iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Anna Cuevas

GET UPDATES FROM Anna Cuevas
 

Is Eminent Domain to Seize Mortgages the Solution to California's High Foreclosure Problem?

Posted: 08/08/2012 9:01 am

Under a joint authority, San Bernardino County has proposed the use of eminent domain to help homeowners with distressed mortgages. Rather than seizing homes, however, the county and several towns in it intend to seize the mortgages, replacing those mortgages with more affordable ones that would reduce the homeowners' debts and allow them to keep their homes. This proposal has invoked the threat of litigation by the American Securitization Forum and a warning by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) that it could result in mortgage lenders boycotting the financing of homes in the county.

In an official statement released to Reuters, Lt. Governor Gavin Newsom publicly called on SIFMA to "cease making threats to the local officials of San Bernardino County." Newsom stated that while the use of eminent domain to seize mortgages is aggressive, it deserves a fair hearing. Due to San Bernardino County's high foreclosure rate, Newsom added, "We must think big and help our local governments develop solutions -- because the industry and federal government have not."

Eminent domain has been the traditional method governments use to seize property needed for highways, infrastructure, and other public projects. The use of eminent domain to seize and reduce mortgages was designed by Mortgage Resolution Partners in San Francisco. Chicago, and Berkeley, Calif., have also passed resolutions to hold hearings on the use of eminent domain to seize mortgages, which SIFMA and other organizations promise to fight, stating that it is unconstitutional and would negatively impact mortgage markets.


Anna Cuevas, ex-bank executive turned homeowner advocate known as "America's Loan Modification Guru," has empowered and guided thousands of Americans in keeping their homes from foreclosure through loan modification self-advocacy. A popular blogger (askaloanmodguru.com), Cuevas has been called a "superhero of the loan modification industry" and has been nominated for CNN's Heroes. She is the #1 bestselling author of SAVE YOUR HOME Without Losing Your Mind or Money.

 
 
 

Follow Anna Cuevas on Twitter: www.twitter.com/annacuevas

FOLLOW MONEY
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:02 PM on 08/11/2012
Everything else aside, I think it’s nice to see the both the public and private sectors trying to be creative to solve the housing crisis. I think this video explains that part of it really well http://bit.ly/MlSTgE
03:24 AM on 08/09/2012
If you are in a home and want to refinance, 2 things are absolutely key. First, you must have meaningful equity in your home. Second, you must have a good credit score. But in this economy if you do not have both of them still you could get a good rate, Search online for 123 Refinance they gave me the lowest rate of 3.45% my credit history is not so good.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:13 PM on 08/08/2012
Only problem with any of that is GOVERNMENT. You let them in and it is a slippery slope because they never know when to stop and to think it is in a town that just filed BK to boot. Why are we so unaware that the government could care less, your banker cares less and you know why they are both in bed together. When the courts started throwing out the rules that you & I have to live by to secure title on things aka UCC or good title transfer (chain of ownership) as an accommodation to the banks NOT doing this correctly as you & I would have to do you can further conclude they don't want to bite the hand that feeds our political machine. No book is going to make you more money to save your home and force a bank that under presidential decree doesn't have to show the real loss until the last moment. We are in trouble (thanks to King George, Alan & Dick and the Goldman Boyz). Sad but true.
01:52 PM on 08/08/2012
Remember the term Force-Placed Insurance, because it is responsible for the majority of foreclosures since 1994. Benjamin Lawsky and his New York Department of Finance has proven these illegally and artificially inflated premiums create a negative escrow account, which leads to doubled monthly mortgage payments, blocked property tax payments, and denial of a loan modification, among other issues.

Read Chapter 2 of my firsthand account as a bank whistleblower exposing the largest banking fraud in history here: http://thoughtforyourpenny.blogspot.com/2012/07/the-boy-who-cried-force-placed.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:33 PM on 08/08/2012
Not sure if anyone here can actually explain this process, but is it along the lines of:

1. seizure as a "blight"
2. county pays CURRENT FMV, which is below mortgage balance
3. county re-sells house to current owner at the eminent domain price; and
4. banks take the writedowns NOW instead of after putting the homeowners through foreclosure?

If so, it actually seems like kind of a tidy solution that will expedite the recovery, prevent neighborhoods from going into very serious decline, protect the credit of the underwater homeowners, and put banks in possibly an even better position than they would be if they had to go through the foreclosure process on 5,000 houses.

There must be some massive gravy train for banks that makes them prefer foreclosure to short sales, loand modifications and this eminent domain thing - figure out why they love foreclosure so much (fees? cheap investments for their buddies? sadism? tax incentives? handouts/bailouts? insurance settlements?) and you will figure out why the market is not recovering.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
libertysanders
09:59 AM on 08/08/2012
Talk about dangerous concepts!!! If Eminent Domain can be used to seize mortgages, what's to prevent it being used to seize 401Ks or IRAs in order for a state pay its bills?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ron Sokota
Excelsior
06:02 PM on 08/08/2012
Maybe we ought to worry about that after the value gets reclaimed from the fraudulent mortgage industry via eminent domain.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ejhickey2
09:49 PM on 08/08/2012
what's to prevent it being used to seize 401Ks or IRAs in order for a state pay its bills? "

Nothing. Of course you might get some municipal bonds in return that are priced at whatever the state wants to and which you are forbidden to sell.