October 17, 2008
Douchebags

Why conservatives love abortion

Here's your October surprise, people. The GOP has finally found a way to win this election, and all it's going to take is the speedy invention of time travel. Wait, let me explain.

In the National Review Online, Ed Whelan writes that Barack Obama's mother, pregnant at 18 and living at a time before Roe v. Wade, was forced by circumstances to have her child and marry the baby's father. Had abortion been legal, Whelan speculates, Baby Barack would have wound up as nothing more than a twinkle in his father's eye and a stain on a Honolulu clinic's bedsheet.

Charming.

Whelan, who lovingly refers to the candidate as "former fetus Barack Obama," not-too-subtly uses this baseless theory as evidence of Obama's hypocrisy, implying that the senator ought to thank his lucky stars he was born at a time when America cared nothing for female reproductive rights. How could Obama believe that Roe v. Wade was "rightly decided" when he himself was a beneficiary of those freewheeling, birth-'em-if-you-got-'em pro-life days? After all, had Barack Obama been aborted, it's likely that at this point he'd only be up in the national polls by five points, tops.

But let's put aside, just for a moment, the sheer repugnance of Whelan's argument and his wild assumptions about the moral character of Barack Obama's long-dead mother. What Whelan fails to consider is that the young Ann Dunham did deliver her baby, and that baby grew up to pose a serious threat to the future of the modern Republican party. In essence, Barack Obama is the John Connor to the GOP's Skynet. Wouldn't John McCain and the Republicans be much better off if Barack Obama had been aborted? Ed Whelan, you may have just articulated the strongest, most persuasive pro-choice argument ever to come out of the conservative movement.

That's not even taking into account women who had legal abortions under Roe v. Wade. Had that case never been decided, it's not inconceivable to imagine that some of those women would have carried their children to term, and that subsequently some of those children would have grown up and gone into politics, and that perhaps one of those politicians would rise to become an inspirational Democratic presidential candidate, and that, furthermore, he might actually be white! Against such a foe, the GOP wouldn't have a chance. Even if John McCain does manage to squeak out a victory, Republicans should be down on their knees every day, thanking abortion doctors for preventing the early downfall of their party.

Hence, the new Republican strategy. Find a way to get Roe v. Wade decided a mere twelve years earlier than it actually was, thereby ensuring Barack Obama never makes it out of the womb. In the meantime, please don't forget to pass along Ed Whelan's convincing pro-choice argument to every registered voter you know. Americans need to be made aware of the GOP's newfound respect for abortion rights. Otherwise, we're forced to wonder: Why the hell couldn't Roe v. Wade be on the books when Ed Whelan's mother was pregnant?

Wait a minute...to the time machine!

Posted by: Jason Reich and 236.com staff
Related Stories
The country may be post-racial, but Joe Biden is still Joe Biden
The country may be post-racial, but Joe Biden is still Joe Biden
Saudi Prince Asks for Bailout
Original Video: Saudi Prince Asks for Bailout
Media Drunk Tank: Officer O'Reilly
From The Room: Media Drunk Tank: Officer O'Reilly
Ann Coulter, you can't hurt us anymore.
From The Feed: Go Away Ann Coulter
Comments (6)
Comments FAQ  | 0 comments pending
Commenting is disabled
jalbertbowden
posted 2:15 am on 10/18/2008
See profile | I'm a fan of jalbertbowden
Mr. Whelan's assumptions about Obamma's mother are off-color and rude. His assumptions about society's views in the 50's on certain topics (children out of wedlock & interracial dating/marriage) are unfortunately dead-on. I could nitpick this retort, but instead I'll focus on one thing. Labels. Being a Conservative/Republican does not necessarily mean that you are pro-life. Being a fundamentalist-(insert your religion here) more than usually does. Ok ok, second focus...uh, if they had a time machine, do you really think they'd go back to have him aborted? Why just kill his parents so he could never be? Or why not go back and rewrite the Constitution? No, no, they'll just go back and make Roe v. Wade earlier....brilliant!

SOB231
posted 7:57 pm on 10/17/2008
See profile | I'm a fan of SOB231
They don't just love abortion. They love a woman's right to have one, too. That's why they hate America so much, not enough women-love and man-hate. Ain't fundie logic grand?

WaitWut
posted 3:34 pm on 10/17/2008
See profile | I'm a fan of WaitWut
I was 18 when my son was born and abortion was legal, at that time. Does this make me dumber, or smarter, than Obama's mother? Oh, and my son is a Marine and not a homeless meth-addict.

Whelan is a moron. His mother should have aborted.

gloriavonstache - 1 Reply
posted 2:49 pm on 10/17/2008
See profile | I'm a fan of gloriavonstache
I've been f**king ed whelan. why? I get a kick out of aborting ed's would-be children. it ''sounds'' wrong, but it ''feels'' right. right? he calls me irresponsible, but I just need to shake my sillies out, abortively speaking, so come time the GOP takes command, I will have wiggled my waggles away. I chose ed because he understands that it is OK to say anything -- no matter how baseless -- so long as we excuse ourselves by mentioning the "fact" that abortion kills actual unborn children. I like kicking the shit out of the homeless! I've consumed human flesh! abortion kills actual unborn children! he's a charmer and a friend, and a person so blessed with insight that as a man he us willing to watch over all the bodies of all the women of all the world.

replying to gloriavonstache; posted 10:52 pm on 10/17/2008
Very creative and amusing, gloria -- two thumbs up. Meanwhile, i assume that all of the intelligent people on this site realize, even while they're playing at being serious and hypertensive about the "election", that *both* parties are, in fact, owned by the same "interests", right? And, thus, no matter who is "appointed" by the NWO, the agendas remain the same?
Maxx
posted 2:06 pm on 10/17/2008
See profile | I'm a fan of Maxx
Well done Jason! Your argument completely decimates that fucker Ed Whelan... I love the comparison to John Connor lol

Daily   Weekly
Get Our Newsletter