iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ann Wright

Ann Wright

Posted: August 21, 2009 09:49 AM

On Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's August, 2009 trip to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), she announced $17 million in new funding in the U.S. Government's contribution to international efforts to prevent and respond to sexual and gender-based violence in the DRC.

The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), the coordinating agency for work on sexual violence in Congo, estimates that 200,000 women and girls have been the victims of sexual violence since 1998. In 2008, UNFPA recorded that nearly 16,000 women and girls had been raped in the Congo. 65 percent of the victims were children, mostly adolescent girls.

The US Agency for International Development (USAID) will implement a $7 million program with medical care, counseling, economic assistance and legal support to 10,000 women and girls in North and South Kivu provinces, the regions most affected by rape and sexual assault.

Another $10 million U.S. contribution will fund new programs in eastern DRC to include equipping women and front-line workers with mobile devices to report abuse and share information of treatment and legal options.

A separate $2.9 million U.S. program will recruit and train female police officers to investigate rape and interview survivors of violence against women.

According to Human Rights Watch, rape in the Congo is increasing. Human Rights Watch visited nine conflict zones since January 2009 and in those zones, rape cases had doubled or tripled compared with last year. In over half of the cases, the victims were gang-raped by at least two or more assailants, and the youngest victim was two years old. Human Rights Watch reports that the cases of men being raped are increasing.

According to figures collected by Human Rights Watch, 65 percent of the new rape cases in North Kivu were perpetrated by Congolese army soldiers.

But, despite the huge number of rapes by soldiers, military courts in eastern Congo convicted only 27 soldiers of crimes of sexual violence during 2008. In 2009, 17 soldiers have been convicted in North Kivu. In July, 2009, the highest-ranking officer convicted to date, Lieutenant Colonel Ndayambaje Kipanga was found guilty of rape by a military court, but he remains at large. No general has been convicted either for his own actions or for failing to control his troops.

In July, 2009, Human Rights Watch published a 56-page report on rape by soldiers titled: "Soldiers Who Rape, Commanders Who Condone" which called on the government of the Democratic Republic of Congo to urgently investigate and prosecute senior army officials allegedly involved or complicit in rampant sexual crimes against women and girls, as part of its efforts to combat sexual violence.

Part of the new U.S. initiative in the DRC includes a baffling addition to U.S. government agencies involved in prevention and response to sexual assault and rape of the women of the Congo--the U.S. military!

According to the State Department's Aug. 12, 2009 fact sheet on the U.S. partnership with the DRC on gender-based violence, the U.S. military's Africa Command (AFRICOM) is sending an assessment team to "determine how to best assist survivors," and provide "sensitivity training on sexual violence and legal seminars that contribute to the professionalization of the Congolese military."

AFRICOM is the U.S. military's newest command and is looking for missions to justify its existence--in this case with new funding available--in rape prevention. The Bush administration more than tripled U.S. assistance to Africa, to about $9 billion annually. U.S. military training for African forces has steadily expanded, and U.S. troops have dug wells, built schools and clinics and have provided medical care as humanitarian assistance.

In the past decade, the U.S. military has created and funded programs in fields that are normally done by other U.S. government agencies. Arguing that the militaries of other countries are key organizations to prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS, the U.S. military carved out a major role in the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) program, in HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment, and care, strategic information, human capacity development, and program and policy development in host militaries and civilian communities of 73 countries around the world.

AFRICOM had to reduce its initial goals after African governments refused to provide a location for its headquarters and civilian aid groups protested plans to expand the military's role in economic development in the region.

If the women of the Congo should Google, "U.S. military - sexual assault and rape," I suspect they will decline the offer of assistance from the African Command. 1 in 3 women in the U.S. military are sexually assaulted or raped. Women and girls in countries with U.S. military bases are raped by U.S. military. 8,000 U.S. Marines are being "re-located" from Okinawa in great measure because of citizen activist pressure following the numerous rapes of women and girls there. Prosecution rates in rape cases in the military are abysmal- 8% versus 40% in civilian cases.

In 2008, the US Ambassador to Japan had to fly to Okinawa to give his apologies for the rape of a 14 year old girl by a US Marine. The US military forces on Okinawa had a 3 day stand-down for "reflection."

Secretary of State Clinton's predecessor, Condoleezza Rice, had to express her "regrets" to the Japanese Prime Minister "for the terrible incident that happened in Okinawa... we are concerned for the well-being of the young girl and her family."

The August 10, 2009 Washington Post article "Congo's Rape Epidemic Worsens During U.S.-Backed Military Operation" begins with an alarming statement: "For the women of eastern Congo, a U.S.-backed Congolese military operation meant to save them from abusive rebels has turned an already staggering epidemic of rape has become markedly worse since the January deployment of tens of thousands of poorly trained, poorly paid Congolese soldiers, with people in front-line villages such as this one saying the soldiers are not so much hunting rebels as hunting women."

I think the United States government can find a sufficient number of civilian organizations to assist the women of the Congo. There is no need to jeopardize the women of the Congo with our U.S. military.

The Human Rights Watch report "Soldiers Who Rape, Commanders Who Condone" can apply to our own military. The U.S. military should stop the criminal acts of sexual assault and rape in its own ranks before offering advice to another country's military. The women of the Congo have enough problems!

Ann Wright is a 29 year US Army/Army Reserves veteran who retired as a Colonel and a former US diplomat who resigned in March, 2003 in opposition to the war on Iraq. She served in Nicaragua, Grenada, Somalia, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Sierra Leone, Micronesia and Mongolia. In December, 2001 she was on the small team that reopened the US Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan. She is the co-author of the book "Dissent: Voices of Conscience." (www.voicesofconscience.com) She has written extensively on sexual assault and rape in the U.S. military.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:56 AM on 08/23/2009
American civilians just need to get over the fact that the US military is, in fact, a military riddled with rape and sexual assault records. Get over it. Stop being such ignorant, blindly patriotic fools to think that everything America does is always squeaky clean and everything everyone else does is always stupid and second rate....get over it.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Quaoar
Pine on Skull!
09:35 PM on 08/21/2009
We shouldn't send anyone at all but given a choice I'd prefer sending U.S. troops rather than Blackwater/Xe or other mercenaries.
12:54 AM on 08/22/2009
Strange you should say that considering there has never been one documented case of rape with Blackwater/Xe in Iraq or in Afghanistan. Before you speak of things you do not know, BW has been active in that part of the world for several years in humanitarian support missions. Never has the question of rape ever come up in any of those missions.
04:43 PM on 08/21/2009
The political use of women, along with the world wide abuse, has got to stop! In an interview on Democracy Now yesterday, a brilliant Afghan woman, co-author of "Bleeding Afghanistan" commented on how blatant and unconscionable the situation of warlords supporting warlords is in Afghanistan. These 2 groups of warlords are, of course, the US Military and the Taliban. She elaborated on how disgusting the treatment of women is and how both groups of warlords purport to "support" women, but in reality each only uses them for their selfish gain -- then they ar cast aside as always, and marginalized. The truth is that they are still condemned to the Burquas, to having their schools destroyed, and to be treated like common cattle. What is it going to take to make the world awaken and DO SOMETHING -- TAKE ACTION to end this monstrous situation?
04:37 PM on 08/21/2009
Don't send anybody.
Problem solved.
02:19 PM on 08/21/2009
One in three women in the US military are sexually assaulted or raped? How was this number arrived at? Anonymous survey? What constituted sexual assault? Any touching? Any words? A look or glance from an unattractive male? I served in the Navy, three years aboard a carrier. There was not one reported sexual assault for our entire six-month Med cruise, although there were about 17 women that left the ship due to pregnancy. My roommate was the mini-judge and I would have heard about it as we discussed lots of cases he sorted through. The fact is, the military is extremely politically correct and even the appearance of impropriety is dealt with quickly and forcefully. I got talked to for playing golf with two of the enlisted fellows (one time) since it might seem that I was playing favorites. As I was the DIVO, I saw the point but did not agree with it. I followed orders. To lump the entire US military into the same fold as a group as indistinguished as the Congolese army is a joke, perhaps the Colonel has a civilian agency in mind? One with an exemplary record of not raping young girls? That leaves the UN totally out. I agree that this should not be a job for the military- their job is to break things and kill people. But to accuse the entire Army of being a big gang-rape outfit based on a few horrible cases is just plain wrong.
12:55 AM on 08/22/2009
Good points!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marinara
02:30 AM on 08/22/2009
Ann is talking about women who feel that they can't go to superior officers or have a sympathetic ear to deal with very real harassment. I don't think one in three was raped, but why the hell am I explaining this to someone who isn't interested in looking for cases of rape?
01:34 PM on 08/21/2009
I guess my first comment got censored. It was kind of off topic, but not completely. It was addressed to the Colonel, and the idea was as to whether it would be a good thing to have a fund for government officials and military people that resign because they are protesting immoral or criminal policies, such as the invasion of Iraq. It could be called the '21 July' fund or 'the Von Stauffenberg' society. What do you think of that Colonel Wright? Thanks so much for reading this.
12:16 PM on 08/21/2009
I would hope that the military is getting better, as more women advance in rank, and some of the more macho traditions of the military fade. Granted, incidents like the Air Force academy rapes are disconcerting (I still wonder if the event is tied to the pressure to convert from the Baptists there-the other big scandal at the same base at the same time), I think SAVI programs and training are improving the enviornment.
One issue, because of Republican bias against the government but for the military, I am not sure there is any funding from other sources. Right now the military is about 50% of the US government, perhaps a bit larger. Don't believe me? Look up the budget, over 50% of federal government funding (outside of medicare, social security, et. al), goes to the military.
In that enviornment, perhaps we should look more at how the military can spend the funding in the best way, instead of looking at whether the funding is military or state department.
11:28 AM on 08/21/2009
Colonel Wright, this is slightly off topic, but has there ever been an idea to create a fund to support government officials or military people that resign to protest public policies (as you did), especially for those members of government that cannot retire due to not having sufficient years of service? The fund could be called '21 July' or the 'Von Stauffenberg Society' in memory of the Nazi insider who stood up to Hitler? The fund could be paid to officials that resign in protest of criminal policies; the recipients would be compensated at the exact amount they were paid at the time of resignation... Thank you for reading this...
photo
kamachanda
Mr. President, Tear this Wall Street down!
11:01 AM on 08/21/2009
This really sounds like a good idea. Even read something similar when I was young, something about he who is without sin trowing the first stone. In reality however we live in a country (those of us in the US) in which Republicans have been sending armies to an oil rich nation to promote democracy in the middle east. Republicans who let their party be run by right wing demogogs and neo-conservatives who want to bankrupt our representative government and rule by signing statement. If you look at the American street, it looks like not only is the country heading in the wrong direction, but that evolution may have made a wrong turn somewhere. Frankly, I suspect that we are going to need evolution to get ahead of policy before we can hope for a rape free military. In the meantime, this is a good effort and may I add that the US military has no business establishing a "humanitarian" presence while our government is throwing away uncounted billions paying politically connected firms to perform services provided under no-bid contracts. Ongoing humanitarian work is not the forte of heavily armed men trained to kill.
10:40 AM on 08/21/2009
While clearly any criminal act by a member of our military needs to be dealt with appropriately under the UCMJ and applicable SOFAs with other nations, it is very misleading and an unfairly overbroad generalization to say the Marines are being relocated from Okinawa in "great measure" due to sexual assaults. Setting aside the much larger truth that these relocations are in fact the result of years of negotiations with Japan over myriad issues, using such words as "great measure" is irresponsible since they are incapable of quantification and the allegation unfairly smears all Marines for the crimes of a few. Someone with Colonel Wright's experience should know better but obviously her extreme bias outweighs whatever sense of responsible and fair behavior she may have learned in the service.
10:34 AM on 08/21/2009
"For the women of eastern Congo, a U.S.-backed Congolese military operation meant to save them from abusive rebels has turned an already staggering epidemic of rape has become markedly worse since the January deployment of tens of thousands of poorly trained, poorly paid Congolese soldiers, with people in front-line villages such as this one saying the soldiers are not so much hunting rebels as hunting women."

No surprise.

What's the problem: men are attacking women.

What's the usual answer: arm more men.

Until that model of "solving" this issue is obliterated and turned on its head, we won't see much progress. Time to start arming these women and training them to hunt rapists, and then giving them wide latitude to do so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FilmCriticOne
10:22 AM on 08/21/2009
Ann must be a lunatic. To say American troops are going to rape women in the Congo -- what is she on, c rack, or an overdose of touchy-feely male bashing support groups?

I don't want American troops in the Congo either, but if our troops were sent, they would probably be the most disciplined troops on earth. The Congo has a culture of rape, not the US Military.

Oh -- and what's Ann's base her claim on? Women in the American military report "sexual harrassment" which can include anything from a whistle, to a comment that "you sure look good tonight darling". Sure there are some serious claims of sexual harrassment -- and many bullshit ones.

So let me get this straight -- some GI is going to whistle at a Congo woman -- so we shouldn't prevent rape in the Congo. We should let the crazy rapist hack, rape, and kill the women instead, Great thinking.

Ann is fortunate -- she isn't handicapped by reality.