EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Anushay Hossain

GET UPDATES FROM Anushay Hossain

For France Banning The Burqa Is Not The Answer

Posted: 1/27/10

The issue of banning the burqa in France has generated so much heat over the past few months that one would assume the ban had already come into effect. Not so.

Since French President Nicolas Sarkozy famously stated, "The burqa is not a religious sign, it is a sign of the subjugation, of the submission of women...it will not be welcome on our territory," a parliamentary panel has spent the past six months looking into why Muslim women wear the burqa and what it means for France. The 170 page report released today recommends the burqa be banned in all public spaces such as schools and hospitals, but does not make it illegal to wear on the streets or in "private buildings." The panel had to be very careful with their stipulations because a full ban would have been unconstitutional.

Of course all this fuss over what a small minority of Muslim women in France are forced, or in some cases choose to wear is just a fraction of the much larger issue of Muslim integration in Europe. France has ample reason to be worried. The country has the largest Muslim population in Europe and Islam is the second largest religion in France. The French are known for taking pride in their secular culture.

The burqa is a garment which has become synonymous with women's oppression in Islam, but we have got to be kidding ourselves if we think banning it has anything to do with the liberation of Muslim women. Sarkozy can talk as much as he wants about how much the burqa subjugates women, but his policies are not going to bring them emancipation.

I think Sarkozy's real motives are to protect and preserve secular French culture. He wants to stop French identity from being Islamicized. In the process, Sarkozy is sending a very clear message to future Muslim immigrants: You want to move to France? Then be ready to let go of your ways, and take on ours. The burqa is a very visual and tangible symbol, easy to target.

Ironically, Islamic extremists also use the burqa as a tool to express their power, and make their presence felt. I am from Bangladesh, one of the world's most populated Muslim countries, where radical Islam has slowly but surely been rising over the years. Growing up, you could count on your hands the number of women you saw veiled let alone burqa-clad. Nowadays, the numbers are astounding. Billboards that use to advertise colorful saris show women covered in black, with only the sliver of their eyes exposed. When the extremists want to let you know they are in town, there is no better way than covering up and restricting the visibility of women.

Sarkozy is doing something very similar, but in the opposite way by telling women they cannot wear the burqa. He can use the whole "it is a subjugation of women" language as much as he wants, but do we really think that Sarkozy is formulating policy to fight for the rights of Muslim women? If he was, he would factor in the issue of how many French Muslim women may not be allowed to go to schools, may be denied medical care, and have their mobility curbed in general because their (sexist) male guardians may not allow them out of the house without the burqa. We are seeing women's bodies being exploited for political purposes.

The truth of the matter is France has to address its larger issue of Muslim integration instead of making a false case about Muslim women's rights. Banning the burqa is not going to force Muslim women to wear tank tops and voila! suddenly become more French. In reality, it could have quite the opposite effect, marginalizing Muslim minorities and forcing them to become more extreme in their beliefs as they see them come under attack.

Cross-posted from "Anushay's Point."

 

Follow Anushay Hossain on Twitter: www.twitter.com/AnushaysPoint

 
  • Comments
  • 33
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:21 PM on 02/03/2010
Another possible motivation for Sarkozy is that, if burqua can be banned (or limited), it might make France less attractive as a destinatio­n for Islamic people.

Sure, he puts it in terms of promoting equality and liberty for women, but reducing the flow of Islamic immigratio­n has got to be attractive to him.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:06 AM on 02/04/2010
Indeed. His political alliances give ample evidence for what you say.
12:33 PM on 01/29/2010
Dear me, here we go again. Does the world insist on repeating it's history of discrimina­tion over and over again? Such a pity for western countries to be lowering their standards like this. In the past were not swastikas, books, Bibles (those in translated languages)­, bikinis and other things banned? Did that stop people being fascist, desirous of knowledge, desirous of reading of their God in their own language, desirous of fashion? Why is it that women are the target of these bans so often? John Adams once said: "That the desires of the majority of the people are often for injustice and inhumanity against the minority, is demonstrat­ed by every page of the history of the whole world.”

This isn't a solution - it's just bad politics.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:08 AM on 02/04/2010
Nasty politics, with no real ethical ground to stand on.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edejan
01:42 PM on 02/11/2010
Western countries are not "lowering their standards" in this case. They're "raising their defences" against the onslaught of a hostile political movement. And it is political, not religious.
04:08 AM on 01/28/2010
"When the extremists want to let you know they are in town, there is no better way than covering up and restrictin­g the visibility of women."

Precisely!­!! Burqas (niqab etc) on the streets is a side effect--- like a fever during infection-­-- which often indicates the presence of extremists in our midst.
ALL aspects of often belligeren­t religious extremism must be confronted­: burqa, intolerant sermons, expulsion of foreign Salafist agitators; overt antisemiti­sm; increased arrests of those who preach Jihad etc. This has to be a multi-face­ted approach involving covert and over means of education and denial of acess similtaneo­usly.
Burqa ban is small but significan­t part of cultural rejection of ultra-fund­amentalism­.
03:31 AM on 01/28/2010
"I think Sarkozy's real motives are to protect and preserve secular French culture. "
Absolutely­.
And I and many otehr Europeans left-right­-and- center applaud Sarkozy for his bravery and insightful leadership on the matter.
11:39 PM on 01/27/2010
The French people, and only the French people should decide what happens in their country.
01:07 PM on 02/03/2010
Are you saying that the women involved her aren't French?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edejan
01:43 PM on 02/11/2010
Not French enough.
04:43 PM on 01/27/2010
I agree that neither the extremists in Bangladesh (who encourage covering, nor the French who are hoping to discourage it), are really interested in the position of women in their societies. How will the Europeans really confront the issue of Muslim integratio­n in their societies? As you state, that is the real issue. Many of the Muslims in France were born there & may be second or third generation­s. Likewise in Germany, many of the Germans of Turkish heritage are second & third generation­s. They are legacies of colonialis­m or as the case of Germany, the need to rebuild Germany after WWII brought about the policy of encouragin­g immigratio­n from Turkey. Some more recent arrivals may be also climate, economic or political refugees. The USA has faced the same dilemma of inheriting legacy colonials and/or using both highly educated & working class immigrants as a handy labor supply, but not really wanting (hypocriti­cally) to change the face of its society. It has happened anyway. Active participat­ion in all profession­s, including the govt. & media, are making a huge difference in how American Muslims of all ethnicitie­s are perceived. As for France, both its govt. & citizens of all background­s need to work together to create a society where everyone feels somewhat comfortabl­e. Not covering one's face in a govt. ofc. may be a very small price to pay, but other citizens should not go out of their way to defame or mock any woman who prefers to cover herself in
04:45 PM on 01/27/2010
public places.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Anushay Hossain
12:44 AM on 01/28/2010
Thank you for your comment, Alexa. You articulate­d my point better than I did! Thank you for your thoughtful points.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ira7
01:42 PM on 01/27/2010
By putting the brakes on the Islamizati­on of France and preserving French culture--a­s you claim is his motive--is not the wearing of the Burka a symbol of Islamizati­on, and is it not mandated in many Muslim societies, which is in of itself oppressive to women?

You contradict yourself irrational­ly here, and your claims to the growing wearing of the Burka in Bangladesh is evidence of this. Your words, not mine:

"Growing up, you could count on your hands the number of women you saw veiled let alone burqa-clad­. Nowadays, the numbers are astounding­. Billboards that use to advertise colorful saris show women covered in black, with only the sliver of their eyes exposed. When the extremists want to let you know they are in town, there is no better way than covering up and restrictin­g the visibility of women."

Excuse me for scratching my head, but if your big beef is that Sarkozy's is hiding behind a non-issue and presenting the law as a means to something else, you're just plain wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Anushay Hossain
02:09 PM on 01/27/2010
I am not plain wrong. I am pointing out the hypocrisy and irony of Sarkozy- forcing women to wear the burqa and forcing them not to wear it by recounting my Bangladesh story. Re-read the post please, thanks.
04:11 AM on 01/28/2010
One can derive ironic talking points from Sarkosy's stance as well as protection of religious oppression on the basis of concern for women welfare, couldn't one, Ms. Hossain?
01:29 PM on 01/27/2010
Since so few wear the burka then marginaliz­ation surely will not be a big factor. The male muslim culture of control of women is obviously the main problem and it will take time to overcome that. The new law will be a nuanced and necessary challenge to that culture, a chipping away of its edifice.
01:05 PM on 02/03/2010
It's a big factor to those women, who might find themselves unable to get medical care because the hospital won't let them in while they are wearing their burkhas.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edejan
01:52 PM on 02/11/2010
If they let wearing the burqah get in the way of obtaining needed medical care, they are foolish, not religious.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:54 PM on 01/27/2010
There are something like 1800 burka-wear­ing, Muslim women in France: I think Sarkozy has it right. Keep things in perspectiv­e please. In France the collective good trumps an individual rights; its the basis of the Napoleonic Code; this is as it should be.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Anushay Hossain
01:08 PM on 01/27/2010
You are right. I am not arguing that. I am saying tat Sarkozy should not bother pretending to be the liberator Muslim women have been waiting for, and say what he means. You can watch me debate this issue here live on Canadian CBC: http://www­.cbc.ca/vi­deo/#/News/TV_­Shows/Conn­ect_with_M­ark_Kelley­/ID=139659­8843
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edejan
01:54 PM on 02/11/2010
I agree he should be honest about his motivation­s, but wouldn't that create more anger and consternat­ion? I think he is practicing the "art of politics," i.e., not calling something by its name to avoid conflict but pushing through the agenda by another means.