More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
April Rudin

GET UPDATES FROM April Rudin
 

Can Crowdfunding and Social Networks Forge Ties to Kickstart the Economy?

Posted: 01/31/2012 12:55 pm

Crowdfunding is yet another example of America's pent-up demand to "crowd together" for daily deals via GroupOn, to 'Like" and "Friend" people via Facebook, to content share by tweeting and re-tweeting on Twitter and so on. In this instance, the "crowd-sourced" buying power allows investors the ability to purchase stock and other securities tied to startups. This meet-up will occur via crowd-sourcing sites and social networks. It appears like a "win-win" for entrepreneurs looking for capital, investors seeking ways for investment transparency while simultaneously helping to kickstart our sluggish economy via bootstrapping startups with many smaller investors. It is hoped that a variety of new jobs will be created in this new investment sector.

The U.S House of Representatives passed a bill last week known as HR2930 -- the crowdfunding bill. It was championed by Rep. Patrick McHenry of North Carolina, a well-known conservative leader. I went to an event last week sponsored by The Soho Loft , where I had the opportunity to hear Rep. McHenry speak in person about the benefits of a new path to economic prosperity via this ecosystem. Nonprofits have used the crowdfunding platform successfully for many years.

Under current laws, startups are not permitted to sell stock or other securities. They may only receive donations through crowdfunding sites . A key component of this investor platform lies in the outbound communications and social media marketing build-out for each firm. This was proven by the most successful nonprofits success through mass donor outreach. In each case, the outreach was fueled through a consistent and constant variety of social media messages pushed through platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, FourSquare and others. Nonprofits were among the early adopters of social media platforms as a way of creating visibility and raising money for causes. Success by the nonprofit sector has drawn the interest of startups.

The eventual passage of this bill would propel the growth of sites like Kickstarter, Rockethub and others as new small-ish investors will clamor for access. It is expected that a significant number of entrepreneurs/startups will race to the market with a variety of products and offerings to help meet the demand. This outreach and deal matchmaking will happen on social networks such as Twitter and Facebook. Social media sites are the meet-up mechanism to connect sellers and buyers. Social media sites can then be used to promote these investments as long as they comply with the same guidelines outlined in the proposed crowd-funding bill. The significance of this bill cannot be overstated to the overall investment community -- both buyers/sellers.

Provisions of the bill include: companies may raise a maximum of $1 million or $2 million if the firm provides audited financial statements. Each investor is limited to investing an amount equal to $10,000 or 10 percent of his/her annual income. Finally, the issuer of this new "stock" must disclose the speculative nature of this type of investment and any limitations on liquidity of the stock. The bill further requires the issuer of the stock to ascertain the investor is aware of the risk and other SEC notices providing for governance of investments.

While expected to provide stimulus, there are some downsides to crowd-funding funds for startups. All issuers/startups must be mindful of any individual state law governing minority stockholders interests including voting rights, inspecting the books, etc. The administrative costs and burden of a potentially huge group of small stockholders presents certain overhead costs in record-keeping, etc. Finally, there is speculation that companies which use crowdsourcing will have difficulty attracting venture funds and other more "sophisticated" investors who will want board positions to more closely control company growth. These board positions will carry large liability due to the unwieldy, disparate larger group of unsophisticated investors.

David Drake, one of the co-founders of The Soho Loft Capital Creation Event Series, is enthusiastic about this opportunity. He is also founder and Chairman of LDJ Captial in NYC where his passions for energy, efficiency and real estate investments which intercorrelate directly with the technology, media and telecom investment strategies of his firm. His premise is that our current market system rewards short-term traders rather than investors. This is just one of the reasons that he supports crowdfunding.

This notable moment in history is rooted in economic growth but also demonstrates the ushering of social media into Wall Street. All investors will now be able to participate in deals like never before. Barriers to entry in alternative investments are being reshaped. Social media platforms are in place to facilitate the conversation, idea exchange and commerce presented by these new investment opportunities.

Next step is to see if the Senate quickly passes a similar bill. This is expected along with the White House's support for this new option of entrepreneurs to meet their potential new investors along the social media highway. The opportunity to locate and participate in these opportunities will be primarily on social networking platforms. It continues to surprise me that so many of my peers continue to eschew the importance of these platforms. Social networking platforms are not a fad, and not expected to "go away." It reminds me of when I bought my grandmother her first microwave and she said that I should take it back as it only melted cheese!

 

Follow April Rudin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TheRudinGroup

Crowdfunding is yet another example of America's pent-up demand to "crowd together" for daily deals via GroupOn, to 'Like" and "Friend" people via Facebook, to content share by tweeting and re-tweetin...
Crowdfunding is yet another example of America's pent-up demand to "crowd together" for daily deals via GroupOn, to 'Like" and "Friend" people via Facebook, to content share by tweeting and re-tweetin...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:02 AM on 02/09/2012
Angels entering are picking up - jemss.co
04:27 AM on 02/04/2012
The UK has had Financial Services Authority-regulated crowdfunding in place since 2010. Crowdcube allows ordinary individuals to invest small sums into start-up businesses or those seeking growth. So far, over £2m has been raised by hundreds of armchair dragons with a 90-day limit on reaching their funding target. Fail to reach the target and the start-up gets nothing.

In return, investors can receive 1) a reward/incentive from the entrepreneur 2) direct equity in the business 3) a chance to build an investment portfolio based on small sums 4) a return on your equity if the company is sold, bought out or floated on the stock exchange 5) the chance to back UK businesses that you want to be a success 6) the opportunity to give feedback and get involved in the business

It would be interesting to see how the Americans would rolls out their offerings. Would they be any different from what's been happening in the UK?
03:04 PM on 02/01/2012
Good article. Capital formation in the US is a core issue to our long-term economic success. I was excited and optimistic when HR 2930 was passed by the House. Now lobbyists have stalled the passage of the Senate versions. I am now skeptical that this current effort to enact crowdfunding exemptions will work for 3 reasons: 1) crowdfunding w/o regulation is ultimately doomed to fail as there will be bad actors and we need a cost-effective way to moderate the use of crowdfunding; otherwise, the critics will quickly be proven right and crowdfunding will be permanently shut down before it gets a chance to succeed. 2) crowdfunding within the confines of the current regulatory regime will not work because it will be too costly and slow – thus blow up the intent and strengths of crowdfunding. Crowdfunding requires bright-line rules for everyone to play by, which is clearly lacking, and 3) crowdfunding with a new regulatory oversight component (which is highly unlikely by itself) would several years to implement and execute for a myriad of reasons.

In the meantime, I do go to work everyday laser focused on bringing products to market that will improve lives by expanding local access to capital. That's why I educate people on directly accessing capital.

Regards,
Patrick E. Donohue, CFA
DealPen
08:46 PM on 01/31/2012
Crowd Funding could be the answer for our economy. I am in full agreement with Mr. Drake that our capital markets are much too short term oriented.
08:45 PM on 01/31/2012
Hello Ms. Rudin.

Just to note, you've indicated that H.R. 2930 was passed by congress last week; however, I believe it was actually passed by the house on November 3rd of last year (http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr2930eh/pdf/BILLS-112hr2930eh.pdf). It has actually been stalled in the Senate for a little while now.

gburtch
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thecornerangel
03:33 PM on 01/31/2012
Yes, it's they only way the 99% will be able to get some real help. We need the techies/nerds/geeks/financial engineers/our kids to get political.
Voting is too difficult in the USA. If the American people were not essentially disenfranchised they would choose the right people to govern them.
Why is it that I can go anywhere in the world and use my debit card to get funds from my bank account? But voting in an election to get representation is almost impossible. Every US Citizen should have the option to use a piece of plastic, anywhere, to vote in any election. We all know that this is technically possible, but the Political Class has fixed the game.
In some countries there is a requirement that all citizens vote. We are a Republic, and an informed electorate is necessary for it to work the way our founders intended. Voting is serious business, not a popularity contest. But name recognition has been shown to be the only important variable in an election. (Don't you think Newt knows this?)
With the internet it is possible to be informed, but the actual act of casting a vote is the problem. Every state has different rules for everything...and the media (liberal or not) is just a bookie sheet giving poll odds.
When was the last time anyone saw a major media outlet give out the very important information such as times and places to vote?
02:13 PM on 01/31/2012
[YES]
02:11 PM on 01/31/2012
Dear Ms. Rudin:

Excellent article! It points to the way social media will affect commerce and finance going forward. I used to be at a large investment bank, then a consultant. Me and a colleague decided to strike out on our own and develop deals that were not interesting to the traditional big investors.

Our project, ttwick.com, "prices" opinions and memes on any social media platform. Institutional investors are not all ready to venture into this field. But we've been talking to social-media-savvy individuals and entrepreneurs, and they see the potential and catch our excitement. If this legislation passes and crowdfunding takes the shape you indicate, that will put us, and others like us, in a position to execute and realize our plan.

If this social media-enabled wave gains real momentum, it could definitely help turn the economy around and lead to greater prosperity. We've got our fingers crossed.

Ralf Voellmer
08:26 AM on 02/01/2012
Following up un Ralf's comment, and to use as an example, an aggregation of "crowd sourcing" in terms of what are the national priorities of this country RIGHT NOW and in real-time (by monitoring comments and sentiment in social media) can be found here http://ttwick.com/presidential-election-2012-national-priorities.html