iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Anthony Tarricone

Anthony Tarricone

Posted: March 24, 2010 08:54 AM

Tort Reform Hypocrites: "Do As I Say, Not As I Sue"

What's Your Reaction:

For nearly a year, the only ideas opponents of health care reform would discuss were "tort reform" and "frivolous lawsuits." With 40 million people uninsured and skyrocketing health care costs, the GOP concluded - despite all the facts to the contrary - that trial attorneys and litigation were to blame for all of the current health care system's woes.

Now that monumental legislation has been signed into law, what do these reform opponents do next?

Hire lawyers and file lawsuits of their own.

Of course, there's nothing inherently wrong with parties using the legal system to solve disputes when no other solution is available. That's why we have such a system in the first place. Our forefathers, for this very reason, created the judicial branch. Individuals, small businesses, corporations, and governments use it all the time.

But it's awfully hypocritical for lawmakers to curtail Americans' access to the civil justice system, and at the same time, file lawsuits to push their own self-serving agenda. While today they brand the health care bill as a "Washington takeover of health care" and that it violates states' rights, just yesterday they wanted to enact sweeping federal tort reform and trump the wisdom of judges and juries in states or local communities.

This certainly is not the first time we've seen "tort reform hypocrisy" in action, and won't be the last. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce - which has a whole arm that lobbies for laws to give negligent corporations immunity - also has a group dedicated to pursuing litigation on behalf of these very same corporations. Robert Bork, one of the most ardent supporters of the tort reform movement, filed suit three years ago against Yale after a slip-and-fall on their property. And former Senator Trent Lott tried to enact tort reform dozens of times, but after Hurricane Katrina, found himself with thousands of other Gulf Coast residents whose only remaining recourse was through the courts after insurance companies refused to pay claims.

For years, lawmakers beholden to insurance companies, the drug industry, Wall Street, or other corporate lobbies have pushed to undermine the right of every American to access our legal system. In their view, Americans shouldn't hold wrongdoers accountable - the free market could police itself.

How has the free market operated in the last few years? We've experienced the worst financial crisis in a generation, Enron, Bernie Madoff, contaminated food, runaway vehicles, and a constant assault on the rights of workers and consumers.

If opponents of the current health care bills want to use the courts to undermine the bill, America thankfully has a more-than-capable judiciary that can settle the dispute. But next time these same lawmakers demand tort reform - a ploy to protect big corporations at the expense of the American people - don't fall for their old credo: "do as I say, not as I sue."

 
For nearly a year, the only ideas opponents of health care reform would discuss were "tort reform" and "frivolous lawsuits." With 40 million people uninsured and skyrocketing health care costs, the G...
For nearly a year, the only ideas opponents of health care reform would discuss were "tort reform" and "frivolous lawsuits." With 40 million people uninsured and skyrocketing health care costs, the G...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:32 PM on 03/28/2010
The problem today is that ALL politicians continue to talk to TWO sides of an issue. Even if I personally would be limited on a lawsuit, the CORRECT course in healthcare is to find a reasonable way to cap over-the-top liability, but more importantly curb legal waste and redundancy. If politicians would embrace the idea of CONTROLLING COSTS rather than being concerned with access, then more Americans could be covered for LESS money. I touch on this in my post about Tort reform and legal waste. W.C.C.

http://pjmonolog.blogspot.com/2010/03/no-waste-tort-reform.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wily
02:52 PM on 03/25/2010
Tell it like it is, Mr. Tarricone! The judicial system is for everyone, not just corporations, and not just politicians who, after demeaning our civil justice system, file lawsuits of their own with legislation they do not like. As the GOP reminded us again and again, "elections have consequences."
photo
Democrat in the South
Empathy, the most important word
10:23 AM on 03/24/2010
I was talking about tort reform the other day with someone whose child is in medical school. She believes tort reform would solve the cost problem and everything would be just fine. I asked her who would protect the patient? She had no response.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LCRover001
09:41 AM on 03/24/2010
The only ones who should have the right to protect them selves are the big business interest and the wealth, the rest of us should accept our losses as cost of business in others clamor to make money anyway possible.

So what if a doctor messes you up you should have had the money to hire a better doctor, so what if your car catches fire when you turn the ignition switch or the baby food you just bought has crushed glass in it, why should those who are wealth suffer just because they produce a bad product.

Now if you come out and falsely claim that their car catches fire or their baby food has glass in it, it is ok if they sue you for everything you are worth because you cost them profit.

Just like you should fear the government health care bill because it will put people between you and your doctor, but not fear that the insurance company puts people between you and your doctor, who base decisions on what it will cost the company in profit not what is best for you.

Up really is down.