More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

Remembering the Israeli-Gaza War

What's Your Reaction:

Spending Christmas and New Year in the Holy Land was to be a once-in-a-lifetime experience. But in December of 2008, there was little to celebrate in Israel and the Palestinian Territories. As I landed on Christmas Day, tension between Israel and Hamas had escalated to the point where an official declaration of war was imminent. Many had expected Israel to respond to Hamas rocket fire with military force sooner than it did.

Two days after Christmas, Israel began its Operation Cast Lead.

My main purpose for traveling to the region was to research the proposed Red-Dead canal project - a joint effort by Israel, Jordan and the Palestinian Authority to construct (after considering a feasibility study) a 112-mile canal and tunnel system from the Red Sea to the Dead Sea. The project aimed to alleviate the region's water crisis and revive the Dead Sea. My schedule included stops in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, Ramallah and the Dead Sea shore in Ein Gedi. But the outbreak of war in Gaza necessitated a visit to the Israeli-Gaza border first.

The Israeli-Gaza Border and Hamas Rockets

Hamas rocket fire steadily increased during 2008. According to GlobalSecurity.org, Hamas fired a total of 1,750 rockets into Israel that year. Another 771 rockets and mortars were reportedly fired at southern Israeli cities such as Sderot and Ashkelon during the three-week operation.

In the months leading up to the military offensive, Israel kept journalists out of the Gaza Strip. In November of 2008, major media organizations including CNN, BBC, the Associated Press and Reuters, among others, sent a letter to then Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, demanding that Israel allow reporters to cover the conflict from within Gaza. Israel blamed it on security concerns.

Timeline of events between November 2008 and January 2009, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists.

Nov. 5, 2008

Without any prior notification to media organizations, Israel's military authorities stopped allowing foreign journalists into the Gaza Strip.

Nov. 19 Heads of major media organizations including CNN, BBC, the Associated Press and Reuters, among others, sent a letter to then Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, demanding that Israel allow reporters to cover the conflict from within Gaza.
Nov. 24 The Foreign Press Association in Israel (FPA) petitioned Israel's Supreme Court asking it to rule on the legality of the ban.
Nov. 25 The Supreme Court ordered the government to respond to the FPA's inquiry within 15 days. The government failed to meet that deadline.
Dec. 27 Israeli defense officials imposed extensive "closed military zones" inside Gaza and throughout a two-mile strip around its perimeter.
Dec. 31 The Supreme Court ruled that the government must grant 12 journalists entry into Gaza each time the Erez Crossing on the northern end of the strip was opened. The government failed to respond to the Court's decision.
Jan. 2 The Court recommended on Jan. 2 that eight foreign journalists – two chosen by the defense ministry and six picked through a lottery – be granted access each time the Erez Crossing was opened.
Jan. 22 Israeli authorities granted access to a total of eight journalists – far fewer than the number ordered by the Supreme Court.
Jan 23 Israel removed all the restrictions that it had put in place in early November.
Jan. 25 The Supreme Court issued a final ruling on the issue, overturning the blanket ban on the entry of foreign journalists and stating that reporters are to be granted access to Gaza "unless the security situation changes drastically in such a way that the Erez Crossing has to be closed completely for security reasons.

On Dec. 28, I purchased a round-trip ticket to Ashkelon at the Tel Aviv Central Bus Station with the intent of reaching the Erez crossing. Seeing the equipment draped on my body, the man at the ticket counter smiled and asked "journalist?" I smiled and nodded, took my ticket and proceeded to the boarding platform.

There weren't too many passengers to Ashkelon but many of the ones on the bus were young men and women of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), probably in their early 20s (if not still teenagers). One by one, as they walked down the aisle to find a seat, their M16 rifles brushed against my shoulder. On this second visit to Israel and having become quite comfortable with public transport, the presence of so many guns on the bus had stopped attracting my attention.

The central bus stations in both Tel Aviv and Jerusalem are typically crowded with young Israeli soldiers, in their olive-green uniforms, either on their way to the frontlines or going home on leave.

In Ashkelon, residents were, for the most part, going about their day-to-day lives, though fearing the next Hamas rocket attack. The Committee to Protect Journalists reported that Israel declared a two-mile area around the Gaza Strip "closed military zones" on Dec. 27. However, there was no visible barrier restricting access a day later. No checkpoints along the main roads and no major military presence on the streets. At that time, the mass influx of journalists had not taken place.

The Erez border crossing is roughly 10 miles from Ashkelon. The taxi driver agreed to drive me to the crossing and back. I decided I would cross over to Gaza if I was permitted but was fairly certain I would not be allowed.

As I approached the security terminal at Erez, a Palestinian woman and two children were seated on the bench waiting to cross over to Gaza. The guards, as expected, turned me away, and I returned to Ashkelon. As we were heading back - another rocket attack - this time in a residential neighborhood.

The rocket had landed in the middle of the street. No one was hurt this time. As a small group of local journalists gathered, an Israeli soldier spoke to me anonymously. He had just been called from the reserve - one of approximately 7,000 soldiers Israel called up when the Gaza war broke out. This soldier was forced to interrupt his master's degree program to serve in the army. He said he personally wished that Israel would not move into Gaza.

Welcoming New Year 2009 in the West Bank

After Ashkelon, the next stop was the West Bank city of Ramallah in the Palestinian Territory. Surprisingly, there was no checking at the border crossing, and I arrived by nightfall.

As I checked into my usual hotel near Al-Manara Square, I requested a room with a street view to keep an eye on the situation below. The atmosphere in the city was noticeably different from when I visited in 2006. There was little to celebrate as the New Year began.

 

Follow Anuradha K. Herath on Twitter: www.twitter.com/AnuradhaKHerath

 
 
  • Comments
  • 43
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wisdo
semantics shamantics
04:33 AM on 02/22/2010
The refusal to allow journalists access to gaza has a lot more to do with closing the eyes of the west to Israel's brutality than any fear for their safety.

Tthe press association released a statement saying, “The unprecedented denial of access to Gaza for the world’s media amounts to a severe violation of press freedom and puts the state of Israel in the company of a handful of regimes around the world which regularly keep journalists from doing their jobs.”
10:54 AM on 03/03/2010
The refusal is logic after Israel is experienced with biased media (lot of it the due to Hamas threats the lives of not obedience reporters). Israel acted as Britain in Falkland 1982. Although I think that the next time, if they operate there, they will let the reporters to go in at their own obligation. As we saw in the 2006 Lebanon war some of the reporters will prefer to escort the Israeli forces than sit next to the Hamas terror groups.
Israel has nothing to hide. Their soldiers "brutality" is less than the US and Britain soldiers in Afghanistan. Israelis don't shoot Gazan citizens by purpose but Hamas terrorists that hide behind citizens. Although Israel uses precise weapons, sometimes civilians hit. You have to blame the Hamas for that.
Tell Associated Press to ask the US to let them to express their journalistic freedom in Afghanistan. Especially when they refer to "freedom" as a clearance to be biased against Israel.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
07:42 PM on 02/20/2010
If you're interested in learning some of the forgotten (perhaps deliberately) history of the beginning of the Israeli-Gaza war (which goes back to the Suez crisis), you can listen to the CBC's interview with Joe Sacco here http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/ (it's part 2 of the Feb 19th show).

You'll be surprised (or dismayed) to see the same things (the shooting of civilians by Israel, the Gazan's having to smuggle in food to survive, and the excusing of Israel's actions) playing out 50 years ago.

You can also see some excerpts from his book here http://us.macmillan.com/BookCustomPage.aspx?isbn=9780805073478&m_type=4&m_contentid=16725#cmscontent
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
06:45 PM on 02/20/2010
While your "remembering", let me remind you of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KntmpoRXFX4&feature=related
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
06:56 PM on 02/20/2010
"you're"
08:52 PM on 02/20/2010
I see. So Israel goes after armed fighters who had attacked Israel, and then Hamas decided to attack innocent men, women, and children as their "justified" response! Only an idiot could blame Israel in this.
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
11:26 PM on 02/20/2010
Yes, Israel is to blame because Israel is holding an entire nation of millions hostage in a limbo of occupation and military oppression while extremist settlers steal their land! Tens of thousands of Palestinians have paid with their lives over the years, a million Palestinians rendered homeless and two or three generations growing up in poverty-stricken refugee camps while Israelis lived the hi-life on THEIR land!! These people have every right to justice for the crimes committed against them! Israel is in breach of International Law, has repeatedly committed war crimes and is comiting a crime against humanity by collectively punishing an entire city where children make up half the population!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Smithn
Different strokes for different folks.
03:16 PM on 02/20/2010
Obama has given & given, First, by going to Cairo and speaking so early in his presidency. Next, employing the gifts & talents of his "team of rivals" approach. 3rd. by appointing envoys all over the place. Thre has been no lack of attention. If you don't believe it find the PBS: Charlie Rose interview with George Mitchell. According to our guy on the ground progress is being made. As far as I'm concerned it's starting to look like Obama is just another scapegoat--another "the dog ate my homework." excuse.

It's time for Isreal, the Palestinians, the Gazans, Egyptians, Syrians, and whomever else has skin in that game to grow up. Please end "The Never Ending Song" of war and strife and write yourselves a new harmony. Please.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
06:54 PM on 02/20/2010
If a US president had undertaken such an approach before Cast Lead, it would generated some progress, and likely have born some fruit, especially if it had been accompanied by some pressure on the party the US does not usually apply pressure to.

But, after Cast Lead, and the casual violations of the Geneva conventions by Israel, and a US response to that of trying to protect Israel from the consequences of its actions, it will take more than politely listening to concerns expressed, and a promise to bear them in mind in future. He would need to show some willingness to do more than just slap Israel on the wrist while feeding them candy to take away the sting. And, like all temporary babysitters (and that is what the President is on this issue, the real parents of the US policy towards Israel and the Middle East aren't in the White House), he can't discipline, even for the sake of the child, when the parents have clearly said no disciplining is allowed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Smithn
Different strokes for different folks.
08:20 PM on 02/20/2010
Thank you very much for sharing your thoughts on this with me. You've confirmed the "child" role. However, the "babysitter"-in- Chief is totally new. Now, I have new eyes for this play. It becomes lot less frustrating and disappointing to watch and read about them, now.

{{{{greatefully fanned}}}}}}
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
05:12 PM on 02/21/2010
that is the best post of the day RP...you have been fanned
09:43 AM on 02/20/2010
Fortunately for Gazans and ISraelis alike, Hamas capacity and morale was serious degraded.
Consequently-- the current period of relative calm.
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
01:04 PM on 02/20/2010
Fortunately for Gazans? You call the collective punishment of 1.5 million people fortunate???

You call the deaths of hundreds of children fortunate??? You call the destruction of thousands of homes and essential infra-structure, schools, hospitals, acres of farmland for tu nate??? You call homelessness and being deprived for an entire year of building materials and for 3 years of humanitarian aid FORTUNATE???

Your comment exposes extreme insensitivity.
02:11 PM on 02/20/2010
"As I approached the security terminal at Erez, a Palestinian woman and two children were seated on the bench waiting to cross over to Gaza."

No further elaboration about this woman & her children by the author of this piece. No detail of description or even giving a voice to this woman or even a small show of concern that the mother & her kids might be dead or badly injured or lose the home they were returning to within a very short time. Increasingly, there are individuals like us around the world who no longer accept this presentation of the Palestinian families as "otherized" with no individuality, no humanity & no voices worthy to be heard. We are not necessarily alone. Even Bloomberg news (a huge surprise to me as one of my favorite targets is the MSM) keeps airing the Rashid Khalidi debate in which the undecideds in the audience were influenced by the end of the debate to question the special relationship between the USA & guess who? It's time for the leaders in the USA & Europe to act in concert to end the cruel & spiteful siege of Gaza before any more Palestinian children lose their lives.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
07:53 PM on 02/20/2010
So, because Israel did so much damage to the civilians of Gaza that Hamas has been so pre-occupied helping people deal with their immediate needs to attempt to try and fight for the same people's future, Israel's attack on those civilians was justified? This is sort of like a bully justifying beating a kid so badly he needs hospitalisation on the grounds that it meant the bully wouldn't have to worry about him fighting back for a while. It only makes sense if you accept the premise that the bully is the only person that counts.
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
09:37 PM on 02/19/2010
I'm not sure what the point of this article is. It's totally one-sided, indifferent to Paletinians and non factual about the circumstances leading to the Gaza invasion. The rocket fire had diminished substantially until November when Israel broke the truce and killed Palestinian civilians.

Israel's Gaza invasion was perfectly timed as a political move to boost Kadima in the polls against Likud and show that they were big on "security", but what this invasion turned into was a massive slaughter of hundreds children and civilians, total destruction of property and essential infrastructure executed with illegal weaponry in a densely populated city, together with a heavy-handed attempt to hide it all from the press.
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
09:47 PM on 02/19/2010
Correction: "Palestinians"
10:17 PM on 02/19/2010
I totally agree with everything, although I don't see the problem in reporting the rockets being fired from Gaza. They shouldn't fire rockets at civilians. Of course, the response was heinous and immoral.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StCuthbert
Anytime the mods are ready...
11:22 AM on 02/20/2010
Nice. "They shouldn't fire rockets at civilians". BUT the response is "heinous and immoral". If you only used such language for the rocket attacks as well, I'd think you were an objective commentator.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
07:02 PM on 02/20/2010
So, I guess you have no objection to the reporting of the bullets and missiles being fired into Gaza. Unfortunately, that is such a common occurance that, like collisions on the highways, they only rate a headline when the continuous background level is interupted by an abrupt spike.

If firing rockets in the vicinity of civilians who have moved into places that have been ethnically cleansed for them is 'heinous and immoral', what words would you use to describe firing at people who are trying to scavenge enough material from the bombed out remains of buildings to allow them to build some sort of shelter, other than mud huts, because Israel will not allow anything better to enter Gaza?
02:48 PM on 02/19/2010
Thank you for keeping this in the news. Operation Cast Lead was an egregious war crime, and we must not let it be swept under the rug.
07:05 PM on 02/19/2010
I agree SR - I've noticed this week that the BBC and other channels here have been talking about Britain's "good relationship" with Israel, as though Cast Lead never happened. i do know that our broadcasters have had CAMERA breathing down their necks recently ...
Anuradha, this is an interesting blog but I think you have some of the facts wrong. The rocket fire from Gaza didn't steadily increase during 2008, there was a ceasefire from June onwards when the rockets dropped down to just a few a month. You can check the details here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Israel–Hamas_ceasefire
Your timeline is interesting because it demonstrates that far from being a response to rockets Cast Lead was carefully planned. Israel broke the ceasefire on November 4 with an incursion into Gaza, killing six people, then started shutting journalists out the day after.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StCuthbert
Anytime the mods are ready...
11:23 AM on 02/20/2010
"According to The New York Times, neither side fully respected the terms of the cease-fire.[6] Some rockets still continued to fire from Gaza and the Israeli blockade of Gaza was loosened but not completely opened. Hamas hoped that the accord would lead Israel to suspend attacks on the West Bank and Gaza while Israel hoped that the accord would lead to progress on negotiations for the release of Gilad Shalit; neither hope was met.[6] USA Today stated on July 1 that the Israelis had a zero tolerance policy towards the truce in which every rocket and/or mortar attack would be punished in some way"
(from your source)

Can't blame Israel entirely for this one.
06:53 PM on 02/20/2010
So march into Israel with Skia,Thabit,and the others and arrest the IDF leaders! You can even take ALL of Hamas with you..but I doubt they'd cross the border out of Gaza while being watched!!!!!!!!!!!!