/26/2009
There is no such thing as usury - just opportunities!
photo
Kassandra
Your micro-bio is empty
10:40 AM on 09/26/2009
And here I thought they actually accomplished something...::::::::::sigh::::::::::::::::Whenever the IMF is brought up, I think of the 5 billion (probably MUCH, MUCH more via Bernanke) the US taxpayers were forced to give it so it could lend it back to US with interest and then, demand all our "wasteful social programs" be stopped.